r/eyebombing 13d ago

Googly-eye Jong Un wants your USB stick.

Post image
793 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

22

u/RichCorinthian 12d ago

Especially ironic given that dear daddy had a ridiculously huge library of western films, which Flat-Top Stalin here almost surely inherited.

135

u/Stenwold91 13d ago

Can we do this for America?

24

u/CaptainGashMallet 13d ago

I just knew this would be the first comment 😂

12

u/Stenwold91 13d ago

Yeah, can’t resist that low hanging fruit 😬

9

u/AutisticGayBlackJew 12d ago

Cool idea but do they even have devices that can play such content?

13

u/dogisbark 12d ago

They have computers in some offices and houses that run a custom os

2

u/No_Cook2983 11d ago

Instructions unclear. USB stuck in wok.

1

u/warp16 11d ago

general tso w/ 8 gigabytes of spice

2

u/l33774rd 12d ago edited 12d ago

Ok this is a cool idea. Glass half empty though this is to steal data. "We'll definitely erase your data we promise 😉". Devils advocate, assuming it's legit. How do they view the highly dangerous & illegal material? Material that they & their family members will be imprisoned for & probably "unalived" for if found. I'd bet 99.99999% of all USB ports are in the capital & 100% are heavily monitored.

1

u/BalanceOk6807 12d ago

Yeah but when they get caught possessing said USBs.... 💀

1

u/myxoma1 11d ago

I was gonna say the same, it's a great idea to help people but not if it will get them and their entire family erased

1

u/DeathByPetrichor 11d ago

How exactly are they getting that many USBs into North Korea?

3

u/SokkaHaikuBot 11d ago

Sokka-Haiku by DeathByPetrichor:

How exactly are

They getting that many USBs

Into North Korea?


Remember that one time Sokka accidentally used an extra syllable in that Haiku Battle in Ba Sing Se? That was a Sokka Haiku and you just made one.

1

u/DeathByPetrichor 11d ago

Good bot

1

u/B0tRank 11d ago

Thank you, DeathByPetrichor, for voting on SokkaHaikuBot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

-2

u/realistic_aside777 12d ago

Lmao standard chauvinist redditors has no idea about DPRK

-117

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 13d ago

So Human Rights are illegally copying movies thus breaking copyright laws?

101

u/damontoo 13d ago

In places like North Korea, where access to information is nearly non-existent, sharing films, books, and other media isn't about piracy. It is about human rights. It’s about giving people the chance to learn, think critically, and imagine a world beyond what the regime allows. People similarly smuggled the same content into The Soviet Union also despite being technically illegal.

If copyright law is the hill you want to die on while millions live in a digital and intellectual blackout… that’s a choice.

1

u/Ace_C7 9d ago

Gosh, that reminds me of Cloud Atlas. The film is about one soul being reincarnated throughout Earth's history. One of the reincarnations, Sonmi 451, was born as a clone labourer. She manages to stumble upon a clip, probably like 10 or so seconds, of her previous life's film. This clip inspires her to be more than a clone, to think for herself, and she uses that power to make a stand. And she brings about a revolution, all because she was able to think for herself.

I know it's a film but I remember how much the film spoke to me when I was a kid. It's a good watch.

I could talk for hours about copyright and piracy but I doubt anything I could add wouldn't just bounce off of this guy's nog any less than what you said probably will. You just reminded me of one of my favourite movies and wanted to share.

-91

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 13d ago

Theft creates a victim ..and you claim to be helping victims whilst saying theft is okay; nope.

63

u/damontoo 13d ago

There is no victim as nobody in North Korea would ever be able to actually purchase or otherwise consume the content being given to them. To have a victim, you have to prove harm. Prove this harms anyone.

35

u/JimboJamboJombo 13d ago

But think of the poor billion dollar media conglomerates, how will they get by now? /s

33

u/YesStupidQuestions1 13d ago

Why not put up material old enough for the copyright to have expired

-46

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 13d ago

Depending on the country, copyright is 25-50 years.

27

u/madnux8 13d ago

I know nothing about copyright laws but im going to say these things.

  1. Youre thinking Blackbeard (for profit) piracy when i think this infers Robin Hood (for charity) piracy.

  2. Given the digital world we live in there are lots of digital copy protections it seems. The post never mentioned how they would be doing it. They could be buying individual copies and placing them on the drives. If you buy 100 copies of a book and give 99 of them away, is that piracy? If a library buys 99 different books and allows people to borrow them, is that piracy?

  3. The risk NK citizens are assuming in even possessing these drives is probably not insignificant. And any creator looking for a PR stunt would love to be involved in the humanitarian effort.

-1

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 12d ago

I know copyright laws.

24

u/Roll_Ups 12d ago

Oh gods above!! Won't someone think of the Hollywood executives? clutches pearls

-4

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 12d ago

Thieving is thieving ..and if you had something stolen from you you sound like you would be the one screaming the loudest.

What's your address, let me send someone around to steal from you and see if your still so bravado about theft.

6

u/Competitive_Page3554 12d ago

Corporations aren't people. Get bent.

-4

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 12d ago

Theft is theft. Get honest.

7

u/Competitive_Page3554 12d ago

There is no harm in someone (north Korean civilian) viewing a pirated movie that they would not have ever paid for in any circumstance. No revenue is lost. No harm is done.

And even if it was, fuck corporations. They're not people, and the harm they do is not even close to being offset by the harm from the theft of their intellectual property.

Thanks javert.

You sound like you'd snitch on a starving man stealing an apple.

3

u/CurrentPossible2117 12d ago

Not necessarily. Theres a heap of film/tv/literature/educational material that's free to view and copy. Also, they may work with organisations to donate copies of normally paid materials. Nothing here indicates they're copying illegally...

1

u/lunarwolf2008 11d ago

who said illegally? maybe they bought a licence from the companies to fill usb drives

1

u/Andrew_Higginbottom 11d ago

Most likely not. Assumption, in the case ..is valid.