[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

Who were the "counterparties" to all of the real estate deals that former President Trump is being accused of falsifying? Counterparties include banks that financed the loans, their LAWYERS, and their COMPLIANCE teams, INSURANCE companies on the deals, ACCOUNTANTS, etc. In fact, did the state of NY itself approve any land titles, deeds, or licenses WITHOUT performing any due dligence (but now claims the deals were 'fraud")? If so, where are the state's attorneys and bankers who financed those deals in the state of NY with TAXPAYER SALARIES (when they craved Trump's money at the time)?

Every counterparty had a fiduciary responsibility UNDER LAW to perform "due diligence," including documentation of their investigation into any asset used to collateralize loans on behalf of their institutions. If Trump is "guilty" of fraud, then by extension, the counterparties are ALSO guilty (aiding & abetting, malpractice, fraud, negligence, etc.) Why has the Trump defense team not employed the legal tactic of JOINDER? In for a penny, in for a pound. ... Go for the jugular.

Some research on THIRD PARTY JOINDER: SOURCE Joinder of Parties in Civil Lawsuits | Vassallo & Salazar, P.C. | Dallas, Texas (vslawyers.com)

​

Permissive Joinder of Parties Court rules provide that the plaintiff has the option of joining an additional person as a plaintiff. The defendant also has the option of joining an additional person as a defendant. The test for permissive joinder of parties is whether the lawsuit raises a question of law or fact common to all parties and whether some right to relief relating to the same event is asserted on behalf of each plaintiff and against each defendant.

Impleading Third Parties A defendant is permitted to bring into the action or implead another person or persons whom the defendant claims would be liable to him or her for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim. The added person is called the third-party defendant, and the defendant who asks the court to add the third party is called the third-party plaintiff. It is up to the court whether to permit a defendant to add a third party. The court might decide not to add a third party if it would complicate or confuse the lawsuit. Examples of third parties who might be impleaded include a person who is a joint venturer with the defendant. Another example would be an insurance company that might be responsible for payment of the plaintiff’s claim if the defendant, an insured, were held liable.

​

Who were the "counterparties" to all of the real estate deals that former President Trump is being accused of falsifying? Counterparties include banks that financed the loans, their LAWYERS, and their COMPLIANCE teams, INSURANCE companies on the deals, ACCOUNTANTS, etc. In fact, did the state of NY itself approve any land titles, deeds, or licenses WITHOUT performing any due dligence (but now claims the deals were 'fraud")? If so, where are the state's attorneys and bankers who fiancned those deals when they craved Trump's money at the time?

Every counterparty had a fiduciary responsibility UNDER LAW to perform "due diligence," including documentation of their investigation into any asset used to collateralize loans on behalf of their institutions. If Trump is "guilty" of fraud, then by extension, the counterparties are ALSO guilty (aiding & abetting, malpractice, fraud, negligence, etc.) Why has the Trump defense team not employed the legal tactic of JOINDER? In for a penny, in for a pound.

Some research on THIRD PARTY JOINDER: SOURCE Joinder of Parties in Civil Lawsuits | Vassallo & Salazar, P.C. | Dallas, Texas (vslawyers.com)

​

Permissive Joinder of PartiesCourt rules provide that the plaintiff has the option of joining an additional person as a plaintiff. The defendant also has the option of joining an additional person as a defendant. The test for permissive joinder of parties is whether the lawsuit raises a question of law or fact common to all parties and whether some right to relief relating to the same event is asserted on behalf of each plaintiff and against each defendant.

Impleading Third PartiesA defendant is permitted to bring into the action or implead another person or persons whom the defendant claims would be liable to him or her for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim. The added person is called the third-party defendant, and the defendant who asks the court to add the third party is called the third-party plaintiff. It is up to the court whether to permit a defendant to add a third party. The court might decide not to add a third party if it would complicate or confuse the lawsuit. Examples of third parties who might be impleaded include a person who is a joint venturer with the defendant. Another example would be an insurance company that might be responsible for payment of the plaintiff’s claim if the defendant, an insured, were held liable.

​

[removed]

My account is flagged as inactive and scheduled for deletion. I would like to keep the free account, but it does not give me the option. How to proceed (to keep the free account)? Thanks