r/memes 1d ago

Leave them alone🤬🤬🤬

Post image
69.9k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

193

u/Kenny-KO 1d ago

I hate to break it to people, This isn't a Nintendo only problem.

29

u/VickFVM 1d ago

But it is since Nintendo is the one pushing for those prices

78

u/Pokedudesfm 1d ago

nintendo has 3 games at $70 or above. totk, new DK, and new Mario Kart at $80

every single sony and microsoft first party release that isnt a remaster has been $70 since  NBA 2k21

14

u/IxeyaSwarm 1d ago

Charging that much for a sports game is also ridiculous when the only noticeable changes are names on the shirts.

3

u/JFISHER7789 1d ago

But those updated rosters are worth hundreds!! /s

8

u/atemus 1d ago edited 1d ago

People were generally willing to accept the increase to $70 because games had been $60 for decades so it didn't seem too horribly greedy to finally bump it up a bit. But now it's just been a few years and Nintendo's already experimenting with $80 and $90 price points. Should we just accept games going up $10 every 3 years or so? And for a game that's just going to be another basic iteration of Mario Kart, most likely with more paid DLC on the way? Not even going to get into the paid tech demo they revealed. Nintendo's getting greedy and they deserve the criticism.

6

u/Pokedudesfm 1d ago

no, pay what the game is worth to you, but im pointing out that the comment I was responding to is inaccurate.

And for a game that's just going to be another basic iteration of Mario Kart

for most people thats enough, but the implication that it would be more worth it if the game had more in it actually supports nintendos position that games should be priced according to demand. 

sony doesnt sell GOW at 20 bucks often because they are nice, they do it because not many people are willing to pay full price for that game many years later. MK8 is the fifth best selling game of all time and has not had significant discounts during that entire period. we will see if people have the same sentiment with a 80$ price point, but of course, i have to imagine even if it sells many copies a large majority of those copies will be the bundle

2

u/pyrolizard11 19h ago

Should we just accept games going up $10 every 3 years or so?

No, you should be pissed off at the policy decisions driving rampant inflation. But Nintendo isn't your/a government. You may as well be pissed off at time for passing as at Nintendo here, the fault lies elsewhere.

1

u/ChargedBonsai98 Cringe Factory 15h ago

What the other guy said, but also, the $90 games you mentioned do not and have never existed. Nintendo wants $80 for Mario Kart and $70 for DK.

31

u/Independent-Dust5122 1d ago

BUT NINTENDO IS EVIL CAUSE I WANT MY GAMES FOR FREEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8

u/MakingaJessinmyPants 1d ago

You are exactly who this meme is talking about

12

u/St1cks 1d ago

Helldivers , astrobot, and Lego horiizons all released last year and were 60 or less

4

u/TrueZach 1d ago

mario and Luigi brother ship, mario party jamboree, echoes of wisdom all released last year and were all $60

2

u/St1cks 1d ago

I never claimed Nintendo didn't, I only disputed that Sony hasn't released any first party games for less then $70

5

u/bellos_ 1d ago

Helldivers isn't a first party game.

1

u/AirCautious2239 20h ago

Astrobot was definetly 80€ at one point. That's what I bought it for in a local hardware store that uses market price only

1

u/CloacaFacts 1d ago

Atleast those other games go down in price over time. Nintendo will keep the price for the lifetime of the system

1

u/VickFVM 1d ago

Who is saying I'm defending that? Any company doing that is just greedy, Nintendo is greedy for selling a game at $80 dlls