r/interestingasfuck • u/Red_Lotus_Alchemist • 2d ago

/r/all A Chinese earthquake rescue team deployed drones to light up the night and aid search and rescue operations after the devastating 7.7 magnitude earthquake in Myanmar.

62.7k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.5k

u/BrentButler 2d ago

That’s a straightforward and clever use of a new technology. I’m curious what the usable flight time would be.

1.6k

u/EmusOnly 2d ago

Looks like that wire is connected to a generator, that’s actually pretty neat

56

u/NJ_Legion_Iced_Tea 2d ago edited 2d ago

I can't wait for when wireless charging is able to extend multiple/hundreds of feet.

Wired drones are already capable of so much, and powering them wirelessly is going to be a civilizational game changer.

Edit: I'm talking high concept sci fi. The likes of which is probably outside of our reach but what we can strive towards. On par with Star Trek Transporters and Communicators from the 60s.

166

u/Jazz8680 2d ago

Wireless energy decays exponentially as distance increases. Wireless charging over hundreds of feet would require massive amounts of energy to the point it wouldn’t be worth it.

6

u/xenelef290 2d ago

Technically it decays geometrically a distance squared.

1

u/FieserMoep 1d ago

Wasn't it arithmetically degradation at longitude multiplied?

1

u/SpaceyFrontiers 1d ago

This thread sounds like it'll have 1k+ upvotes

0

u/xenelef290 1d ago

That is gibberish

30

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

50

u/flukus 2d ago

At that point you're probably better off with a mirror on the bottom of the drone to provide light.

21

u/AwesomeFama 2d ago

Ahh, a disco ball perhaps?

27

u/S-r-ex 2d ago

For rescue parties.

4

u/xenelef290 2d ago

That is a good idea

2

u/dinosaur_from_Mars 2d ago

Just make a small reactor to generate energy on board.

1

u/pepinyourstep29 2d ago

Just no. Transferring electric wirelessly is like trying to drink water by licking moisture in the air. It just doesn't work and will never be practical.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/AwesomeFama 2d ago

Transferring energy wirelessly is very easy. They had cannons that managed it quite well many centuries ago, and for example the catapult before that!

Transferring electricity wirelessly is much trickier though, you're right about that.

1

u/Throw-a-wizzle-acct 2d ago

Lasers or microwaves could direct energy much better

1

u/rouvas 2d ago

Nikola Tesla would like to know your location.

1

u/SixShoot3r 1d ago

Yup, just like any other radiation. Time, Distance and Protection.

115

u/nico282 2d ago

Spoiler alert, it won't. Physics laws don't change.

16

u/NJ_Legion_Iced_Tea 2d ago

You're not entirely wrong, and it's probably only a good idea in sci fi. But there's nothing wrong in aspiring to create tech near that hypothetical potential.

Even 20 years ago you'd have been called mad for charging a cell phone wirelessly.

27

u/Jealous_Priority_228 2d ago

It currently exists, but radiating that much power would undoubtedly be harmful to any humans, or pets, caught in the area. There's a room at a university where you can hold a light bulb, and it'll light up anywhere you hold it.

It's probably smarter to focus on concentrating batteries even more. Electricity is plentiful and renewable.

5

u/Somepotato 2d ago

Not necessarily. Directed radiation and lasers are ways to distribute power over a distance without risking people.

15

u/sikyon 2d ago

its conceptually straightforward to supply power via a scanning laser, in practice anything that steps betwen the beam line will get burned. There are ways around it but the safety risks are so high it's not practical

6

u/Jostain 2d ago

I hope you realise that this is worse than just attaching a wire. Suddenly you have a thing that needs to have direct line of sight to the drone at all times and uses 100 times more power. Solutions don't just need to be cool, they need to be better than the already existing solution.

3

u/TapdancingHotcake 2d ago

That sounds terribly like a wire with extra steps

2

u/BishoxX 2d ago

Sure , but we are miles off any technology of that nature.

Its like 0.0000001% of magnetic charging

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Somepotato 2d ago edited 2d ago

Um...are people holding that power station on the ground? And fyi, radiation isn't inherently harmful...the light, wifi, and heat coming off your phone are all forms of radiation.

Edit: LMAO HE BLOCKED ME "Those aren't forms of electrical radiation" alright buddy what a sore loser.

I was hoping to engage in hypotheticals - not provide this as a 'guaranteed' solution. I think it could work given a proper setup (such as a mesh of drones)

2

u/Jealous_Priority_228 2d ago

Shouldn't have tried to have fun with a troll. Those aren't forms of electrical radiation, and you're incorrect.

6

u/flukus 2d ago

Even 20 years ago you'd have been called mad for charging a cell phone wirelessly.

Not really, it's something kids have been doing in science classes for many decades.

4

u/Jostain 2d ago

It's not wireless though. You have to put it down on a plate and keep it perfectly aligned while it's charging. If anything it's more wired than regular charging. There is a reason that a lot of phone manufacturers stopped pushing that feature because they did the math and realised it was a technological dead end.

10

u/nico282 2d ago

Sorry to ruin it for you, but the QI wireless standard is from 17 years ago (2008), and non standard solutions existed way before that.

My toothbrush was wireless charging in the 80s.

To become mainstream on phones it lacked only intelligence (phone now communicates with the charger) and standardization. It was never a physics issue.

2

u/VladamirK 1d ago

Nikola Tesla was experimenting with wireless energy transfers in the 1900s.

6

u/_xiphiaz 2d ago

Physics allows for wireless tech to carry energy? It’s probably going to have to be something like microwave lasers or something, but there’s no physics that disallows this

17

u/Narcuterie 2d ago

Crazy inefficiency and complexity as compared to a cable I'm afraid

1

u/OpenRole 2d ago

That's like saying wireless communication will never take off because of the crazy inefficiencies and complexities compared to cable. The point of wireless is to be an option in areas where running a cable is unfeasible, not because it is superior to cable.

2

u/TapdancingHotcake 2d ago

The issue is radiating power in large enough volumes to actually do anything. I can't even fathom having the power to do it over a wide area, but even if you did, I cannot imagine that's good for living things in the vicinity. And if you want to direct it, you still face the issue of anything in its path getting fried, or even just obstructing it.

There's technically experimental tech to shoot power down from orbiting solar panels via microwave beams. The satellite dishes would be massive and dangerous to be near.

Of course it's technically possible if our understanding of physics is incorrect, but then so is everything.

1

u/OpenRole 1d ago

Lasers, not radiation

-4

u/_xiphiaz 2d ago

Oh sure there are plenty of good reasons this isn’t a thing, physics isn’t one of them.

2

u/VP007clips 2d ago

There's no law of physics that says it's impossible.

Using magnetic fields to charge it doesn't make sense of course, since they drop off with the cube of distance, but there are other viable ways to move power long distances without wires.

Lasers for example can be used with very efficient solar panels to transfer power remotely. It hasn't been done on a realistic scale yet, we lack the technology and don't have a use for it. But there's no reason why it wouldn't be possible once we improve those.

0

u/Cristianelrey55 2d ago

Bruh, lazer focus chargers exist.

-2

u/iWesleyy 2d ago

Someone will figure it out. There is tons of research in this area. You have to think outside the box of course as electricity tends to like the ground :)

5

u/Tangata_Tunguska 2d ago

I'm not sure that'd ever make sense. Even with a narrow beam you'd still be limited to line of sight. And that beam emitter would be bordering on being a weapon in itself. It'd make more sense to use wires like they are here, or just use more drones and cycle through charging them 

1

u/aaron_1011 2d ago

I believe Isaac Newton tried doing that, and that's how he discovered microwaves. Except while testing they found it also boils water which is a neat side effect .... It didn't work that's well, though they did invent the microwave

1

u/Fickle-Reality7777 2d ago

Here’s to another banner year.

2

u/RuairiSpain 2d ago

I guess the motors overheat after prolonged running?

Great use of tech, love it. Nice to see Chinese firefighters doing humanitarian work. Seems like the world needs to get used to Chinese being more reliable than the USA in times of crisis.

1

u/Ryhsuo 2d ago

Motors shouldn’t overheat unless they or the propellers are incorrectly sized.

-8

u/mike_sky4 2d ago

you could add a supportpole to the bottom, to reduce the power required to generate lift, oh wait, its just an ineficient mobile floodlight....

32

u/Spiritual_Bus1125 2d ago

Brother, do you get that a "mobile floodlight" that could get that high is not a suitcase I can put in the back of my car but a whole ass vehicle?

And more importantly, it can't go OVER irregular terrain

537

u/certifiedintelligent 2d ago

They’re tethered, so they can fly and light as long as the generator on the ground runs.

232

u/DeathByPetrichor 2d ago

That’s… freaking brilliant. Why has this not been done before? Tethered drone seems like a fantastic idea for increased flight duration for security or time lapses

204

u/_stonedspiritv2 2d ago

It's being used in wars right now since the signal can't be jammed. Fiber optics tethered drones.

76

u/MajesticBread9147 2d ago

I mean we've had wire guided missiles since the 20th century.

21

u/seanular 2d ago

Honestly, wilder to me than heat seeking.

6

u/Kenny741 2d ago

With the Milan launch system you can guide the rocket while it's flying due to it being tethered as well. We had a group of 30 people shoot it for the first time and nobody missed a 2m by 3m metal plate 2000m away.

2

u/JohnnyFartmacher 2d ago

There is some alternate universe out there where the pigeon-controlled guided bomb worked out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon

1

u/FLABANGED 2d ago

Should check out beam riding missiles.

2

u/Callisater 2d ago

During the Song Dynasty in China, the Fire Crow was invented, which was a kite with a gunpowder bomb attached. You could say this was the earliest version of the idea, and it was almost as old as gunpowder in warfare itself.

2

u/xenelef290 2d ago

BGM-71 TOW

1

u/Wakkit1988 2d ago

since the 20th century.

That is a terrible way to word this because it makes me feel old.

18

u/shmodder 2d ago

The fiber cable doesn’t power the drone, though. It’s merely for data transmission.

2

u/LevelBrilliant9311 2d ago

Fiber optics don't transfer power, so they don't increase flight duration.

2

u/Fearless_Parking_436 2d ago

These are tethered for signal, not power. Having power up there is a bit more difficult.

2

u/Kazath 2d ago

That's different though, fiber optics aren't used for power, so those drones still rely on batteries and can only be up a limited time. But yes, drones commanded by fiber optic lines can't be jammed by electronic warfare.

2

u/darkroy131 2d ago

Fibre optic cables are not used to transfer electricity, as they are not conductive. They are used to control the drone, because radio jamming in Ukraine is pervasive. You need copper cables to transfer power, and they are prohibitively heavy for the drone to carry, not without sacrificing payload weight.

1

u/leixiaotie 1d ago

that's crazy, fiber optics are essentially glass, that it can bend and follow a drone is amazing

21

u/nertynot 2d ago

I just saw a picture on here of a tesla plugged into a generator that it was towing down the highway

10

u/Wakkit1988 2d ago

Some company actually sold a gas generator that uses a tow hitch receiver, so you can charge your EV with a generator.

Also, EVs with built-in range extenders should start hitting the market in the next few years out of China. They anticipate vehicle ranges around 1000km.

2

u/NotThreeFoxes 2d ago

Didn't the BMW i3 have one as an option or something? Its def not common but im almost certain there's been at least a few on the market already

2

u/PCBen 2d ago

It did and I was really excited to get one one day - then they discontinued the i3 :(

I don’t think any of the replacement models have the extender anymore

2

u/NotThreeFoxes 2d ago

I cant get over the bicycle tires thought, I cant imagine theres a wife selection of tires that narrow on rims that big. Its also the only vehicle I've ever seen in my career that had non preformace non M+S rated tires. Normaly we can put a customers summers on before the highway requirements lift because literaly everything is rated M+S, so the customer booking for their summers a month early didn't raise any alarms, but we had to turn them away because the tires weren't legal on the highway for another few weeks.

0

u/Upset_Ant2834 2d ago

Brother that's called a hybrid and they already exist

1

u/Wakkit1988 1d ago

No, it's not.

Hybrids allow the engine to directly power the vehicle.

EVs with range extenders only allow the engine to charge the battery.

There's no mechanical connection between the engine and the wheels.

0

u/Upset_Ant2834 1d ago

There are different kinds of hybrids. Series hybrids are exactly what you're talking about with no connection between the engine and the wheels

1

u/Wakkit1988 1d ago

The only production "series hybrid" car was the Volt. Which, again, you are missing the distinction. The engine varies the load relative to the needed output to drive the vehicle exclusively with electricity produced by the engine. This is done to eliminate the transmission and other drivetrain components so that it can be powered exclusively through a small battery and the electricity being produced. These cars can operate without a battery installed at all.

EVs with range extenders can operate exclusively with their batteries, and the engine only operates at a fixed speed to produce a constant amount of power to charge the battery. The extender produces enough power to offset the motor's consumption at cruising speed. Otherwise, it's insufficient to provide any more power to operate the vehicle.

You can try to come up with whatever you'd like, but there are distinctions to be made between the different types, whether you like it or not. A range extended EV is not a hybrid, and hybrids are not range extended EVs. It's not a hybrid unless it can operate without necessitating the need for the battery to function.

5

u/photosendtrain 2d ago

Don't believe you can actually drive while charging.

2

u/IBetThisIsTakenToo 2d ago

Seems like we could make this more efficient, somehow... Imagine if the generator could directly move the engine?? That could be huge!

1

u/Astra_Mainn 1d ago

You just made it less efficient lol, by a solid 60% comparing the avg combustion engine efficiency vs the avg EV motor

1

u/IBetThisIsTakenToo 1d ago

And the portable generator is what, 100% efficient? Come on man haha

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

1

u/nertynot 2d ago

It's rare that someone responds with something that's actually interesting, thank you

0

u/LazyGandalf 2d ago

That's how many hybrids work, i.e. the engine under the hood (under most circumstances) doesn't directly drive the wheels but instead acts as a generator for the otherwise electric powertrain.

3

u/turtlelore2 2d ago

What would you need it for except for emergencies like this?

2

u/TheTerrasque 2d ago

Already been used for things like cleaning buildings for a while now.

2

u/xenelef290 2d ago

Drones with fiber optic lines miles long are being used in Ukraine to defeat ferocious radio jamming. They are completely immune to jamming.

2

u/bobbertmiller 2d ago

It's already in use. I've seen it as a flying camera, exactly as you suggested. It's brilliant for security and such. You can check on big crowds like festivals, ensure medics know what, where, how many. 

2

u/sylfy 2d ago

Tethered drones have existed since forever, this is nothing new. I was part of a project where we deployed tethered drones due to regulatory requirements of the area that we were operating in, and this was at least 5 years ago.

2

u/AnnualAct7213 2d ago

Why has this not been done before

It has. For decades.

Just as remote controlled quadcopters have existed for decades.

The difference is that it's only recently gotten popular and accessible enough that regular people can afford a hobby drone without breaking the bank, and thus have become aware of their existence.

1

u/whaasup- 2d ago

Tethered drones are also being used to provide microwave internet connections in emergencies

1

u/Battery4471 2d ago

Cable heavy. It makes no sense if you want to fly distances

1

u/das_kleine_krokodil 2d ago

its is brilliant. But I feel its good for the short term until they bring in a long pole and stick it in the ground for more permanent solution.

1

u/Ryhsuo 2d ago

In rescue situations like this where the first 72 hours are crucial, I think the portability is the most important part.

1

u/Slothstralia 2d ago

It's sort of a mental backwards step with that sort of tech, i can see why it would be not a common thought.

1

u/General_Helicopter1 2d ago

Because we have pretty decent, simpler and well proven tech in floodlights on masts with built in gensets.

1

u/TazBaz 2d ago

Because the tether limits range and risks tangling in all kinds of things

It’s got its uses cases, for sure, but also significant downsides. Ukrainians are using one-shot ones with fiber optic tethers to deal with RF jamming; these SAR guys are using a (power) tether because they don’t really need this drone to go far away and they do need the power for uptime/keeping the hella bright light powered.

1

u/TheDMsTome 1d ago

It is done and has been done for many years. I remember seeing police departments use this 7 years ago at least

1

u/DarwinsTrousers 1d ago

Because quadcopter technology was practically nonexistent 15 years ago. What did exist was hobbyists. This is just the natural progress of innovation now that the parts are so cheap and widespread.

1

u/LevelBrilliant9311 2d ago

The point of drones is to fly freely.
While this drone has some uses, pretty much the same could be achieved by a metal pole with a light.

1

u/Ryhsuo 2d ago

You can carry a drone case, a 50m coil power line and a small generator on your back. I don’t see someone doing the same for a 50m retractable pole.

Remember that a lot of this tech was probably conceived on the back of the 2010 Yushan earthquake, where the sites of rescue were incredibly remote and difficult to get to.

1

u/LevelBrilliant9311 1d ago

I'm not saying it doesn't have its uses. It clearly does, but the previous poster stated that "balancing poles is hard" and other reason why a pole is not working. Like they were just born and never seen a light pole in an emergency situation.

1

u/ruat_caelum 2d ago

This is in use everywhere. We have huge blimps in the US that are tethered to about 1k feet up with millimeter wave radar to watch for smaller drug traffic drones, and people on foot that cross the border as well as low flying aircraft, ultra lights, and paramotors.

One broke loose and got away just last month.

https://www.cbp.gov/frontline/frontline-november-aerostats

https://apnews.com/article/border-patrol-balloon-breaks-loose-texas-449bbea9884109bdb777d6eb2ee150aa

20

u/IntelligentMoney2 2d ago edited 2d ago

Why this and not a balloon? Less power consumption. What would be the limitations on a balloon? A drone is more stable to wind, what else?

Edit: I’m actually curious, not trying to start a war over this. What are the benefits of a drone over a balloon?

33

u/terlin 2d ago

You can easily reposition the light on a drone if you need more in a certain spot, which can happen if you're digging into rubble and looking for survivors.

20

u/FallschirmPanda 2d ago

No need for a helium supply chain in a disaster zone. Plus better control and responsiveness.

34

u/ninetynyne 2d ago

Balloons are harder to deal with and clumsy. Repositioning could be a pain.

Actually, I think a small balloon attached to a drone (kind of like a tiny zeppelin) might be the best of both worlds.

But helium is actually quite a valuable resource, and the next best thing, hydrogen, is far too flammable.

2

u/apathy-sofa 2d ago

Helium is quite valuable? The grocery store up the street from my home fills helium balloons for 99 cents each.

10

u/ninetynyne 2d ago edited 2d ago

Yes, actually, it is. In fact, there is preparation for a global shortage. Balloons are a giant waste of helium, and in fact, a large amount is required for usage in research and medical applications, such as MRIs.

It is produced as a byproduct of natural gas production, however, but that also means that needs to ramp up as well.

It's more like helium is being used frivolously for things like balloons because it's currently very cheap but that may stop due to needing it for more important applications first.

There's also the fun fact that, as far as I understand, once helium is released into the atmosphere, it is incredibly difficult and economically unviable to recapture, hence why once it's used, it's essentially gone permanently, as far as we're concerned.

1

u/apathy-sofa 1d ago

TIL, thanks

8

u/Ryhsuo 2d ago edited 2d ago

It’s actually quite a complicated subject. The answer is yes, sort of.

Helium’s most important use is supercooling. Think, MRIs, quantum computers, semiconductor fabricators. It doesn’t really have a substitute as a refrigerant so it’s a critical material for securing a technological future. With the accelerated advance of AI requiring more chips and fabs, this is quickly becoming a reality. Since 2021, helium prices have doubled.

Currently, the only good supply of Helium is a byproduct of natural gas. Only 3 countries supply most of the world’s demands, US, Qatar and Algeria. Because sources are so few, any war or trade disruptions can be highly damaging to tech industries that rely on it. In the long term, we will also run out of helium as it is a finite resource in the earth’s crust, with the only feasible option to generate more being a byproduct of fusion. This makes it unlike other gases such as Hydrogen and Nitrogen, which we can simply pull from the air or water and chemically seperate.

As for why Helium balloons are 99c, Helium currently costs around $15 a cubic meter, and it takes ~30-40 standard party size balloons to fill a cubic meter. It feels cheap because you’re buying Helium in its gas form, whereas industrial applications use Helium in its liquid form which is magnitudes of quantity greater.

-1

u/FlimsyMo 2d ago

Y’all think they gonna send up 50 pounds of helium? wtf is this comment chain?

Light balloons are 100 years old, drones just make it complicated

1

u/Profezzor-Darke 2d ago

Natural Helium is absolutely limited, and we need that stuff to defrost plane wings in between flights and other things

1

u/NiceAxeCollection 1d ago

It was free when I was a kid.

1

u/heart-aroni 2d ago edited 2d ago

Mini zeppelin sounds like a great idea!

I found these examples on YouTube

https://youtu.be/r8pXYhPDzBI?si=Fi7lCmpHcf-BxcNE

https://youtu.be/DHvhF4traPY?si=dyyoB6OUVuARoag7

And I remembered these things exist, inflatable rc dolphins

https://youtu.be/X0bdVWEmN64?si=yAlnbBScGHIyrMSg

7

u/brzrk 2d ago

I would assume that the size needed for a balloon to carry those powerful lights might be the issue.

5

u/CitizenCue 2d ago

Size + wind.

A balloon big enough to hoist lights that big, plus the weight of the cable, would be fairly substantial. And it would of course move with the wind. Which could be annoying at best and dangerous at worst.

23

u/Fortune_Cat 2d ago

Helium is a scarce resource

What if it's a windy, can the balloon self stablise

U need to lug a helium tank

U need to tether either way to power the lights

Lights produce heat Can the balloon resist and disperse that heat

What if the balloon pops. Carry spare helium and balloons?

Can you manouvre the balloon over rough landscape and rubble?

A drone boxes up quickly and easily in a portable case

2

u/lovethebacon 2d ago

Helium is not a scarce resource.

But the rest of your points are mostly correct.

5

u/phire 2d ago

A balloon just isn't a very stable platform. The wind is constantly moving it, so will need a gimbal to keep the light pointing in the correct direction. Even with the gimbal, the light will shift around in ways which might be distracting to workers.
With the right sensors, a drone can lock it self into a fixed position in 3D space. You can even make it fly to a fixed position over the site for better light positioning. You don't need a gimbal, because the drone can just rotate.

A balloon is lighter than air, so you still need a heavy base to anchor it in place and counter any wind. The drone doesn't need any anchoring it's neutral.

I suspect by the time you include the extra anchoring, the gimbal and equipment to fill the balloon with helium, the drone is far lighter and more portable. This is before we even talk about helium logistics.

With the wind, you can't operate the balloon anywhere near power lines, and you probably need a dedicated person to supervise each balloon full time. I suspect you can probably get away with leaving these tethered drones more or less unattended, once they are proven.

2

u/LevelBrilliant9311 2d ago

Maneuverability

2

u/Jealous_Priority_228 2d ago

They need to be able to move it consistently about the area to help focus efforts. They can't have a balloon constantly moving around, slipping, and being unreliable as the wind shifts.

1

u/Bell_FPV 2d ago

You still need a generator and a tether. You don't have to carry heavy pressurised helium containers

1

u/lipstickandchicken 2d ago

The enormous size of a balloon needed to lift the lights? And the fact you would have to transport helium around, and it leaks, and you're in a disaster zone so you can't get more?

And it would blow around and have to be taken down to refill etc.

1

u/Melicor 2d ago

Por que los dos? Why not drones with a air bladder that makes them almost neutrally buoyant.

1

u/li_shi 2d ago

To save electricity? It's not like they lack generators.

1

u/ark_keeper 2d ago

Tell drone where to go and it stays there. Can move it over the wreckage anywhere. Balloon could only be directly above the generator. Plus keeping the lights balanced under it would probably be more difficult.

1

u/madsci 1d ago

Have you ever handled a large balloon? I've launched weather balloons carrying up to about 12 pounds. That much lift requires almost a full K cylinder of helium, which weighs maybe 100 pounds and last time I got a price on a refill it was $350 to $400. The balloon is around 6-8' across and even in a light wind will blow all over the place. It doesn't take a lot of wind to blow it all the way back down to the ground. You can counteract some of that with more lift but that's more helium and a bigger balloon. The balloons themselves are extremely fragile and can tear themselves apart when tethered. You can get tougher balloon material but it's expensive and heavier.

A drone has active control and even my little consumer drone can hold its position to within a couple of feet in 20 MPH winds.

1

u/noodleexchange 1d ago

Steering. Pointing. Multiple capabilities on one platform

1

u/makeaccidents 2d ago edited 2d ago

Because drones get more likes on social media. There are plenty of solutions that are more efficient.

1

u/rolim91 2d ago

Why not just get a really long pole?

25

u/666666thats6sixes 2d ago edited 2d ago

A drone with 100 meters of cable fits into a pelican case and can be operated by one person, while a 100m pole, no matter how cleverly telescopic, will need a crew and at least a pickup truck to move around.

8

u/iBoMbY 2d ago

Because this solution beats an equally high pole on pretty much every conceivable metric. Overall price, logistics, etc. You can easily fit this drone, and a generator, in a car, and the setup time is maybe a minute, or two.

0

u/Ryhsuo 2d ago

You can conceivably carry this on your back in a 1-2 man team, which is really important for Asia since a lot of their disasters happen in remote mountainous areas with no road access.

6

u/StolenPancakesPH 2d ago

I imagine balancing the long pole would be hard, or probably additional structural cost for the base, not to mention the pole itself.

5

u/Wobbelblob 2d ago

The drone is also easier to set up, even if you assume that the base cost nothing. You need to find stable ground, get it up, that all cost manpower and time. The drone is up and running in 30 seconds.

2

u/dobiks 2d ago

And if you need to move them, you'd have to disassemble the pole, transfer and put it up again.

While this drone seems to have some extra wire, so you can just move it

-1

u/LevelBrilliant9311 2d ago

Sorry, but that is total bullshit. Poles for lighting in disaster areas have been and are used for decades.

2

u/lipstickandchicken 2d ago

If the disaster area already has all that stuff, which is more likely in a country like the US rather than a country like Myanmar.

These are Chinese responders using an innovative and quick solution to have these types of lights anywhere immediately. You are a sad sack on Reddit who think he's smarter than them.

1

u/FlimsyMo 2d ago

“Sir, it appears the drones malfunctioning. In the mean time they are simply using balloon lights….”

1

u/lipstickandchicken 2d ago

Do you really think lights like this can be lifted by balloons of a reasonable size? Even to lift the cable to power the lights would require so much helium, nevermind the lights themselves.

1

u/li_shi 2d ago

Drones are not alien technology.

They are reliable like any modern tools.

2

u/li_shi 2d ago

Yes.

Don't mean you cannot improve on the concept.

Horses have been used forever to transport people and stuff.

You won't deny a helicopter, and now likely a drone can do it much better for a large variety of cases.

0

u/LevelBrilliant9311 1d ago

The point is that the previous poster stated that "balancing poles is hard" and other reason why a pole is not working. Like they were just born and never seen a light pole in an emergency situation.

•

u/StolenPancakesPH 3h ago

I dont think you get what I meant my guy...

I wasn't saying it was impossible but the cost of running a pole that would probably exceed more than 15 meters would take longer and would cost more than having a drone fly that high or even higher since you'd have to consider the diameter and wall thickness of the pole, its base, the light fixture and the wires running through it. And imagine having to relocate it to another site.

Wasn't any point in explaining but jesus fuck you're being such a condescending cunt about this.

1

u/Starmark_115 2d ago

Limits it's range tho. At best this is just an adjustable Flood Light that u can change the altitude for.

Wonder what's the specs for the Lumens off of the Light and the length of the Pole.

1

u/li_shi 2d ago

It still remote-controlled and likely have the battery like any drones.so they can release the cable, and it works like a drone you can move kilometers away.

28

u/TelluricThread0 2d ago

Well, they're powering the light via the cable, so doing the same with the drone I'd say indefinitely.

2

u/COmarmot 2d ago

it's ground connected, otherwise likely less than 30 minutes

2

u/Ryhsuo 2d ago

I would say 10 minutes at best on if running on pure battery.

2

u/ruat_caelum 2d ago

so very thin but well insulated wire is used to pass high voltage low amp up to the drone where a transformer steps it down to power the LED's and keep the drone's battery topped off.

It says on as long as the generator below (the loud motor sound) stays powered.

2

u/jakgal04 2d ago

It’s a tethered drone, it can fly as long as you provide ground power.

1

u/Educational_Link5710 2d ago

It’s really not new technology. The US used this type of thing in Iraq like 15 years ago. Nearly undetectable surveillance anywhere you want.

1

u/Weimark 1d ago

This is like the good science fiction part.

1

u/Diablo_new 2d ago

Same old video from turkey Earth quake?? I have seen the same video form turkey, I may be wrong.

-41

u/FixedLoad 2d ago

Without light, 20 minutes. With light, 20 seconds... there are of course tradeoffs.

14

u/dumbmostoftime 2d ago

What ? , Did you not see the generator at the bottom and the tether to the drone

1

u/FixedLoad 2d ago

I didn't. But plenty have left me msgs telling me about it.

2

u/dumbmostoftime 2d ago

Reddit's gonna reddit , nothing to do about it

1

u/FixedLoad 2d ago

Yeah, you have a point.

0

u/li_shi 2d ago

Commercial drone can carry 40kg of payload for 15 minutes. Take much less to power leds.

Additionally, they have swappable batteries.

The base station is designed to have enough batteries and charge them fast enough to have continuous run time.

It's almost like people think about stuff

1

u/FixedLoad 2d ago

It's almost like i don't go on social media to be serious...