r/MurderedByWords Jan 02 '25

#1 Murder of Week Brutal ratio holy shit

Post image
104.1k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.2k

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

And it's not like a 5 year old has the context to understand what any of those words mean.

72

u/DayleD Jan 02 '25

I'm pretty sure at five years old I could understand that 'buzzy butt' was related to butts. Not sure I'd particularly care, but I'd get the gist.

180

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

To a 5 year old "buzzy butt" is what happens when they're vacationing on a farm and they get to ride on the tractor for a bit.

They do not at all associate that with sex. At all.

99

u/Spare-Half796 Jan 02 '25

5 year old me would have thought of bumble bees

71

u/AeitZean Jan 02 '25
  1. Its called buzzy butt
  2. Its shaped like a stinger

Are we absolutely sure its not bee related?

12

u/GHouserVO Jan 02 '25

First thing my 5-year-old self would have associated it with. Would have giggled about it and thought it was a great name for bees.

23

u/thtawkwardguy Jan 02 '25

27 year old me thinks of bumble bees

1

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/kermitthebeast Jan 02 '25

Bee movie, clearly

6

u/SectorEducational460 Jan 02 '25

5 year old me would think it's a butt saying buzz buzz and laugh

2

u/Distinct_Safety5762 Jan 02 '25

Fuzzy buzzy butts!

19

u/ColonEscapee Jan 02 '25

Never been around children apparently. Since when did they associate sex with butt?? Yeah, "butt" is funny to them and anything around it. Pee pee or tallywacker... Yeah it's funny from the moment you know it hurts to get whacked there which is around 3.

Poopy butt!

13

u/Open_Perception_3212 Jan 02 '25

Or maybe farting?

2

u/BoneHugsHominy Jan 02 '25

Or something to do with farting.

7

u/DayleD Jan 02 '25

Exactly! Which means some parent somewhere is gonna stand in line for a prescription while their kid whines for the brightly packaged buzzer.

More than a little awkward, but banning the aisle would be a whole lot worse.

35

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

If we're still ignoring the fact that 5 year olds don't really see the top shelf (and also most likely can't fucking read) then sure. Totally.

-14

u/DayleD Jan 02 '25

That's well within normal variation. I could read at five. Would the conversation happen any differently at six?

15

u/madmatt42 Jan 02 '25

Seriously, you're arguing that, because of your experience, most 5 year olds can read those words easily? Have you ever worked with 5 year olds? Sure plenty can read parts of books, in certain fonts, but they don't get context clues so they might not even be able to tell what those words say. You reading a book at 5 doesn't mean you'd be able to read that package.

-6

u/DayleD Jan 02 '25

Butt is four letters. People forget what it's like to be a kid.

6

u/madmatt42 Jan 02 '25

So the fact that I have recently worked with a kid learning to read doesnt' count.

Hop off your soapbox

8

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

Is there a point to you arguing or do you just like the feeling?

-13

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25

[deleted]

16

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

How often do you think the word "oral" is mentioned in children's books?

-16

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25

[deleted]

14

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

This is so fucking funny. It's not a deflection, it's a counter argument my dude.

-13

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25

[deleted]

4

u/Dat_Ding_Da Jan 02 '25

It was not a question. It was an attempt to disguise a terrible argument as an equally silly question. Thus the reaction you are seeing. :)

→ More replies (0)

3

u/WarDry1480 Jan 02 '25

Deflection? Get a fucking grip.

1

u/Potential-Sound-5233 Jan 02 '25

yeah, but what are you going to answer when a 5yo asks how they managed to get "the feeling of riding a tractor" in such a small box

1

u/Jules-of-Jubilee Jan 02 '25

I would have thought of farts tbh.

1

u/VaughnSC Jan 02 '25

If I were a five year old, I might entertain the notion that butt plugs exist to prevent sharting.

0

u/streatz Jan 02 '25

Okay so let's change that to 12 year old, tall enough to read it, just now old enough to understand, still shouldn't be subjected to dildos and cock suckers. What other 20 excuses will reddit make up to legitimize pedophilia?

1

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25

A 12 year old should have basic sex education. This includes knowing that some people like to use tools during sex.

The idea that educating children and them just experiencing that sex exists in the world is pedophilia is so mindblowingly stupid that I kinda feel like I should applaud you.

1

u/Historical_Tennis635 Jan 02 '25

Pedophilia what???? Bro 12 is old enough to where you’re taking sex Ed, me and a bunch of friends at that age walked several miles to make homemade fleshlights lol. Describe the actual harm that comes from a 12 year old seeing that a sex toy exists at an age where most are masturbating anyway?

And again pedophilia? It’s in the sexual wellness section should stores not sell it at all??

-11

u/CaveDwellingDude Jan 02 '25

The aisle sign right by it says SEXUAL WELLNESS, it would be hard to NOT associate it with sex.

13

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25
  1. No 5 year old is gonna read that sign.
  2. No 5 year old has the vocabulary to understand that sign.
  3. No 5 year old has the common sense to link that sign to the products shown there.
  4. No 5 year old has enough context to understand what these names would mean in a sexual context.

-14

u/CaveDwellingDude Jan 02 '25
  1. How could they not read it?
  2. They just learned new words, that's how vocabulary works.
  3. Again, the sign is RIGHT BESIDE THE PRODUCT no linking needed. How retarded were you at 5?
  4. Hopefully they won't know what they mean, but certain groups have made it a danger for public school. It also is a horrible time for a parent to start receiving questions from a curious child.

12

u/sunsetgal24 Jan 02 '25
  1. They don't look up that much. It's not interesting to read.

  2. No, they did not learn new words. Learning new words means understanding what they are. The words "oral sucker" without context are just noise.

  3. You as an adult understand that stores label their aisles so that people can find the products displayed there easily. 5 year olds don't know that, and they don't think about stores in that way.

  4. If you as a parent are not able to explain sexual things to your child in an age appropriate way, that's on you.

I'd also love to know what you mean by "certain groups have made it a danger for public school".

6

u/kasiagabrielle Jan 02 '25

Would you have recognized what those products were at age 5, unprompted? Yes or no will suffice.