Twin study suggests rationality and intelligence share the same genetic roots - the study suggests that being irrational, or making illogical choices, might simply be another way of measuring lower intelligence.

[u/mvea]

https://www.psypost.org/twin-study-suggests-rationality-and-intelligence-share-the-same-genetic-roots/

[u/Dmeechropher]

Yes and no. There are plenty of leadership positions in technical disciplines which require a basic bachelor degree and networking/experience.

Usually, the qualification matters way less than proving yourself as intelligent AND able to get things done. People who are smart, but can't even fake it til they make it in university usually have other issues which make them a bad worker or team member.

I would be the first to advocate for a more equitable education environment, both in terms of support for different neurotypes (I have ADHD, for instance) and financially.

I've spent some time inside and outside of academia, and, frankly, most "misunderstood genius" types were not especially different in intelligence from other smart folks I've met, but often have glaring personality, behavioral, or character flaws which prevent them from being a good worker. I'm of the general belief that it's ok to use an educational document as one proxy for qualification, as long as that document isn't sufficient for a good candidate.

[u/BlipOnNobodysRadar → u/Dmeechropher]

"require a basic bachelor degree and experience"

That's not a counterpoint. That's just saying "no but actually yes". 4 years, lots of money, and working off credentialism just to get your foot in the door to even be *considered* for an impactful position. That's not even accounting for the likelihood you'll be passed over in favor of some incompetent person with more impressive sounding credentials.

Empirical assessments relevant to the position at hand would be infinitely preferable to the current professional system of networking and credentialism. Alas, it seems to have been made semi-illegal.