r/AteTheOnion Feb 28 '25

Yeah, I’m sure that’s why

Post image
5.4k Upvotes

95 comments sorted by

3.1k

u/buttercream-gang Feb 28 '25

“Apparently this isn’t true but I still believe it could be!”

Wow

750

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '25

Right wing political beliefs in a nutshell.

257

u/hfocus_77 Feb 28 '25

Right wingers will create a version of reality in their heads and then look for any evidence to support it. Left wingers will too, but at least thier version of reality still believes in science so they can often be convinced of the truth. Right wingers instead believe in winning, and that admitting you weren't correct about something is weakness.

92

u/AdditionalTheory Feb 28 '25

Look at the two sides political philosophies boiled down are “progressing to a better future” and “conserving the sacred way of thing”, so of course the left is more likely to accept new information and change their mind when a better idea comes along because they don’t have a past (often mythicized) that they aren’t trying preserve

63

u/ZorglubDK Feb 28 '25

Modern conservatives have fuck all to do with conserving anything. They want a hierarchy.

Frank Wilhoit said it best: "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

16

u/nononanana Feb 28 '25

The Regressive Party.

7

u/DrRotwang Feb 28 '25

We kinda have a mythicized future, though...at least, some of us do.

[Hums Star Trek theme]

2

u/wafflesthewonderhurs Feb 28 '25

deep, deep, down, I genuinely think a lot of them know that the more frequently someone is wrong about something, the less people will believe anything they have to say. They understand that if that is the case, and everything everyone says they're wrong about is also the case, they've lost all of their social credit.

1

u/socks_____ Mar 03 '25

I mean they said it themselves, if they have to make something up for people to be mad about, they will.

1

u/throwaway180gr Mar 01 '25

In all fairness, I've seen this exact same sentiment on here from leftists. Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug.

-23

u/holyhibachi Feb 28 '25

Holy shit guys, the left LITERALLY did this with "fake but true".

13

u/queenlizbef Feb 28 '25

What?

-22

u/holyhibachi Feb 28 '25

The problem encapsulated

18

u/queenlizbef Feb 28 '25

I was chronically online for a solid 15 years and never saw progressives say “fake but true” so I literally don’t know what you’re referring to . That’s why I asked.

-24

u/holyhibachi Feb 28 '25

Gotcha, yeah, it was prominent.

13

u/queenlizbef Feb 28 '25

Do you remember what online spaces?

-3

u/holyhibachi Feb 28 '25

Mostly X (formerly known as Twitter)

8

u/queenlizbef Feb 28 '25

That’ll explain it. I tried to mostly stay away from that platform after 2012 or so

8

u/32lib Feb 28 '25

Oh, you mean alternative facts.

7

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '25

So prominent that you can’t repeat it? Because you’re making it up?

10

u/throwaway082100 Feb 28 '25

Are you referring to something specific

173

u/death69reaper Feb 28 '25

60

u/JoJackthewonderskunk Feb 28 '25

Fucking lol I've had that same argument with relatives and acquaintances so many times the last few years. They pretend something is happening that they're mad at. Then you tell them "but that hasn't actually occurred " and they just say something like "well you could see it happening" and still be as mad as if it happened.

8

u/Quirky_Tzirky Feb 28 '25

To be fair, that's alot of politics in a nutshell. Make something up, or misrepresent the information, and then get outraged by it.

23

u/TheOtherRetard Feb 28 '25

It's a tactic used all over the world.

In Belgium the extreme right party spread a video of French Gillets Jaunes claiming they were illegal immigrants in Calais. When this was debunked their response was "I don't care it's fake, it could've been true"

11

u/Omissionsoftheomen Feb 28 '25

The number of times I have backed a right-winger into the corner where they have to acknowledge that whatever meme they’ve posted is false, only to have them follow up with “this might be exaggerated, but X is still true” makes me weep for humanity.

3

u/BLF402 Mar 01 '25

They claim it’s because it’s royalties for naming is Obamacare 😂 The department of education should have it’s budget increase tenfold

2

u/Solid-Ad7137 Feb 28 '25

I wish it was true. Would be a based scheme.

2

u/Ahaigh9877 Mar 01 '25

The word for that, I believe, is “truthiness”.

1

u/ussrname1312 Mar 01 '25

Tucker Carlson Syndrome

1

u/CinemaDork Mar 01 '25

big if true

1

u/Gwalchgwynn Mar 02 '25

Since 2010.

Wait til they hear about his kickbacks for allowing 9/11

-2

u/holyhibachi Feb 28 '25

Lol no way you guys are forgetting "fake but true". NOW there's outrage?

6

u/buttercream-gang Feb 28 '25

I have no idea what you’re talking about. If it’s a similar “this sounds like it could be true,” because people can believe wild claims about Trump, then my question is when has Obama ever been proven to do anything remotely close to this that would validate people believing this obviously fake story?

1.3k

u/Aliensinmypants Feb 28 '25

Royalties on legislation is fucking hilarious... I mean I guess it'd be like lobbying but worse somehow

185

u/bx35 Feb 28 '25

And we’re not supposed to question their intelligence.

78

u/MaximumScrawn Feb 28 '25

Many accusations are confessions.

34

u/hfocus_77 Feb 28 '25

Wait until Musk and Trump invent ways to take the taxpayer's money and put it directly into their own pockets.

33

u/Rin-ayasi Feb 28 '25

Already did. Isn't musk trying to secure a deal right now to use his "starlink" company to "upgrade" federal aviation infrastructure. Due to the sudden cases of plane crashes

2

u/ThreeLeggedMare Mar 01 '25

Until? Invent? They done been

20

u/BionicTorqueWrench Feb 28 '25

No, the royalties are to be paid for the use of the name 'Obama', when they call it Obamacare. So, mostly to be paid by Republicans detractors. If they would just call it the Affordable Care Act, which is after all its name, then they wouldn't have to pay the royalties.

14

u/homelaberator Feb 28 '25

There's a nonzero chance Trump is looking into how to do this right now.

12

u/phunktastic_1 Feb 28 '25

And the reaso ing is ridiculous. Conservatives named it Obama care. The actual name of the legislation is the affordable care act. Republicans just wanted to play into the party racism by naming it after a Black man so their voters would just hate it outright without trying to understand it.

4

u/CathedralEngine Feb 28 '25

"But Obama did it!" will be the refrain when Trump starts collecting royalties.

1

u/Strangest_Implement Feb 28 '25

I wonder who got the Master Tapes for Civil Rights

1

u/elfuego305 Mar 01 '25

Obama should have trademarked Obamacare

1

u/cykoTom3 Mar 01 '25

They would not be called royalties for 1.

753

u/Arejhey311 Feb 28 '25

Ah yes, “Obamacare”. The name they came up with to create confusion around & discourage support of The Affordable Care Act. Makes total sense he’d collect royalties on legislation

42

u/Mrtorbear Mar 01 '25

Just as a little fun fact - I worked as a contracted instructor supporting the ACA for about 10 years. We ended up choosing to own the 'Obamacare' moniker. Not sure if it was well-known or not, but we chose to own the name and consider it a nickname for the legislation rather than an insult.

15

u/Sitting_Duk Mar 01 '25

They mostly love the ACA, they just hate Obamacare…

363

u/Horknut1 Feb 28 '25

They’re all so fucking gullible

85

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '25

Stupid, useful idiots in repeatedly and reliably voting against their own interests for 50 years now.

103

u/Dulse_eater Feb 28 '25

They’re all morons

72

u/dippocrite Feb 28 '25

Pay that man his money

1

u/Mr_Mahn777 Mar 04 '25

Hell no, no politician deserves any more money

55

u/Joe_Nobody42 Feb 28 '25

The party of feelings over facts.

45

u/Adventurous-Ad-409 Feb 28 '25

Wow, DOGE is getting shit done after all: Last time I saw this post, Obama was getting $2.3 billion. Welp, I guess that means it's time for me to write my "why I left the left" speech so I can start e-begging for Thielbux...

22

u/MeInSC40 Feb 28 '25

It’s sad that what should be humor just turns into bs adding to misinformation. I kind of wish the onion would stay away from politics altogether.

53

u/VelveteenJackalope Feb 28 '25

They're literally a political satire newspaper, I don't know what you fucking want from them

-46

u/jkhockey15 Feb 28 '25

Call it whatever you want. Satire is just a form of lying and it just so happens those lies hurt our country. Regardless of the intention behind it, how is it any different from right wing media peddling misinformation?

16

u/Mesonic_Interference Feb 28 '25

Call it whatever you want. Posting half-baked contrarian assertions on the internet is just a form of lying and it just so happens those lies hurt our country. Regardless of the intention behind it, how is it any different from right wing media peddling misinformation?

2

u/Ohsofresh_ Mar 01 '25

Onion eater

21

u/Bao-Babe Feb 28 '25

It's not The Onion's fault that people are stupid.

4

u/hfocus_77 Feb 28 '25

The Onion was boring before their recent rebound. I pretty much only enjoy their recent stuff and stuff from over a decade ago. If conservatives believe the shit the Onion says we'll just add it onto the list of stereotypes.

2

u/Badboy420xxx69 Mar 01 '25

A lot of right wing 'satire' isn't satire to them. They have weaponized for the fanatical bottom 70% of right wingers. Look at Babylon Bee, a lot of their headlines aren't even jokes, they are things that are meant to trick the old and the stupid.

15

u/Gobal_Outcast02 Feb 28 '25

Im confused..was this an onion article?

7

u/GrumpyTom Feb 28 '25

Since the heritage foundation came up with Obamacare, do they get royalties too?

2

u/DracoD74 Mar 01 '25

No. They only get royalties on confederate flags & trump bibles

5

u/Significant-Phrase72 Feb 28 '25

It’s not called Obamacare.

5

u/bunny117 Feb 28 '25

Coincidentally, that's exactly the amount that WAPO reported Musk had in new gov. contracts with the US government. 🤔🤔

3

u/Solid-Ad7137 Feb 28 '25

Ignoring literally all the political layers to this onion, collecting royalties from a government program you named after yourself is a fucking wild concept.

Don’t know if that’s real or not, honestly don’t care enough to check. Just laughed at the idea.

11

u/arknarcoticcrop Feb 28 '25

Also he didn't even name it after himself. People only started calling it Obamacare to disparage it and it caught on.

4

u/LeroyoJenkins Feb 28 '25

If anything we Swiss should be charging the US royalties for Obamacare, it was based on our healthcare system (but then gutted and wrecked by amendments).

Muhricans, I'm going skiing, please pay your royalties, k bye.

3

u/Less_Likely Feb 28 '25

I made up this thing that isn’t happening to get mad at, and it is still 1/100th if the actual real payout the guy who is running the country gets annually, who I support unequivocally!

3

u/Stupid_Bitch_02 Feb 28 '25

Last I had heard it was Musty's business that the government paid $38m to but okay

3

u/joealese Feb 28 '25

let's say it is true. it's still less money then trump cost us just so he could go to the Superbowl and NASCAR race in his first 2 weeks.

why aren't they more angry about that?

3

u/adamttaylor Feb 28 '25

It would be really funny if he trademarked the word Obamacare and required payment whenever it was said....

3

u/Dr_CleanBones Feb 28 '25

My thoughts are - if you believe this, you’re too stupid to walk and breath at the same time.

2

u/laziestmarxist Feb 28 '25

This isn't really "atetheonion" so much as it is a bunch of liars manipulating idiots

1

u/Sergeant_Swiss24 Feb 28 '25

Don’t give them ideas 😭

1

u/mickeyaaaa Feb 28 '25

PROOF or its bullshit

1

u/hatsofftoeverything Feb 28 '25

Even if it is true, 39 mil over 10 years? We have bigger fish to fry homie

1

u/Yoda2000675 Feb 28 '25

The best part of things like this is that these people constantly throw out things like "cope, cry more, and he lives rent free in your head" but all they've done for the last 16 years is whine about Obama

2

u/LeadershipFit2654 Feb 28 '25

I guess MAGA is only ok with people profiting from the presidency if its their cult leader

2

u/tubbsmcgee Feb 28 '25

How much has Trump cost Americans just for golfing again?

1

u/PuzzleheadedEssay198 Mar 01 '25

The amount of people who continue to believe that Obamacare is anything but a bs nickname for the ACA will never not drive me insane

1

u/tiparium Mar 01 '25

With everything else we've seen? What else bitch?

2

u/Meanslicer43 Mar 01 '25

"It's not real, but it could be, so panic"

That's what this sums up to...

Can we just burn this country to ash and start over? Please?

1

u/Sss_mithy Mar 01 '25

The Right seems to forget THEY NICKNAMED IT OBAMACARE it's literally named the Affordable Care Act. Now they're making weird arguments about something they wanted to make sure was named after Obama being named after Obama. How fucking stupid can these people get

2

u/PotatoAppleFish Mar 01 '25

Leaving aside the total impossibility of the premise and taking this as given, it still looks pretty bad for Republicans. If he was getting royalties for the name “Obamacare,” then that’s the Republicans’ own damn fault for calling it that in their propaganda in the first place. It’s called the Affordable Care Act.

1

u/zoinks690 Mar 02 '25

Royalties for having his name on it. Put there by Republicans.

/s for part 1

1

u/WallstreetTengu Mar 02 '25

No, former President Barack Obama does not receive any royalties or direct financial compensation from the Affordable Care Act (ACA), often referred to as “Obamacare.”

The ACA is a federal law designed to reform the healthcare system in the United States, and public officials do not earn royalties from legislation they help create or sign into law.

1

u/Space_creator Mar 04 '25

Regurgitation of propaganda from Russian bots, filling our social media with insipid click bait.