Holy shit, that is an epic level of delusional if he thinks he's the underdog fighting against power. He could be trolling for all we know, because this is just too stupid.
we wont "need" planetary colonization until 400,000 years from now.
and civilization as we know it is only 4,000 years old.
and we're going to exhaust all raw materials in 400 years.
if climate change doesnt cause a catastrophe in 40 years.
meanwhile, why not "colonize" the Sahara or the antarctic. it has atmosphere, survivable temperature, no UV rays, water source. colonizing mars 395,000 years too early is a wasteful error.
Man as we know is about 60,000 years old, give or take a millinia. Civilization is about 10,000 years old, give or take several hundred years, depending on what civilization is (cities vs. communities)
The odds of man lasting an additional 400,000 years is a stretch. We'll be our own executioners.
I do agree, though, that as a species we should focus more on our own planet. Also, 'colonizing' the Sahara wouldn't be good for the entire planet's climate.
Global weather and how each other works together is fascinating stuff.
4.1k
u/255001434 2d ago
Holy shit, that is an epic level of delusional if he thinks he's the underdog fighting against power. He could be trolling for all we know, because this is just too stupid.