r/science • u/mvea Professor | Medicine • 16d ago
Neuroscience ADHD misinformation on TikTok is shaping young adults’ perceptions. An analysis of the 100 most-viewed TikTok videos related to ADHD revealed that fewer than half the claims about symptoms actually align with clinical guidelines for diagnosing ADHD.
https://news.ubc.ca/2025/03/adhd-misinformation-on-tiktok/
27.8k
Upvotes
73
u/moubliepas 16d ago
I think a large part of the problem isn't so much tiktok itself, it's what we're seeing on this thread.
Studies and evidence say Thing, but if people don't like Thing, it's immediately discounted in favour of vibes, hearsay, social media.
Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria? Not only is it not evidenced, there is a lot of evidence to say it's heavily linked to various factors like personality, social circle, confidence, even occupation, gender, ethnicity... But that doesn't seem to matter. If you feel it and you've got ADHD, it must be a symptom of ADHD and no amount of studies or auto-mod posts or anything will change people's minds.
I don't know why it is, but it's a pretty common opinion that if someone seems to be thinking in an illogical way, you should ask them what it would take for them to change their minds. If they say 'I'd change my mind if there were x amount of studies from reliable sources' or 'strong evidence of other things that would explain it' or 'if I saw it with my own eyes', fine, you can probably reason with them. If they say 'I'd change my mind if [specific person] said otherwise' or 'if everyone agreed' or 'if someone explained it in a way I fully understood', then they don't know how evidence works so there's no point trying to show them evidence. And if they say 'nothing would make me change my mind', there is absolutely no point discussing it.
I feel like we're seeing the third type here, or possibly the second.
At best, it could be people are wildly misinterpreting 'neurodiverse' to mean 'thinks and feels differently to most other people', in which case yes, about half the population would count. The options aren't 'neurodiverse' and 'neuroaverage', though, or even 'neuro-what-you've-seen-in-the-media'. Everybody is different, everybody has struggles and weaknesses, everybody's brain and emotions have weird janky bits that get in the way of real life.
But I feel like there's some major cultural or generational thing that I just don't get, that means so many people actively want a specific diagnosis, for no reason that I can tell.
That's not really my business, people can think what they like and if I don't get it, that's a me thing. But I do wonder what's going to happen to science in 10 or 20 years