Al Gore, not George Bush, should be sitting in the White House today as the newly elected president of the United States, two new independent probes of the disputed Florida election contest have confirmed.
The first survey, conducted on behalf of the Washington Post, shows that Mr Gore had a nearly three-to-one majority among 56,000 Florida voters whose November 7 ballot papers were discounted because they contained more than one punched hole.
The second and separate survey, conducted on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, shows that Mr Gore had a majority of 682 votes among the discounted "dimpled" ballots in Palm Beach county.
In each case, if the newly examined votes had been allowed to count in the November election, Mr Gore would have won Florida's 21 electoral college votes by a narrow majority and he, not Mr Bush, would be the president. Instead, Mr Bush officially carried Florida by 537 votes after recounts were stopped.
A year later, in November 2001, the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago announced the results of an examination of all 170,000 undervotes and overvotes.
NORC found that with a full statewide hand recount, Gore would have won Florida under every possible vote standard. Depending on which standard was used, his margin of victory would have varied from 60 to 171 votes.
The recount was paid for by a consortium of news outlets — CNN, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Tribune Company, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, the St. Petersburg Times, and the Palm Beach Post. But this was just two months after the September 11 terrorist attacks. The outlets patriotically buried the blockbuster news that George W. Bush was not the legitimate president of the United States.
Well, there was the time that Nixon‘s people torpedoed the Paris Peace Talks, swinging the election from Humphrey to Nixon. And the time Reagan’s people interfered with the American hostage negotiations with Iran. As soon as Reagan became president the hostages were released, so obviously the negotiations were done before he was president.
Yes. I think the person who wins the election by votes—and not political and legal maneuvering—is the one who wins an election. Crazy concept. Not a dem btw, but I'm sure that won't stop you from whining about it.
Except he just showed you proof dummy, while MAGA didn't have any and were just like "I feel like more people like Trump than Biden so there is no way he lost".
Bleep bleep boop. I am a bot here to serve by providing helpful price history data on products. I am not affiliated with Amazon. Upvote if this was helpful. PM to report issues or to opt-out.
I don't know how anyone saw that election, you know, where it was "so close" and was decided by Florida (who was being governed by Bush's brother) and thought "yeah this election wasn't rigged at all."
Meditate and you may be able to glimpse what could have been. Maybe you can will yourself into that reality and try to drag us in there with you. Or do shrooms and be OK while the world burns around us all
281
u/No_Atmosphere8146 Jan 31 '25
Gore 2000 and Bernie 2016. Two decisions that split the timeline massively and we're on the wrong one.