r/Dodge 2d ago

Side Profile discussion

Post image

A user on this sub, sorry can't remember who, stated the new Charger Daytona looks like a Camaro from the side. Here's all three next to each other. Same color chosen to compare on an apples to apples comparison.

Thoughts?

136 Upvotes

105 comments sorted by

121

u/CarsOfFortLangley 2d ago

Kinda misleading when the Daytona EV's length is just shy of a 747.

10

u/Asynjacutie 2d ago

Could probably drift that Mustang around inside the Charger

8

u/JP-ED 2d ago

You're not wrong. This photo doesn't do the car Justice

4

u/skyHawk3613 2d ago

šŸ˜

23

u/AUCE05 2d ago

I still can't believe that is 75k

6

u/JP-ED 2d ago

Depending on what model over 90000 Canadian ... šŸ˜¬ the price is so prohibitive in my humble opinion

7

u/AUCE05 2d ago

They didn't do their market research. The type of people who buy EVs won't buy that EV. It is a huge flop.

2

u/JP-ED 2d ago

Of all the EVs out there, and I'm contemplating buying an EV, this is IMO the best looking one out there.

This side angle does the car no favours. I just can't get past the price.

0

u/Ambaryerno 1d ago

I would if it wasn't about 20 grand more than it should be.

2

u/The_Lumpy_Dane 2d ago

It's not. Nobody with half a brain is paying that.

1

u/PreferenceContent987 1d ago

75k for now. Theyā€™re going to end up moving a whole lot of them for deep discounts eventually IMO

47

u/Zsmudz 2d ago

I keep seeing people saying that the charger looks like the Mustang and Camaro. Where tf are yall seeing this, they look nothing alike. Like sure they are both 2 door cars with a similar side window design but everything else is different.

17

u/GTOdriver04 2d ago

I always wanted the big coupes to return, but I was referring to the S-Class models. Not a Charger, but it fits the lineage I suppose.

Itā€™s nice to see a BIG 2-door wearing the Charger name.

3

u/ryanissognar 2d ago

Theyre nice to drive man, regardless of what people are freakin out overā€¦

1

u/Zsmudz 2d ago

It surprised the heck out of me, thatā€™s for sure.

8

u/Charming_Ambition_27 2d ago

Mustang driver here - they say the same in the Mustang community. I donā€™t see it either.

2

u/Zsmudz 2d ago

Iā€™m convinced people ran out of things to complain about and so now we are straight up trippin.

3

u/SpacemanKif 1d ago

Yeah, it seems like some people are thinking the Charger is replacing the Challenger, somehow. Then it keeps getting thrown into comparisons with (smaller) pony cars. It's a large, two door, coupe (like the original). The discontinued Challenger, which was already larger than the other pony cars, is also not really a good comparison to the new Charger, itself.

At best, the lines are similar to the Camaro in that they're similarly minimal. It's a two-box vehicle. It still looks more like the original Charger than a Camaro. It just doesn't look like a Challenger, which upsets some.

1

u/Zsmudz 1d ago

I mean in a sense of speaking it did replace the Challenger. The Challenger did get discontinued partially because this Charger has 2-door options, but I get what youā€™re saying.

-7

u/Anayalater5963 2d ago

This years model of Camaro no. But my 2014? Yeah it kinda looks like it

3

u/Zsmudz 2d ago

Yeah still no

17

u/Hot-Actuator5195 2d ago

Chrysler 300 for the win

6

u/MissNashPredators11 Challenger SRT Supercharged 2d ago

Theyā€™ll always look better than the new Charger imo

1

u/EndSmugnorance 1d ago

The 300 really grew on me šŸ˜…

10

u/SkiTz0913 2d ago

The Challenger looked better than all of them. Thanks Dodge.

4

u/Wonderful_Time_6681 2d ago

lol fake news if Iā€™ve ever seen it. The charger prob looks like a giant limo beside the mustang.

2

u/The_Lumpy_Dane 2d ago

Last time I had my Challenger at the local CDJR dealership, they actually had one parked next to a built, low mileage ZL1 Camaro. The size difference was as exaggerated as you might guess. I should have taken a pic.

To be fair, though, I do really like the looks and interior of the new Charger. I'd definitely be all over a 392 or Hellcat version with AWD, if Stellantis can stay in business long enough to make that happen.

1

u/Wonderful_Time_6681 2d ago

To each their own. Thereā€™s never been a more basic looking muscle/sports car imo. Needs to be a major redesign and ice engine for me to be interested especially at $60-$70k

1

u/The_Lumpy_Dane 2d ago

The price is the thing. Either they'll figure that out and significantly lower their MSRPs, or continue having to do deep discounts. Regardless, there is no reason to pay $60K to $70K, at least not for the EV. Probably not for the Six-Pack, either. I'd do $50K for a loaded up 392 AWD with the full glass roof.

1

u/Wonderful_Time_6681 2d ago

Youā€™ll pay that for a used one in 2 years. Thereā€™s no way a fully loaded, brand new 392 will be $50k msrp. Kbb has my 2021 392 at $49k (highest private sale value) with 30k miles.

1

u/The_Lumpy_Dane 2d ago

KBB is all well and good, but a guy could run out right now and pick up a leftover 2023, never titled 392 Charger for less than that. Check out CarGurus or AutoTrader.

Or are you referring to widebody only?

1

u/Wonderful_Time_6681 2d ago

Oh idk I put in my vin. So I guess specific to my car. WB, manual, sunroof, all the options.

I think imma list it at $45k and hope for the best. lol

2

u/The_Lumpy_Dane 2d ago

Sweet! You have a relative unicorn there. I thought you were meaning a Charger.

I just sold my '23 Challenger 392 manual, back in December. Mine was a standard body. Not super loaded, just the heated seats and nice chocolate color suede seats. I got close to what I paid for it from CarMax. Only had around 6500 miles on it, though.

1

u/Wonderful_Time_6681 2d ago

Ah yea my bad, challenge.

Yea carmax offered me $41,500 if I buy one of their vehicles. But holy fuk their shit is expensive. But might do that. Idk. Depends on what the wife will let me get away with.

1

u/The_Lumpy_Dane 2d ago

Yeah, I'd have gotten more if I bought something there, too. But I had to get down to one car.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/F1shB0wl816 2d ago

I think the charger looks pretty good. I like that it seems to draw on the classic design more than it has.

1

u/ImportanceCertain414 10h ago

Yeah, also people keep complaining about the length of the car and seem to forget the original Daytona was half the length of a football field and everyone wants one of those.

9

u/Fast-Bison-7697 2d ago

You can just see how unfinished it looks especially next to the camaro and mustang. Itā€™s Such a bland car. šŸ˜

4

u/DonnerPartyPicnic 2d ago

Honestly I think a flatter hood would look WAY better. The C pillar has to similar lines to the classic chargers, but the hood slope makes it look like shit.

-1

u/ericgallant24 Charger 2d ago

The front end would look way too tall and retarded looking.

3

u/InsecOrBust 1d ago

Tf you mean it would look way more sharp and sporty

-1

u/ericgallant24 Charger 1d ago

https://imgur.com/a/JfUWUBY

It would look stupidā€¦

4

u/Zsmudz 2d ago

I donā€™t see it as being ā€˜unfinishedā€™, it just looks like they went for a smoother design with less pointless angles. It also doesnā€™t help that the stock photo they used has no shadows whatsoever so it makes it look worse than irl.

6

u/Clean_Claim 2d ago

Looks unfinished

3

u/jeffjeep88 2d ago

Charger is just so basic looking. Itā€™s so bland

2

u/whatsapprocky 2d ago

I donā€™t think it looks like a Camaro at all lol itā€™s funny that people keep comparing the new pony cars to the Camaro though, the same thing happened with the new Mustang. The Charger may look bland, but thatā€™s kind of what the Challenger looked like without the widebody. The Challenger has better proportions in my opinion though.

2

u/pryvisee Ram 2d ago

Where are the lines??

2

u/JP-ED 1d ago

On the Charger Daytona they're very subtle.

A YouTuber that bought one bought his in Silver and his comments were upon delivery was he was surprised to see certain lines in the vehicle that were not as noticeable in the Demo he had seen at the dealership.

Seeing one IRL is better IMO than online pictures of it.

1

u/pryvisee Ram 1d ago

I guess thatā€™s true. Cars always look better in person than the pictures. Pictures are bad at representing depth and scale.

2

u/Natural_Photograph16 2d ago

Junk. Junk. Mopar.

2

u/Dud3_Abid3s Scat Pack 2d ago

Iā€™ve seen them in person. I actually like the look. Iā€™m just waiting for them to drop a 6.2 supercharged Hemi in one.

2

u/reformedankmal 1d ago

Anyone who thinks the new charger looks like a camaro needs to get their prescription checked lmao

2

u/AcanthisittaOk1683 23h ago

When given the same color and general 2 door style I can see if it you were blind and looking 10 foot away.

2

u/ysmith83 21h ago

I this picture comparison is not all accurate because they're not all the same size. The Dodge Charger is a lot bigger than both of those.. it does make a difference... In real life they look nothing a like

4

u/userlion1 2d ago

The charger is the worse one. It 100% looks unfinished. If they just based the design on the 60s/70s era muscle cars it wouldā€™ve looked a lot better.

Thereā€™s also just something uncanny about the way it looks. Itā€™s bloated but at the same time long length wise. Canā€™t quite put my finger on it.

This car was a failure, and unless they stick a hemi V8 in it itā€™ll have a short lived lifecycle.

1

u/Logical-Dealer-78 1d ago

they're putting a v8 in it

3

u/maxdoornink 2d ago

Top two look like aggressive, stylish modern muscle cars, bottom looks boring and sad

2

u/CombinationBitter889 2d ago

The S650 looks like the 6th gen Camaro šŸ˜‚

1

u/Imapirateship 2d ago

lol that looks so bad imo

1

u/CharacterEgg2406 2d ago

Mach4 is gonna be lit

1

u/JP-ED 2d ago

Ok just looked up Mach 4 and... yikes. If it looks like what is in Car and Driver no thanks. My initial take.

2

u/CharacterEgg2406 2d ago

Lol yeah they did make it look like a fusion reboot. That said thats a Car and Driver ai modeled image. Iā€™m anticipating a high performance sedan with mustang styling queues.

1

u/ResponsibilityFew938 2d ago

That front splitter overbite

1

u/JuiceNCaboose2025 2d ago

All looks the same to me.

1

u/mess1ah1 2d ago

So they all basically copy each other. Theyā€™ve been doing it for decades. Who cares

1

u/Responsible_Big_1349 2d ago

Sure looks poor compared to the Mustang

1

u/MrRandyLayhee 2d ago

Doesnā€™t look right thatā€™s all I know

1

u/RUserII 1d ago

ā€Hereā€™s all three next to each other. Same color chosen to compare on an apples to apples comparison.ā€

Which one is which: in the above picture from top to bottom?

1

u/JP-ED 1d ago

I guess that's part of the game?

For reference. 1. Chevrolet 2. Ford 3. Dodge

1

u/EndSmugnorance 1d ago

hate the front end

1

u/Zack_ZK 1d ago

They're all ugly now.

1

u/Automatic_Mammoth684 1d ago

Looks more like the gta version of a Nissan gtr to me

1

u/Drinkingasslee 20h ago

Why put the ZL1 instead of the ss

1

u/wutang61 2d ago

People will forever complain about the glass house of the Camaro. But it is one of the most aggressive designs especially in the ZL1/1LE trim.

The Mustangā€™s front and rear donā€™t match the body. Round to squares.

The charger is Tesla clone with its egg shape lines.

Outgoing models for both Ford and Dodge were superior aesthetically. The Gen 5-6 Camaro was a positive move.

1

u/cBird- 2d ago

Idk man, I think the mustang looks the best of the 3 by a slim margin. Looks a little more pissed than the Camaro to me atleast.

1

u/wutang61 2d ago

2015-2017 is my favorite for the S550-650 range thus far.

1

u/LookatthisslapNutz 2d ago

I just donā€™t like the EV

-3

u/UnbelievableDingo 2d ago

Buy the fucking hurricane šŸŒ€ then... jeez

Noone cares

2

u/LookatthisslapNutz 2d ago

I already have a 5.7. Donā€™t need the hurricane unless it goes in my dart. Either way better than electric

2

u/iBUYbrokenSUBARUS 2d ago

Faster is the least important feature though

1

u/LookatthisslapNutz 2d ago

Whatā€™s the feature most important for u

0

u/UnbelievableDingo 2d ago

You do know the EV us faster rightšŸ˜„

1

u/iBUYbrokenSUBARUS 2d ago

Faster is the least important feature though

1

u/UnbelievableDingo 2d ago

I'm still trying to figure out why I'm engaged in a conversation with someone who owns a Dart.šŸ˜†

1

u/JP-ED 1d ago

Woah there... which year Dart do they own?! If it's a 1968 Dodge Dart, I hope you're not mocking THAT Dart.

1

u/TechImage69 1d ago

It's still a POS, a Model 3 Performance is faster than a lot of performance cars off the line but it doesn't make it a better car.

1

u/UnbelievableDingo 1d ago

Literally nothing Stellantis build is a "better car"šŸ˜†

1

u/LookatthisslapNutz 2d ago

From a dig, but what about the top end, and itā€™s not a good looking car

0

u/UnbelievableDingo 2d ago

What?

(Brovoice)

I'm into muscle cars bro...

But that EV is only like... a 9 second car...

Pfft.. off the line......

But what about 140 plus...?

....

Getthefuckouttahere

2

u/LookatthisslapNutz 2d ago

It can do 140+ but so can a hemi, but it can slow down at higher speeds, hence the what about the top end,

1

u/Melodic_Fee_5498 2d ago

They got rid of the Challenger for thisā€¦ at least we still have Mustangs and Rams

1

u/Iamninja28 2d ago

I might be a Mustang guy but I do feel pretty bad for the Dodge Bros on this one. Your brand took what had become an American icon of muscle for over a decade and somehow made it the weirdest equipped yet simultaneously most bland NPC looking road car at the same time.

I miss the ad where Washington rips across the field at redcoats in his Challenger, and I have grown to use as a metric for Mopar styling, if the car wouldn't work in that ad if it was remade today, it isn't a good Dodge. The new Charger would not work in the ad.

0

u/Various-Emergency-91 1d ago

Camaro is way better looking.

0

u/aobie4233 1d ago

I honestly donā€™t see the camaro in the dodge at all. The Camaro looks way better from the side than the charger.