r/interestingasfuck Mar 06 '25

/r/all Chick with genetic defect

Post image
74.8k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

530

u/Lou_LL_11 Mar 06 '25

Genetic defect is just another word for evolution.

269

u/StonedEnby Mar 06 '25

Not really. A genetic defect is a precursor to evolution. If the trait doesn’t benefit the animal and isn’t passed on with reproduction there is no evolutionary process, just a dead mutant.

180

u/SousVideDiaper Mar 06 '25

not really

You just gave context for what they said, tho

87

u/Caspica Mar 06 '25

I think it's more that they're trying to point out the difference between evolution and genetic mutations. Evolution is what occurs on a macroscopic level over a long period of time to organisms. Genetic mutations are what happens on the microscopic level that could play part in the evolution of an organism. That doesn't mean that a genetic mutation implies that the animal has evolved. 

14

u/discordagitatedpeach Mar 06 '25

I'm an evolutionary biologist and this is incorrect. By definition, evolution occurs any time the frequency of alleles changes in a population. Microevolution is still evolution. That means that a single novel mutation is still evolution, even if it doesn't spread to fixation in the population.

2

u/yongo2807 29d ago

You don’t even have to be an expert.

De-ficere means to abandon (to fail, to desert, etc).

Evolution is the study of defects in the truest sense of the word. It’s the meaning of defect in the genetic context.

The only way genetic defects are not synonymous with evolution, is to not know what those words mean.

Their comment is a string of inherent contradictions, you don’t even need to know a single thing about anything, pure logic is enough to defeat their nonsense. The process consists of … but … is not part of the process.

Unintelligible bullshit.

2

u/Caspica 29d ago

Evolution is the study of defects in the truest sense of the word. It’s the meaning of defect in the genetic context.

The only way genetic defects are not synonymous with evolution, is to not know what those words mean.

That's literally not true. Evolution is not the "study of [genetic] defects in the truest sense of the word". There are a lot more processes to evolution than just mutations.

2

u/yongo2807 29d ago

Just because something is something, it can’t also be other things, be made up of multiple parts.

The biological study of evolution includes, and is fundamentally based on, studying the defects in replication going back as far as we can. Understanding which ones are ecologically viable and the spectrum of possible, and potentially real defects, is also an aspect of it.

For short, genetic defects is an accurate description of [one of] the mechanism[s] of evolution.

It’s sufficiently logical.