r/memes 1d ago

Leave them alone🤬🤬🤬

Post image
66.1k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

186

u/Kenny-KO 23h ago

I hate to break it to people, This isn't a Nintendo only problem.

29

u/VickFVM 21h ago

But it is since Nintendo is the one pushing for those prices

76

u/Pokedudesfm 21h ago

nintendo has 3 games at $70 or above. totk, new DK, and new Mario Kart at $80

every single sony and microsoft first party release that isnt a remaster has been $70 since  NBA 2k21

13

u/IxeyaSwarm 17h ago

Charging that much for a sports game is also ridiculous when the only noticeable changes are names on the shirts.

3

u/JFISHER7789 10h ago

But those updated rosters are worth hundreds!! /s

9

u/atemus 19h ago edited 19h ago

People were generally willing to accept the increase to $70 because games had been $60 for decades so it didn't seem too horribly greedy to finally bump it up a bit. But now it's just been a few years and Nintendo's already experimenting with $80 and $90 price points. Should we just accept games going up $10 every 3 years or so? And for a game that's just going to be another basic iteration of Mario Kart, most likely with more paid DLC on the way? Not even going to get into the paid tech demo they revealed. Nintendo's getting greedy and they deserve the criticism.

6

u/Pokedudesfm 19h ago

no, pay what the game is worth to you, but im pointing out that the comment I was responding to is inaccurate.

And for a game that's just going to be another basic iteration of Mario Kart

for most people thats enough, but the implication that it would be more worth it if the game had more in it actually supports nintendos position that games should be priced according to demand. 

sony doesnt sell GOW at 20 bucks often because they are nice, they do it because not many people are willing to pay full price for that game many years later. MK8 is the fifth best selling game of all time and has not had significant discounts during that entire period. we will see if people have the same sentiment with a 80$ price point, but of course, i have to imagine even if it sells many copies a large majority of those copies will be the bundle

1

u/pyrolizard11 5h ago

Should we just accept games going up $10 every 3 years or so?

No, you should be pissed off at the policy decisions driving rampant inflation. But Nintendo isn't your/a government. You may as well be pissed off at time for passing as at Nintendo here, the fault lies elsewhere.

1

u/ChargedBonsai98 Cringe Factory 1h ago

What the other guy said, but also, the $90 games you mentioned do not and have never existed. Nintendo wants $80 for Mario Kart and $70 for DK.

31

u/Independent-Dust5122 21h ago

BUT NINTENDO IS EVIL CAUSE I WANT MY GAMES FOR FREEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8

u/MakingaJessinmyPants 16h ago

You are exactly who this meme is talking about

13

u/St1cks 20h ago

Helldivers , astrobot, and Lego horiizons all released last year and were 60 or less

1

u/TrueZach 15h ago

mario and Luigi brother ship, mario party jamboree, echoes of wisdom all released last year and were all $60

2

u/St1cks 13h ago

I never claimed Nintendo didn't, I only disputed that Sony hasn't released any first party games for less then $70

4

u/bellos_ 11h ago

Helldivers isn't a first party game.

1

u/AirCautious2239 5h ago

Astrobot was definetly 80€ at one point. That's what I bought it for in a local hardware store that uses market price only

1

u/CloacaFacts 15h ago

Atleast those other games go down in price over time. Nintendo will keep the price for the lifetime of the system

1

u/VickFVM 15h ago

Who is saying I'm defending that? Any company doing that is just greedy, Nintendo is greedy for selling a game at $80 dlls

17

u/AttackHelicopter641 Bri’ish 21h ago

I've seen people defend GTA 6 potentially being over 100 so definitely not just Nintendo

4

u/LightEarthWolf96 17h ago

I saw someone on tiktok say it's absurd for mario kart to be the same price as gta6 and they compared that to saying tacobell should be the same price as a high end steak dinner

I pointed out that gta6 doesn't warrant the high price either. It's more like tacobell verses McDonald's. It's a gta game. I haven't got a response to that.

-5

u/ecn9 16h ago

GTA6 absolutely warrants a higher price than Mario kart. Your comparison is just bad. Mario Kart doesn't have any story.

11

u/mmf9194 21h ago

Monster Hunter Wilds was $70

7

u/TheFemboiFaerie 19h ago

Did not hear a SINGLE peep about that, beyond launch; which, the reception was mostly tame disappointment.

Nintendo does it? Frothing at the mouth.

1

u/minx_the_tiger 17h ago

Disappointment? I didn't hear that at all. I heard the opposite. MonHun also does free updates that add more content into the game for quite a while after it comes out. One just came out today, if I'm not mistaken.

1

u/TheFemboiFaerie 16h ago

It did; and I'm playing it.

And yeah, I heard plenty of people mildly upset about the pricing, but it wasn't the most widespread, mouth-frothing thing, which was my key point.

1

u/minx_the_tiger 16h ago

I think I would have been more upset about it if things like Diablo 4 weren't more expensive and not as fun. XD

1

u/AirCautious2239 5h ago

The community was really disappointed by the performance on pc alone. Even console players had problems playing at resolution mode and pc players are still required to have the newest gear to play 1080p or above. The game itself is mostly loved but there still was much disappointment

1

u/minx_the_tiger 3h ago

I've noticed performance issues seem to be kind of a theme with Capcom games on release. Sometimes they patch them...

Actually, now that I think about it, most games that I've recently played that released on PC and console at the same time had, and continue to have, some performance issues.

1

u/ierghaeilh 21h ago

The bean counters have already decided games should be $100. Companies are just egging each other on to see if it sticks now.

1

u/CorruptedAura27 21h ago

Yup. All it takes is one of these companies pushing for it for everyone else to pile in behind them following suit, and then it's a shit standard. And then they wonder why people are starting to sail the 7 seas again.

1

u/Ok_Combination_294 12h ago

Ubisoft selling their full version of games for 130$ - "Hold my beer"

2

u/runnytempurabatter 19h ago

Except it is? Haven't paid over 30€ for a single game on steam or PlayStation

4

u/NorwegianPopsicle 16h ago

1

u/runnytempurabatter 3h ago

I didn't say there are no games above 30€ on the PS store. I bought Ghost of Tsushima for 16€, and Ragnarok for 24€. Every single steam game of mine was bought at a 60% discount minimum. How often do games like Mario Kart and Pokemon go on an 60% sale?

0

u/EymaWeeTodd 21h ago

All publishers want it. Nintendo is just going to try it first.

3

u/dziggurat 20h ago

Huh? Sony broke the $60 line 5 years ago.

3

u/NorwegianPopsicle 16h ago edited 16h ago

Here I can look at the Playstation and Xbox game stores and see games have crossed $100 dollars and a lot are in the $80-90 range, it all happened shorly after Sony made a push for the $70 standard years ago.

https://i.imgur.com/uwdmZSU.png

So they aren't the first just following suit

-1

u/takeitsweazy 20h ago

Not really. If you look at Steam, or the PS5 Store you'll see a ton of games currently available for $80-100+ right now. They just market them as the "premium" edition or whatever bullshit they want to go with - where you get the base game + pointless digital bonuses or battle passes. They do sell base versions for $70 or so, but these are not the first prices over $70 that we're seeing people pay.

-1

u/Thenameisric 19h ago

These prices existed in the 90s LOL.

2

u/takeitsweazy 19h ago

I get that and remember it. But I don’t think that necessarily holds relevance to the conversation being had which is firmly in our current era of game prices.

-1

u/Thenameisric 19h ago

And those prices exist now as well... So...

1

u/liquinas 15h ago

Exactly. The lack of a Squid Game style Mario Party TV series is their biggest problem right now.

1

u/Real_J_Jonah_Jameson 9h ago

Agreed brother I'm seeing a frightening trend with each generation the games are bumping up £20 or so the standard on the 360 was 40 and since then we'll it's gone to shi*

1

u/yummymario64 8h ago edited 8h ago

Also I think a lot of people are glossing over the fact that they are offering upgrades for switch 1 games, instead of just making us buy them again for 80 bucks.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not happy with the 80 bucks for Kart, but the Switch 1 upgrade packs definitely seem like a "they didn't have to do this" kind of thing to me

1

u/Zestyclose-Sundae593 40m ago

They're spearheading the increase. We gotta shut them down now or else everyone else will start jumping on the wagon and make your comment true.

0

u/WarpmanAstro 20h ago

No, you see it's okay that Sony and Microsoft released $500 consoles with $75 controllers, $70 games, and mandatory $10 online subscription five years ago because those are big boy consoles!

2

u/AirCautious2239 5h ago

500? On release ps5 was more like 700+ and not even from resellers but at hardware stores and there have been more than enough 80+ games for both consoles but nInTeNdO iS eViL cOrPorAtIoN

-2

u/Bowser_Rocks 20h ago

Exactly inflation happens with everything. Just took a while for games to do that as well.

-4

u/aloonatronrex 22h ago

Nah, AAA PC games that you’ll spend hours and hours playing over and over again cost, what, £20 maybe £30?

1

u/Slow_Possibility6332 20h ago

What world is a triple a game releasing at 30 pounds?

1

u/aloonatronrex 18h ago

Literally none.

1

u/smallfried 8h ago

Games don't go bad though. You can wait a few years before buying them.

1

u/AirCautious2239 5h ago

In What world do AAA Games get cheaper though? Witcher 3 fe. is still full price