r/Moviesinthemaking 4d ago

David Fincher to Direct Brad Pitt in ‘Once Upon A Time in Hollywood’ Sequel Written By Quentin Tarantino

Post image

David Fincher and Brad Pitt are putting aside everything they’re working on to direct and star in a sequel to “Once Upon A Time In Hollywood” written by Quentin Tarantino.

Now Fincher and Pitt working together isn’t a surprise; the “Se7en” filmmaker gives Pitt first dibs on all his projects (he turned down “The Killer” for example), but directing a film based on the screenplay of Tarantino, who always directs his own material, is not only an unexpected shocker, it’s a cinematic first.

What’s more, the project is being set up at Netflix, where Fincher has a first-look deal and aims to shoot quickly this summer.

From what I understand, this is the screenplay that Tarantino’s “The Movie Critic” evolved into when the writer/director couldn’t put the pen down and kept exploring the adventures of Cliff Booth.

Tarantino must have loved the script and didn’t want it to languish in a drawer because sources close to the filmmakers tell us he approached Fincher, and Netflix has quietly put together the deal, which will probably end up being around a $200 million budget to shoot in California this July—yep, it’s being fast-tracked and happening fast, meaning we’ll get additional casting soon.

2.8k Upvotes

143 comments sorted by

1.1k

u/thesuavedog 4d ago

I'm not buying this until I see it posted tomorrow.

283

u/OiGuvnuh 3d ago

The Hollywood Reporter just picked it up. As shocking as it may seem, and today of all days, I’m starting to think this might be real. 

87

u/Two_Shekels 3d ago

Don’t do that. Don’t give me hope

56

u/RangerLt 3d ago

David Fincher directing a Tarantino script? I won't believe it until they release the bluray.

30

u/gunt34r 3d ago

til the dvd commentary

5

u/the-artistocrat 3d ago

That’s the only time I’ll drop character

4

u/PanteraOne 3d ago

It's only being released on VHS tape.

2

u/cobaltfalcon121 2d ago

I wont until I hear casting announcements

218

u/frolie0 3d ago

18

u/ScipioCoriolanus 3d ago

Okay. This is now my most anticipated movie.

359

u/bellyofthebillbear 3d ago

A sequel to a Quentin Tarantino movie directed by David Fincher? I don’t buy it.

289

u/Secure-Target338 3d ago

Reports say this'll be from "The Movie Critic" screeplay he wrote to be his last film, which had Brad Pitt's character Cliff Booth featured in it.

But Quentin probly had second thoughts about making his tenth and final film to be a sequel, so he's made the genius decision to pass this off to Fincher to direct so that the screenplay he wrote doesn't go to waste.

306

u/Rugged_Turtle 3d ago

Or he could stop being fixated on number 10 NEEDING to be his last lmao

108

u/Secure-Target338 3d ago

yea for realz, then we coulda got his R-rated Star Trek film, and the Kill Bill sequel with Vernita Green's (Vivica A. Fox) daughter all grown up and ready for her quest to exact revenge on Beatrix "The Bride" Kiddo (Uma Thurman)

30

u/ragua007 3d ago

Holy shit I want this movie so bad……who do you want to see as her daughter in it? I immediately pictured Jodie Turner-Smith

10

u/armchairwarrior42069 3d ago

I might like Keke palmer. She can be serious when she wants but I think in the "Tarantino camp" style she could really shine.

11

u/atethebottle 3d ago

I think Zazie Beetz, Domino in Deadpool 2, would be a great fit for the character.

6

u/Secure-Target338 3d ago edited 3d ago

maybe Zoë Kravitz or Teyana Taylor

1

u/Purple-Mix1033 3d ago

Good call

9

u/frenchfries089 3d ago

He actually wouldn’t have counted those films as part of the 10, more like side-quests.

6

u/Secure-Target338 3d ago edited 3d ago

I always told myself that same loophole so i could keep hope alive that these projects could still see the light of day, but he's said he put those aside because he wants his 10th movie to be more like a career epilogue.

42

u/Bing_Bong_the_Archer 3d ago

Yeah, but…that wouldn’t be the pretentious asshole thing to do

5

u/beantrouser 3d ago

Wanting to make a certain number of movies does not make one an asshole. Artists don't owe us anything. Of course, we can think what they make is lame or dumb, but they don't owe us anything.

17

u/MechaNickzilla 3d ago

Why does thinking it’s pretentious automatically mean “they owe us something?”

5

u/beantrouser 3d ago

I've got no qualms with the 'pretentious' label. It's the calling-someone-an-asshole-because-they-only-want-to-make-a-certain-number-of-movies thing that I take issue with.

Don't you take the term 'asshole' to inherently mean a person that is fucking things up for the rest of us? Our world is not made worse by Tarantino not making another movie. We are not owed one.

8

u/cwatson214 3d ago

He's rich and successful, he can do whatever the feet he wants...

1

u/bdb5430 3d ago

I see what you did there

0

u/ScipioCoriolanus 3d ago

I feet what you did there *

FIFY

1

u/ScipioCoriolanus 3d ago

He can make another movie only if he feets like it.

-1

u/ScrungulusBungulus 3d ago

The guy is so fucking obsessed with his legacy as a filmmaker, it's incredibly obnoxious. Like no one cares about his legacy more than he does.

He wants his legacy to be a prestigious 10-disc Criterion box set with his autograph on it or something

2

u/Muilutuspakumies 2d ago

This. I like his 90s output as much as the next guy, but he's so high on himself that it's pretty comical tbh. Just make your movies and let's judge the overall quality and your career after it's all done, just like with everyone else.

1

u/ScrungulusBungulus 2d ago

Yeah, the guy peaked in the 90s. He was the shit back then, while Weinstein propped him up as the greatest filmmaker of his generation. But after that? His output became sparse and not as culturally impactful.

That's when he became a tryhard who obsesses over his own legacy. And he also can't shake off his association with Weinstein.

2

u/TheGruenTransfer 1d ago

Especially when his legacy is that he's only made two great movies and everything else was kinda mid because they're genre parodies or weird historical fiction

1

u/FodderG 20h ago

Lol....?

2

u/cookingandmusic 3d ago

Netflix did 😂

63

u/RandoDude124 3d ago

Holy fuck it’s real

10

u/AdamAptor 3d ago

And I’m on board. Two of my fave filmmakers collaborating? Yeeeeeah

1

u/Motorboat_Jones 3d ago

More fights with Bruce Lee, please!!

1

u/ScipioCoriolanus 3d ago

Ikr! I'm still processing the news lol

1

u/WestleyThe 2d ago

I saw this yesterday and ignored it because i was sure it was fake… why would anyone announce something on April 1st

88

u/West_Conclusion_1239 3d ago

I'm so in for this.

Fincher wants to do his Godfather Part II, his Aliens, his Terminator 2.

But at the same time a sequel to Once Upon A Time In Hollywood on Netflix feels a crime against cinema.

34

u/allenmwnc 3d ago

His Alien 3 perhaps?

1

u/dex206 3d ago

Fatality.

-17

u/Timely_Temperature54 3d ago

Alien 3 > Aliens

Fight me

16

u/mrPitPat 3d ago

No need to fight when we all know you're wrong. :)

1

u/Timely_Temperature54 3d ago

To be fair I’m referring to the assembly cut which I think most people haven’t watched

-6

u/sloaninator 3d ago

Alien > Aliens 3 > Aliens Come at me

7

u/Homer_Potter 3d ago

Wait, what’s the connection with Fincher and those films? You just mean he wants to make a great sequel?

-9

u/Cptn_Melvin_Seahorse 3d ago edited 3d ago

Yes, If the script is on par with the first one's this could be just as good or even better.

Fincher is a better director than Tarantino.

-4

u/Twistedjustice 3d ago

Wouldn’t be hard, Hollywood is probably Tarantino’s weakest film

3

u/jaggervalance 3d ago

Once upon a time in Hollywood$.

-10

u/Cptn_Melvin_Seahorse 3d ago edited 3d ago

Tarantino is a genius screenwriter and great director, but Fincher is just better at directing. His movies have better composition, pacing, editing, than Tarantino's.

The Fincher version of this will be better than the Tarantino version. I hope Fincher shoots it on film like Tarantino, but I doubt it.

2

u/ByeByeDan 3d ago

Hot take...

32

u/PoppaTitty 3d ago

Fincher shooting quickly might be the most unbelievable part of this.

4

u/ScipioCoriolanus 3d ago

This time, he'll make only 80 takes instead of the usual 100 takes.

40

u/snart-fiffer 3d ago

If this movie had a dick. I’m not saying I’d suck it. But I would consider it. 100%

6

u/Homer_Potter 3d ago

And I’d watch you consider it!

2

u/ocxtitan 3d ago

And I'll consider it while you watch!

29

u/Lou_Mennatti 3d ago

But he doesn’t always direct his own material. He wrote True Romance directed by Tony Scott and Natural Born Killers directed by Oliver Stone. I realize both were at a time before he was well known, but he has done this before to some degree.

9

u/thexmandrew 3d ago

he hasn’t done it since he didn’t have to

5

u/Training_Match_8407 3d ago

He wrote from dusk til dawn, and clearly had a hand in writing Desperado

9

u/catgotcha 3d ago

Tarantino sold the True Romance script because he needed the money to fund Reservoir Dogs before Harvey Keitel came onto the production.

He also hated what Oliver Stone did with the NBK script.

Ultimately – both movies have very "Tarantino" elements in them, especially the dialogue, but I often wonder how different they would have been with Tarantino behind the camera. It's a great "what if" to think about.

1

u/layzeeboy81 2d ago

And he will probably do a lot more of it going forward when he stops directing. He's said he wants to win the original screenplay Oscar so many times they name the award after him. I think writing is where his true love and probably most of his talent lies.

1

u/cabbage16 2d ago

I think the weirder part is that it's a sequel to a movie he directed not necessarily just because he wrote it.

47

u/Danwinger 3d ago

Weird. Just give us more Mindhunter.

10

u/mattneutron 3d ago

Blame Netflix not Fincher.

12

u/InaneTwat 3d ago

Seriously. Fincher has been making weird decisions for a while now.

1

u/FodderG 20h ago

Like what?

1

u/InaneTwat 12h ago

Well, mutually agreeing with Netflix to cancel a show like Mindhunter because it wasn't making enough money, and then making a high budget movie about a murderer that didn't make money is pretty ironic.

IMO, the subject matter of Mank is pretty boring.

The first season of Love Death + Robots felt like it was directed by an adolescent boy.

And the whole Squid Game deal sounds really lame.

5

u/23saround 3d ago

Truthfully, my read was that Once Upon a Time in Hollywood was neither Tarantino’s most popular nor best work. While everything about it was well-made, it just was absolutely forgettable to me, especially compared to movies like Kill Bill, Inglorious Basterds, and Pulp Fiction.

I want to trust these artistic directors whose works I’ve loved, but if it was anyone else I’d be calling this a blatant cash grab…

6

u/popculturerss 3d ago

That movie would take 15 years to film between numerous takes and fighting between QT and Fincher. Haha

6

u/IaMuRGOd34 3d ago

lmao two things i thought be jokes wind up being real

this

and palworld havin a dating sim

5

u/94MIKE19 3d ago

Even if it wasn't April Fools day, I'd doubt it. Both are polar opposites in terms of tone and style, and both are used to getting their own way. They'd be butting heads from the first camera roll.

5

u/Secure-Target338 3d ago

Not when he trusts the director, like with Tony Scott, he was pretty much totally hands-off with True Romance, and Robert Rodriguez with From Dusk Till Dawn he pretty much stepped back and concentrated on acting in that movie

14

u/Thesinistral 3d ago

Check the date. Ugh. I should just skip this day on Reddit

10

u/TegridyPharmz 3d ago

Been reported on multiple outlets so let’s find out tomorrow

4

u/evan274 3d ago

It’s real

4

u/reefchieferr 3d ago

What? Why!?

3

u/ScubaWhale 3d ago

This is a plot twist

3

u/thisisdell 3d ago

Well thats kinda interesting.

3

u/mrubuto22 3d ago

That has a chance to good then

3

u/OracleVision88 3d ago

This is going to be absolutely legendary. Epic. Rarely do we get blessed with Tarantino scripts, with other directors at the helm. I know he tried to get a Star Trek movie made, that he wrote an outline for, and passed on to another screenwriter, at Bad Robot/Paramount, but like a lot of projects there, they would spend all this money on development and never actually make the damn picture.

Quentin has guarded his screenplays closely, and he hasn't really lent his pen to any other directors in quite a while, not since the 90s where he had a great experience doing so with Tony Scott and True Romance and subsequently, a truly horrible experience doing so with Oliver Stone and Natural Born Killers. He specifically hated whatever in the hell it is RDJ is doing on screen in the film (It's honestly the only RDJ role I've ever seen that had me outright hating it. He plays a reporter from Australia and has one of the absolute worst attempts at an Aussie accent ever put to film.)

I can't think of anything else QT has written for other directors off the top of my head, but perhaps a few things for Robert Rodriguez over the years, maybe. And I know back in the 90s, the Weinstein's had Quentin punch up all kinds of scripts of theirs, including one of the Halloween sequels. So there is history with QT lending the pen, he's just held it close to the chest for such a long time now.

Getting to witness QT and Fincher work together is going to be iconic. And they are doing this at Netflix? Too wild to think about. They have to put thing in theaters, don't they? Why wouldn't you!? I'm beyond stoked about this!

3

u/VariousMap1939 2d ago

My favourite director is directing the sequel to my second favourite directors best movie.

8

u/BardicGoon 3d ago

H’okay pal

5

u/mma5820 3d ago

I’m so excited. Folks let’s theorize here… I started thinking Brad Pitts character was tied to inglorious basterds. But, obviously the timeline doesn’t add up unless it’s some sort of descendant

2

u/ManwithaTan 3d ago

Was actually just wondering what Fincher was up to

2

u/alien_from_Europa 3d ago

Why would they announce this today of all days‽

2

u/Bertrum 3d ago

If it's not an April Fools Day joke I can see David Fincher doing this, because he made Zodiac and Manhunter which have a similar aesthetic to them, I know he grew up in the 70s and has a fondness for that time period.

2

u/PedriTerJong 3d ago

What an incredible movie. Tarantino dialogue with Fincher’s direction.

2

u/Oswarez 3d ago

Another project for Fincher that will never come to fruition.

2

u/Rufus2fist 3d ago

First and foremost WTF???? I love Fincher, and while I would not ever think to attach him to something like this, I love the fact he seems to be challenging himself here. The look and feel of the original is so on the other side of the map than this.

2

u/palwilliams 1d ago

Didn't Tarantino write and not direct True Romance?

2

u/Secure-Target338 1d ago

Yea, he also wrote Natural Born Killers (although heavily re-written by Oliver Stone) & From Dusk Till Dawn, and he didn't direct those either.

2

u/HectorBananaBread 1d ago

I’ll watch. Netflix needs better content.

3

u/Forgotten_Lie 3d ago

I did enjoy Once Upon A Time in Hollywood but I wouldn't be able to watch this film in good faith knowing what I do now about the ongoing physical and mental abuse Brad Pitt has inflicted on his wife and children.

-1

u/Background_Hyena9176 3d ago

I think it makes the film better

0

u/FodderG 20h ago

What?

1

u/Filmmagician 3d ago

Not buying it. Not today.

1

u/Crazyripps 3d ago

It’s actually real? No fucking way

1

u/IndecisiveTuna 3d ago

This is interesting. I wonder what direction they’d go with it.

If anything, Cliff’s past was the most intriguing part of the movie, so you’d think they’d explore that — but the mystery is also what makes his character.

1

u/luckycsgocrateaddict 3d ago

Was excited till I saw Netflix

1

u/Timely_Temperature54 3d ago

Fincher is one of my favorite directors but he does not seem like the right fit for a sequel to OOATIH

1

u/AmolAnand- 3d ago

I don't understand what is happening.

1

u/Alejxndro 3d ago

this totally reads like an april fools joke lmao

1

u/Rudi-G 3d ago

Thing with these April Fools posts is that keep on appearing in feeds days after and then are seen as real.

1

u/Active_Investment_66 3d ago

A sequel to a boring movie would be a a great financial success

1

u/J-Nice 3d ago

This is the first step in Tarantino and Netflix making the Bounty Law series. Everyone dips their toes in without a huge commitment then if they all play nice bounty law gets made.

1

u/Snakepli55ken 3d ago

Meh. Didn’t care for OUATIH at all.

1

u/shaomike 3d ago

This is a kaiju level event. Produced by Cecil B Demille?

1

u/Ascarea 3d ago

directing a film based on the screenplay of Tarantino, who always directs his own material, is not only an unexpected shocker, it’s a cinematic first.

the fuck are you talking about?

1

u/Mydadshands 3d ago

Really confused of this is real or not. Forbes talking about it today still like it's real.

1

u/Flaky-Reality-6572 3d ago

Tarantino doesn’t always direct his own material?? True Romance (1993) was directed by Tony Scott, From Dusk Till Dawn (1996) was directed by Robert Rodriguez, he wrote the screenplay for both. He also wrote the story of Natural Born Killers (1994), which was rewritten by director Oliver Stone.

1

u/BlackLeb 3d ago

I’m sure it will happen. Like when JJ Abrams turned that one Star Trek script Tarantino wrote into an actual movie

1

u/applegui 3d ago

I hope so. If you read the book, I loved the back story on how Brandy came into Cliff’s stewardship. My favorite Tarantino film.

I’m still waiting for the Bounty Law series to unfold. I think Tarantino actually wrote the first three show scripts when writing the script for Once Upon a Time in… Hollywood

1

u/greenwavelengths 3d ago

I always mix up David Fincher and David Lynch, so naturally I thought this was a really sick April fools joke.

1

u/CheeserButler 3d ago

Yeah but it's fucking Netflix.

1

u/Useful-Soup8161 2d ago

Wait is this real?? I thought this was an April fools joke.

1

u/Secure-Target338 2d ago

yea son frfr

1

u/in2xs 1d ago

$200 million???!!! 65-70% dialogue heavy prob. No huge set pieces wtf with these inflated budgets. Ok that being said, this sounds interesting, but we shall see.

1

u/PoeBangangeron 3d ago

If this is true. This is probably the greatest news since the invention of the car.

1

u/No-Joke8521 3d ago

Just finish mindhunter already you gremlin!!

1

u/No-Category-6343 3d ago

Shame Brad pitt hits his children

1

u/North_South_Side 3d ago

I'm not a big celeb gossip guy. But after reading some of the shit that Pitt did to his wife and family in front of corroborating witnesses! In public!) I'm not sure I can watch another movie starring this shitheel ever again.

-5

u/pardonme206 3d ago

First one sucked

0

u/upstatedreaming3816 3d ago

Why did I think Fincher passed away?

0

u/EntertainmentQuick47 3d ago

I’ve been fooled…havent I?

0

u/ReflexReact 3d ago

I must be the only person who didn’t rate OUATIH. It wasn’t bad, just felt over hyped and rated.

0

u/Spooner_Goldberg 3d ago

OP trying too hard to convince everyone it’s real lol happy April fools

0

u/Lawlers_Law 3d ago

nobody asked for this.

0

u/astro_naut9 3d ago

I hated One Upon a Time in Hollywood but I’ll watch the sequel because I love Fincher. Why am I like this?

0

u/seanathan24 2d ago

I hated that movie

0

u/ScroteMcTaint 1d ago

Domestic and child abuser Brad Pitt. 

-1

u/Greedy-Advantage6129 3d ago

Bruh, that’s a waste

-1

u/overweighttardigrade 2d ago

Damn that movie was booty cheeks other than the last 10 minutes, the other 2 hours and 50 drags so hard

-7

u/jonnyb61 3d ago

I’m sorry but….i don’t care enough about Cliff Booth to see him again, even if it is with Fincher. Fincher hasn’t made a great film since Dragon Tattoo. He should be doing those sequels for Netflix instead. Why do this