MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1j539dx/chick_with_genetic_defect/mghwds5/?context=9999
r/interestingasfuck • u/Significant_Snow_718 • 29d ago
3.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
12.1k
Why does this look functionally better than a normal chick?
4.0k u/Away-Wave-2044 29d ago This one has….evolved 1.8k u/_who-the-fuck-knows_ 29d ago This is kinda how evolution works. Random mutations in genes. The good mutations carry on through breeding. 1.2k u/Aridross 29d ago Bearing in mind that when you’re talking about evolution, “survives long enough to breed” is the only criterion for “good” that matters. 356 u/Kellei2983 29d ago you still need to be able to attract/get mate, survival on its own is not enough I'm looking at you, pandas 6 u/XanderZulark 28d ago Pandas would be fine if we hadn’t destroyed their habitat.
4.0k
This one has….evolved
1.8k u/_who-the-fuck-knows_ 29d ago This is kinda how evolution works. Random mutations in genes. The good mutations carry on through breeding. 1.2k u/Aridross 29d ago Bearing in mind that when you’re talking about evolution, “survives long enough to breed” is the only criterion for “good” that matters. 356 u/Kellei2983 29d ago you still need to be able to attract/get mate, survival on its own is not enough I'm looking at you, pandas 6 u/XanderZulark 28d ago Pandas would be fine if we hadn’t destroyed their habitat.
1.8k
This is kinda how evolution works. Random mutations in genes. The good mutations carry on through breeding.
1.2k u/Aridross 29d ago Bearing in mind that when you’re talking about evolution, “survives long enough to breed” is the only criterion for “good” that matters. 356 u/Kellei2983 29d ago you still need to be able to attract/get mate, survival on its own is not enough I'm looking at you, pandas 6 u/XanderZulark 28d ago Pandas would be fine if we hadn’t destroyed their habitat.
1.2k
Bearing in mind that when you’re talking about evolution, “survives long enough to breed” is the only criterion for “good” that matters.
356 u/Kellei2983 29d ago you still need to be able to attract/get mate, survival on its own is not enough I'm looking at you, pandas 6 u/XanderZulark 28d ago Pandas would be fine if we hadn’t destroyed their habitat.
356
you still need to be able to attract/get mate, survival on its own is not enough
I'm looking at you, pandas
6 u/XanderZulark 28d ago Pandas would be fine if we hadn’t destroyed their habitat.
6
Pandas would be fine if we hadn’t destroyed their habitat.
12.1k
u/Dramatic-Avocado4687 29d ago
Why does this look functionally better than a normal chick?