r/movies 18d ago

Review 'Disney's Snow White' - Review Thread

Director - Marc Webb
Starring - Rachel Zegler, Gal Gadot, Andrew Burnapp, Martin Klebba, Ansu Kabia

A beautiful girl, Snow White, takes refuge in the forest in the house of seven dwarfs to hide from her stepmother, the wicked Queen. The Queen is jealous because she wants to be known as "the fairest in the land," and Snow White's beauty surpasses her own.

Rotten Tomatoes: 47% (Rotten)

Metacritic: 47/100 (Mixed or Average)

Some Reviews:

The Hollywood Reporter - David Rooney

Webb proves equally adept at romantic interludes, attack scenes and production numbers, notably the joyous finale, “Good Things Grow,” with the entire cast outfitted by Powell in resplendent white. Sure, those poorly integrated CG little people take some getting used to, but this is the type of wholesome and uplifting family entertainment that comes directly from old-school Disney DNA.

Awards Watch - Erik Anderson [C+]

Snow White is more clearly made for children than most of the other Disney live-action remakes, and its focus on being a fairytale helps with that goal. This is a simple story that anyone can understand and enjoy, with a cheer-worthy lead and some catchy, if unmemorable, new songs. The film threads the needle about as well as it possibly could, which is impressive even if it doesn’t mean the film is actually great. You may not be whistling on your way out of the theater, but at least watching Snow White doesn’t feel like work.

Variety - Owen Glieberman

You could say that we’ve seen other fairy-tale rulers a lot like this one. Yet movies connect in mysterious ways. Who would have thought that a Disney live-action remake could seem this pointedly political? In the end, the most resonant romantic feeling “Snow White” leaves you with may be: Someday my chintz authoritarian will come tumbling down.

FandomWire - Manuel

Rachel Zegler is the heart and soul of this film. Not only does she deliver an impressive vocal performance, but she also radiates charisma and emotion in every scene. Her Snow White is fearless, fair, brave, and true like she should be, elevating the character to a new level of sophistication. It’s disappointing to see how many people will leave outside influences to shape their perception of her work because this is, without a doubt, one of the most memorable performances of the year from one of the most talented actresses of her generation.

Independent (UK) - Clarisse Loughrey [1/5]

With Snow White, they’ve finessed their formula -- do the bare minimum to make a film, then simply slap a bunch of cutesy CGI animals all over it and hope no one notices. The film’s prince, played by Andrew Burnap and, for some reason, called Jonathan, is essentially Disney cannibalising itself, as he has the same thief backstory and curtain bangs as Tangled’s Flynn Rider. There’s self-cannibalisation at work, too, in Sandy Powell’s costumes, which are dour replicas of their animated counterparts. At times, Zegler’s bob leans dangerously close to “little Dutch boy”. What’s most disheartening about it all is how predictable Disney’s choices have become.

The Daily Beast - Nick Schager

From a strictly political standpoint, it provides a more enlightened portrait of female independence. Such a nominal improvement, however, proves inherently incompatible with its source material, and the resultant awkwardness defines this misfire, whose every duplication is underwhelming, and whose every alteration is less a move in the right direction than a step on a face-smacking rake. No Magic Mirror is needed to identify it as the lamest Mouse House re-do of them all.

Guardian - Peter Bradshaw [1/4]

Those otherwise estimable performers Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot are now forced to go through the motions, and they give the dullest performances of their lives. Here is a pointless new live-action musical version of the Snow White myth, a kind of un-Wicked approach to the story and a merch-enabling money machine. Where other movies are playfully reimagining the backstories of famous villains, this one plays it straight, but with carefully curated revisionist tweaks.

RogerEbert.com - Nell Minow

Some parts of the film work better than others, but none of it has the sweetness and imagination of the animated feature. This “Snow White” is not the fairest of them all. It’s just, well, fair. The other core elements of any version of this story are all present here, with varying degrees of success. Near the top is replicating Disney’s version of the iconic magic mirror that answers the question about fairness (the mirror for “Sydney White’s” nemesis is the online campus popularity poll). This one is close to the 1937 film’s design, familiar to Disney fans through many appearances in various productions, from the “Wonderful World of Disney” series of the 1950s, when it was voiced by Hans Conried, through the popular “Descendents: Wicked World” series of 2015-17.

The Film Verdict - Alonso Duralde

Like so much of contemporary fantasy cinema, Snow White exists in a weirdly artificial netherworld, and not just where the seven dudes are concerned.

AV Club - Jacob Oller

For every attempt to replicate majestic shots from the original or to give them a bit of technological oomph (perhaps most effective as sunlight breaks through Snow White’s fearful first trip through the forest), there is a spurt of modern quippiness that pulls the audience in the other direction. It’s a disorienting take on a film whose success relied as much on its elegance as its beauty, and yet, thanks to sunny songstress Rachel Zegler, there is a talented throughline still obvious amidst the mess.

New York Magazine/Vulture - Alison Willmore

Snow White is, for better and (mostly) worse, a product of a corporation that has for years been lumbering after its idea of the zeitgeist with all the agility of an aging colossus. That, in chasing something vaguely progressive and YA-inspired with Snow White, Disney has turned out a film with some hilariously timely choices is a great joke, though I wouldn’t call it an intentional one. The most pragmatic aspect of Snow White is that with its plasticky set design and gift shop tacky costuming, it already looks like it takes place in a theme park — no adaptations necessary.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller [C+]

At the end of the day, the best parts of Snow White are the parts that feel genuinely real and authentic. If only there were more of those, and less screen time spent dancing in the realm of mind-breaking absurdity.

The Playlist - Rodrigo Perez [C-]

Films are supposed to be passion projects, even the biggest and kitschiest, but one wonders what in this material compelled Marc Webb to dedicate two years of his life to this hollow and soulless project seemingly meant to move merchandise other than hopefully what was a very handsome paycheck. White interjecting its social commentary, “Snow White” otherwise tackles much of the same ideas, but it’s all put together in a very familiar and garish package. The fairest in the land? Far from it.

886 Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

146

u/kiyonemakibi100 18d ago

I mean look how the live-action Dumbo didn't do that well either (90s/2000s nostalgia is much higher than 1930s/1940s nostalgia), and while Cinderella did do well, this film cost 2.5-3 times more than that did for some inexplicable reason. But some people can only see things through an endless tedious culture war prism.

57

u/Puzzled-Tap8042 18d ago

The Dumbo movie was poorly received, this has nothing to do with popularity, if it was good it would have good word of mouth

42

u/Worthyness 18d ago

Poor Pete's Dragon adaptation. That was a good movie (better than the original in some aspects).

21

u/-SneakySnake- 18d ago

This is why it annoys me about these Disney things; some of those movies were flawed to begin with, or aged horribly. It's legitimately a great chance to go back and give it another try with hindsight and fresh ideas. Instead, it's just the same thing again but boiled to the point of being inoffensive gruel.

2

u/Amaruq93 18d ago

some of those movies were flawed to begin with, or aged horribly

The original Pete's Dragon opens with a bunch of rednecks singing about how they're gonna beat and enslave a small boy.

5

u/saintash 18d ago

Like I don't want to see a live adaptation of One of these stories that's filled to the Is brim with CGI.

Like you could have done something really cool with snow white. By giving the dwarf something more to do than be the fun little guys who let her stay at the house if she cleans.Make them actual characters.

Instead Peter Dinklage made a crappy comment about snow white Remake and suddenly they have to be CGI. And there goes any hope in turning them into anything else.

3

u/-SneakySnake- 18d ago

Just make them more dwarves than dwarfs. Which they're supposed to be anyway. Problem solved.

3

u/saintash 18d ago

That's why reference the Peter Dinklage Comment. I looked up the quote

"Take a step back and look at what you're doing there. It makes no sense to me,. "You're progressive in one way and you're still making that fing backward story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together, what the f are you doing, man?"

Right after he said that they announced they weren't going to cast any actual dwarves and instead make them CGI's as to not offend people Is actual little people.

They actually hadn't cast any of the dwarfs and we're talking about possibly doing some stuff a little different when that quote came out.

After that the announce they were just doing CGI. To not offend the little person community.

I'm not a little person so I can't make Fair call here but it seems like Peter Dinklage basically lost 7 potential little people major role in a franchise. And kind of boxed Disney into a position where Their only option was to be like you're right casting little people as dwarves is bad so will just make them cgi.

2

u/HawaiianKicks 18d ago

Yeah, blame the actor making an offhand comment on a comedian's podcast and not the massive corporation that's over-reliant on CGI and remakes.

Dinklage never claimed to speak on behalf of anyone else and if you actually listen to that segment of the podcast, he doesn't sound entirely serious in the way he expresses himself. So if you actually buy that Disney was ever going to cast little people as the Dwarfs instead of using CGI(like they tend to do these days), it's still Disney's decision to not cast seven little people instead of an actor who only made one comment about it one time on a podcast.

3

u/saintash 18d ago

I'm tentatively trying to say that the fact that it made news is more the issue not his comment.

I mean it was blown up and kinda everywhere for a few days and that's enough for a single executive to make a decision. Especially in the context of them trying to be like what we're casting a non white person to play snow white and show we think all girls to think they can be princess not just white ones.

They have made quick decisions like that for dumber reasons.

But then again I'm talking out of my ass. I don't know the what's or whys of the choices they made.

Do think the dwarfs being CGI is unnecessary and dumb? yes.

Do I think they could have done something better by making 7 dwarfs living characters. Who could do more? Yes.

Do I think Disney would rather just kinda make the same film but with cgi and call it a day? Yes.

2

u/HawaiianKicks 18d ago

I'm tentatively trying to say that the fact that it made news is more the issue not his comment.

What you wrote above seemed to be blaming the actor and coming across as Disney was "boxed in" and didn't have a choice. I don't know, that's how it came across to me.

I mean it was blown up and kinda everywhere for a few days and that's enough for a single executive to make a decision.

I definitely agree that media blew it up a ridiculous amount. At that time I went and listened to that podcast segment myself and I didn't even think he came across as being overly serious about his offhand comment. I just don't agree with blaming Dinklage unless it comes out he was strongly pressuring Disney behind the scenes or something like that but there isn't any evidence of that, as far as I know. I think the blame is on Disney.

I just don't believe Disney was ever going to use anything but CGI for the Dwarfs. It's what they do.

I don't know the what's or whys of the choices they made.

Yeah who knows what's behind their illogical decisions

→ More replies (0)

1

u/blankedboy 18d ago

That remake was genuinely great, and I saw that as someone who grew up with the original and absolutely loved it.

1

u/peterhohman 18d ago

Honestly one of the better David Lowery films, which is high praise!

1

u/joshuatx 18d ago

That was well done and completely flew under the radar.

Disney passed on Nimona too IIRC.

They make Poochie the Dog content.

7

u/sfitz0076 18d ago

And that was directed by a guy who actually knows something about directing

6

u/Griffdude13 18d ago

They did heavy reshoots, apparently? It was shot in 2022, then they did a lot more filming in 2024.

3

u/eienmau 17d ago

I love the Cinderalla LA and I'm not a super-big fan of the animated Cinderella (I do love Ever After, and the LA hews a bit more closely to that I guess..).

It was just very well done and perfectly cast, for me.

2

u/natfutsock 18d ago

Jesus Christ, I'm not even joking, I had absolutely no clue they did a live action Dumbo.

4

u/irongix 18d ago

Michael Keaton, Danny DeVito, Colin Farrell, Eva Green, and directed by Tim Burton.

2

u/NEWaytheWIND 18d ago

But some people can only see things through an endless tedious culture war prism.

Disney played a huge part in krafting that krazy kaleidoscope, so I'm glad they're suffering the consequences.

1

u/CommanderDataisGod 9d ago

I am sure a man who makes over 200k a year had a really great powerpoint that the execs loved explaining why this film was going to do great, because on paper, it hit every note. Gal G. and 'action start', Rachel Z. for the young people, great CGI and a vague connection to a story people like....lots of data and analytics....and absolutely no appreciation for the fact that it is neither 1940 nor 1990 anymore. That world is dead. A lot of things from those times could never be remade again because that world/America is gone and never coming back.