MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1jraffn/5_rate_cuts/mldaake/?context=3
r/wallstreetbets • u/abishop717 • 1d ago
697 comments sorted by
View all comments
417
JPow is neither obligated nor inclined to clean up Don's mess. $SPY going under $500 after he talks.
64 u/Various_Car8779 1d ago He's obligated to step in when unemployment spikes 1 u/JGWol 1d ago And unemployment was down today and job numbers were good. So spy is going to nosedive against expectations cause forward earnings are now all crushed thanks to tariffs 6 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Unemployment was up. 3 u/JGWol 1d ago Oh sorry I was looking at U6 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Thatโs only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
64
He's obligated to step in when unemployment spikes
1 u/JGWol 1d ago And unemployment was down today and job numbers were good. So spy is going to nosedive against expectations cause forward earnings are now all crushed thanks to tariffs 6 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Unemployment was up. 3 u/JGWol 1d ago Oh sorry I was looking at U6 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Thatโs only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
1
And unemployment was down today and job numbers were good. So spy is going to nosedive against expectations cause forward earnings are now all crushed thanks to tariffs
6 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Unemployment was up. 3 u/JGWol 1d ago Oh sorry I was looking at U6 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Thatโs only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
6
Unemployment was up.
3 u/JGWol 1d ago Oh sorry I was looking at U6 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Thatโs only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
3
Oh sorry I was looking at U6
Thatโs only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing.
1 u/MasterGrok 1d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed.
1 u/Dr-McLuvin 1d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
417
u/Emilio___Molestevez 1d ago
JPow is neither obligated nor inclined to clean up Don's mess. $SPY going under $500 after he talks.