since the CCTV footage had been thrown out as evidence for being too low-quality to say it was him
I know the actual legal proceedings are always more complicated than anonymous redditors make it out to be, but how is that not the jury's responsibility to determine?
Because for whatever reason, a jury is supposed to use their option of the evidence, but also not be allowed to actually have an opinion. It's a fucked system.
Honestly I would prefer if we had it be people's actual job to work on a jury instead of a bunch of random people who don't really want to be there making these decisions. No system is perfect but it would be better than this crap.
I feel like that would lead to a whole new set of problems though. Like the jury always assuming the defendant is guilty because that's how the last 10 cases ended up.
3
u/sonofaresiii 1d ago
I know the actual legal proceedings are always more complicated than anonymous redditors make it out to be, but how is that not the jury's responsibility to determine?