r/memes 1d ago

Leave them alone🤬🤬🤬

Post image
69.9k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/DrScience01 1d ago

The whole "inflation exist" is moot when the wages are still the exact same

14

u/Yamabikio 1d ago

I don't really think anyone is saying it doesn't suck for the consumer. It's not really Nintendo's fault that wages are stagnant. I personally would like for the price of games to be relative to how much time and effort goes into them. I'm fine with paying more for games that they take a few more years to make and polish.

7

u/DrScience01 1d ago

And BG3 cost 60 dollars with the amount of time and care to create the game. I'll assure you, you will spend more time in bg3 than any other Nintendo game

10

u/Yamabikio 1d ago

Yeah I think a lot (most?) of Nintendo games are overpriced. I guarantee a lot of the $80 games don't belong at that price point. The Pokémon games definitely don't.

10

u/DrScience01 1d ago

And the fact that Nintendo doesn't lower the price of games that came out years ago is pretty shitty practice

4

u/Yamabikio 1d ago

It's pretty inconvenient for us, but if people are still paying that price I don't see why they would stop. Same thing for them pumping out low quality Pokémon games every year.

1

u/Life_Ad_7715 1d ago

To not be degenerate scum who have deeply upset their audience with naked greed?

5

u/superbabe69 1d ago

Do you think any rational business lowers their prices when sales are through the roof without lowering?

3

u/Myrsky4 1d ago

If people keep buying it and going back for more then they aren't deeply upsetting their audience - big caveat we haven't seen the new price increase in action so that definitely could change things, but at least previously Nintendo not lowering their prices certainly hadn't upset the majority of their audience enough to stop buying.

My little soapbox is that this isn't a big deal though. It sucks, but the best games were already indie and small studio games that sell for far far cheaper. There is very little passion that makes it to the end game on large studios and it's getting more and more obvious.

0

u/Life_Ad_7715 1d ago

You are incorrect in an immediately observable way

3

u/Myrsky4 1d ago

Their games still sell like hot cakes even with them not lowering prices. Pokemon games still sell like crazy despite them being messes.

Yes people are complaining about the price increases on social media, but we don't know how that's actually going to translate to the real world when the people online are the minority. Until their actual sales are affected clearly Nintendo isn't upsetting their audience all that much

1

u/Life_Ad_7715 1d ago

Okay they have sold zero switch 2s clearly everyone is mad. 

Stop being dishonest. 

I never said they couldn't GET AWAY with cheating people, I said that is what they are doing.

2

u/Myrsky4 1d ago

You're the one being dishonest claiming Nintendo is deeply upsetting their audience. Nintendo charged the same price for Zelda:TotK as the Donkey Kong was announced at and it still sold amazingly. Nintendo has a long long history of never putting their games on deep sales and it hasn't stopped people from buying games years later. The only evidence for your claim is social media and we are the minority. We have 0 hard evidence so far that Nintendo is alienating customers

The solution is simple - stop buying expensive games. Maybe you are right and this is the point where they've gone too far, but until the sales slow down or stop then clearly Nintendo hasn't really upset their consumers

1

u/Life_Ad_7715 1d ago

Yeah no one is upset! We are all being very polite and agreeable!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Life_Ad_7715 1d ago

No, bro. Inflation.

1

u/f-ingsteveglansberg 1d ago

Nintendo used to have two major price points. One for handheld, one for home console. When they consolidated lines, I really wish they had kept the two level pricing system so smaller games like Link's Awakening, FDC wouldn't be priced similarly to big hitters like Odyssey and MK.

1

u/Yamabikio 1d ago

Anything like that would be great. At this point it just feels like an arbitrary price point that incentivizes companies into churching out low effort trash.

1

u/luckyvonstreetz 1d ago

Yes, if they charge 80 for the next pokemon game and it's in the state of violet/scarlet, they can't really justify the price. They should let Monolith Soft collaborate on their next game, they know how to make most of Nintendo hardware.

1

u/Yamabikio 1d ago

As much as Pokémon games aren't worth $80, it's not going to stop it from being the highest selling game on the switch 2, so why wouldn't they