r/dontyouknowwhoiam Mar 06 '25

Unknown Expert He said Homosexuality isn't a sin

Post image
934 Upvotes

91 comments sorted by

352

u/LeroyoJenkins Mar 06 '25

I mean, the bar for being a pastor is very low, a pastor is as an expert in the bible as a used car salesman is an expert in car mechanics.

41

u/Out_of_ughs Mar 06 '25

šŸ’Æ The mom from Honey Boo Boo can claim to be a pastor in the US.

15

u/shinitakunai Mar 06 '25

In spanish Pastor means someone that walks and takes care of sheeps. Do what u want with that info

32

u/LeroyoJenkins Mar 06 '25

Not just in Spanish. And that's the religious sense of "Pastor", because - according to the bible - they act as shepherds, guiding and caring for their flock.

10

u/EobardT Mar 07 '25

Yeah that's the origin of the word. In English they're called shepherds and pastors often refer to themselves as shepherds.

14

u/Imaginary_being_ Mar 06 '25

Not the case in every country

37

u/LeroyoJenkins Mar 06 '25

You mean "Church", not "Country", right? In no major English or German-speaking (the two languages in the screenshot) country is "pastor" a regulated profession

PS: In some rare cases those overlap, but for most intents and purposes here we can ignore those exceptions.

20

u/inaktive Mar 06 '25

In Germany you do have to successful study theologie at a University to be one a Pastor. At least as long as you do work for a legally recognized church

13

u/Imaginary_being_ Mar 06 '25

No, I mean country. (I guess you could argue that Iā€™m talking about church as well as Iā€™m talking about the biggest two groups here in Germany, those being catholic and protestant christians.) To be a christian pastor/pfarrer at least in Germany you have to study theology at a university and afterwards complete a training. Itā€˜s not easy and you have to learn old greek and latin to the extent that you basically are able to read the bible in its original language. Iā€˜d say they are qualified to say what the original meaning is/can reasonably be argued to be. Such as that homosexuality is not a sin.

7

u/AffectionateHand2206 Mar 06 '25

Even the Freikirchen require their pastors to have studied theology (including the biblical languages) at least to Masters level.

10

u/LeroyoJenkins Mar 06 '25

Isn't that to be a Licensed Minister? Because AFAIK (and I might obviously be wrong), you're free to start a church as a Verein, charge fees, preach and whatever without having any licensing or education.

-1

u/AffectionateHand2206 Mar 06 '25

In which case you can preach, but aren't a pastor.

5

u/LeroyoJenkins Mar 06 '25

You aren't a Licensed/Ordained Minister, which is the proper term for that IIRC (might be wrong, I'm not German), but can still be a pastor.

Anyway, we're just arguing nomenclature at this point...

1

u/AffectionateHand2206 Mar 07 '25

I don't know how the rules are elsewhere, but in Germany, you cannot just call yourself a pastor without fulfilling the requirements for the job (usually having studied theology). Pastor is a legally protected job description here. So, you don't have the same level of authority if you're preaching to a congregation without being a pastor.

1

u/Mcby Mar 06 '25

This entire discussion is arguing nomenclature...

My understanding of the definition of a pastor is that they have the ability to lead a congregation. In this case you need to be ordained and have the qualifications others have described in order to do this in Germany. Others may lead ceremonies but not congregations.

1

u/EobardT Mar 07 '25

You're still arguing nomenclature. Pastors lead congregations. They could be ministers or priests or whatever but in this conversation I believe we are using the term pastor very loosely

1

u/Mcby Mar 07 '25

It's a discussion about definitions, of course I'm arguing nomenclature. German is a different language to English, so you need to know what word you're actually translating.

-5

u/MistbornInterrobang Mar 06 '25

My dude, the original b8ble was written in a long dead language, so no one is learning to read the Bible in that language. That is according to experts in theology.

3

u/yun-harla Mar 06 '25

Plenty of people learn Koine Greek, Latin, Biblical Hebrew, and Biblical Aramaic to study religion, history, and literature. Each of these languages is easy to learn for a speaker of the closest modern dialect descending from it, and probably easiest for speakers of Hebrew. I learned Latin for non-religious reasons and found the Vulgate (Latin translation of the Bible ā€” Latin is not one of its original languages, but itā€™s studied by scholars who want to learn about historical Christianity) easy compared to prose and poetry originally written in Latin. All four of these languages are well-understood by modern scholars despite the lack of native speakers of the original dialects.

-1

u/SPRICH_DEUTSCH Mar 06 '25

that is literally wrong, in germany for example you have to study theology to become a legally recognized pastor iirc

3

u/LeroyoJenkins Mar 06 '25

Look at the rest of the discussion. You don't need that to be a pastor, you can create your church and be a pastor. You need that to be a Licensed Minister.

"Pastor", especially in English (which is the language used in the screenshot) is a generic term.

1

u/mischievous0ne 29d ago

it depends on the subset of Christianity we're talking about. In Catholicism in the US/CA, a pastor is the head priest of a parish/parish priest. They're over the other priests that serve the parish. This means they're supposed to be one of the most knowledgeable of the Bible in the community

1

u/LeroyoJenkins 29d ago

Yep, that's the point, "pastor" can be a million things. You can create a church and call yourself a pastor without ever reading the Bible or anything.

-1

u/jessedegenerate Mar 06 '25

The pope agrees with him

21

u/pendletonskyforce Mar 06 '25

I hate these screenshots. I was wondering why my battery was so low and confused that I had Snapchat again.

7

u/throwaway180gr Mar 06 '25

That bar for pastor is pretty low, and its hard to get around how homophobic Paul was. You can reinterpret him if you want, but I seriously doubt he would support LGBT+ people if he was around today.

46

u/Dandy11Randy Mar 06 '25

Everyone knows that when the Bible said "if a man lies with another man, he should be stoned" was A. a suggestion and B. referring to how they should be high.

35

u/Imaginary_being_ Mar 06 '25

Some translate that as a part against pedophilia. As in If a man lies with a boy

11

u/AdMurky1021 Mar 06 '25

The original greek text said boy.

24

u/Dismal_Boysenberry69 Mar 06 '25

The original greek text said boy.

Greek, you say?

5

u/hoggineer Mar 06 '25

That's what all the Hebrews spoke in, ya know?

9

u/Cole444Train Mar 06 '25 edited Mar 07 '25

Well the original text is Hebrew, so Iā€™m definitely not taking your word for it.

9

u/overmotion Mar 06 '25 edited Mar 06 '25

And the Hebrew text explicitly says man and male, age doesnā€™t matter. Never understood why people try to hard to twist the Bible instead of just saying ā€œyes it does say that and I donā€™t careā€

2

u/Cole444Train Mar 06 '25

Completely agree. I await the day humanity stops caring about what some dude scribbled down 2,000+ years ago and just chooses to have empathy regardless

2

u/EobardT Mar 07 '25

Whats the most fascinating to me is reading the Bible as a survival guide, the Torah has all sorts of rules concerning cleanliness and the new testament has rules about dealing with society at large. If you can cut through the bullshit and read the rules as that it makes a lot more sense. Gay sex introduced poop to dicks, eating swine introduced pathogens that could affect humans, love thy neighbor regardless of their background is essential for societies to continue etc..

1

u/stackoverflow21 Mar 07 '25

Youā€™re much better off saying thatā€™s the Old Testament, which was renegotiated between God and men with the coming of Jesus in the New Testament. Jesus hasnā€™t said anything about it, so it doesnā€™t seem to matter. The closes thing is probably ā€œDonā€™t judge lest ye be judged.ā€

At least thatā€™s what I would say if I were a Christian

1

u/overmotion 29d ago

Well Iā€™m not Christian and I donā€™t believe in Jesus soā€¦. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļø

1

u/AdMurky1021 Mar 07 '25

I didn't say it was the OG

2

u/Cole444Train Mar 07 '25

What do you think ā€œoriginalā€ means?

1

u/AdMurky1021 Mar 07 '25

What do you think Greek means? I did say original Greek, not original Hebrew.

3

u/Cole444Train Mar 07 '25 edited Mar 07 '25

ā€œThe original Greekā€ implies the original text is Greek. This is a weird way to save face. Iā€™m not sure why the original Koine Greek matters anyway because:

1) we donā€™t have the first translations to Greek

2) even if we did, often a lot of meaning is lost in translation, and it wasnā€™t translated to Greek until over 1,000 years after it was written.

So why even bring up the ā€œoriginal Greekā€ (which we donā€™t have)? It wouldnā€™t demonstrate anything. So what if the Greek says ā€œboyā€? The Hebrew is what matters.

1

u/Cole444Train 29d ago

Are we giving up on this conversation?

4

u/Dandy11Randy Mar 06 '25

I'd support those dudes getting stoned, then. You know, with rocks.

4

u/Joe__Exotica Mar 06 '25

There are multiple passages condemning being gay though. Not a word against pedos in the whole book.

0

u/Alan_309 Mar 06 '25

My brother in christ, this is a joke. Take a hit and pass it along the holy smoke circle

6

u/orbjo Mar 06 '25

It also says we shouldnā€™t look at each others nakedness A LOT.

And technically everything done outside the garden of Eden is sinful. The whole point of the first story is they are kicked out of the good place for being shits and sent to bozoville, population us (I read a modernised version from 1980)

18

u/prpslydistracted Mar 06 '25

https://www.treehugger.com/animals-can-change-their-sex-4869361

If God doesn't have an issue with it why should you?

9

u/The69Alphamale Mar 06 '25

Don't confuse them with science. Oh wait, science is bad, so they won't even see this, let alone try to find someone to read it to them.

-1

u/Bombulum_Mortis Mar 07 '25

How come none of the examples are of mammals?

5

u/Short-Paramedic-9740 Mar 07 '25 edited Mar 07 '25

God openly expressed it doesn't support homosexuality in the Bible. (Leviticus 18:22)

But God, also doesn't support hate, discrimination, or indifference against homosexual people. In fact, it promotes love to all kinds of people that expressed themselves different than what is only approved by God.

Despite not approving of homosexuality, you should still respect, and love them. You'd know a true Christian by just this, because then it means they actually read the Bible.

5

u/prpslydistracted Mar 07 '25

We know ... I have seen more hate directed at homosexuals by "Christians" than any other demographic. Name calling, aggressive harassment, beatings, killings, bombings ... how very "Christian" of them.

I've seen more compassion and general respect from gay coworkers toward anyone and everyone they meet. I saw gay men stopped at the door of church, shunned, and greeters refuse to shake their hands in welcome.

Hate is a sin.

3

u/chrissie_watkins Mar 07 '25

Not all interpretations agree that it refers to homosexuality. I've seen numerous scholars present compelling arguments that the original language referred to incest or child molestation. Here's one I found just now, but there are plenty of others that go into detail about the translations from Hebrew, Greek, etc. of various supposedly anti-gay bible passages and how they can be interpreted.

https://blog.smu.edu/ot8317/2016/05/11/leviticus-1822/

2

u/prpslydistracted Mar 07 '25

Fine article; I've bookmarked it for reference. I've long had an issue with the various translations (embarrassed American here I only speak and read English). Had a close Greek friend ages ago; she preferred her Greek Bible and stated how very different her Greek Bible read over English translations.

One word could change the whole meaning of a sentence. I can't remember exactly but at the time it was profound. On https://www.biblegateway.com/ there are 27 different English translations ... that doesn't even touch all the various languages and dialects of the world. We have a Jew who married into the family who isn't wholly Christian nor an observant Jew. We've talked a lot about that.

If there is any issue that would be damning today with biblical teaching it is how Christians conveniently ignore Abraham marrying his half sister. Then Noah sleeping with his daughters-in-laws and granddaughters, drunk or not; they are championed as Old Testament patriarchs. Then Lot tries to traffic his daughters to Sodomites. Then his daughters sleep with their father.

We know, the OT is a historical record of a people rather than a moral standard, but the killings and rapes; dang ....

I refuse to condemn; particularly when my homosexual coworkers (since retired) were some of the kindest, most upright people I've ever met.

0

u/Blurazzguy Mar 07 '25

Homosexuality wasnā€™t mentioned in the Bible until a 1940s version

0

u/keeleon Mar 07 '25

Animals also rape each other constantly....

0

u/prpslydistracted Mar 07 '25

You're ascribing human/consciousness morals to animals?

1

u/keeleon Mar 07 '25

You're the one justifying "morality" by it's mere natural existence.

-4

u/prpslydistracted Mar 08 '25

Animals don't rape they procreate.

5

u/wildmonster91 Mar 06 '25

I mean thats disputed. From what i gather its talking about the commonality of preditory rape either in or out of marrage. Even the man lays with man issue is referencing the marrital status of the man with a woman. But sure bible is correct and earth is only 6 thousand years old.

3

u/wildmonster91 Mar 06 '25

I mean thats disputed. From what i gather its talking about the commonality of preditory rape either in or out of marrage. Even the man lays with man issue is referencing the marrital status of the man with a woman. But sure bible is correct and earth is only 6 thousand years old.

7

u/Godofmytoenails Mar 06 '25

Funniest thing about posts like these as you see delusional christianity defenders in the comments

4

u/TheButcherOfBaklava Mar 06 '25

1 Corinthians 6:9.

People like to adapt the Bible to their needs, thatā€™s regardless of the side youā€™re on. I donā€™t like when people say the Bible doesnā€™t denounce gay people. It most certainly does.

You should still love your neighbor and let god judge, if that is your belief system.

2

u/mischievous0ne 29d ago

Paul wrote these as letters to threaten his 'flock' to do as he wanted and a lot of these letters really come off as drunk texts.

4

u/Nuppusauruss Mar 06 '25 edited Mar 06 '25

Most of the time when Christians say that homosexuality is not a sin, what they mean is that we all are born with desires and tendencies. Simply having these tendencies is not sinful, it's just a part of being a human. Of course they usually just stop there, because the next part that's implied is that engaging in homosexual acts is a sin, even if having those wants isn't a sin. Which means that homosexuals aren't free to express their sexuality in Christianity, which might as well mean that Christianity doesn't accept homosexuality.

Of course there are plenty of more secular or liberal Christians who also accept homosexual acts, but just be aware whenever somebody specifically says that being a homosexual isn't a sin. They might not be as tolerant as they want you to think.

7

u/literallyhundreds Mar 06 '25

I would argue that it doesn't necessarily matter if it's a sin or not. We're all sinners in one way or another. It's not our place to judge others on their sin. "Take the plank out of your own eye." Matthew 7:3-5

3

u/Pan7h3r Mar 06 '25

Exactly this, being gay isn't a sin.. as long as you live the rest of your life celibate.

1

u/Snake_Plissken224 Mar 07 '25

No, I don't know who you are

1

u/darkmaninperth Mar 07 '25

I'm a Priest of the ULC.

If I can become a prostate, anyone can.

1

u/kozxt4cc0 Mar 07 '25

And you are...?

1

u/Mo-shen Mar 07 '25

The division here is that the claim that being gay is bad is actually a mistranslation.

The passive anti game people claim is "don't sleep with men" but many scholars say it's actually "dont sleep with boys"

The first interpretation is about gay people where ask the second is pedophilia.

Secondly gay relationships were extremely normal in the past and not seen as anything abnormal. In fact most societal rules simply revolved around how a woman was able to behave, patriarchy etc. Its not till much later when Christians decide they dislike gay relationships.

Lastly if memory serves there are stories of Jesus helping gay couples and it's not an issue. My memory is fuzzy on how many there are as it's been a while.

1

u/mischievous0ne 29d ago

King James really liked little boys. I wonder which version decided to change boy to man? šŸ¤”

1

u/Mo-shen 29d ago

No idea but many Jewish scholars openly say the old testament is talking about pedophilia and not being gay.

I guessing it's the usual thing that a group gains power and decides to fix things. Similar to getting a new manager or CEO that needs to reshape the business into their image.

1

u/mischievous0ne 29d ago

Fix, ha.

I agree across the board

1

u/keeleon Mar 07 '25

I have no idea who this is.

1

u/neeeeonbelly 28d ago

I know many pastors. Being a pastor doesn't mean you're an expert on anything. And all across christianity, pastors disagree about fucking everything lol

0

u/PersnicketyKeester Mar 06 '25

This is dumb. I don't need a pastor to tell me my lifestyle is ok.

-16

u/polandreh Mar 06 '25 edited Mar 06 '25

He may be a pastor, but he's clearly wrong.

I mean, aside from the Leviticus quotes, which are quite explicit, there's also many references against sodomy... which means I also would go to Hell, and I'm not gay, wink wink.

Edit: downvote me all you want. You're just defending a book whose followers have committed atrocities and numerous massacres in its name (Crusades, inquisitions, forced conversions, slavery, etc.), and whose stories within describe massacres against whoever goes against their ideas (Noah's flood, the Canaanites, the plagues of Egypt,...). Your so-called "religions of peace" are anything but that.

1

u/FjortoftsAirplane Mar 06 '25

Exactly what the sins of Sodom were in the Bible can be debated. Other references to same sex relations come under other laws that aren't thought to be needed to be followed today (no shellfish and all that jazz). It takes some work but there are ways to interpret it all to get to a Bible that doesn't condemn homosexuality.

Honestly, I think we'll probably get to a point where a lot of major denominations take those interpretations seriously. And, not being Christian, I don't really want discourage that. At the same time, it is creative interpretation, and it commits them to saying that for so many centuries people were just completely confused what the hell the Bible even meant until the rest of us figured out it was fine to be gay. Isn't the whole point supposed to be that they have this unchanging moral guide and they know better than the rest of us?

0

u/AdMurky1021 Mar 06 '25

There are zero references to sodomy. There are a few about Sodomy, the city.

1

u/polandreh Mar 06 '25

Well, d'uh. The word sodomy was derived from the city, but they didn't have a word for "anal sex" as such, which is why they come up with colorful metaphors to refer to it.

In 1 Corinthians, the original Greek uses words that refer to the passive and active participants to say "men who practice homosexuality,"

Saying the Bible does not condemn homosexuality is taking the texts out of its historical context and cherrypicking its meaning.

People want to paint these religions as progressive and inclusive, but tend to forget all the horrible things that happened in their name.

-5

u/Gravbar Mar 06 '25

Leviticus is basically deleted by the new testament. go through and you'll realize it's an entire book of rules that Christians don't follow. the point is that Jesus through coming unbounded us from those rules.

also sodomy didn't mean what it means now.

8

u/Wimbledofy Mar 06 '25

https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-17.htm

So what is Jesus referring to here?

0

u/Gravbar Mar 06 '25

Okay, explain why Christians don't follow the rules in the book of Leviticus then. Your options are A) because they don't believe they apply or B) because they are all sinning. If A) then it would be inconsistent to pick and choose rules from that book, if B) at least you're consistent, but now you can't eat shellfish.

-4

u/literally_tho_tbh Mar 06 '25

What did Bilbo mean when he said Old Toby was the finest pipeweed in all the Shire? It's about as real and tangible as anything said in the bible

2

u/Cole444Train Mar 06 '25

Jesus said several times (according to your wacky book at least) that you must keep all of the old law. He also contracted this several times, so do with that what you will

1

u/Gravbar Mar 06 '25

My point is that either Christians should follow all the rules in Leviticus or none of them. In fact, they disregard most of them, and only mention the book because it says a man shouldn't lay with another.

3

u/Cole444Train Mar 06 '25

Well it is literally impossible to follow all of them bc several of them contradict. But I hear you

1

u/polandreh Mar 06 '25

Yeah.... he also said his one commandment was "Love one another". But we know how much Christians tend to ignore that one....

-3

u/AffectionateHand2206 Mar 06 '25

He isn't. Christianity means freedom from the laws given to Moses which are considered as part of God's covenant with Israel.

-9

u/b0bscene Mar 06 '25

Is this Russ from Retro Game Corps?