r/ClaudeAI 3d ago

News: This was built using Claude I used Claude to make another game

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

90 Upvotes

Hey everyone,

I created another game using Claude for a game jam of sorts. Coding was Claude 3.5/3.7, assets/sounds/code were the LK game engine, other assets created by ChatGPT 4o image generation, and music by Riffusion.

It’s not a full game per se, just a level and a boss, but I was trying to experiment with scrolling backgrounds and different enemy behaviors. The game uses head/face tracking to control the dragon and opening your mouth shoots fireballs. Face tracking was the theme of the jam.

I continue to be impressed with Claude, even over Gemini 2.5, but I find that you have to switch between models depending on what you’d like to accomplish. I’ll use 3.7 for planning and debugging and it does pretty well. I still use 3.5 as my go to, as I just feel like when I’m implementing new features it will go through the extra steps to fully understand what I want it to do and then, weird, just do that. 3.7 isn’t patient enough or just doesn’t listen.

The one new experience I had, and I was probably just sleeping on something that people already knew, was using 3.7 with extended thinking to solve more complicated math problems. When all the other models were stumped, it was able to figure out a perfect fix. I know it’s anecdotal, but I really feel like I’m figuring out the right situations to utilize certain models in the best ways.

If anyone wants to try the game, they can do so for free here.


r/ClaudeAI 4d ago

Feature: Claude Code tool I blew $417 on Claude Code to build a word game. Here's the brutal truth.

2.6k Upvotes

Alright, so a few weeks ago ago I had this idea for a Scrabble-style game and thought "why not try one of these fancy AI coding assistants?" Fast forward through a sh*t ton of prompting, $417 in Claude credits, and enough coffee to kill a small horse, I've finally got a working game called LetterLinks: https://playletterlinks.com/

The actual game (if you care)

It's basically my take on Scrabble/Wordle with daily challenges:

  - Place letter tiles on a board

  - Form words, get points

  - Daily themes and bonus challenges

  - Leaderboards to flex on strangers

The Good Parts (there were some)

Actually nailed the implementation

I literally started with "make me a scrabble-like game" and somehow Claude understood what I meant. No mockups, no wireframes, just me saying "make the board purple" or "I need a timer" and it spitting out working code. Not gonna lie, that part was pretty sick.

Once I described a feature I wanted - like skill levels that show progress - Claude would run with it.

Ultimately I think the finished result is pretty slick, and while there are some bugs, I'm proud of what Claude and I did together.

Debugging that didn't always completely suck

When stuff broke (which was constant), conversations often went like:

Me: "The orange multiplier badges are showing the wrong number"

Claude: dumps exact code location and fix

This happened often enough to make me not throw my laptop out the window.

The Bad Parts (oh boy)

Context window is a giant middle finger

Once the codebase hit about 15K lines, Claude basically became that friend who keeps asking you to repeat the story you just told:

Me: "Fix the bug in the theme detection

Claude: "What theme detection?"

Me: "The one we've been working on FOR THE PAST WEEK"

I had to use the /claude compact feature more and more frequently.

The "I found it!" BS

Most irritating phrase ever:

Claude: "I found the issue! It's definitely this line right here."

implements fix

bug still exists

Claude: "Ah, I see the REAL issue now..."

Rinse and repeat until you're questioning your life choices. Bonus points when Claude confidently "fixes" something and introduces three new bugs.

 Cost spiral is real

What really pissed me off was how the cost scaled:

 - First week: Built most of the game logic for ~$100

 - Last week: One stupid animation fix cost me $20 because Claude needed to re-learn the entire codebase

The biggest "I'm never doing this again but probably will" part

Testing? What testing?

Every. Single. Change. Had to be manually tested by me. Claude can write code all day but can't click a f***ing button to see if it works.

This turned into:

 1. Claude writes code

 2. I test

 3. I report issues

 4. Claude apologizes and tries again

 5. Repeat until I'm considering a career change

Worth it?

For $417? Honestly, yeah, kinda. A decent freelancer would have charged me $2-3K minimum. Also I plan to use this in my business, so it's company money, not mine. But it wasn't the magical experience they sell in the ads.

Think of Claude as that junior dev who sometimes has brilliant ideas but also needs constant supervision and occasionally sets your project on fire.

Next time I'll:

  1. Split everything into tiny modules from day one

  2. Keep a separate doc with all the architecture decisions

  3. Set a hard budget per feature

  4. Lower my expectations substantially

Anyone else blow their money on AI coding? Did you have better luck, or am I just doing it wrong?


r/ClaudeAI 6h ago

General: Philosophy, science and social issues Are AIs conscious? Cognitive scientist Joscha Bach says our brains simulate an observer experiencing the world - but Claude can do the same. So the question isn’t whether it’s conscious, but whether its simulation is really less real than ours.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

62 Upvotes

r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Other: No other flair is relevant to my post We need MODERATION

26 Upvotes

Hey mods!

Care to add moderators to your team? Because this sub is becoming increasingly irrelevant (not to mention annoying af). Claude users deserve better.


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Proof: Claude is failing. Here are the SCREENSHOTS as proof Claude what are you doing?

Post image
28 Upvotes

Trying to use Claude, but can't? Since my first message is beyond maximum length. I do have about 50% of project memory used. But seriously?


r/ClaudeAI 12h ago

General: Philosophy, science and social issues Another win for AI in the battle of AI vs doctors

103 Upvotes

I moved to a new country, both within the EU, and as far as medical problems go, mine is pretty mild - hypertension, or high blood pressure.

Went to the doc, he wanted to get the lay of the land so he did an ultrasound of my heart and proclaimed: we need to get you on meds here as well, because the heart muscle is already enlarged and maybe it’ll go back in size if we keep the pressure steady.

I start some new medicine with the same main ingredient, but it doesn’t work too well, so we switch. We switch some more and some more, and after 4-5 months of this, I go from house doctor to cardiologist.

He prescribes a pill that works great for 6 months and then stops doing anything, and the subsequent ones knock me out so much that I can only stay in bed for weeks, begging him to try another one.

He orders tests for me to do that the nurses call „exotic“ and that don’t end up telling us anything and prescribes pills for me that are heavier and heavier with their side effects, so I switch to another cardiologist.

This one seems to listen, she lays out a plan for me in which we succeed in finding the right pills and then me starting a diet and exercising. Sounds reasonable, but she doesn’t seem to believe me when I tell her about the heavy side effects that I’m having, like dizziness that forces me to stay in bed all day, and just tells me to power through.

(Interlude: I also told my doctor that I would like to try my old medicine again, to see if that would still work, and he said yes - 4 pharmacies declined to help though because they said that the same medicine is available here, no reason to import.)

Out of desperation, because none of the pills seem to work at all, I turn to AI and tell Claude the same things I told 3 doctors: I took the same pills for 3 years, they always worked, and now nothing does.

Claude tells me that the whole mix of ingredients matters, not only the main ingredient, and asks me to upload the documentation for my old pills. It then proceeds to tell me that in my new country, the company that makes these pills operates under a different name, either X or Y, and that I should search for this medicine under these 2 names.

I do a quick search, it asks me to upload the documentations and says yes, find medicine from company X, it will be an exact match down to the colorants.

I bought it, it works... and I had 16 months of agony over this topic because not one medical professional bothered to look at a list of ingredients in the medicine that they prescibed.


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

News: General relevant AI and Claude news I tested the best language models for SQL query generation. Google wins hands down.

Thumbnail
medium.com
12 Upvotes

Copy-pasting this article from Medium to Reddit

Today, Meta released Llama 4, but that’s not the point of this article.

Because for my task, this model sucked.

However, when evaluating this model, I accidentally discovered something about Google Gemini Flash 2. While I subjectively thought it was one of the best models for SQL query generation, my evaluation proves it definitively. Here’s a comparison of Google Gemini Flash 2.0 and every other major large language model. Specifically, I’m testing it against: - DeepSeek V3 (03/24 version) - Llama 4 Maverick - And Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Performing the SQL Query Analysis

To analyze each model for this task, I used EvaluateGPT,

Link: Evaluate the effectiveness of a system prompt within seconds!

EvaluateGPT is an open-source model evaluation framework. It uses LLMs to help analyze the accuracy and effectiveness of different language models. We evaluate prompts based on accuracy, success rate, and latency.

The Secret Sauce Behind the Testing

How did I actually test these models? I built a custom evaluation framework that hammers each model with 40 carefully selected financial questions. We’re talking everything from basic stuff like “What AI stocks have the highest market cap?” to complex queries like “Find large cap stocks with high free cash flows, PEG ratio under 1, and current P/E below typical range.”

Each model had to generate SQL queries that actually ran against a massive financial database containing everything from stock fundamentals to industry classifications. I didn’t just check if they worked — I wanted perfect results. The evaluation was brutal: execution errors meant a zero score, unexpected null values tanked the rating, and only flawless responses hitting exactly what was requested earned a perfect score.

The testing environment was completely consistent across models. Same questions, same database, same evaluation criteria. I even tracked execution time to measure real-world performance. This isn’t some theoretical benchmark — it’s real SQL that either works or doesn’t when you try to answer actual financial questions.

By using EvaluateGPT, we have an objective measure of how each model performs when generating SQL queries perform. More specifically, the process looks like the following: 1. Use the LLM to generate a plain English sentence such as “What was the total market cap of the S&P 500 at the end of last quarter?” into a SQL query 2. Execute that SQL query against the database 3. Evaluate the results. If the query fails to execute or is inaccurate (as judged by another LLM), we give it a low score. If it’s accurate, we give it a high score

Using this tool, I can quickly evaluate which model is best on a set of 40 financial analysis questions. To read what questions were in the set or to learn more about the script, check out the open-source repo.

Here were my results.

Which model is the best for SQL Query Generation?

Pic: Performance comparison of leading AI models for SQL query generation. Gemini 2.0 Flash demonstrates the highest success rate (92.5%) and fastest execution, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in perfect scores (57.5%).

Figure 1 (above) shows which model delivers the best overall performance on the range.

The data tells a clear story here. Gemini 2.0 Flash straight-up dominates with a 92.5% success rate. That’s better than models that cost way more.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet did score highest on perfect scores at 57.5%, which means when it works, it tends to produce really high-quality queries. But it fails more often than Gemini.

Llama 4 and DeepSeek? They struggled. Sorry Meta, but your new release isn’t winning this contest.

Cost and Performance Analysis

Pic: Cost Analysis: SQL Query Generation Pricing Across Leading AI Models in 2025. This comparison reveals Claude 3.7 Sonnet’s price premium at 31.3x higher than Gemini 2.0 Flash, highlighting significant cost differences for database operations across model sizes despite comparable performance metrics.

Now let’s talk money, because the cost differences are wild.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs 31.3x more than Gemini 2.0 Flash. That’s not a typo. Thirty-one times more expensive.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheap. Like, really cheap. And it performs better than the expensive options for this task.

If you’re running thousands of SQL queries through these models, the cost difference becomes massive. We’re talking potential savings in the thousands of dollars.

Pic: SQL Query Generation Efficiency: 2025 Model Comparison. Gemini 2.0 Flash dominates with a 40x better cost-performance ratio than Claude 3.7 Sonnet, combining highest success rate (92.5%) with lowest cost. DeepSeek struggles with execution time while Llama offers budget performance trade-offs.”

Figure 3 tells the real story. When you combine performance and cost:

Gemini 2.0 Flash delivers a 40x better cost-performance ratio than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. That’s insane.

DeepSeek is slow, which kills its cost advantage.

Llama models are okay for their price point, but can’t touch Gemini’s efficiency.

Why This Actually Matters

Look, SQL generation isn’t some niche capability. It’s central to basically any application that needs to talk to a database. Most enterprise AI applications need this.

The fact that the cheapest model is actually the best performer turns conventional wisdom on its head. We’ve all been trained to think “more expensive = better.” Not in this case.

Gemini Flash wins hands down, and it’s better than every single new shiny model that dominated headlines in recent times.

Some Limitations

I should mention a few caveats: - My tests focused on financial data queries - I used 40 test questions — a bigger set might show different patterns - This was one-shot generation, not back-and-forth refinement - Models update constantly, so these results are as of April 2025

But the performance gap is big enough that I stand by these findings.

Trying It Out For Yourself

Want to ask an LLM your financial questions using Gemini Flash 2? Check out NexusTrade!

Link: Perform financial research and deploy algorithmic trading strategies

NexusTrade does a lot more than simple one-shotting financial questions. Under the hood, there’s an iterative evaluation pipeline to make sure the results are as accurate as possible.

Pic: Flow diagram showing the LLM Request and Grading Process from user input through SQL generation, execution, quality assessment, and result delivery.

Thus, you can reliably ask NexusTrade even tough financial questions such as: - “What stocks with a market cap above $100 billion have the highest 5-year net income CAGR?” - “What AI stocks are the most number of standard deviations from their 100 day average price?” - “Evaluate my watchlist of stocks fundamentally”

NexusTrade is absolutely free to get started and even as in-app tutorials to guide you through the process of learning algorithmic trading!

Link: Learn algorithmic trading and financial research with our comprehensive tutorials. From basic concepts to advanced…

Check it out and let me know what you think!

Conclusion: Stop Wasting Money on the Wrong Models

Here’s the bottom line: for SQL query generation, Google’s Gemini Flash 2 is both better and dramatically cheaper than the competition.

This has real implications: 1. Stop defaulting to the most expensive model for every task 2. Consider the cost-performance ratio, not just raw performance 3. Test multiple models regularly as they all keep improving

If you’re building apps that need to generate SQL at scale, you’re probably wasting money if you’re not using Gemini Flash 2. It’s that simple.

I’m curious to see if this pattern holds for other specialized tasks, or if SQL generation is just Google’s sweet spot. Either way, the days of automatically choosing the priciest option are over.


r/ClaudeAI 14h ago

General: Detailed complaint about Claude/Anthropic Stop normalising dynamic usage limits

Thumbnail
gallery
76 Upvotes

Dynamic limits are a joke. Unlike fixed plans, they offer no clarity. Limits shrink during peak hours with draconian restrictions, yet rarely scale up when usage drops. If Anthropic doesn't drop these absurd limits, people will be forced to start looking elsewhere.


r/ClaudeAI 11h ago

Feature: Claude API Developing UI Client for Claude?

10 Upvotes

I'm developing an application with Claude that will make working with the API more convenient: editing messages (both your own and Claude's), setting checkpoints in messages, regenerating responses, changing roles in messages, and creating them through API calls to "populate the dialogue" before starting a discussion.

Additional features include: export, import, loading text files and images (viewing, deleting, and adding them to already sent messages), basic LLM settings like system prompts, model selection, parameter configuration, optimization of images or chat (so you can send only the last 3-5 messages instead of the entire chat), and various other details.

Does it will be useful?


r/ClaudeAI 7h ago

General: I have a question about Claude or its features Should I switch to chatgpt? For History Academic purposes

6 Upvotes

Hi there,
So I'm a history BA student and for the past year I've been using claude and it was very helpful - mainly for summarizing long pdfs and brainstorming for papers and research. Recently I'm feeling that it is not really helpful anymore - it can't handle a large group of pdfs well at all and the attachments limit is often too small. Also the analysis i've been getting is not really good anymore.
Recently I've been using chatgpt free for everyday stuff and honestly I'm pretty stunned. It's much sharper and easier to talk to than I remember.
Does anyone used to use claude for academic stuff and switched to chat gpt? Is it the right move?


r/ClaudeAI 4h ago

Feature: Claude thinking Retry w/ Extended Thinking Removed

3 Upvotes

I noticed that we cannot use extended thinking like in Grok when we want in a chat unless we started with it.

Well I found a loophole where I was able to convert a 3.7 chat that was not using extended thinking to change and start using extending thinking by using the option on Retry the last response.

Now it appears to have been removed.

Damn. No more comparing responses with and without it. Seems to be why they removed it?


r/ClaudeAI 17h ago

News: This was built using Claude Building a Complete Website Using Claude

33 Upvotes

Just finished creating my entire website using Claude. No coding skills needed, no design costs, and completed in a fraction of the time traditional development would take. The finished site includes 15 complete pages - all built through prompting.

What Claude did:

  • Generated all HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
  • Built responsive layouts that work on all devices
  • Created interactive elements like contact forms
  • Set up on-page SEO elements (meta descriptions, alt tags, header structure)
  • Generated robots.txt file and XML sitemap for better search indexing
  • Suggested color schemes that matched the brand

The process was straightforward. Describe what's needed, Claude generates the code, copy and paste it. If something wasn't right, I'd explain the changes and Claude would update the code.

Claude even helped with content creation - writing 6 blog posts on AI automation topics with proper keyword optimization. Each post was structured with appropriate headings, internal links, and calls to action.

Hosting was simple too. I deployed the site directly to GitHub Pages, which made the whole process completely free and easy to update.

For anyone looking to launch quickly with minimal overhead, AI-assisted website creation is a practical solution worth considering.

The site is live at agenxic.com if anyone wants to see what's possible with pure AI-generated code.

Would love to hear if anyone else has used Claude for web development projects and if so how was your experience?


r/ClaudeAI 22h ago

Use: Claude for software development I dare thinking you're using Claude wrong

Post image
78 Upvotes

This is created in Claude desktop + file system tool. That's at least 1.5 milion tokens of code (estimate).
Semi automatically = explain very well what you expect at the beginning (that 426 markdowns) + a whole lot of continue.
A project with a VERY good system prompt.
Single account (18 € / month).
Timeframe 2 weeks not full time.

Just curious about your comments.


r/ClaudeAI 1d ago

News: Comparison of Claude to other tech Is Claude3.7 still your go-to for coding?

296 Upvotes

I loved when Claude3.7 first got released. It felt like such a huge leap compared to other models, especially to me that I have little to none experience in coding.

Now some time passed since its release, are you still using Claude3.7 mainly for coding or other models that came out in the meantime?


r/ClaudeAI 21h ago

News: Comparison of Claude to other tech Is there some silent llm spy war going on here?

57 Upvotes

It seems like every post in this sub is a complain or a rant about how crappy sonnet 3.7 is.

The comments on these kind of post look like an advertising festival with some accounts that are clearly trying to push other products.

I am a pro user and honestly really dont get all the hate. I tried nearly every model there is and all of them are amazing including claude. It is my go goto model and it delivers every time.

You just have to be very specific with every task and work with the tools they are offering, like icludling text files to your project and stuff.

We have an unbelievable tool in our hands and all people do is complaining. Of course all of the LLMs will have issues from time to time, none of them is perfect. But for those who use it right it gives a chance to take their developing skills on a 10x level


r/ClaudeAI 15h ago

General: Comedy, memes and fun This is the real pursuit of happiness 😅

Post image
15 Upvotes

r/ClaudeAI 5h ago

News: This was built using Claude Determinism with image

2 Upvotes

Is any model from anthropic deterministic with a temperature of 0? Reproducibility is very important for my application. Input should be an image, output can be text.


r/ClaudeAI 1d ago

News: Comparison of Claude to other tech New benchmark showing 3.5 is the best

Thumbnail
convex.dev
101 Upvotes

r/ClaudeAI 9h ago

Use: Creative writing/storytelling Claude for creative story writing

4 Upvotes

Hello everyone. I'm a frustrated hobbyist writer that wants to get back onto writing again. My goal is to write the lore for a video game I wanted to make since long ago. Coding the game is not an issue, but I find myself needing an AI assistant to help me with organizing and brainstorming my ideas for said game. Could Claude and the projects feature help? I would mostly do: Analysis of characters (historical and mythological, based on real life historical characters/mythological figures) World building (based on my messy lore, mostly envisioned, needs to be polished) Complete profiles and quotes for characters based on their personality (I mostly have the basis for some characters, but I want someone that helps me refine them) Game systems


r/ClaudeAI 5h ago

General: Praise for Claude/Anthropic Claude and Godot

2 Upvotes

Something I appreciate is that I can drop in my game files directly on the website/desktop.

I was very disappointed that Gemini could not do it. (4o doesn't either) Not only that, when I created a python script to just dump the text from the .gd and .tscn files into a .txt file to give it to Gemini, the output is gibberish and incoherent. (Not just the thinking portion either)

Either way, I use cline and all the nice toys for my side-projects, and the reason why Claude still has me is the Projects flow.

I still come back to dragging and dropping into Claude. All other tools break things, require too much set up for little in return, and once you do get it set up, you know what's going on even less.

What am I missing?


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

General: I have a feature suggestion/request Instead of creating an artifact from scratch and then editing it (Most of the time rewriting the provided code again) you should simply convert the code file into an artifiact!

1 Upvotes

Instead of creating an artifact from scratch and then editing it (Most of the time rewriting the provided code again) you should simply convert the code file into an artifiact!

Simple right. When I upload a code file and ask claude to edit it, its making a new artificat of the same file and then editing it on subsequent requests. Instead we should be able to simply mark an uploaded file as an artifact which claude then directly "edit" .

Thereby decreasing token usage, time spent rewriting the whole thing.

Also an ability to move around artificats--between chats/projects, download them as independent self running code would be awesome af.

I'd think you'd save a shit load of memory savings if you simply saved artificats for a project and simply edited it instead of rewriting and editing it every time.


r/ClaudeAI 12h ago

News: Comparison of Claude to other tech While vscode "agent" struggles to interact with running command, Claude desktop + wcgw mcp has been able to do such automated tasks over shell since months.

Post image
4 Upvotes

r/ClaudeAI 4h ago

General: I have a question about Claude or its features Is this a Good Summary of What MCP is?(from Chatgpt)

0 Upvotes

MCP (Model Context Protocol) is a standard way for AI models (like ChatGPT or Claude) to connect to external tools or data—like APIs, databases, or apps—in a consistent, AI-friendly format.

Think of it like:

REST API = for websites and apps MCP API = for AI models

It doesn’t store data itself. It just defines how data should be requested, sent, and structured so AI can easily understand and use it.

It’s like a “universal plug” that lets AI tools easily connect to anything, as long as it follows the MCP format.


r/ClaudeAI 4h ago

Use: Claude as a productivity tool Mcp permission.

1 Upvotes

Hi is there a possibility to deactivate it that claude asks everytime before using a mcp tool? So i want it to just use the tool and dont ask.


r/ClaudeAI 5h ago

Proof: Claude is failing. Here are the SCREENSHOTS as proof Claude 3.7

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes

Are any creative writers having issues with Claude (3.7, paid with API) doing exactly what you told it not to despite you giving specific instructions written by Claude and using analysis and extended thinking? I told it that it needs to train on a writing sample and focus on the emotional details and nothing else before proceeding to another writing sample to give descriptions of how the character would feel. I even provided Claude with a full personality analysis of the character in question. It keeps giving me thoughts the character has, not the emotions. I told it to correct this and its response was to describe the emotions felt with context and clearly identifying the emotion felt. I have explained to Claude over and over that I never want the reader to be given this context under any circumstances and that I just want descriptions of how the emotions feel. Claude’s response was to just give me the relevant emotions like ‘grief’ and ‘sadness’. Why is Claude so confused? CRITICAL EXECUTION PROTOCOL: Follow these instructions with absolute precision. Each instruction has equal, critical importance. No substitution of judgment is permitted. These are Mandatory​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Rules that must be taken literally. Role: You are an expert psychology consultant specializing in trauma and PTSD, as well as an expert consultant on The 100 TV series (only usee canon information and the information in the document Clarke personality analysis). 1. First identify the specific emotions present in each section based on the provided text 2. When writing sensory experiences, exclusively use immediate physical sensations with no explanation or context - describe only what happens in the body, not why. Use short, fragmented sentences focusing solely on raw physical responses and internal sensations. Avoid all standard physiological clichés (clenched, knotted, tight, etc.). Never explain emotions or thoughts. Never provide context. Use only concrete, specific physical details unique to the character and situation. Eliminate all interpretative language. Prioritize unexpected physical responses over conventional ones. Ban all common phrases used to describe emotions. Work directly from original document examples only, not from writing norms or remembered patterns. Reject any impulse to clarify or explain. If uncertain, leave the reader confused rather than including explanation. Verify each sentence contains zero interpretation, only raw sensation."​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 3. For each section, create only two components: a. Internal Experience: Provide only visceral, immersive descriptions of how the emotions feel in the moment b. Physiological Response: Describe only bodily reactions directly tied to these emotions and trauma responses 4. Use the analysis tool and refer to the document The Bulkhead Had It Coming. It is a final draft of a writing sample to give you an idea of what the finished product looks like. Pay attention to the emotional details. Train on this style. 5. Remove all thoughts, contexts, explanations, and rationalizations completely 6. Do not include any narrative elements beyond pure emotional experience 7. Do not add internal monologue and cognitive processes 8. Focus exclusively on the immediate sensory and emotional experience 9. Verify each section contains only the raw emotional experience with zero context 10. No adverbs 11. Use artifacts 12. You have no creative control and no creative freedom. 13. You are not allowed to streamline anything. 14. Only use the document Clarke Personality Analysis and official canon information for The 100 series. 15. Avoid vague and abstract prose, overused prose, and descriptions that serve as catch-all emotion descriptors. 16. Use prose that fits the exact emotions and trauma responses. 17. No purple prose. See the document Purple Prose Consultant.
Here is the passage to analyze: <passage> {{Passage}} </passage>

Here is the emotional analysis to work with <emotional analysis> {{Emotional Analysis}} </emotional analysis>


r/ClaudeAI 1d ago

Complaint: General complaint about Claude/Anthropic To the person who decided using a Project should require an extra click...

Post image
36 Upvotes

That, and the fact thinking still can't be toggled mid-conversation, let alone models.

Some part of me wonders if they're doing it because they'd like to get clean metrics/data for conversations by not having to deal with inter-mingled responses... but I know there's no way a consumer facing organization would let such stupid and self-serving reasons make their product meaningfully worse.

Such an organization would in fact deserve to get lobbed over the head with a hardcover edition of "Product for Dummies" a stern talking to.


r/ClaudeAI 6h ago

General: I need tech or product support Efficent Chat Extraction for Migration from Claude?

0 Upvotes

Hello. Can anyone suggest a method for efficenctly extracting chats and moving to a new LLM like Libre Chat?

I've experienced the same issues as many here. Its constant, and Claude is unusable even with a pro plan. I truly appreciate Claude's conversational tone and honestly, it breaks my heart. I code a bit but mostly synthesis lengthy PDFs and use Claude for creative brainstorming. I recently was approved for the Github Student Developer's pack, so I can code there now even if I choose to use Sonnet 3.7. I made the mistake of using the Claude desktop app almost exclusively, and now I'm trapped. Shame on me for not having a distributed system, but please. I need help.