r/Persecutionfetish 5d ago

=Custom flair: original flavor= "For The Same Reason"...

Post image
2.0k Upvotes

141 comments sorted by

1.2k

u/No_Kick_6610 5d ago

If the parties never switched how come I only ever see Republicans with Confederate flags

711

u/BroughtBagLunchSmart 5d ago

Republicans know two facts. They know democrats started the KKK, and the word for when you are attracted to 15 year olds that is not pedophile. For some reason those two facts are very important to them.

321

u/Satanic_Earmuff 5d ago

Hey, give them some credit, they also know the age of consent in each state.

96

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 5d ago

Sure. they don't care though.

And in a scary amount of them, it's 16 anyway.

57

u/meoka2368 5d ago

The states should switch to something like we have in Canada.
The age changes depending on the age of people involved.

Anyone under 12 cannot be charged with that kind of crime.
Then there's a 2 year sliding window, so for example if a 14 year old has a 15 year old girlfriend, they're both legally fine.
Then the general age is 16, unless the other person is over 18 and in a position of authority (like a boss, police officer, etc.). Then it's 18 for everything else.

There's even considerations in the law for... explicit images and videos.
So long as the person sending it is only sending it to their partner, and their relationship falls within the legal ranges mentioned above, it's not going to get them in trouble.
The person receiving it later then sending it to someone else could get charged for distribution, as well as revenge porn.

It seems complex, but really isn't. Like, if you're a teen and your partner is more than 2 years older or younger than you, you should reconsider that.
If you're not a teen, then don't have sex with one.

But they put in the complexity so that kids can't get in trouble for hooking up with each other in high school or whatever.
Better than the "16? Good enough." in the states anyway.

32

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 5d ago

The worst part? Most of those states where they're 16 require parental consent to marry at that age....

15

u/meoka2368 5d ago

I think the lowest in the US is like 12 or 13 to get married, in some states. Needs parental approval.
And then in both Canada and the US it's 16 if emancipated.

That's what I recall, anyway. I'd have to look it up to be sure.

4

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 5d ago

Googled it, you're wrong. 16 is the lowest.

8

u/meoka2368 5d ago

I just went looking as well.

https://www.mass.gov/news/child-brides

Massachusetts does not have a law specifying the minimum age at which a person can marry with a parent’s consent.

So... yeah. That's probably what I was thinking, but it was changed recently (2022). It's not something I keep up on personally, so was going by old info I guess.

8

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 5d ago

Honestly, I'd be more worried if you had detailed information and knoweldge about the age of consent laws. We're all good.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/LaCharognarde 5d ago

Aren't there still a hell of a lot of states with no "floor," provided the parents are depraved enough to okay it, at all? 😬

1

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 3d ago

Not according to what I found, but we are speaking of legal marriage as defined by the state. Not "Wacky Pastor Mcdoodle said that we're husband and wife now, and we're six."

1

u/Smiley_P 4d ago

What's even worse is that it's used for child marriage, like selling your daughter and stuff

2

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 4d ago

I mentioned down below that there was a reason that I remembered that. It was creepy as fuck and that is exactly why.

2

u/garaile64 4d ago

Thankfully it's to stop a high schooler from being arrested for hooking up consensually with their classmate.

1

u/Kiwithegaylord 5d ago

Unless there’s an egregious age difference I think 16 is fine, make it any higher and you start to get teens refusing to cooperate in investigating actual abusers out of fear of their own prosecution

48

u/gert_van_der_whoops 5d ago

Republicans know two facts

Who are we talking about? Republican voters (mendelian classification h. trumpelopithicus)know very little, and require daily programming for anything to penetrate their thick brows and enter their smooth brains. If we are talking about the members, then yes, they know two things. 1. What dorito mussolini told them their agenda was. 2. How to lie and decieve endlessly in the cause of advancing that agenda.

5

u/OrnerySnoflake ANTIFA-BLM pimp 5d ago

Troglodytes works well too.

8

u/Holiday-Reading9713 5d ago

They know democrats started the KKK,

"Fun" fact: The original KKK didn't even burn crosses. It was done by the KKK that re-emerged in the early 20th century

2

u/Shwastey 4d ago

Woodrow Wilson, pioneering a new age of racism

8

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 5d ago

Isn't that word "sicko?"

6

u/flyingdics 5d ago

2 1/2 facts if you include that Lincoln was a Republican (and would be burned alive by Republicans today).

3

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 4d ago

Trump is better, though. According to him, he did more for blacks. Like... deny them rentals?

1

u/RambaldiMilo94 5d ago

What IS the word for when you are attracted to 15 year olds that is not pedophile?

So many upvotes, but i have no idea.

1

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 3d ago

"Creep."

Seriously though, the word they insist on using is "Ephebophilia," which means "Attracted to teenagers."

I'd love to see someone try to use that as a defense in a trial. 'Yer honor, I'm not a pedophile; I'm a Ephobiliphile!"

In the eyes of the law, that doesn't matter.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Your comment has unfortunately been filtered and is not visible to other users. This subreddit requires its users to have over 1,000 karma from posts and comments combined. Try participating nicely in other communities and come back later.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-11

u/meoka2368 5d ago

... and the word for when you are attracted to 15 year olds that is not pedophile.

That's one that annoys me too, but for different reasons.

So for those that don't know, there's three words and general age ranges (varies child to child, and gender impacts it as well).
Pedophilia - 0 to about 10
Hebephilia - 10 to 15
Ephebophilia - 15 to 19

And yes, that does mean that there's some adult sites out there that specifically cater to ephebophiles, legally.

My issue with calling all of that "pedo" is that someone who is attracted to an 18 year old is wildly different than someone attracted to a 2 year old.
Applying that name to all attraction below 20 lessens the impact of the word when someone actually does something with a toddler.

7

u/Square_Ad4004 5d ago

Well, no. I agree that the term pedophilia is used way too casually, to the point where it's sometimes harmful, but those other terms are scientifically questionable at the very best. It's also patently ridiculous to lump them into clear age groups like that - pedophilia is primary sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children, regardless of age. If you're attracted to children you're a pedo, even if some online creep told you that acktchually you're not a pedo if the child is 10.

Oh, and hebephilia is controversial to the point where it both largely remains unused by professionals and was suggested for the DSM-5 as an extension of pedophilia. We don't need more bullshit terms to give adults guidelines for which kids to creep on, we just need to stop creeping on kids.

-1

u/meoka2368 5d ago

It's also patently ridiculous to lump them into clear age groups like that - pedophilia is primary sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children, regardless of age.

They aren't clear age groups. I specifically pointed that out. Any credible source that talks about them also mentions that there isn't a firm range on them.

I don't get why people are in favour of watering down "pedo" to mean both of legal age to go to war and just out of the womb at the same time.

3

u/uberfission 4d ago

My guy, come on, while I agree with you that there's a huge difference between attraction to a 2 year old and a 17 year old, this is the worst place to be arguing that. Read the room.

-1

u/meoka2368 4d ago

Not sure why you want to water down the term and make it seem like less than it is.
Red flags, my guy.

1

u/SomeoneRepeated Attacking and dethroning God 4d ago edited 4d ago

Listen. I am a pedantic little shit. It's literally in my description. But even I think that being like "erm, actually its hebephilia!" when someone calls a person attracted to a 15-year old a pedo is ridiculous.

79

u/ChaosOfOrder24 5d ago

But when you point that out they flip flop to "It's southern heritage, not hate."

31

u/Biffingston πš‚πšŒπš’πšŽπš—πšπš’πšπš’πšŒπšŠπš•πš•πš’ πš‚πšŠπš›πšŒπšŠπšœπšπš’πšŒ 5d ago

The irony is that's the fucking problem in a nutshell. Their heritage involves slavery and mistreatment. It's not something to be proud of.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

-1

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Your comment has unfortunately been filtered and is not visible to other users. This subreddit requires its users to have over 1,000 karma from posts and comments combined. Try participating nicely in other communities and come back later.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

42

u/TimeLordHatKid123 5d ago

God, I actually almost hate that the parties switched, all it did was make this discourse harder to talk about, and gives conservatives another tool to confuse and muddy the conversation with.

22

u/PhazonZim 5d ago

They'll look for any excuse, and if they can't find one they'll just make one up

18

u/BringBackAoE 5d ago

The parties didn’t really β€œswitch”. It’s more that social issues weren’t central, politics was local.

So across the US there were a mix of Dems and GOP everywhere.

I think it’s more correct to distinguish between Southern Conservatives and Northern Liberals.

Lincoln was elected by Northern Liberals. Southern conservatives started KKK and were Confederates.

5

u/NotDescriptive 4d ago

A lot of people ignore that there were two Democrat parties when Lincoln was elected, the Democratic Party and the Southern Democratic Party. The Democratic Party largely sided with the Union while the Southern Democratic Party is the one that went on to form the Confederacy (and eventually the KKK).

3

u/jrae0618 4d ago

I got into it with someone online before and I listed several KKK group's numbers. Sadly, they were easy to find. I told them to go ahead and call them and ask if they are Democrats. They said they didn't need to ask, they know they are Democrats. That's when I finally just stopped arguing with people, it's useless. They will never admit they are wrong and need to believe it's true or else they are aligned with the KKK.

1

u/schmyndles 3d ago

I went back and forth with someone claiming there was no party switch. I asked if Republicans today were for small government, like states' rights, and he said yes. I asked if a federal ban on something was big or small government, and he said big government, which Republicans today are against. I asked which party put a federal ban on slavery, and he said Republicans. So then, logically, if the parties never switched, shouldn't Republicans still be in support of big government? He got confused and said no, they hate big government. So then the Republicans who federally banned slavery, and the Republicans of today have opposite views, like they switched? No, there's no party switch, he said.

This went on for a very long time, where he kept calling me stupid for asking the same questions, bur every time I'd come to the logical conclusion of his answers, he'd revert back to the no party switch response. He could not understand the point I was making on just one belief of the parties, just the difference between small and big government in the 1860s and today. He finally stopped responding to me after about 20 minutes of this.

57

u/Eeeef_ 5d ago

Also why do I only ever hear republicans say β€œblacks?”

29

u/bitetheasp Leftoid femboy overlord 5d ago

They love using adjectives as nouns. Instant slurs without being slurs. Which is weird, because they also really like using actual slurs, anyway...

43

u/Natural_Sky_4720 5d ago

That shit is so dehumanizing i fucking HATE when people call other people β€œblacks” we are BLACK PEOPLE!

27

u/Adkit 5d ago

I'll be honest, I'm just glad we're past the "african american" age. That shit is about as forced as calling you "ebony".

3

u/Bearence 5d ago

I was a kid in the 70s, when "colored" was still used. I think I might have even heard some older people in the 80s use that word.

3

u/garaile64 4d ago

Also, that could be used to describe someone like Elon Musk.

9

u/Rockworm503 5d ago

They can't help themselves. They gotta be racist even when they are trying to paint the other side as the racists.

3

u/DatNick1988 4d ago

And how come republicans were angry when they took down confederate statues

-28

u/ninjacat249 5d ago

It’s the same as ultra left fascists I guess.

26

u/NoLavishness1563 5d ago

Ultra-left fascists? lmao.

14

u/ninjacat249 5d ago

Yeah I should have added /s I guess

3

u/NoLavishness1563 5d ago

Nah I'm just slow apparently.

297

u/under_the_c 5d ago

I dont even believe that the oop actually believes this. This is the worst faith take I've ever seen.

102

u/1994californication 5d ago

They almost never argue in good faith

35

u/gert_van_der_whoops 5d ago

What do you mean almost?

8

u/1994californication 5d ago

By almost I meant basically never.

66

u/GUlysses 5d ago

When someone says Democrats used to support slavery, remind them that Republicans used to oppose Russia.

26

u/warm_sweater 5d ago edited 4d ago

I’ve called out people I’ve known in person for this type of shit; during the first Trump term I caught a old coworker reposting edited images from Greek riots calling them photos of antifa attacking police here in the US.

When I told him he was lying and pushing propaganda on purpose, he said he didn’t care because this is what antifa really wanted to do.

10

u/i-caca-my-pants Wokonut tree BLM DEI hire theythem pronounce 5d ago

you really do need to understand your enemies and avoid making shit up about them, lest you forget why you don't like them. right wingers passed this point a long time ago

3

u/gert_van_der_whoops 5d ago

When I told him he was lying and pushing propaganda on propose, he said he didn’t care because this is what antifa really wanted to do.

Yep. It's the era of trump. Objective truth doesn't exist anymore. Lying isn't even wrong anymore, as long as it gets you what you want.

9

u/Tornado2p 5d ago

Yeah, quite a few conservatives have utilized this to make progressives burn themselves out trying to get through to them.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Your comment has unfortunately been automatically removed and is not visible to other users due to your account being less than a week old. You are welcome to try again later. If you continue to receive this message after your account has been active for seven days, then please message the moderation team.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

241

u/AegisKaisar 5d ago

Blud does not know about the party switch πŸ’”

Also the usage of "blacks" instead of black people is very telling

96

u/Winterstyres 5d ago

Give them credit for not using the name they were thinking though.

60

u/vxicepickxv 5d ago

Dogwhistling is important when you're spreading propaganda.

43

u/Kimantha_Allerdings Sexier than an M&M 5d ago

β€žDemocrat partyβ€œ is the giveaway. The American right seems to think thatβ€˜s a slur, for some reason. I see lots of people in the US using language like β€žblacksβ€œ. As a Brit it makes me uncomfortable, but it doesnβ€˜t seem to be seen as dehumanising or racist in the US.

35

u/Cether 5d ago

It is. No one goes around saying "Whites". It's always "if you're white" humanising the person first. Anyone who calls someone "a black" is racist AF.

There's just a huge amount of racist people.

10

u/Worldly-Ocelot-3358 5d ago

Literally this.

2

u/Kimantha_Allerdings Sexier than an M&M 5d ago

Fair enough. Iβ€˜m sure Iβ€˜ve seen it in things like non-far-right news reports, but Iβ€˜m not from the US so Iβ€˜m sure thereβ€˜s plenty about the culture that I donβ€˜t know and Iβ€˜m happy to defer to someone with more knowledge.

19

u/Tru3insanity 5d ago

Oh it definitely is racist and dehumanizing. If someone is defending it, they got an agenda. Its ok to use it as an adjective like saying "black people." Its the people part thats important. Using it as a noun is exactly as gross as it sounds. Anyone doing that is definitely racist. Sadly there are a lot of racist people in the US.

1

u/uberfission 4d ago

The only time using the word "blacks" is okay is when you're describing paints. It's still dehumanizing and racist on this side of the pond, we just have more shitty people over here that seem to think being racist is a good thing.

97

u/secondarycontrol 5d ago edited 5d ago

Sooo...Republicans are now onboard with a Confederate flag ban and tearing down Confederate monuments? Getting rid of Rbt. E Lee day? Yeah, didn't think so. Fun fact: The south regularly voted Democratic until the civil rights era and then suddenly they no longer voted Dem - And it sure as shit wasn't the south that changed. Because the South? The South never changes.

12

u/EatsCrackers Moderately Immoderate 5d ago

I totally read the last line in Ron Perlman’s voice.

1

u/Scatterspell 5d ago

You get a cookie. A dark side cookie.

73

u/goodgamble 5d ago

Easy reply. Go find your local kkk. They exist. Walk into the meeting and call them a bunch of democrats and see how that goes for you.

44

u/Street_Peace_8831 5d ago

Exactly, they all vote republican. Racists, the KKK, white supremecists, and neo-Nazis do not vote Democrat and would get angry if you said they did.

14

u/thechaoslord 5d ago

I remember that months ago I had gotten into an argument with a self proclaimed nazi on Twitter about how trump was copying hitler's rise to power, and they tried to claim they had a degree in history to backup their denial. Their smoking gun: "Trump hasn't put people in concentration camps yet"(this was around October), and I just told them that they made me question the credentials of where they got their degree if STEP 15 On the guide to being Hitler is the point they say someone is copying him

29

u/Kineth 5d ago

Oh, so when Republicans were doing it for the last 50 years, it was for a different reason?

23

u/bz_leapair 5d ago

I love that Republicans have to go back anywhere from 60 years (Civil Rights) to 150 years (Civil War) for a point in time where they were unequivocally the good guys.

40

u/girlwiththemonkey 5d ago

DOES NO ONE TEACH IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS ABOUT THE PARTY SWITCH? I’m Canadian. And I know about it. And I didn’t even take American history.

16

u/BishonenPrincess 5d ago

American here.

My favorite subject was history, and I took multiple AP classes on it, including AP American history.

The subject never came up once.

13

u/VERO2020 5d ago

Probably never heard about Tulsa's Black Wall Street or Rosewood, either.

6

u/TJM18 5d ago

It was pretty eye opening when I learned about the Tulsa Race Massacre…..YEARS after getting out of high school. Like what else are aren’t they teaching us?

American education system is failing us, and that’s by design.

7

u/BishonenPrincess 5d ago

Not in a school setting, no.

6

u/Vallkyrie FEMALE SUPREMACIST 5d ago

Same. Grew up in New England, did all my schooling there in both CT and MA, good schools with good subjects, but still those were never brought up. I know you can't cover everything, gaps are expected. I do wish those were brought up though.

1

u/girlwiththemonkey 5d ago

Also, they straight up just don’t teach about the party switch. Well, OK great. I understand that we can’t teach everything but some stuff feels like it should be taught.

5

u/thechaoslord 5d ago

The majority of what they teach us are sanitized colonial era, sanitized meeting of Europe and the aztecs, skip anything about the Caribbean, minimal history for how we interacted with the native Americans, the cause of world war 1, slightly sanitized world war 2(they don't like mentioning where Nazis got laws for hate with surgical precision) and then they conflate socialism and communism while teaching sanitized capitalism

4

u/girlwiththemonkey 5d ago

I got a question now because I keep saying Americans on TikTok saying something and it’s pissing me off because it’s not true. But do they not teach that Canada was there for the second world war before America? Because so many of them seem to think it’s true and it’s such a stupid thing and they’re all responding to me with. β€œOh this is what they taught us so it’s right.”

3

u/thechaoslord 5d ago

No, possibly because that makes us look bad. And that is part of the reason why they think invading you is a good idea, because they forgot what our earliest loss is, and what Canadian soldiers are known for (no offense intended on the last bit)

3

u/girlwiththemonkey 5d ago

Oh absolutely, no offence taken. We were brutal in the war. We have parts of our history that are not really taught, but when I was in high school, I had a really good history, teacher (I live in Newfoundland) and what our ancestors did when they got here it’s fucking brutal and it only really stopped not that long ago. Have you heard of the residential schools? if you’re sensitive, you don’t have to read it. It’s just awful.

I’ll see if I can write a toned down version. (I know there’s one that I’ve already written here on the iPad somewhere so….)

These schools in Newfoundland were places of severe abuse, where Indigenous children suffered physical beatings, sexual violence, starvation, and neglect. Many were forcibly taken from their families, forbidden to speak their languages, and punished for practicing their culture. Some children died from starvation , disease, or the horrible fucking mistreatment, and many survivors live with deep psychological scars. There are some that can take what happened to them and they can be productive about it, but a lot of them literally lost their will to live because of those places. The government refused to acknowledge their suffering, excluding them from Canada’s national residential school settlement until 2016. The horrific damage from these schools continues to devastate Indigenous communities causing cycles of grief, loss, and cultural erosion. So many of them deal with alcohol or substance abuse issues, and as someone who had drug related issues, I can tell you that if you need help, this is not the place to be. So they just go in and out of the system and never get the help they actually need to get better. β€οΈβ€πŸ©Ή

2

u/thechaoslord 5d ago

I don't remember if the American version of those was any better, but ours was focused on stomping out the language, culture, and religion of the native American peoples

1

u/jrae0618 4d ago

Surprisingly, I'm in Texas and was taught about the Southern Strategy. Granted this was in the 90s and we weren't as ridiculous as we are now.

17

u/cartoonsarcasm 5d ago

This is by far the worst case of persecution complex I've seen.

13

u/Karhak 5d ago

So then, it should be crickets from them when Democrats tear down statues dedicated to traitors since, ya know, they were Democrats.

12

u/_Oops_I_Did_It_Again 5d ago

Any American who refers to PEOPLE as β€œblacks” (it feels gross even typing that out tbh) is really telling on themselves and their values…

8

u/Galappie 5d ago

Are Tesla owners actually having their cars set on fire? I’m pretty sure it’s only been cars at dealerships. Either way I don’t really care since these people seem more upset at some vandalism than they do when children are riddled with bullets.

11

u/lgodsey 5d ago

Conservatives burned the crosses. And worse. And it was/is way more pervasive. No amount of history denial of political parties will change that.

That said I suppose that some of the Tesla vandals may be considered left/liberal, but they are a tiny group that has been thoroughly condemned by the left, unlike thousands of past and even current instances of racist violence perpetrated by the right.

God damn you conservatives for your bastardization of the truth.

7

u/AutomaticAccident 5d ago

Wait. Where are they keeping their Teslas?

8

u/Responsible_Ad_8628 5d ago

Go check the modern KKK to figure out their pay affiliation. They're enthusiastically MAGA and have been since the start.

5

u/TheFrenchPerson 4d ago

Republicans comparing Tesla cars to black people, they really do like owning things don't they?

4

u/Rockworm503 5d ago

Elon Musk is literally a Nazi but I guess he's black now and a victim of lynch mobs because that makes sense.

My god these people are beyond stupid.

4

u/VERO2020 5d ago

Aside from the idiocy that this weirdo posts, does no one remember that it is the Democratic Party? Rush Blimpo started this "democrat party" dumb-assery, and it seems almost standard now.

It is a giveaway that the author is either informed by the RWNJ media, a troll, or too young to remember the actual name of the party. Could easily be all three.

3

u/sloaches 5d ago

Wasn't Newt Gingrich also responsible for the whole "Democrat Party" labeling as well? Either way, they have been doing it intentionally for decades. Honestly, whenever I hear someone use that term it just helps identify them as an asshole.

4

u/Scatterspell 5d ago

The thing is, it was Conservatives who were burning crosses. If you search back through historical news articles and documents, they interchange Democrat and Conservative constantly. Who are the Conservatives now?

3

u/Ludate_Solem 4d ago

Anyone who uses "blacks" to refer to poc, does not care about poc.

4

u/Reedwool 3d ago

Is so tiring when people say β€œdemocrats started the kkk”. Democrat is a name for a party not an ideology. Such an easy google search to find out who used to be democrats almost 200 years ago

9

u/manickitty 5d ago

All conservatives are bad regardless of what name they are currently parading under. Same shit different toilet

3

u/Blacksun388 Socialist communist atheist cannibal from beyond the moon 5d ago

Something something southern strategy switched platforms ect

3

u/CreativeName6574 mentally ill f*ggot being groomed by Pedophilesβ„’ 5d ago

β€œBlacks”?

3

u/Paulie227 4d ago

What are "blacks"?Β 

"Blacks" sounds like something someone who would burn a cross on your lawn would say.

3

u/PeanutFreeMeatLoaf 4d ago

Yup they're definitely burning Teslas because Elons African totally no other reason

2

u/VisibleRecognition65 5d ago

Say the POS who have been using the same script since the cold war

2

u/secretbudgie 5d ago

Expected brain rot from a Paula Deen PFP

2

u/WiggyStark 5d ago

Conservatives burned, and still burn, crossed to intimidate black people.

2

u/EarthLaser 5d ago

β€œBlacks”

2

u/postdiluvium 5d ago

FFS, every time a Republican is in the white House the people who are against womens suffrage, racial equality, affirmative action, dei, LGBTQ rights... yell about how they are being treated like black people in the segregated south.

2

u/Filmguy313 4d ago

They post stuff like this and usually post something racist too

2

u/phatstopher 4d ago

The Wide Awakes fought those cross burners, just like woke people fight racists today.

1

u/Daddywitchking 5d ago

Republicans farm babies to drink their spinal fluid so they wrinkle less (it doesn’t work)

Anybody can say anything, the internet is a curse

1

u/LaCharognarde 5d ago

Change "Democrats" to "right-wingers" in the first part. Also: Tesla owners are in no way a marginalized group, and I suspect that Enron Skum is doing a false flag.

1

u/AverageFoxNewsViewer 5d ago

Not even real Teslas. Just Roman candles.

1

u/OisforOwesome 5d ago

I'm fairly sure Elon isn't black and he's the only one intimidated by this.

1

u/WaltDisneyWasAFurry 5d ago

The caucasity of the motherfucker who posted this

1

u/TinyCleric 5d ago

Whats the main political makeup of the modern kkk? WHAT IS THE-

1

u/slomo525 5d ago

I didn't know owning a Tesla and supporting a fascist were immutable characteristics. You learn something new every day.

1

u/swiftb3 4d ago

Needs to be right alongside "STATES' RIGHTS TO DO WHAT?"

"WHO DO THE CROSS-BURNING RACISTS SUPPORT NOW?"

1

u/FreedomsPower Help! Help! I am being Repressed! 4d ago

It's pathetic when conservatives cherrypick history to hide the fact that the KKK were far right terrorists

1

u/LCDRformat 4d ago

Ah yes, the old south conservative democrats

1

u/kbeks 3d ago

Conservatives used to burn crosses, now they burn books and democratic norms.