I won't pretend to know their situation, but given laws on polygamy I reckon it's likely they're both with the same guy but only one can be publically/legally married to him.
That's what I gathered, as well; that they are both with him, and that he loves them both, too, but could legally only marry one - I suspect they chose alphabetically, (but I have no proof of that). Regardless, they all seem happy together, so I am happy for them :)
My unhinged plan to make polygamy legal is that you can marry a person but they don't have to marry you back. Instead, they marry a third person, and that third person marries you. Only completed loops are allowed for power balancing. Probably wouldn't work here tho since they're siblings
25
u/AcherontiaPhlegethon 1d ago
I won't pretend to know their situation, but given laws on polygamy I reckon it's likely they're both with the same guy but only one can be publically/legally married to him.