r/neoliberal NATO 1d ago

News (US) Obama and Harris publicly rebuke Trump’s second-term actions

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/04/politics/obama-harris-rebuke-trump/index.html
1.0k Upvotes

80 comments sorted by

370

u/DeparturePlenty4446 1d ago

Thanks, Obamna

48

u/Hi9hlife 1d ago

5

u/101Alexander 1d ago

What is the context of this?

27

u/Death_by_carfire 1d ago

Biden was saying Minnesota

4

u/RhetoricalMenace this sub isn't neoliberal 1d ago

This does not explain it.

23

u/Death_by_carfire 1d ago

https://youtu.be/80BwqQQY31w?si=ssb2q1aIWCzlTqom

I dont really know how to explain what was a brainrot shitpost but here's the OG

-3

u/sluttytinkerbells 1d ago

Yeah I hate stupid no context comedy shit like this.

8

u/Excellent-Juice8545 Commonwealth 1d ago

Trump actually said “Obamna”. The Biden part is just from him saying Minnesota.

13

u/breadlygames 1d ago edited 1d ago

This, but unironically. IIRC, the Obamas privately supported dropping Biden after the debate disaster, which is good. But they wanted his replacement to be Harris, which brought all of the baggage of Biden's unpopular (deservedly or not) administration. If you looked at the betting markets, you'd have seen she had the worst conditional odds of any Democratic candidate. Gretchen Whitmer had the best conditional odds, by quite a ways, if memory serves. Against Trump, we should have gone with the candidate who had the best odds.

28

u/585AM 1d ago edited 1d ago

How? A backroom deal? People are still complaining about the 2016 primary being “rigged.”

A convention in short notice? Did everyone suddenly forget that the reason certain candidates all dropped amount and endorsed Biden in 2020 was because the Sanders campaign publicly announced that the nomination should go to the candidate who wins a plurality delegates rather than the candidate who gets the majority through a brokered convention. A convention that would have been absolutely dominated by one issue and one issue only. Do you remember the shit show in 2016 over the TPP? A great trade agreement. Now replace that with a convention dominated by Israel and Palestine.

I think Whitmer would have been a great candidate, but there was no guaranteed path to get her there. It suck. It would have been great if Biden declined to run originally, but that was not the hand they were given shortly before the election.

1

u/breadlygames 1d ago

Yeah, backroom. The main party influencers (e.g. Pelosi and the Obamas), should have had an eye on the betting markets, and acted very early to prevent the highest-odds candidates dropping out. Then once they knew who was willing to run, supported the candidate with the best conditional odds (while remaining silent about doing so, so that the markets weren't manipulated).

I'm not talking about guarantees. There are no guarantees in politics. I'm talking about playing the odds correctly.

9

u/IpsoFuckoffo 23h ago

while remaining silent about doing so, so that the markets weren't manipulated

Lmao sure buddy nobody would have bothered to ask why the current VP wasn't running. And if they did she would simply have waved her hand and say vaguely "I didn't really feel like it" and then everyone would have moved on.

13

u/Curious-Caramel-4937 NATO 1d ago

Lost me at betting markets. Probably the worst way to analyze the situation.

-1

u/breadlygames 1d ago

Pretty weird position to hold for a neoliberal. If people think they're more accurate than the betting markets, they can bet, and if they're right, they improve the market's prediction. If they're wrong they lose money, and thus have less influence over the odds.

If you think their odds are garbage, you should bet, and see how right you are.

12

u/captmonkey Henry George 23h ago

Betting markets are skewed by the beliefs of the kind of people who use betting markets.

1

u/Curious-Caramel-4937 NATO 20h ago

Regardless of if I am right or wrong in a prediction it doesn't make prediction markets good tools to predict outcomes with. Even if it was right on this election it doesn't actually help the understanding of anything.  Why would you draw conclusions from the beliefs of betting markets users and not from voters with polling?

0

u/breadlygames 14h ago edited 10h ago

And just how are you going to get a pure random sample from a voluntary poll? When separate pollsters get different results, how do you weight them? What about poll recency? And how do you factor in predictable changes in public opinion in the lead up to the election? It was only after Harris became the candidate that people could see themselves voting for her. (Conditional polls often produce garbage results because people don't think too hard about hypotheticals.)

Prediction markets already factor all of this in. They also change with the polls, but in an appropriately measured way (e.g. not overreacting to outliers or low quality pollsters). Your suggestion is similar to mine, but lacking in details, and once you fill those details in, it's worse in every way.

Betting odds are literally just another asset class (specifically, they're binary options). For the same reason free markets are the best way to value companies, betting markets are the best way to put a probablity on a partition of events. The only reason you'd argue against this is degenerate gamblers, but many, many degens bet using the stock market too (many degen fund managers and retail investors exist). You're just dead fucking wrong here.

7

u/benkkelly 1d ago

I thought Obama was anti Harris?

-1

u/breadlygames 1d ago

Hmm looks like there was some news recently that says you're right, which I missed. I was basing my opinion on the fact that they publicly supported her soon after Biden pulled out. 

450

u/Icy-Magician-8085 Mario Draghi 1d ago

Completely unrelated, but seeing Obama greyed out makes me feel old and I’m in my 20’s 😭

265

u/SpiffShientz Court Jester Steve 1d ago

He's been grayed out since his second term

161

u/Icy-Magician-8085 Mario Draghi 1d ago

I know it’s been happening but it’s a complete light grey now. The once or twice a year I see a picture of him in the news he just looks significantly older than my childhood and it hits me.

106

u/anothercocycle 1d ago

Yeah, I think it's especially bad because youth was such a key part of his image. Even now when I think about Obama I can't help but think of him as a young politician for an instant before my brain kicks in.

80

u/arbrebiere NATO 1d ago

Compared to the last three presidents he still is a young politician

26

u/RaaaaaaaNoYokShinRyu YIMBY 1d ago

He's an oldman, and the others are dinos

5

u/Khiva 1d ago

I mean, as has been pointed out Bill Clinton is still younger.

37

u/ProudScroll NATO 1d ago

The fact that he is significantly younger than either of successors probably plays a big role in this.

25

u/surgingchaos Friedrich Hayek 1d ago

It doesn't help that we have had zero Gen X presidents, and Obama is the only person from Generation Jones. Gen X has a ton of shit politically about them that sucks, but I think a big untold problem with the presidency being seen as a gerontocracy is in large part to do with the fact that two full generations have been locked out of the White House despite being in the primes of their careers.

The fact that JD Vance is the very first millennial just to be on a presidential ticket shows just how much the American political system is heavily biased towards older generations.

5

u/MayorofTromaville YIMBY 1d ago

I mean, the Silent Generation just barely managed to get their first president with Biden.

1

u/Harudera 1d ago

Yeah and they're the parents of Gen X, and both generations are eclipsed by size of the ones right after them, the Boomer and Millennials.

1

u/DiogenesLaertys 1d ago

He was cherry picked by Generation X though. Thiel had a big hand in helping him up.

24

u/NeueBruecke_Detektiv 1d ago

Lies, he ain't grey while playing CoD with biden in the pandemic 

You can't fool me

46

u/Louis_de_Gaspesie 1d ago

He looks pretty damn good for 63 tho. Like yea his hair is gray but overall he's aged pretty well

34

u/Okbuddyliberals Miss Me Yet? 1d ago

Obama is 63 years old

16

u/wallander1983 Resistance Lib 1d ago

Oh dear god.

16

u/Okbuddyliberals Miss Me Yet? 1d ago

Obama's birth was closer to the assassination of William McKinley than to today

3

u/wallander1983 Resistance Lib 1d ago

Stop it.:(

6

u/One_Bison_5139 1d ago

Cleopatra was born closer to the first moon landing than the construction of the pyramids

... wait

0

u/Mickenfox European Union 23h ago

By American standards he still has two political careers ahead of him.

10

u/Shalaiyn European Union 1d ago

I've been going grey since my mid-20's. So yeah.

8

u/Foucault_Please_No Emma Lazarus 1d ago

It's because he's the master of magnetism.

5

u/Sine_Fine_Belli NATO 1d ago

Same here honestly, for real

59

u/ForgetTheRuralJuror 1d ago

In the name of The Lord I REBUKE Trump's second term.

116

u/DraconianWolf George Soros 1d ago

Hope he starts "trolling" the media with talks of a third term so we can all claim Republicans are overreacting to an obvious joke

127

u/FartBarf6969 Niels Bohr 1d ago

Nah, lets not normalize the rhetoric. It would be funny for us but its also all Fox News need to do the "see? Both sides do it, what he is saying is normal" schtick.

25

u/miss_shivers 1d ago

The right way to do it is for Obama to make it an obvious joke.

88

u/Underyx 1d ago

“He’s not gonna make a third term legal cause he knows he’d just lose against me.” – based Obama, in my dreams

20

u/miss_shivers 1d ago

That's exactly the line. Nicely done.

1

u/k5berry 18h ago

Once it leaves Trump’s mouth, it is normalized. They don’t need a both sides to point to, the gravitational pull of Teflon Don is strong enough. So I think something low stakes like this is an example of where we can’t be obsessed with coloring within the lines out of fear we’ll ruin the image, because our playmate just took a shit on the paper.

And for a HOT take: if the judiciary bends the knee and finds Trump eligible for a third term… why not run Obama again if he is our best shot? Not that I want that, I actively beg it does not come to that. But if it came to that point and if it were our best shot, it wouldn’t just be OK to do it IMO, we’d have an imperative to do it. In a civic fantasy world, he could even run, win, make whatever changes are needed to ensure our democratic institutions are stronger, and then resign.

110

u/miss_shivers 1d ago

About time. These two need to be a lot more vocal.

261

u/iusedtobekewl Jerome Powell 1d ago edited 1d ago

I mean yes but also they put this shit on blast before the election and nobody listened to them. Pile on all the people blaming them for losing the election to this moron, and I don’t blame them for being silent until now.

They warned us all, and Kamala Harris even torched Trump about in their debate, and 77,284,118 people still didn’t listen.

80

u/homerpezdispenser Janet Yellen 1d ago edited 1d ago

From a messaging and media relations perspective, a few chill "I warned ya" moments might be best. It's not as if Obama and Harris taking it up to 11 again "THE NATION IS FALLING APART" would reach people vs diminishing returns or just backfiring somehow. This kind of tone might reach and persuade the largest amount of people possible right now, in a way that's most meaningful and effective for now. Or maybe it should be something else, IDK - the point is whatever gets Medians lapping it up and talking.

62

u/betafish2345 1d ago

“Medians” lol. That needs to be a slur.

18

u/Foucault_Please_No Emma Lazarus 1d ago

I'm down but u/p00bix would ruin our fun as soon as he caught wind.

10

u/Beer-survivalist Karl Popper 1d ago

I can't even say regarded with the fash mod thought police showing up.

6

u/Foucault_Please_No Emma Lazarus 1d ago

They hate fun. And minorities. But mostly fun.

4

u/betafish2345 1d ago

🤫

6

u/Khiva 1d ago

Or sabotage it by running the joke into the absolute ground and grinding into atomized dust with the automod.

"Medians? Don't you mean people of ignorance?"

2

u/homerpezdispenser Janet Yellen 1d ago

Love em on roads, love em in data analysis, ... In my electorate though ...

11

u/Healingjoe It's Klobberin' Time 1d ago

Correct. Oftentimes, less is more.

Obama waiting until now before rebuking Trump was an astute move.

22

u/BozoFromZozo 1d ago

I think both are aware of the risk of speaking out, not only for themselves or their family, but also being a convenient foil for Trump to rage against and end up muddying the waters.

9

u/byproxxy George Soros 1d ago

I’d like to live in the universe where them being more vocal would make things better. I really would.

11

u/JapanesePeso Deregulate stuff idc what 1d ago

Them being more vocal does not change the calculus even a tiny bit.

-3

u/miss_shivers 1d ago

Whatever that means.

1

u/PleaseGreaseTheL World Bank 1d ago

It means this is meaningless, Obama and Harris don't fucking matter in 2025, this is just a dose of copium for us.

20

u/Cultural_Ebb4794 Bill Gates 1d ago

What does matter then? Everyone's butthurt about the dems "doing nothing," but when you have two of the most influential dems in the country speak out it's meaningless and doesn't matter?

-1

u/PleaseGreaseTheL World Bank 1d ago

I guess I want people actually

  1. in office, or
  2. running for office,

to actually do stuff that might have an impact on how shit is run. For instance, Schmuck Schumer could have done literally anything to try and obstruct this admin, and instead enabled it. That mattered.

These two speaking out literally doesn't sway anyone. Zero MAGA people respect either of them, they fucking despise both of them - they're both minorities, they're both democrats, they're both seen as leftist socialist demons who want to destroy America. Many median voters don't like them either (Harris literally just lost the election to the guy she's speaking out against - and lots of people still hate her and blame the modern Democratic party, under her and Biden, for enabling Gaza, whether or not that makes sense or is true/fair.)

This is. Pure. Cope. This is an attempt to substitute people who actually are in power and could do at least some obstruction and truly notable shit, like Cory Booker, for two former candidate who nobody in power fucking cares about and the electorate either hates or who has moved on from.

9

u/Dependent-Picture507 1d ago edited 1d ago

Chuck Schumer had no leverage and shutting down the government at that point would not have accomplished anything since the Republicans would just say no to anything the Dems proposed, since the Dems have no leverage. Trump and Elon would love the government to close so Trump can spend more time golfing and Elon could pillage with even less oversight. It was a lose-lose situation.

Fact is, Democrats have no power and all they can do is work on messaging and filling the voids that the Republicans are creating like town halls and such. Call them out on their bullshit. Track every action of the admin and file lawsuit after lawsuit. Hold out until we get an opportunity to exercise some kind of power.

This tariff fiasco may push enough people over the edge where Democrats will have an opportunity to begin seriously damaging the Trump admin's hold on power. Trump has overreached and if the Democrats play it right and focus the messaging on what has been unleashed on us, I think we can damage the Trump brand to the point where people will turn on him in enough numbers to empower the Republicans in office to turn on him. We don't need them all, we just need enough to push through some votes. As much as I don't like him, people like Rand Paul will vote with the Democrats on this.

Many people don't give a fuck about some random people they don't know getting deported without due process. It's easy to ignore that if you are a selfish person. But if your 401k just lost a quarter of its value, you're not gonna just brush it off. I am hopeful that this is the turning point. The damage that these tariffs have done to the global order and global economy is staggering. Undoing this damage will take time. But this is the best opportunity to come at Trump hard, open the tent, and try to get enough of the people in the middle to acknowledge the fact that Trump is just a moron and doesn't have some masterplan beyond power and money for himself and only himself.

This is not a time for Dems to be conducting purity tests, and I'm glad to see them move away from that toxic behavior. At the end of the day, this is a fight between those of us that like this whole western liberal order thing and want us to maintain our influence vs those that want to tear it down for one reason or another. Luckily, there are more of us and we just need to focus on aligning everyone on the same side. There are plenty of Republicans that want to dump Trump, they just need to be given the exit ramp.

If you haven't watched the Newsom podcast with the mooch, I highly recommend it. I didn't realize how much of a 180 the mooch has done. He is speaking honestly and open about the situation like almost nobody I've seen.

https://youtu.be/7jlZIKNL318

1

u/Moth-of-Asphodel 13h ago

I'm so done with this guy.

Bring out Bill and Joe and you have my attention.

-6

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

29

u/HowardtheFalse Kofi Annan 1d ago

Ok but what if Trump actually did say something funny? He's awful in more ways than can be expressed but I don't think anybody here hasn't laughed at something he said at some point, like asking "At that age it's marginal, right?" to the kid who still believed in Christmas.

Obama is also really funny, just look at his Rahm Emanuel joke, so this pic doesn't really surprise me at all. I get people who are really focused on optics may be but they were at a funeral and seated by each other.

-8

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/HowardtheFalse Kofi Annan 1d ago

You don't get as far along in politics as to be seated at the Presidents' section of Jimmy Carter's state funeral if you're the kind of person who can't be in a room with unsavory people.

If Donald Trump offends you now, imagine how much more he would offend you if he claimed you were a false American, born in Kenya? And the Americans still elected him? If I were Obama I'd be like fuck this country too, but instead he still campaigned in 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2024 and none of that service is undone or discredited by one pic of laughing at a joke.

Blow a rape whistle and the right would call you hysterical and uptight while the left would say you made Carter's send-off all about yourself and took away attention from the most decent man to serve as US president in a century.

3

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Jimmy Carter

Georgia just got 1m2 bigger. 🥹

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

7

u/arist0geiton Montesquieu 1d ago

I would have blown my rape whistle instead,

At jimmy Carter's funeral? Do you often make scenes at solemn events?

2

u/HowardtheFalse Kofi Annan 1d ago edited 1d ago

If they blew a rape whistle at merely sitting by Trump during Jimmy "Notorious Do-gooder" Carter's funeral, I kind of wonder how they'd tackle the 2017 inauguration.

Which to prioritize? My "not being in the same room as a rapist" virtue or the tradition of peacefully transfer of power? It's silly to act like this one funeral pic summarizes the Obama-Trump relationship.

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

jimmy Carter

Georgia just got 1m2 bigger. 🥹

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/neoliberal-ModTeam 1d ago

Rule III: Unconstructive engagement
Do not post with the intent to provoke, mischaracterize, or troll other users rather than meaningfully contributing to the conversation. Don't disrupt serious discussions. Bad opinions are not automatically unconstructive.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.

-35

u/BlackCat159 European Union 1d ago

They're just different sides of the same communist coin...