Specific neurons that secrete oxytocin in the brain are disrupted in a mouse model of autism, neuroscientists have found. Stimulating these neurons restored social behaviors in these mice. These findings could help to develop new ways to treat autism.

[u/mvea]

https://www.riken.jp/en/news_pubs/research_news/rr/20250207_1/index.html

[u/bigasssuperstar]

Scientists' presumptions that what looks like autism in their judgment of mouse behaviour is the same thing as what they think looks like autism in human behaviour is still stuck in the idea that what makes humans autistic can be understood from analysis of behaviour by non-autistic people.

IOW, they think they understand human autism; they think mouse autism is that, too; they think helping mouse autism will help autistic humans. But I don't believe they understand human autism at the start of that chain.

I don't question the methods they're using to test their hypotheses, but this is so many steps removed from autistic adults and what they say about their experience of the world that I don't trust it to be applicable to human autism.

[u/PlumSome3101 → u/bigasssuperstar]

Thank you for writing this. My understanding is that autistic people do not exhibit social deficits when interacting with each other. In the same way that non autistic people exhibit social deficits when interacting with a group that is predominantly autistic, autistic people have difficulty with social interactions that are not geared toward their brain type, not difficulty in general. 

It reminds me of the study that was done showing that autistic people are less likely to engage in a situation that puts others at a disadvantage. The non autistic researchers concluded that was a fault rather than looking at it as a strength. 

That said I've (diagnosed autistic) always felt like I didn't experience oxytocin in the same way as others. However just because I don't feel like oxytocin works the same for me doesn't mean the way I bond or interact socially is wrong. It's just different. 

[u/Bac2Zac → u/PlumSome3101]

(also autistic speaking)

Okay so I'm going to challenge you slightly to consider how this

However just because I don't feel like oxytocin works the same for me doesn't mean the way I bond or interact socially is wrong.

And the notion that a "autism cure" could be a good thing are not mutually exclusive concepts.

The objective purpose of social skills is to connect/communicate with other human beings. If an adjustment to social activity can be performed (via drug, "discovery of a new social queues" which autistics should resonate with, therapy, ect.) that allows people to either connect with more people or build stronger connections with the people they know, that is objectively a good thing.

Things being different is not inherently bad, and the ability to communicate with people who are unable to communicate effectively with neurotypical people is objectively good. Diversity of opinion is also objectively a good thing, and as a high functioning autistic person myself, the idea of a "cure" is not something that I have any vested interest in taking should it become available. I however, am not generally at a significant disadvantage when interacting with the world like some others are and to deny that a solution for that condition could be beneficial is silly to me.

[u/bielgio → u/Bac2Zac]

Babies don't choose, there are people willing to choose the skin color, hair color and eye color of their babies, they'd for sure choose their neurotype and it's unlikely to be autistic

[u/Bac2Zac → u/bielgio]

I don't feel like you read all of what I wrote.