MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/nothingeverhappens/comments/1jrurs8/because_random_acts_of_kindness_dont_exist/mlhtlwn/?context=3
r/nothingeverhappens • u/TS_4Life • 1d ago
23 comments sorted by
View all comments
11
Nah, the syntax is all wrong and it doesn't make sense. Probably AI slop
"I'll pay for it with my groceries" makes 0 sense
11 u/SquidArmada 1d ago I interpreted it as "I'll pay for your thing when I pay for my thing." Either way, it still looks fake af 4 u/KaralDaskin 1d ago “It (along) with” Even with the implied word missed that phrase makes sense. I agree this one sounds fake, though. Just not for that reason. 3 u/Goroman86 1d ago More that the first "line" of dialog from the "poor person" included "I'll pay for yours" 5 u/NeilJosephRyan 1d ago No, it DOES make grammatical sense. Syntax is the last thing that makes this fake.
I interpreted it as "I'll pay for your thing when I pay for my thing."
Either way, it still looks fake af
4
“It (along) with” Even with the implied word missed that phrase makes sense.
I agree this one sounds fake, though. Just not for that reason.
3 u/Goroman86 1d ago More that the first "line" of dialog from the "poor person" included "I'll pay for yours"
3
More that the first "line" of dialog from the "poor person" included "I'll pay for yours"
5
No, it DOES make grammatical sense. Syntax is the last thing that makes this fake.
11
u/Goroman86 1d ago
Nah, the syntax is all wrong and it doesn't make sense. Probably AI slop
"I'll pay for it with my groceries" makes 0 sense