No no, I insist. You're the one doing that. Google psychological projection. Pretending to be stupid isn't an argument. If you don't have an actual response, just don't respond.
Oh, so you can arbitrarily limit what I'm allowed to reference what you said after you said it?
you're argument was to ask me fallacious questions to get me to say some variation of "the company is greedy". you don't get to avoid the context of the conversation because you didn't say a word.
Oh, so you can arbitrarily limit what I'm allowed to reference what you said after you said it?
you're argument was to ask me fallacious questions to get me to say some variation of "the company is greedy". you don't get to avoid the context of the conversation because you didn't say a word.
No I already spelled out for you that I think it could backfire. Not that it was greedy.
My original criticism was of you saying it was unsustainable to keep it at $60. I'm questioning you why that is but you're unable to explain that.
It's never been about greed. I think they'll be less profitable when they won't sell as much. We could've had a discussion but you're insufferable so guess not.
1
u/El_Giganto 1d ago
Where did I even call them greedy? You're not even arguing why it makes sense you're just justifying something completely irrelevant.