r/Michigan • u/LavenderBloomings • Feb 28 '25
Politics šŗšøš³ļøāš Michigan Democratic Gov. Whitmer makes direct appeal to young men after sharp shift in election
https://apnews.com/article/michigan-governor-gretchen-whitmer-young-men-e237387d0762e900f2dc7e38a1c49f7b141
u/Bymeemoomymee Feb 28 '25
As a young man, I have never thought that a political party or ideology owes me anything. I align with Democrats on their policies and morals. I will vote for them even if they don't pander to me. People like to think of politics as a team game where the side you root for must give you something in return for handing them power. I cannot understand these people. You should be voting for what people are better for EVERYONE. Literally, ask what you can do for your country, not what your country can do for you.
9
u/wtfwtfwtfwtf2022 Feb 28 '25
Do you think they understand that the Republican policies are going to harm all of us?
The abortion and birth control issues are going to negatively impact menās lives. My friend would have left her husband with 5 children under the age of 6 without safe late term abortion available.
That equals severe financial and mental hardship for the rest of that manās life.
-unless he gives the kids up for adoption.
7
u/motorcity612 Feb 28 '25
You are asking people to do something when there is no incentive for them to do anything. You mentioned that no political party owes you anything, which I agree with. I'd even go further and say the world doesn't owe anyone anything...but conversely no one owes anything to the world and conversely no one owes anything to a political party.
I cannot understand these people. You should be voting for what people are better for EVERYONE. Literally, ask what you can do for your country, not what your country can do for you.
You haven't provided an incentive to do so though, what do those people get out of that deal? Provide a reason to vote for them that actually benefits those people, and they will vote accordingly. If none is provided then don't be shocked when people have bad lives and the other side says your life is bad because of the policies by the other side, whether true or not, and vote accordingly. I'll also say that the "greater good" is not a motivating factor so the whole "what can you do for the country" thing doesn't work, what does that person owe the country?
1
u/Fine_Luck_200 Mar 03 '25
Not getting robbed and killed for starters. It isn't really that hard to connect a lack of social safety nets, lack of abortion, environmental pollution, etc to crime and violence.
70
Feb 28 '25
[removed] ā view removed comment
16
12
→ More replies (7)2
u/thegil13 Mar 01 '25 edited Mar 01 '25
For real. She looks like sheās gotten replaced by a robot with Whitmerās face stretched over it.
52
u/Danominator Age: > 10 Years Feb 28 '25
I think the main issue is economics. A lot of young men have absolutely zero upward mobility and that makes it very easy to bring them into right wing extremist movements.
10
u/live4failure Feb 28 '25 edited Mar 02 '25
Itās also hard to engulf yourself in politics when you are working 60+ hours a week to provide for your family. Not much physical or mental energy to spare since itās reserved for your loved ones or chores. Many younger men are just disassociated with politics at this point.
59
u/Beeblebroxia Feb 28 '25
Sure, the main issue is economics, buuuuut....
If poor economic opportunities were the driving issue for supporting Trump, black/Native women would be his biggest supporters as they are statistically the lowest earners in the nation and have been since basically forever.
The Right specifically uses racist and sexist propaganda to cover just about any topic. No jobs? Minorities and women took them! Education is worse? They're teaching critical race theory and turning kids trans! Your city isn't safe? It's the illegals!
These "economically anxious" young men could pin the cause on anything (including actual causes like monopolization of industry and suppression of workers wages and rights), but they choose to target minorities because that's what they're being told by people they view to know better than them.
The main issue is economics, but the underlying issue is the susceptibility of humans to bigoted ideologies.
6
u/motorcity612 Feb 28 '25
but they choose to target minorities because that's what they're being told by people they view to know better than them.
Trump made double digit gains with minority men and stayed relatively consistent with white voters which is why a relatively white state like Wisconsin only moved a couple percent right but states like NY, NJ, IL, CA etc... with large minority populations shifted right a lot in this past election enough for Trump to win the popular vote as well.
→ More replies (4)5
3
u/saladman7941 Mar 01 '25
Youāre not wrong and I donāt necessarily disagree with you, but I want to add that for my entire adult life (Iām 26) democrats and the left have seemingly all but demonized men, and specifically straight white men. Especially as men have lost the upward mobility and economic security that previous generations had, and the only ones talking about that is republicans and conservatives I donāt get why the left canāt understand why men have fallen away from the democrat party
1
u/pnbloem Mar 02 '25
Democrats haven't said or done that though...? That's what young men are being told things like DEI truly mean by those that want to sow discord. We need to stop claiming this "evil straight white male" is some sort of Democratic party policy. That's messaging is coming from the manosphere, the GOP, and grifters that profit from conflict.
16
u/highroller_rob Feb 28 '25
I am a middle aged white man.
Most white men donāt know what upward mobility means.
6
u/GittaFirstOfHerName Mar 01 '25
Most people don't know what upward mobility means.
We live in shit times for everyone who isn't rich.
29
u/Mr-and-Mrs Feb 28 '25
Why though? Itās not like young white men have a specific oppression working against them that isnāt already applied to the entire population. Get off social media, get out into society, and work on making yourself better.
6
u/Billy_the_Burglar Feb 28 '25
Okay, so here's the thing:
Young white men have been falling behind for some time in the job market. This is primarily linked to rising difficulties in k-12 which haven't been addressed. This has been a thing since I was in high school twenty years ago and has only gotten worse since then.
The main theory I've heard for why this is happening is that we live in an increasingly social-centric society (particularly in large cities) that rewards those who can best navigate it. This means a social support structure on a personal and communal level which women have, and men no longer do*. No emotional support means more stress, more difficulties connecting to personally meaningful work, and thereby no excelling or the feeling of it in anything you pursue.
Yes, young men do need to get out there.. but why would they if they don't feel like anyone gives a damn or if they can't because they had no emotional support to get through the trials and travails of schooling with decent enough grades (thereby making applying to programs impossible)?
*It's actually, ironically, argued that the 40's and 50's change to industrialization/"Dad works and Mom manages the house" meant Dads no longer raised their sons, Moms did, but Moms couldn't teach boys how to socially engage in a system with everyone because it only existed amongst the sexes so Dad's absence just destroyed that structure and led to today's issues.
3
u/Mr-and-Mrs Feb 28 '25
What is your source for stating the primary issue is difficulty in K-12 schooling? Youāre also talking a lot about how they āfeelā and the emotional aspect of society, but these types of discussions should be based on facts and statistics. I completely disagree that ābad gradesā are the root of this issue. Instead, I encourage you to research the negative impact of decades of social media and an increasing self-imposed isolation.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Abbreviations-Sharp Feb 28 '25
How about starting with your first response? It was "deal with it." Nobody else gets that message when they are struggling.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)9
u/Danominator Age: > 10 Years Feb 28 '25
They are specifically targeted by these groups. Race, background, and environments are factors as well.
It's the same thing as young urban minority kids getting dragged into street gangs.
It's not individual failings that cause this but a societal failure.
Also saying "just stop and get better" doesn't work at all. Like telling a depressed person to just be happy.
→ More replies (6)
51
Feb 28 '25
[deleted]
40
u/Severe-Product7352 Feb 28 '25
Sadly youāre right. This group of people would vote for the party that still views marijuana in the same light as cocaine as opposed to the party that legalized it because of her raising the tax on it.
10
u/gb187 Feb 28 '25
Funny how there are probably 200+ shops on the state line, those are all red counties.
8
u/nesper Age: > 10 Years Feb 28 '25
no party legalized it, the people of the state did from all walks of life and political parties.
30
u/Funny-Puzzleheaded Feb 28 '25
Idk man
I'm not pro tax or anything but weed in Michigan is so mind bogglingly cheap I'm just not sure raising the tax would change the experience for customers much
An ounce of pot is legitimately $50 or less in Lansing
→ More replies (30)14
→ More replies (3)2
u/tripops13 Feb 28 '25
Raising the tax on marijuana to 32% will definitely help the secondary market. The secondary market doesnāt pay any taxes.
→ More replies (3)
12
u/Fate_BlackTide_ Feb 28 '25
Yes democrats need to convince young men that voting for Democrats will make their lives better. They also need to have a platform that will show that voting democratic will do that for them and everybody else. Otherwise the left will continue their loosing streak.
4
u/wmurch4 Feb 28 '25
One election where all of the incumbents from around the world lost?
People have the memory of a gnat
21
u/sn95joe84 Feb 28 '25
The gender disparity in college enrollment is as bad as it was in 1970ā¦. Only itās the other way around.
Shes absolutely onto something. We either care about equality, or we donāt.
Democrats need to do hard reflecting on why they lost their broad appeal. This is a terrific start and I applaud governor Whitmer!
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Disastrous-Drop-3516 Mar 01 '25
Been reading this thread, and the dialogue is thoughtful. What do you think about the influences of men like Joe Rogan, or the Tate brothers, and their influence on this demographic?
6
u/8004612286 Mar 01 '25 edited Mar 01 '25
The #1 thing people want is to be heard.
Someone like Andrew Tate will go on MSNBC, ignore the interviewers question, tell the men watching that it's hard out there, that he knows that, then follows it up with a 5 minute speech about how it was gods gift to him to be a man. He's telling young men that they should be proud to be men. It's an honour to be one. Unfortunately he takes this schtick to the extreme, so you have a lot of misogyny sprinkled on top.
I think Kamala's refusal to go on Joe Rogan/Theo Von/etc had a huge contribution to how much she lost the young men vote for the same reason. These are podcasts that tailer to young men, and the democrats thought it was too risky to go on them. Doesn't make you feel heard does it?
The great irony with Joe Rogan, is that he actually publically endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2020. The reaction? So much hate from the left that news outlets would write articles about it:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51241462
I genuinely think Joe Rogan would've stayed fairly central and never dived into those COVID conspiracies had the left not had a massive attempt to cancel him the same year when he signed with Spotify.
5
u/Novaghost8 Mar 01 '25
Kamala didnāt reject going on Joe Rohanās podcast, she just didnāt want to fly over to him at his in-house studio and have a 3 hour talk. Her team agreed on the conditions he came to her and the talk was only 1 hour instead, to which he refused.
His right of course, but I want to remind people that she was not only campaigning full time but still the active vice-president, so her time was a lot more valuable than his. But Iām pretty sure he has these standards for everyone, like even Trump agreed to the 3 hour in studio interview. Not necessarily disagreeing just adding more info.
19
u/Happy-Addition-9507 Feb 28 '25
I usually don't agree with her, but this is an exception. If the perception is that you are vilified by a group, then you end up not supporting that group. CIS men in general have been beaten down the last five years as a group. This drove them to Trump, who they saw a lesser evil with their interest at heart. Well, that's a big voting base, and you need their support to win.
→ More replies (12)
7
u/Ecstatic-Return-9778 Mar 01 '25
I made a post and then I went through and read a bunch of comments. I have absolutely no sympathy for these guys. Grow the fuck up. Pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Isnāt that what you always say? Stop blaming women for your problems. This whole Incel misogynistic bullshit is unbelievable. Youāre mediocre. Accept it. Most people are. Stop following Joe Rogan and Andrew Tate. Grow the fuck up.
→ More replies (1)1
18
u/SqnLdrHarvey Feb 28 '25
At 59 I am not a young man.
I come from a long line of FDR and JFK New Dealers.
I hate Donald Trump with every fibre of my being.
However...
The messages I have gotten from the Democratic Party since the 1990s are:
"You're a white, heterosexual Christian male. You're the problem. You're an oppressor. We don't want you."
"You're a Christian. You're not welcome."
"You served in the military. You're part of world domination. Go somewhere else."
Is it any wonder so many men go Republican?
I haven't, but many feel "the Dems don't want us."
11
u/TheGruenTransfer Feb 28 '25
The only thing Democrats ever want is donations. They're still spaming my inbox and asking for money while the world falls to shit, and they haven't said or done anything worth a donation since Obama made a moderate amount of improvements to health care. If Bernie wasn't screwed out of the last 2 primaries we wouldn't be in this mess
→ More replies (1)5
u/SqnLdrHarvey Feb 28 '25
I voted for Bernie in 2016 and 2020 primaries.
But, honestly, he would have faced a Republican Party bent as much on obstruction as Obama did.
The difference? I think Bernie would have at least tried to fight back. Obama didn't.
4
u/busigirl21 Mar 01 '25
The democratic party has never said a single one of those damn things.
→ More replies (3)2
2
1
Mar 01 '25
[deleted]
3
u/SqnLdrHarvey Mar 01 '25
No, but I have had not a few rank-and-file Dems say it to me, in exactly the words I used
1
u/SpiritOfDearborn Mar 02 '25
The Democratic Party has literally never said any of this.
→ More replies (9)1
u/shifty_coder Age: > 10 Years Mar 05 '25
At 39, Iāve never seen this version of the Democratic Party you claim has existed since the 1990s.
The previous democratic president was cis white catholic octogenarian. WTF are you on about?
→ More replies (1)
13
u/mchgndr Feb 28 '25
The fact that this headline exists tells me we have a long way to go. Reeks of āplease clapā
2
u/Sensitive-Acadia4718 Mar 01 '25
I saw her speech and I hadn't been aware of the statistics she brought out about women buying more homes and getting more degrees than men. It does sound like there's a need to reach out to them. Feminism isn't female supremacy. It's equity.
2
u/warmheart1 Mar 01 '25
As long as Whitmer is the voice of Michiganās Democratic Party, her words will fall on deaf ears. She has spent her political career championing the rights of women, immigrants and the homeless while neglecting male voters. She assembled an administration of females in all leadership positions; none of whom made any appeal to men; young or old. She has a token male Lt. Govā¦..can anybody name him?
8
u/staymadbro Mar 01 '25 edited Mar 01 '25
Iām not coddling a group who does and has always enjoyed an overwhelming supermajority of corporate leadership, political leadership, wealth, prominence, lack of accountability, and culprits of violence. For centuries this same group has enjoyed their supermajority at the expense of artificially oppressing other groups for advantage. āThis group is falling behind in education.ā Then pick up a book and study harder rather than playing video games and lamenting your lost privilege in an online incel forum. āThis group feels emasculated.ā Then have words of affirmation in the morning and tell yourself you are somebody. This victimization of a group who clearly has always held a supermajority of everything in society is nothing more than entitlement and artificial oppression because equality feels like oppression to this group. The engagers of most of the violence in the world. The engagers of all wars. The leaders of most countries. The leaders of most Fortune 500 companies. The concentration of most wealth. Not simply a majority, but a supermajority. Any truly oppressed group in history has always had to work twice as hard and longer because the forces at work make it impossible to achieve. That is why historically oppressed groups are excelling (i.e. women). Itās out of necessity. However, when you are given things by virtue of your dominance in a group, you have no real incentive to work harder to achieve. Despite this group being the minority in numbers itās a supermajority in world domination. If this group wants to continue to advance, then try character development, empathy, morality, discipline, abstinence, consideration for others, nonviolence, skill development. What is it we tell women? Act like a lady, monitor your appearance, be obedient, donāt talk so much, watch what you eat and your weight, your role is to serve at the behest and pleasure of this dominant group. If you want to be better than do better.
1
u/June_2022 Mar 02 '25
I have had a lot of young white men come through on an IT position in my company through the years. It pays well enough, it's a good work location (clean building, window office), the job is busy enough but not hard. And I as their semi-supervisor don't clock-watch them (As in they come in a little late, leave early? Get paid for 8 hours no matter what.) And if they need to run an errand during the day, no problem.
They don't like to be challenged, they spend too much time on their phone, and they have a bad attitude as if they should be thanked for just showing up. Some have acted so ill-mannered it was as if they've never been around humans before, let alone an office setting. The last guy was upset that he wasn't sent tickets he could easily solve. He didn't like having to do research and find a solution on his own. Lazy. The guy before him wouldn't do half the job and left piles of undone work everywhere. Lazy and he was fired. And it goes so on and on, just really mediocre humans that have severe entitlement issues that I don't run into hardly ever other groups of people, women and people of color.
I've had young white men that were excellent workers and coworkers too. They just are so few and far in between nowadays.
10
u/ValkyroftheMall Feb 28 '25
The time to appeal to young men was when they were being vocal about the problems they were facing, not years later after the right had radicalizes them while everyone else was telling them to kick rocks and fix their own problems.
15
u/Trombear Feb 28 '25
That was the best time, the 2nd best is always now. Saying too little too late and giving up is just abandoning them
→ More replies (2)
6
u/TaterTotJim Feb 28 '25
This messaging is annoying. Do something for young men.
I would say I align w a lot of the democratic messaging but feel like the party hasnāt been for me for quite some time. Thatās okay, I just keep quiet and vote.
But if I was a young male I would be questioning why I would even consider the Democratic Party..
71
u/Isord Ypsilanti Feb 28 '25
What does "Do something for young men." even mean? What the fuck do young men need that everybody else doesn't?
47
u/DanishWonder Feb 28 '25 edited Feb 28 '25
Right? I'm a 45 year old white guy and I don't think young men are singled out any more than when I was their age.
Yes, there are economic things like tuition costs and the economy or jobs. Those aren't "young man issues".
They had DEI as a buzzword, we had Affirmative Action and a lot of women's rights at their peak.
I really don't see any major things young men are facing today that we didn't already go through. The difference to me is social media is fueling their echo chamber and making them feel victimized.
24
u/richardrrcc Feb 28 '25
38 year old white guy and same. I have no clue what these "experts" think the Democratic party is doing that alienates young men.
8
u/DanishWonder Feb 28 '25
I should have added that it wasn't until I was maybe 25-30 years old that I really learned what white privilege meant. My first reaction was to get defensive like today's young men are. So, maybe it's just part of the maturation process to swallow your pride and realize regardless of how YOUR life is going, you have some built-in advantages that some others do not.
I can only hope Gen Z finds a way to learn this.
6
u/richardrrcc Feb 28 '25
The gen-zers that I know don't act like they are owed/entitled. Maybe I just know the more mature ones.
3
u/DanishWonder Mar 01 '25
The votes don't lie. GenZ men went heavy for Trump...so it does seem like you know the exceptions.
20
u/dalebor Feb 28 '25 edited Mar 01 '25
In for this clarification because Iāve genuinely been trying to figure this out for a while.
Edit: thanks for the replies!
16
u/Unprovocative Feb 28 '25
The one thing I can think of is helping them with education. Men have been falling further and further behind in both highschool and college.
11
u/Isord Ypsilanti Feb 28 '25
That's very fair. Likely the best thing that can be done there is getting more men into teaching roles.
However I suspect a large part of the issue is parents with a "boys will be boys" mentality as well.
1
u/WallaWallaWalrus Feb 28 '25
Thatās true, but studies show boys are way more likely than girls to be punished than girls for the same behavior. There is a definite gender bias in how we socialize boys and girls. This is doubly true for Black boys. Theyāre seen as loud and disruptive. What you expect is what you get.Ā
1
u/SpiritOfDearborn Mar 02 '25
How does getting more men into teaching roles improve academic outcomes for young boys? Are you suggesting women are not fit to teach?
11
u/dalebor Feb 28 '25
Noted, definitely an issue.
Why are less and less young men choosing to attend higher education? Tuition costs? Lack of prospects after college so why bother?
22
u/Isord Ypsilanti Feb 28 '25
Both of those things apply to everybody so that wouldn't make much sense.
Some things I can think of specific to young boys.
- Lack of male role models in education.
- Parents having lower expectations for boys because "Boys will be boys."
- Boys being the target of scammers and grifters like the Tates and Rogan who push the idea that you just need to grind and don't need an education.
→ More replies (1)13
10
2
u/TaterTotJim Feb 28 '25
Isnāt that the crux of the issue? Why have things broken down for them? I have no idea. Itās not my demographic.
Personally I wouldnāt enjoy being brow-beaten by the governor if I was in their shoes.
12
u/Isord Ypsilanti Feb 28 '25
The crux of the issue is things have not broken down for them specifically, they are just being lied to. And I say that was a white man. I've never encountered a single problem in my life that was because I was a white man. It's not a thing!
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)5
u/d_rek Feb 28 '25
The Democratic Party has been making a fairly concerted effort the last several elections to appeal to more diverse demographics and in doing so fails to market to the core voting demographic in the US: white males. If you fail to appeal, or even outright ostracize, a large percentage of voters then you should not expect to win important elections.
→ More replies (7)13
u/Isord Ypsilanti Feb 28 '25
Nobody is ostracizing white men though. Some white men are just perceiving not being catered to at every moment as "ostracizing." Largely because they are being propagandized to by people like Andrew Tate, Elon Musk, and Joe Rogan.
10
u/FearlessThree6 Feb 28 '25
I hear this from a growing number of young men, and I'm genuinely curious, what would you like a state or even national leader to do for young men?
4
u/TaterTotJim Feb 28 '25
I would again like to preface that I am not a young man, I would consider myself more middle aged at 36. This was missed by a few people in my OP. I am good overall and have no complaints in life and am well adjusted as one can be.
There is a glaring lack of participation in society from many young men. People have theorized a lot of things. I give certain weight to ālearning stylesā and āsocializationā but am no expert.
I donāt have an answer myself but maybe people could start talking to these guys?
9
u/FearlessThree6 Feb 28 '25
I think starting the dialogue is what the governor is attempting to do, but you said her messaging was annoying and that she should actually DO something. So what is it that you suggest she do?
A lot of these young men are actively choosing to exclude themselves from society. They arenāt being forced out. So it's difficult for me to see what needs to be done. And personally, I have not heard many people advocating FOR anything, merely against something, or complaining that no one is listening to them.
I'm listening. What is needed?
→ More replies (2)17
Feb 28 '25
[deleted]
4
u/TaterTotJim Feb 28 '25
I think you misunderstood my point and also are putting a lot of words in my mouth. I am a middle age man, I am not who the governor is addressing and I do not feel āleft outā.
→ More replies (1)4
u/CoachTwisterT3 Feb 28 '25
Iād start with no longer telling men they canāt be involved in certain discussions. I get why, but itās sure hard to advocate or ally when young men are shutdown preemptively at times.
8
u/dalebor Feb 28 '25
Sure, could you give an example of such a discussion?
7
u/CoachTwisterT3 Feb 28 '25
Sure. I hit most of the privilege branches on the way down the tree (straight, white, cis, male) etc and have been told to my face that nothing I say on abortion matters and I should ātake my privilege somewhere elseā. Even if I agree with the person who says this, am I now incentivized to assist? Iāve also been told this re: trans issues, womenās sports, and immigration. This is all anecdotal, obviously, but for someone that sits in some area of privilege I have been explicitly unwelcome coming to certain discussions. I imagine others face this and I imagine there are obstacles I canāt/donāt know. Contrast with right leaning media and what is peddled there and itās easy to see how it happens.
1
Feb 28 '25
[deleted]
1
u/CoachTwisterT3 Feb 28 '25
Interesting that you just put some arguments in my mouth? The only point really to address is the incentivized comment. I agree, the true incentive to stand up or ally is to do what is right. I do live in reality though, and in reality if a person Iām defending also hits me itās not unreasonable if I move out of the way. The WHOLE POINT is how to bring them in. Your comment and āwell itās just your problemā is exactly what is pushing young men away.
→ More replies (8)
4
2
u/ShyGuy19945 Mar 02 '25
If young men can be so easily persuaded by internet talking heads to think they deserve a woman as if they are property and want all people of color and LGBTQ people made second class citizens again bc they canāt afford a 2 bedroom apartment then I donāt want them on our side.
2
-1
u/Devilnutz2651 Feb 28 '25
"Hey I know we blame you for a bunch of stuff, please vote for me"
š¤£š¤£
→ More replies (3)2
u/nerd_bucket6 Mar 02 '25
Mid 40s white guy here. What do you think any of us are being blamed for? If you donāt understand that we have had every advantage over other demographics, youāre not paying attention. White men have had a disproportionate amount of power and wealth for the entirety of the US history. Advocating for those who are underserved doesnāt hurt you.
→ More replies (6)
1
1
u/TheDark_Knight67 Mar 02 '25
The infighting cited within this article is some good honest reporting and not a fluff piece like you often see. However itāll be intriguing how things go when looking for her replacement
1
1
u/nmi_bottom Mar 04 '25
As a white male and democrat I totally get it! This last election was a living embodiment of it; no out reach to young men
1
u/Gfive555 Mar 04 '25
Chivalry is dead. Trump is like cancer and has infected our humanity. Infusing UFC toxic masculinity BS.
1
479
u/Sin_of_the_Dark Feb 28 '25
I can understand why people are reacting negatively to this messaging, but I can't help but think she's on to something here. As a young male, there's a lot of perception out there in the last decade or so that 'men don't matter, women are superior'.
I'm not saying that I agree with that perception, or that it's anywhere near true, but it's a valid feeling that a lot of independent and conservative young men I know tend to espouse. Most of it is the result of disinformation mixed with general disenfranchisement, but it still exists all the same. We've spent the better part of a decade or two (rightfully) focused on the underprivileged. We shouldn't let up the gas at all, but we can do this while being inclusive of young men.
What we need is (loathe as I am to agree with the GOP speaker) more than just lip-service though. I'm not a politician, so I can't even pretend to suggest what actions should be done. But if we don't do something to at least make these individuals feel heard, we'll continue to bleed any potential voters on a national level to the GOP or libertarian parties. Maybe we can start with education to help combat the disinformation that's led them to this spot, I don't know.