Yeah MW pumps their mana like crazy during big damage scenarios, but mana tea is just goated.

Netop.... Og det er hvis de overhovedet kommer ind til at starte med.

Mit anekdotiske indtryk er, at dem som faktisk er på læreruddannelsen (og nok nærmere, som stadig er der efter 1. År er overstået), er dem, som rent faktisk ønsker at være lærer enten fordi de brænder for fagene, eller de brænder for specifikt at undervise, eller de brænder for at gøre en forskel for børns opvækst/vilkår i folkeskoleårene. Ud af de hundrede/flere hundrede personer, som jeg er kommet i kontakt med på læreruddannelsen, er der kun 1 hvor jeg simpelthen ikke forstår, hvorfor vedkommende tog læreruddannelsen, samt hvordan personen kom igennem.

Jeg oplevede dog en del som valgte faget fra, fordi vilkårene, pænt sagt, ikke var særligt gode samt dårlige oplevelser fra enten lærerne på studiet eller fra de lærere, som skulle vejlede dem som studerende/praktikanter i folkeskolerne.

Problemet er ikke, at det bliver valgt fra fordi det ikke er en "fuldt ud" universitetsuddannelse. Du får en professionsbachelor, og det er et "university college" du studerer på, men man hører bare konstant om, at vilkårene som folkeskolelærer bliver værre og værre, lønnen følger ikke med, og normeringerne og omstændighederne kun bliver ringere... For ikke at snakke om, at måden den generelle befolkning opfører sig overfor lærerne også kun følger folkeskolens negative tendens.

Men som sagt; Hvis du kommer ind via kvote 2, på trods af en mangel på en snit på 7, så bliver du sat igennem en række små prøver for at finde ud af, om du egner dig som folkeskolelærer til at begynde med. Du får 2 cases, hvori du bliver testet på, hvordan du ville agere som folkeskolelærer, hvis du stod i de situationer, sammen med, at du også bliver stillet spørgsmål til din motivation som lærer, hvilke fag du overvejer, hvad dine interessepunkter er, osv osv., så du kommer ikke bare ind "bare fordi de mangler".

Kvaliteten vil altid være svingende, fordi de både afhænger af, hvor godt du klikker med læreren personligt og fagligt (om deres undervisningsmetoder fungerer for dig), hvor meget forberedelsestid, klasse dynamikken, hvor motiverede de er, og jeg kunne blive ved...

Så kort og godt... Det er squ ikke nemt.

Argh... Som en der faktisk har taget læreruddannelsen, så er det sjældent de yngre lærere, som har en tendens til at overproppe elever med den her type ting. Ofte er det lærere, som ikke selv kender hoved og hale i, hvilket materiale der er godt materiale, fordi det netop er nemt at finde på nettet. IT færdigheder er desværre en mangelvare fra især den noget ældre generation.

Det er ikke for at sige, at det ikke også kan ske ved yngre lærere, men jeg har klart oplevet en tendens.

For så ikke at sige; I hvert fald den læreruddannelse jeg var på gik meget op i, at man vurderede det materiale man brugte, hvis man fandt det på nettet.

Du skal have et snit på 7 fra gymnasiet for at komme på lærerstudiet ELLER gennemgå en adgangsprøve, hvori din tilgang til undervisning, børn, m.m., bliver stillet spørgsmål til.

Man bliver ikke "bare" skolelærer, fordi man ikke har andre muligheder eller fordi man klarede sig dårligt i skole. At tro anderledes er ikke bare forkert, men direkte tåbeligt.

Da jeg flyttede hjemmefra i '15 kostede en liter mælk 5 kroner.

Det ved jeg, fordi jeg drak en liter om dagen.

Nu drikker jeg maks et par liter om måneden, medmindre jeg finder et heldigt tilbud et sted. Det er sygt.

På baggrund af, at du umiddelbart troller, så er det her sidste besked, men i tilfælde af, at du er komplet seriøs (man ved aldrig nu om stunder):

Det er du i din fulde ret til at synes. Det gør det bare ikke til virkelighed.

Fortsat god dag

Nu er det ikke for at springe tilfældigt ind i en debat jeg egentlig ikke gider være en del af, men... Samfundet og dets sprog skal ikke føje sig for, hvad dine personlige holdninger er om det. At du, som enkeltperson, mener at noget kan være misbrug, fordi det synes du, er det ikke ensbetydende med, at det er det.

En ting er holdning. Du kan godt have holdningen at det er misbrug. Det er du i din fulde ret til at mene.

Det betyder dog ikke, at du har ret.

Hvad definerer du som sketchy?

Men aftensmadshacks, eller nærmere, nemme aftensmads ideer, her jeg nogle stykker af.

Pasta med pesto og tomater. Evt tilføje andet grønt eller kylling.

Grilled cheese sandwiches (eller lav dem til "melts", som /r/grilledcheese ville kalde den)

Beef Broccoli

Svinemørbrad marineret i brun farin, soya, og krydderier, stegt i ovn (med tilfældigt tilbehør)

Spaghetti m. Kødsovs med whatever grøntsager du har til rådighed eller som du har lyst.

Stir fry - whatever grøntsager, og whatever kød, svitset på en pande med en sovs lavet af en blanding af Hoisin Sauce, teriyaki sauce og Soya Sauce (kan tilføje honning, brun farin eller sukker for at sødme det op hvis det er for saltet, eller du kan tilføje andre krydderier).

Remas rød/grøn thai karry blanding fra frost. Det er åbenlyst ikke i nærheden af autentisk thai grøn karry eller noget, men det smager squ egentlig meget godt.

Oh, og så kan jeg anbefale jer alle at købe et glas Ajvar når I alligevel befinder jer i Rema (eller endnu bedre, jeres lokale special forretning/Bazaar) Det er i hvert fald nogle stykker. Smid det på brød, i mad, eller gør som min far lærte mig: Bland det med hytteost og smid det på noget brød (evt med kødpålæg og ost ovenpå som en sandwich).

No, I stopped doing it after trying it, because the comment was the result. You dont even have an argument as to why, or when, it would actually work.

So, tell me, what elo are you, where this works uncontested more often than it fails? Do tell.

Within the last few months? No. And it's entirely irrelevant to the discussion whether or not I have invaded from red to Gromp recently.

So let's get this straight: Your dont think the fact that all the following conditions have to be right is an obscene amount of work for, at best, a kill and taking their quadrant:

• Your champ has to be able to reach their Gromp before theyre finished with it (considering 5 seconds advantage)

• Entire enemy team neglects using the information of your bot or top showing your position

• Enemy doesnt place a river ward

• Enemy jungler hasnt finished his Gromp and either is low enough that you kill him before he gets to smite it OR he fucks his smite OR he's somehow playing something that takes so long to kill Gromp after smiting blue that you'll be able to fight him on it

• Enemy jungle doesnt consider any of the above at any point, nor considers jungle matchup

• Enemy bot/top, whichever side youre on, doesnt use their level 1 prio to get an advantage OR they do, but dont move OR they do, and they move, but somehow you get away after killing Enemy jungle and getting his Gromp (because only getting a kill means you'll, at best, be up those 300g, maybe down a little bit of time depending on if you can go straight to your camp or not).

• Enemy jungle then continuously fucks up by either going to their now dead quadrant OR doesnt ward the next quadrant they go for in preparation for invasion.

That is, as a fact, a LOT of shit that has to go right for you to be up 300g + the xp/gold you might get from clearing an extra quadrant over the enemy (if enemy team allows for it).

If your team chooses to "fake it", you suddenly gave up level 1 on both sidelanes. Congrats, thats even more problems for your team for an irrelevant gain that most likely wont do anything for you.

And no - in high elo junglers dont often neglect an early ward AND ignore jungle matchups. D+ junglers actually get super annoyed every single time their jungle isnt covered by their entire team (unless invading, in which case they might be more understanding. In this scenario there might also be leashing, but thats more about keeping up the numbers in case enemies collapse, rather than actually helping with the clear - its just a bonus).

Also in regards to them helping: By the time you reach the Gromp, top/bot will be level 2. They can collapse, on time, unless you somehow instantly kill Enemy jungle. If you dont, then any time you spend ik Enemy jungle is time YOU lose. Its super easy to crash 2nd wave or 3rd wave if you get level 1-2 advantage. Doing so means leaving the lane doesnt really cause any losses to the sidelane that does so.

Its not a high risk, high reward: It's an absolutely insane risk for, at best, an okay reward, and on average, a net negative reward, and at worst, a literally game-losing reward.

There's a reason no one leashes unless the circumstances literally REQUIRE it (like 5% hp after an invade or youre invading, have been spotted, and youre helping cover for your jungler).

If you get to scuttle at 3:35 (or 3:30 with a leash), you could - in almost any case - optimize your clear to save those 5 seconds in a way that wouldn't give away your position or ruin your laners lvl 1.

You will, generally, always be full - or close to full - hp from a full clear. Leashing vs no leash won't change much, probably less than 50 hp worth, as you've finished, because your jungle item heals you more based on missing health when finishing a camp.

The advantages are, at best, insanely minor, and at worst completely inexistent. The negatives, however, can range from "more or less irrelevant" to "game-ruiningly bad" depending on matchups and such

Not only did our understanding of laning change - the entirety of the jungle has changed, on average, completely once per year. Jungle has gotten more resources to become entirely self-sufficient and capable of catching up to laners and enemy jungle if falling behind. Years ago this wasn't the way it is today.

There is, at its current iteration, absolutely no reason to leash, unless you're 5% HP and can't clear the camp because you're not capable of kiting the camp in relation to the sustain/cc/kiting abilities your champ provides.

This is all based on the assumption that you actually even get 5 full seconds from the leash AND those 5 seconds actually provide any sort of meaning AND none of the negatives are present in any way.

So no. Don't leash. Ever. It's beyond atrocious.

Huh... I see. I haven't seen a lot of Bel'veths lately, so I haven't really noticed they're more likely to start buff. The more you know, though I do imagine she'd have trouble doing buffs at 5% hp because she lack sustain, range or cc to keep sustaining with the jungle item.

Okay. Let's say you want to do blue side red into red side invade.

Your botlane just leashed you. You got that extra 5 seconds. Cool. Enemy jungle now knows where you are and is prepared for your invade (if your jungle champ is capable of invading). Your own bot just lost lvl 1 prio. You can no longer invade then.

The ABSOLUTE best case scenario is if they completely ignore your team leashing (your positioning not being compromised because they choose to ignore it), they didn't ward, the enemy jungle ignore what champs both of you are playing, and the guy is slow as hell clearing his 2nd camp so you reach him on it, and he either dies, or he fucks his smite so you get it, only for him to then recall (or having died), walk into the quadrant you just killed him in, only for him to realize you cleared his jungle, not to mention in meantime enemy bot for some reason not using their lvl 1 prio to push OR they do push and don't help OR they do push, and help, but don't kill you.

That's an absolutely obscene amount of things that has to go right for that 1 leash to actually be worth it. If ANYTHING goes wrong in this invade, you might've just hard griefed your early game as a jungler. Not to mention your champ, their champ, and the time it takes for you to get from red to gromp, might literally mean those 5 seconds are completely irrelevant.

Same goes for blue side red into red side blue invade.

Not to mention the wards put in river means you'll be seen if you invade then.

Say you choose to do red buff into clearing that quadrant into invading their 2nd quadrant.

Enemy still knows where you are and can ward in preparation. Those 5 seconds now mean significantly less due to difference in champs, how well you optimize your clearing, mobility, etc etc.. Not to mention: Enemy mid also knows where you started, and can also ward or play in preparation for whatever you might do.

There's also the situation where you end up vertical-jungling. This could've happened regardless of the leashing - in fact, you getting a leash means the enemy knows that vertical jungling is probably going to be on the table, and they can act accordingly (by not walking into their already cleared botside).

All of this stems from wanting 5 seconds of "tempo" that, as I mentioned, literally don't matter.

I mean, youre free to correct me. How will you utilize 5 seconds of clearing that offsets the problems you just created to gain them?

Also, while we're at it, since this might be relevant: Are you a jungle main, and if yes, what elo are you supposedly in?

Yes. You said "... saying this never worth it is just straight up wrong you can do a ton of thing with the extra tempo ...".

The absolutely only reason to ever "leash", if you can even call it that, a jungler, is when he's at 5% hp or less, because not everyone is good enough to clear like Agurin did above.

Jungler above 20%? Leashing is straight up grief. You grief your junglers position. You grief your own level 1 - hell, in some cases, this griefs your entire laningphase. All for, at best, 5 seconds of "tempo" that really doesn't matter in any way, shape or form.

Leashing is, in its current state, completely and utterly dead... Except if you're for some reason a Draven player who, for some reason, wants to overly minmax your axes by hitting the buff to setup a lvl 1 with early double axes running. In which case: I wouldn't even call it a leash, since Draven players only do this by kiting said jungle camp towards their lane while catching axes, so it might not even be doable.

The 5 seconds you save on your clear isn't as important as the entirety of the lvl 1 wave and level management for your top/bot.

Toplane can literally be lost based on lvl 1 wave/level management. In fact, so can bot.

If you want to save 5 seconds on your jungling - go optimize your clear.

Most, if not all, meta junglers fullclear at around 3:30 or below, in time to reach whatever scuttle, generally at full or very close to full hp (which a leash wouldn't change).

Leash does nothing for your health, and at most 5 seconds on your clear speed unless you want the laners to completely grief their lvl 1 by staying till you're done with the buff/camp.

Those 5 seconds won't save a bad clear/jungler. Many junglers lose more time and health to unoptimized clearing because they're just semi-AFK on autoing camps without consideration for their abilities CDs, their positioning towards next camps, etc.

I disagree. Xin eats a lot of autos from the buff that a lot of other jungle champs, because his only damage is melee autos (and E that puts him in auto range) - who don't necessarily have healing in their kit - wouldn't, either due to range, cc, misdirecting the dmg to plants/boxes/whatever, or just general mobility.

To mention a few: Shaco, Zyra, Graves, Jax, Karthus, Poppy (does shield count here?), among others, should all essentially be able to do this depending on how they play it out. It'll obviously take longer than a normal clear, but well, you gotta kite.

Honestly, significantly more jungle champs are capable of doing this than not. It just requires having abilities that can hit at range or having any sort of sustain in your kit at all. From then on it's just about kiting the buff. Hell, I'm having a harder time figuring out which champs can't either kite + do dmg while kiting OR has self sustain enough to just ignore it (or enough self sustain to kite between the sustain).

Belveth might have trouble on blue/red like this, but she starts raptors.

Maybe Gwen? Idk.

Jeg har mere kontakt med min svigerfamilie som er 3,5-4 timers kørsel væk, end jeg har til min egen familie der er, eller har været, 5-10mins gåtur væk. Ikke fordi vi ses vanvittigt ofte med svigerfamilien, men en gang hver 2-3. Måned nok nogenlunde. Så vælger man jo bare at tilbringe et par dage, frem for et par timer.

For ikke at snakke om: Du behøver jo ikke flytte til Jylland fra KBH for at bo et sted, hvor 25000 udbetalt er rigeligt. En times kørsel er jo stadig ikke så vanvittigt langt væk at man ikke kan ses en middag, eftermiddag, eller noget. Og jeg tænker du kan nå fra de fleste steder på Sjælland til København på knap en time i bil.

Og jo, for 25000 udbetalt kan du da godt spise på feks Noma, Alchemist, eller whatever, komme ud at rejse, drikke vanvittig dyr kaffe, eller andet. Det handler enten bare om prioritering, opsparing, eller en blanding.

Hvis jeg kan rejse til Japan på SU, så kan du også spise på fancy restauranter med 25000 udbetalt.

Timothy T. Timothy.

The T is short for Timothy, but he never uses his middle name

Damn, sounds like a horrendous 3 weeks, especially with the BF thing on top, jesus.

I was told its not necessarily due to bacteria the cat stumbles upon outside, but rather just an acculumation of various bacteria they gather from under their claws (and I guess their teeth to then, if bites can give it as well). Though it makes sense for an outdoor cat to get more bacteria under their claws than an indoor one.

I mean, I probably had a scratch somewhere they just didnt notice, however small it might've been. But yeah, even tiny scratches from animals can do big damage if the wrong bacteria enter your body/bloodstream.

But at least I can tell people to wash their damn scratch-wounds so they dont get to try that.

Cat Scratch Fever/Disease is horrible. I had it when I was around 10 I think. One of the worst times in my life and I barely remember it. My temp was hanging between 39.5-41C (103-106F) for, from what I remember, like 3 weeks or so. Mostly around 40C (104F). Spent a week at home drenched in sweat, with 1 or 2 doctors visits. Got admitted to the hospital. Was there for like a week, or a week and a half, seemed to be stable and seemingly getting better, to a point they thought it might be best for me to go home and sleep in an environment Im used to, while waiting for lab results (mom was told to get back ud the Fever started to rise again or if I got worse). Didnt get better, but had to go to another hospital, by recommendation of the first, because they had better treatment options. Until THIS they didnt even know it was Cat Scratch Fever/Disease. No visible scratches, very little info on it, weird symptoms like swollen lymph nodes on one of my temples, among some other things I dont remember.

It is no fun. Clean your wounds if you get scratched, people.