r/LinkedInLunatics • u/Glitterandglitz21 • 23h ago
This is what happens when you didn’t pay attention in economics 101
553
u/No_Brilliant5888 22h ago
Not condoning violence, but Jesse Waters has the most punchable face I have ever seen.
122
u/elegiac_bloom Facebook Boomer 22h ago
Which one is that? Because when I look at this picture I wanna see both of them get demolished
→ More replies (1)125
u/Purple_Charcoal 22h ago
He’s the guy who looks like he’d let the air out of your tires to try and have sex with you.
53
u/SubparExorcist 22h ago
I know which is which but that also makes sense, because lutnick doesn't look like that. It looks like he would slash your tires then give you a black eye for not having dinner ready when he gets home from a meeting with his secretary
11
→ More replies (1)7
u/elegiac_bloom Facebook Boomer 20h ago
The guy on the right?
24
u/createa-username 17h ago
The guy on the left. He let the air out of his coworkers tires as a ruse to give her a ride and then they hooked up. I believe he was married with a child at the time.
→ More replies (1)7
20
u/Tokyogerman 21h ago
Tucker Carlson sadly still exists
5
u/Bodmonriddlz 19h ago
Tucker Carlson is a massive POS but he’s massively more likeable Jesse waters
9
7
8
5
2
u/simplethingsoflife 5h ago
You know he probably makes that face in the mirror and just stares at himself like that for hours while ignoring his family.
→ More replies (9)3
190
u/rsa1 18h ago
In the fantasy world that these guys live in, where does the $6T come from?
I'm guessing the answer will be some made up shit like "500 badoinks multiplied by 8352 trodybees" but still curious to know
51
u/leons_getting_larger 14h ago
I mean, that’s only 4,176,000 badoink-trodybees.
For $1436.78 each. In this market? Yeah right. Keep dreaming, pal.
35
u/CletusCanuck 13h ago edited 13h ago
The '$6 Trillion' number people are talking about is the value vaporized this week on the stock market... Is it that? Do they think that's 'winning' somehow?
Edit: Nevermind, he is referencing Peter Navarro who claims the tariffs will rake in $6 Trillion in revenue.
23
u/OK_x86 12h ago
That math ain mathing. Total imports into the us in 2024 were 3.5T. You'd have to levy tariffs of 20% to rake in 6T in revenue from tarrifs in a decade. But that assumes imports stay the same, which goes against what they are claiming the tarrifs are supposed to do.
The other thing is that incone taxes in 2024 amounted to 2.4T. 20% on 3.5T is 700B, so a net shortfall of 1.7T. And they replace a semi progressive tax system with a regressive sakes tax, in effect, which will disproportionately impact low and middle wage earners.
This is so stupid
3
→ More replies (7)6
u/TheGreatStories 12h ago
And who do they think is getting this money? Because they can try and prove this and there won't be the 99% getting a dime if this was real money anyway.
145
u/gushi380 22h ago
A cop believing right wing propaganda?!
71
u/Hour-Ad-9508 22h ago
He’s not even a cop and never has been, he just owns/runs “law enforcement today” for…some reason
29
2
64
u/flyingdodo 22h ago
Owner of “Law Enforcement Today” doesn’t understand human transactional interactions. shocked pikachu face
73
u/Ok_Recording_8720 21h ago
I know nothing about economics and this post will probably reveal this
Tarifs are payed by companies and ppl for importing from another country. If I understand correctly. So isn't it more like a "hidden" taxation of the ppl. As the money goes to the state? Basically sucking ppl dry?
As other countries do the same...not to the US...but ie to their own people and putting it in those states' pocket this can be considered a worldwide system filling the state chests.
As this also happend before WWII. It could be seen as filling the warchest. At the end of the day....the poor sods will be the ones fighting and dying by the millions soon. They won't need it anyway.
50
u/motorcycle-manful541 17h ago
- you own a company in America but everything you sell is from China.
- Trump puts tariffs on all Chinese shipments of goods.
- You now pay those tariffs and raise your prices for the end consumer to cover the tariffs.
- some gov't agency ends up with tariff money.
- This money should be used to offset sales of businesses who were 'hurt' with lower sales quantities due to the higher prices they need.
- This money will not be used for that, and historically, using tariff money to 'make businesses whole' has NEVER been shown to convincingly work in an economic system
→ More replies (1)18
u/perringaiden 16h ago
So isn't it more like a "hidden" taxation of the ppl.
You understand it better than the average Fox Entertainment viewer.
As this also happend before WWII.
It happened during the Great Depression with the result of driving the country deeper into debt. They weren't applying tariffs to build a war chest, because they didn't want to join the war.
The US in the 20s and 30s was an isolationist nation with heavy internal manufacturing, a low valued currency (compared to the Pound Sterling), and a massive protectionist system that they claimed would bring them success (it didn't).
After the war, 'new management' reversed most of that and US tariffs crashed down to under 10% on total imports by the 1950s, and has remained that low ever since...until now.
Simply put, anyone who knows anything, is aware that they'll get more tax revenue by encouraging trade, than by limiting it. The US is especially susceptible to this because after WW2, the government engaged in a massive strengthening of the US Dollar, to make it the reserve currency of the world, replacing the Pound. The goal was to make sure that the majority of countries didn't want to attack the US, because their own cash reserves would suffer, and it would allow the US to exercise "soft power" by controlling misbehaving countries access to international markets.
What Trump is doing, could be seen as a misguided attempt to crash the Dollar, to bring manufacturing back to the country. But that only works if they can export those goods because everyone inside the country will be too poor to afford them.
30
24
u/EndlessSnow 19h ago
Or and hear me out here...other countries and trade with each other at low cost and the US gets screwed...
Tariffs are country specifics so just because they tariff the US doesn't mean they can't trade with the rest of the world.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (2)10
u/ashkanahmadi 18h ago edited 16h ago
Yes. Tariffs are a tool to discourage the population from buying non-local products. Imagine you REALLY hate cleaning your room. Then you tell your parents “can we go to KFC tonight?” They don’t want to go and then know how much you hate cleaning your room so they respond with “we will go only if you clean your room”. Since you don’t wanna do that, you drop the whole thing and let it go.
It’s the same with tariffs. It’s a tool to help the local suppliers however it’s not 1850s anymore when nations lived in isolation and could self-sustain.
22
u/imforsurenotadog 18h ago
Imagine you REALLY hate cleaning your mom.
Dr. Freud, paging Dr. Freud.
4
20
u/unskilledlaborperson 20h ago
Ok so let's set aside the fact that this is causing a 2nd great depression level decline in the stock market and going to destroy people jobs, business, and livelihood. If this were to play out perfectly we would pay exponentially more taxes now by putting a tax on basically everything we buy.... Then that tax money goes to the government just like any other tax... Then the government what... Gives a small percentage of people a much smaller tax break somewhere down the line on their income taxes? How the fuck does any of that make sense.
So we pay more taxes overall to eventually pay a tad less on income tax but probably not.
7
u/Emperor_Neuro 13h ago
From my understanding, the wet dream here is that tariffs push the United States economy to refocus on domestic production by making it too expensive to buy anything made in another country. And meanwhile they’re going to remove income tax for… reasons which totally aren’t just rich people not wanting to pay tax. So then all of our production facilities get spooled up here, we no longer pay the tariffs, but then we also aren’t paying income tax… and now the federal government has no income and the country goes completely bankrupt.
13
u/barney_trumpleton 16h ago
The economy needs fixing? The only thing wrong with the economy was high prices and stagnant wages. How is raising prices, reducing workers rights and giving tax breaks to billionaires fixing that?
6
13
13
u/NecessaryCounter6902 14h ago
As someone who used to work in LE...I try really really hard not to take any advice from someone putting 'thinblueline' or 'lawenforcement' as hashtags. From experience, they are most often not fountains of wisdom.
6
u/Ok-Abbreviations543 8h ago
Yes, secret weapon that presidents for the last 90 years refused to use for an unexplained reason.
But Trump, the very stable genius and advocate of hurricane nuking and bleach injecting was the one to figure it out?
What are the chances of that being the case?
Less than zero.
How poor do Americans have to get before we demand something less stupid?
This will be interesting
7
u/CuckAdminsDkSuckers 18h ago
I got 10, SQUILLION TRILLION BILLION WILLYON committed to America so I win.
11
10
6
u/NolanSyKinsley 19h ago
6 trillion over 10 years, and Trump's tax cuts for mega corporations and the ultra wealthy are expected to cost 7-9 trillion over the same time, GREAT JOB!
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Landed_port 13h ago
That's all from Saudi Arabia and is committed over the next decade
→ More replies (1)
2
u/OzzieGrey 6h ago
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in history class. Or information in history class isn't gone over tbh
2
2
u/Glittering-Farmer724 1h ago
Yessiree - that’s what a degree from Haverford College gets you these days. Such brilliance! Such insight! Such bullshit! But he gives so much money to Haverford that the school administrators are all dropping their pants and bending over!
2
2
3
3
u/DanTheIEMan 10h ago
Step 1: Impose tariffs and claim they’ll raise $6 trillion in revenue.
Step 2: Americans experience even more inflation and are desperate for relief.
Step 3: Roll out $6 trillion in tax cuts as “economic relief”
Step 4: Wealthy get richer at literal expense of poorer Americans paying tariffs.
3
2
2
u/Carrot-Proof 11h ago
So why do countries have tariffs against the United States if they don’t work?
2
u/Anastasiasmaster 9h ago
Please look at 1890,1912 and 1930. See how well it turned out those times....then get back to us.
2
u/Ther3isn0try 10h ago
My guy, no one is saying tariffs don’t have a place in trade. They do, when you use them surgically to prop up a specific industry that your country has a robust market for. Using them as a negotiating tool or as, god forbid, an income source is insane and has historically never worked out well for the country placing them.
3
u/0vert0ad 19h ago
America does not have economics 101. The last thing it wants is to teach it's citizens to not be mindless consumers.
1
u/diamondtippedheart 11h ago
Why do hashtags now have nothing to do with posts? Sorry, I know it's not the whole point, but kind of hammers home the stupidity part....
1
1
1
u/disgusting-brother 9h ago
“Repost and expose the truth!” You got to be a special kind of idiot to still be falling for news that presents itself that way.
1
u/subeewrx 8h ago
The ONLY thing that drives the economy is Consumer Spending. Econ 101. NOT tax cuts for the rich, NOT deregulation of industry, and NOT investment banking. 🖕
1
u/OGchickenwarrior 8h ago
If these tariffs work, there’s no truth that needs to be exposed, no? Won’t everything and the way things are trending be quite obvious by this time next year?
1
1
1
u/Icy_Post800 8h ago
I think he’s purposely trying to get the US into a state of chaos so he can declare martial law and try to stay in office for as long as he wants. When I see this administration all I can think of is that movie Civil War with Kirsten Dunst.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/PUSSY_MEETS_CHAINWAX 4h ago
I think what's most amazing to Trump supporters is that they don't ask themselves a very simple question: if it really made as much sense as they claim it does, wouldn't it have been used for decades now?
1
1
u/ProcessWorking8254 2h ago
Whoever said intelligence is a prerequisite to become President? Or an economist for that matter? You can switch the weathermen and the economists and literally no one would know the difference😂
3.2k
u/WS-Gilbert 23h ago
I’m not saying this to be glib, hand to God, I remember on literally the FIRST day of Principles of Macroeconomics, they taught us why tariffs don’t work and how every reputable economist moved away from isolationist theories over the last hundred years.
We always knew Trump was stupid, but the fact he can’t even grasp one day’s worth of freshman Econ really drives it home