Hi everyone,
Last month I posted a Google Form survey with a bunch of questions about class structure and what people find valuable in training. It was a fun exercise and I wanted to make the responses (minus personal info) public for gym owners and general discussion. The post title links to the results and below are some interesting takeaways given the sample.
Also, I promised to randomly award a gift card to a survey participant. Congrats to u/peteypotato! Send me a DM for that $25 Amazon gift card.
Highlights
Demographics - We got a reasonable spread of belt levels and ages with ~3/4 of survey takers ranging from 26-45 years old. Check out the data for further breakdowns.
Class length - No one thinks BJJ should be less than an hour and ~60% would like to see a 90 minute class.
Takedowns - Nearly 4/5 people believe takedowns should be a regular part of class and take up 10-25% of class time.
Curriculum - More than 80% of respondents want class to focus on a recurring theme or position, with slightly more than half wanting to focus on the same thing for multiple weeks at a time.
Street vs Sport - A greater number of respondents disagreed vs agreed with 'Self defense is an important part of my BJJ training.' with an equal amount being neutral either way.
How tough or chill should class be? - There were a few questions on this breaking it down a bit. Generally speaking, it looks like people prefer a moderate tempo during drilling ramping up to vigorous (but not too hard) effort when sparring.
The Ideal Class... (sort of)
Within the survey there was a set of questions attempting to determine how long to spend on each of six parts of a standard class (warm-up, instruction, drilling, positional sparring, free sparing, and conditioning). Respondents selected a time range for each of those. My thinking here was that this could be quantified to both come up with a rough class structure that appeals to the masses and also give a means to compare 'value' between parts of class. Note: This data says nothing about what's necessarily the most effective for teaching, competing, etc. It's simply a reflect of the preferences of people who took the survey.
In order to do this I matched each of the responses to a value (ex: 15-20 minutes of preferred time drilling became '20'). Then I created a weighted average based on the frequency of responses. Don't take this so much as a set schedule rather than a way to visualize the data. The output looks like this:
- Warm-up: 5.09 minutes
- Lecture/Instruction: 12.37 minutes
- Technique Drilling: 17.81 minutes
- Positional Sparring: 19.04 minutes
- Free Sparring: 22.19 minutes
- Conditioning: 3.25 minutes
Warm-up generally got a lot of responses between 0 and 10 minutes, hence the ~5 minute average. Conditioning on the other hand got mostly 0's with a couple of psychos wanting more time. Overall I interpret that as most people don't want any specific conditioning time during class and it's probably fair to deprioritize it entirely.
I do find it interesting there is essentially a 1:1:1 ratio between drilling, positional sparring, and free sparing. I've been to gyms that mostly positionally sparred over free sparring (outside of maybe competition lead ups) and to some that might jump into free sparring for a third of class. I'm interested to see what people think of this.
Thanks for reading this far. Hopefully someone out there finds the info useful.