Just stop doing the work unless it directly affects you.

Make your own individual meals, no leftovers. Wash your own dishes only.

Wash your clothes and towels only.

Straighten up after yourself only.

Do shopping, errands, transportation for you only.

And do it without saying a word or making an announcement.

Doing this type of thing sets up every other coworker as being expected to do the same.

I don't see it as 'nice' i see it as setting up unsuspecting peers to fail.

ACLU.

It's gonna hit them/us all, that don't have 5 billion

Not sure work can do that then. Protected status - unless the orange thing wiped that out too.

Untrained 'emotional support' animals are an entirely different category.

Yeah. My 10 year olds could garden. They certainly didn't do the industrial farming that these people are assuming.

Edit. My comment wasn't survivability. It is Clearly about the assumption of needing industrial farming vs digging a hole and putting a seed in the ground.

I don't game 🥺 but I get people to the next level

Finally seeing a response from someone who gets it.

Awesome

It is that easy.

Gardeners do it all the time.

It's completely amazing to me how the answers seem to be from those who can't imagine life going on without being at the currently used practices.

Like it's impossible to even imagine that the way of life would completely change and current practices would be obsolete.

Humans do stay loyal to an egocentric view.

Yup.

There you said it.

Industrial farming.

It Won't be the same world. Your current view will be obsolete

As you mentioned. You know about "modern" farming.

Farmers know how to grow their own garden and that can be done with hand tools.

This thread appears to emphasize that the world continuing as you currently know it, would be imperative. I think not.

They won't need "modern"/industrial farming. They won't be feeding the world

An actual trained service dog?

Edit, that wears a working vest?

I quit greatclips years ago.

This makes me even happier that I did.

Wasn't there.

Still, it appears that the driver Actually hit the riders, so that 'try' that you mention appears to have been a successful assault, and vehicles have commonly been called deadly weapons.

btw, it's harder than you think to 'run over' something. Ask the (small) deer that just skidded ahead of my wheel getting a good case of road rash; it completely disregarded the commonly held belief that it's easy to 'run over' things like deer (and people?)

Now assure voting rights and any gerrymandering

Not really, to anyone that knows how to read research

As well as the margin for error being different in each group, fairly significantly.

Really?

It's a comment about the med, not the article

Dose dependent