MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/madlads/comments/1j68c5y/thisss/mgnf6w9/?context=3
r/madlads • u/Sad_Raspberryy • Mar 08 '25
179 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
52
..... all meat is completely full of chemicals
-60 u/bb_kelly77 Mar 08 '25 And that changes my point HOW 21 u/sniply5 Mar 08 '25 That by your logic you should consider all meat just sludge, yet your statement only says McDonald's meat might as well be just sludge. -17 u/bb_kelly77 Mar 08 '25 Yeah I like to have different ways of saying it for each brand, adds variety to my sentences 21 u/PeaceCertain2929 Mar 08 '25 The variety of inaccuracies 🤌🏻 28 u/[deleted] Mar 08 '25 Then your argument isn't scientific, it's merely semantic.
-60
And that changes my point HOW
21 u/sniply5 Mar 08 '25 That by your logic you should consider all meat just sludge, yet your statement only says McDonald's meat might as well be just sludge. -17 u/bb_kelly77 Mar 08 '25 Yeah I like to have different ways of saying it for each brand, adds variety to my sentences 21 u/PeaceCertain2929 Mar 08 '25 The variety of inaccuracies 🤌🏻 28 u/[deleted] Mar 08 '25 Then your argument isn't scientific, it's merely semantic.
21
That by your logic you should consider all meat just sludge, yet your statement only says McDonald's meat might as well be just sludge.
-17 u/bb_kelly77 Mar 08 '25 Yeah I like to have different ways of saying it for each brand, adds variety to my sentences 21 u/PeaceCertain2929 Mar 08 '25 The variety of inaccuracies 🤌🏻 28 u/[deleted] Mar 08 '25 Then your argument isn't scientific, it's merely semantic.
-17
Yeah I like to have different ways of saying it for each brand, adds variety to my sentences
21 u/PeaceCertain2929 Mar 08 '25 The variety of inaccuracies 🤌🏻 28 u/[deleted] Mar 08 '25 Then your argument isn't scientific, it's merely semantic.
The variety of inaccuracies 🤌🏻
28
Then your argument isn't scientific, it's merely semantic.
52
u/sniply5 Mar 08 '25
..... all meat is completely full of chemicals