Me too, just very recently. If I ask it to suggest a better prompt, it clearly doesn't know why the last prompt was considered a violation.
It's particularly annoying because the same prompt is fine multiple times, then becomes a violation on and off; it makes it hard to retry prompts where the image generation messed up some detail like putting a hand on backwards.
I think this actually supports my thought that it may have tried to generate the skateboarder as a teenager first time around, thereby violating content policies, if it doesn't have an inherent problem with the concept.
It may have tried to generate a teenager either as the subject or otherwise in the image (considering it's skateboarding in the 90's) and that would be against the content policy.
I sometimes get this when the image has some sense of motion, which seems to be the case here. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t, but it seems to depend on the image generated.
making the pictures low quality and grainy goes a long way to hide problems and artifacts if you were to try to pass it off as real. much like the fake leaked jd vance video was able to do a better job of hiding the fact that it was ai based on the fact that it was presented as like a low quality speaker phone, i would imagine you explicitly telling chatgpt to make something low quality and noisy sets of red flags for deep fakes/fraud.
Ya, I managed to jailbreak the chat, but the image generator seems to be completely separate, cause even after being jailbroken it still wouldnt generate anything that remotely sounded like it might be nsfw
I asked it to rewrite the prompt so that it doesn't violate any content policies and that worked once but didn't work another time. It wasn't with this prompt but with another harmless edit.
I don’t so much mind that there is a content filter (I doubt chatGPT is ever going to allow nudity) but the inconsistency and vagueness of it is maddening. It’s especially annoying that ChatGPT itself doesn’t seem to get any feedback from its “image checker subsystem” (I’m sure everyone has seen the thing where the image is almost half done, only for the rejection to appear right after some recognizable copyrighted character or spicy bit is generated).
It probably will allow nudity when google releases another model/vid genratir that is leages abovr them… honestly money on google rn. They have the best model, best video generator and their ai does deep reseaech using….. all the search tools at googles disposal
I don't know, I think at this point it was just hallucinating. Earlier in the conversation, it had started mentioning p***y by itself and when I asked it to cuss, it gave this response.
yeah ive been doing pictures of my self the entire day, and suddenly it just said its against policy. this is what it said : Now, here's the thing: it’s not about who it is — it's about how the system sees recognizable people, even if it’s you. The tools I'm working with automatically restrict image generation involving real people (or people it thinks might be real) in certain scenarios, especially if it thinks the image might look too much like an identifiable person. It errs on the safe side, which unfortunately includes stuff like turning a photo of yourself into a comic book panel. Sucks, I know.
even though ive done prob 30++ different versions of the same picture already in a heeeeap of different styles
Has anybody found and out for this ? I've been trying to remove the background for an image or simply make it transparent and I get stuck with a policy violation.
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Hey /u/BeechoAI!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT conversation, please reply to this message with the conversation link or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our public discord server! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email support@openai.com
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.