MAIN FEEDS
REDDIT FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MurderedByWords/comments/1iea5ng/your_response_is_concerning_bobby/ma67v50/?context=9999
r/MurderedByWords • u/JerryJr99 • Jan 31 '25
4.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
626
He was a heroin addict for 17 years and had a brain worm! This is the best we’ve got?!?!?
-29 u/RedditIsADataMine Jan 31 '25 He was a heroin addict for 17 years and had a brain worm! This is the best we’ve got?!?!? I don't see why either of these things would disqualify him? Let's stick to the anti vax stuff. 38 u/TerribleIdea27 Jan 31 '25 Plenty of reasons 1) blackmail vulnerabilities 2) getting addicted in the first place means poor impulse control 3) potential brain damage 4) heroin is an addiction for life. If he was addicted for 17 years, he's still addicted. He's just clean (we presume) -15 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 You can't blackmail someone for something that is widely known. It's a little more complicated and shouldn't be generalized. It may or may not. This should be investigated in each case. I don't even know what you mean by that. 11 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 I think 4th means that there are generally no former addicts. Once an addict, always an addict. -14 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 Is this a scientific conclusion, or just a loose observation by people who are not qualified on the subject? 19 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says. -11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
-29
I don't see why either of these things would disqualify him? Let's stick to the anti vax stuff.
38 u/TerribleIdea27 Jan 31 '25 Plenty of reasons 1) blackmail vulnerabilities 2) getting addicted in the first place means poor impulse control 3) potential brain damage 4) heroin is an addiction for life. If he was addicted for 17 years, he's still addicted. He's just clean (we presume) -15 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 You can't blackmail someone for something that is widely known. It's a little more complicated and shouldn't be generalized. It may or may not. This should be investigated in each case. I don't even know what you mean by that. 11 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 I think 4th means that there are generally no former addicts. Once an addict, always an addict. -14 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 Is this a scientific conclusion, or just a loose observation by people who are not qualified on the subject? 19 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says. -11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
38
Plenty of reasons
1) blackmail vulnerabilities
2) getting addicted in the first place means poor impulse control
3) potential brain damage
4) heroin is an addiction for life. If he was addicted for 17 years, he's still addicted. He's just clean (we presume)
-15 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 You can't blackmail someone for something that is widely known. It's a little more complicated and shouldn't be generalized. It may or may not. This should be investigated in each case. I don't even know what you mean by that. 11 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 I think 4th means that there are generally no former addicts. Once an addict, always an addict. -14 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 Is this a scientific conclusion, or just a loose observation by people who are not qualified on the subject? 19 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says. -11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
-15
You can't blackmail someone for something that is widely known.
It's a little more complicated and shouldn't be generalized.
It may or may not. This should be investigated in each case.
I don't even know what you mean by that.
11 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 I think 4th means that there are generally no former addicts. Once an addict, always an addict. -14 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 Is this a scientific conclusion, or just a loose observation by people who are not qualified on the subject? 19 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says. -11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
11
I think 4th means that there are generally no former addicts. Once an addict, always an addict.
-14 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 Is this a scientific conclusion, or just a loose observation by people who are not qualified on the subject? 19 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says. -11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
-14
Is this a scientific conclusion, or just a loose observation by people who are not qualified on the subject?
19 u/HokusSchmokus Jan 31 '25 This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says. -11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
19
This is both a scientific conclusion and what every other actual addict ever says.
-11 u/TeBerry Jan 31 '25 If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict? 12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
-11
If this is a scientific conclusion, what is the definition of such an addict?
12 u/nuliaj56 Jan 31 '25 how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
12
how is this even a debate? just get someone who is qualified. wow.
626
u/a-pilot Jan 31 '25
He was a heroin addict for 17 years and had a brain worm! This is the best we’ve got?!?!?