I don’t get why he thinks shitting on Joe Biden helps him. Let’s say Biden is the world’s biggest dummy. That means you lost to the world’s biggest dummy. So what does that say about you?
But the cognitive dissonance that fuels every narcissist knows Biden was not a dummy, and in fact knows Biden is a far better man than him.
Narcissists are full of doubt, that is why they constantly challenge and tear everyone else down to their level, covering the pigeon chess board with so much shit that no one else can tell whose shit it is.
I think the bigger question is how.
How did that wily old bastard and famous idiot, (gotta love cognitive dissonance for its great work fueling lunatics), shit in in trumps bedtime snuggies?
It's got to be some sort of communist funnel/pump scenario. Might be the same technology that's killing all those whales at wind farms and causing the president to deface public weather warnings.
You get it. I think you have to know a narcissist to understand this, I bet you have some stories. There's a lot of vagueness and scepticism around psychology, but narcissists all work from the same playbook. I discovered DARVO recently and it blew my mind.
not just that, we're apparently still overestimating the intelligence of the MAGA crowd assuming they see the world like we do. they don't and that's why Trump is president and why he kept winning over and over despite the outrageous things he says and does. because they are only outrageous to us.
Biden cheated, just not in the way most think. Years later we'd learn social media platforms were working with the FBI and were paid quite handomly to suppress information.
It's for his supporters. Keeps them up against a perceived enemy and allows them to shift their problems to someone else despite him causing more problems than he solved.
He knows he's a piece of shit, he's just prepared to burn the world to try and inflict the same pain he feels on everyone else. Well, he's got keep doing what Putin says too, that Kompromat must be brutal. The man will never be happy unless he's hurting people. Unfortunately, it will never be enough.
A monster without a single redeeming feature. Doesn't even like dogs or painting.
Joe Biden is either a nasty evil communist Mastermind bent on the destruction of the United States or dotting old fool depending on what point they want to make
What does it say about the cult of millions who follow a man like this?
The ladder of pathetic is endless. To them, it's all about making sure someone, everyone, is below you to shit on. Putin shits on Trump and Musk. Trump and Musk shit on everyone they can. The people they shit on shit on people below them. And so on.
Then it gets to someone like Joe Biden and a reporter will be like "Did you hear what Trump said?", and Biden would be like, "Nope, can't hear him all the way out on the beach with my accomplished PhD wife who loves me. I'll just assume he said something stupid.. Let's get ice cream!"
You’re absolutely right, and it’s exactly my thinking every time he says he won by a landslide against an unpopular opponent who had 2 months to fully mobilize the campaign. It’s not exactly a flex to say you won a marathon against a potato sack who hasn’t exercised in 10 years, but politically this is essentially what he’s doing.
But, as other comments have said, this is completely unimportant. And it isn’t just about narcissistic personality disorder. It’s literally how fascism always works. Josef Goebbels himself said it when talking about propaganda—the truth becomes the enemy of the state. Logic, reason, facts—all of them literally HAVE to be meaningless in order for the movement to advance. And what’s even more important is that it always starts as a characteristic of the people whom embrace the ideals of fascism. The political taste of it is just one way it manifests itself, but it always begins with a sense of insecurity driven “otherness” that then gets fomented and harnessed by a personality who recognizes that weakness in people and turns it for their own gain.
But for it to take hold, the facts must first mean literally nothing. And so to argue or criticize a policy/person/ideal based on logic is completely meaningless as well.
This is why it doesn’t make sense to people like you and me, because we are viewing it objectively from the outside through the rational decision making process—but from the inside, there is no decision making. It is intentionally one thought propagated through the masses of “pure”/inside (in this case MAGA) vs. the “degenerate”/outside (anyone who isn’t red hat MAGA)..
Additionally, it becomes a code/signal amongst the “pure” to identify likeness vs. “otherness.” To speak negatively about Biden accomplishes nothing politically—literally nothing—but he is using it to signal like a bird signals to its flock. I guarantee 100% that you would be able to see a big spike in mentions of Biden on every single conservative outlet over the last 48 hours. It’s a way of communicating “I am MAGA/pure” in the same way a wolfpack howls and identifies each other at night or when there’s a threat.
People are fascinating once you really understand why they do what they do. Even in their irrationality, they are completely predictable most of the time.
His mind is only full of negative shit! Did you see him with the Irish Prime Minister, who danced circles around Trump? When he mentioned all the Irish companies providing jobs in America, he mentioned Ryan Air, to which Trump replied, "You wanna trade?" So embarrassing!
This goes around the biggest issue here: His rethoric is that he didnt lose to Biden in the first place. His argument is a big ol' 80 yo tantrum of "nuh huh I won"
That’s the sign of fragile ego, that he has lost, and no one in the world is a sore loser more than Trump. Look at the tantrum he threw on his social media after a judge blocked his executive order. “It’s MY mandate, MINE! I WON! Did he win? NO!”
It's dehumanizing. Democrats aren't "people" or "americans" to them. They're pedophiles, cheaters, liars, groomers, the absolute worst of the worst. The height of corruption.
Same thing they are doing with LGTBQ+. So he's not defeating "the world's biggest dummy," he's a "hero" to them, rooting out evil and defeating it.
Terrifyingly, dehumanization has a second delightful feature. It makes it easier to justify ki11ing those of us who dissent. Even if you aren't, being labeled "democrat" or "liberal" because you're not toeing the red line will be the same as putting a target on the back of your head.
I mistyped corruption as "corrumption" by the way and it made me laugh.
Biden living rent free in that orange numbskulls peabrain is the only consolation I've had since November. It blows my mind the amount of time and energy he wastes on someone that shouldn't matter to him anymore. Every time he says Biden's name, I think "that's right... you're still Biden's little bitch."
There isn't logic involved here for the target audience. It's purely about sending the message "it's OK to hate the people you want to hate," which is the message that got him elected. In this case, he is sending that message by dissing on Biden. So there is never a question about what it says about him, that never enters the minds of his target audience. It's purely a demonstration showing them it's acceptable to insult people you don't like, and they like that, so they like hearing him do it.
Ehhh. Imagine this phrasing reversed. What do Harris and Clinton feel knowing that they lost to Trump? There is a special torment in hell where the Devil tells you to sit and contemplate being less appealing than the Devils reject himself, Donald Trump.
You’re changing it to a different point nobody is making as a way to wedge a “what about them” that has very little connective tissue. Neither are working into every conversation that Trump is a fascist. Actually, outside of campaigning against him, they’ve both barely mentioned his existence.
Except it’s a point you were making. You are the one who brought up the point of what it means when a presidential candidate loses to another candidate. All I did was bring additional candidates into the discussion.
The point I made was that he keeps inserting digs on the opponent who beat him in situations that are completely unrelated to campaigning. You can swap out anyone and I’d make that point. Many other people got the point but it appears lost on you.
And yet my point still stands does it not?
If trump lost to a dumb dumb, what does that make trump?
On that same note, if Clinton and Harris both lost to trump, what does that make them. That question isn’t invalid just because Clinton or Harris didn’t insert any digs towards an opponent they beat.
You’re still completely missing the third part of the point. On purpose or that you can’t follow it, I don’t care. I’ve spent enough time holding your hand. This is why I don’t like engaging with people who use whataboutism.
161
u/Minimum_Device_6379 17d ago
I don’t get why he thinks shitting on Joe Biden helps him. Let’s say Biden is the world’s biggest dummy. That means you lost to the world’s biggest dummy. So what does that say about you?