Hello, how are you all doing?
I would like to ask for some advice, if you don’t mind, in the area of teaching methodology.
But first, I need to give some context so you can better understand the situation.
Context:
I learned to play the violin at church. I’ve been playing in church since I was 9 years old (I’m 23 now). By the way, the church is called Congregação Cristã no Brasil (Christian Congregation in Brazil). And obviously, since it’s all done on a voluntary basis (in our church, no one gets paid), both for those who teach and those who play, the teaching methodology may not be the best.
Basically, we had a general violin technique book (Schmoll, Lambert, Laoureux, Suzuki) and a book with the church hymns (Hymnal). I went through all those books and a few more, mostly because I spent a long time learning. But nowadays they want to stick to the Schmoll method (they’ve made some modifications to it and added some Hans Sitt pieces — I’ll add a link below in case you want to check it out).
The general approach is to start with the method book (teaching material), and once the student begins to understand notes, they start learning hymns. Unfortunately, there are very few instructors (we don’t call ourselves “teachers” because we are not formally trained), and most of them don’t assign anything to study outside of these two sources.
Now that I’m an instructor myself, I really want to help my students in the best way I can.
I teach students of all ages — from little kids who can’t even read yet to older brothers who are married with children — though most of them tend to be children and young people.
I’ve never had face-to-face lessons with a professional teacher — just a few tips here and there. I even tried online lessons, but they were too expensive for my financial situation, and the teacher would mostly just ask for videos and then reply with written feedback. It helped, but not as much as I’d hoped. Still, I was able to get an idea of what a methodology looks like, because he assigned Sevcik and some beginner-level concertos to practice.
The Problem:
At church, the teaching works like this: for example, in my case, on Saturdays at 2:00 p.m., our musical study group starts. Ideally, all students should arrive at the same time, and then I go over their lessons in the order they arrive. I usually spend about 30 minutes with each one to really help them.
To avoid having them come in “cold” when it’s time to play their lesson for me, I usually ask them to do:
stretching,
a right-hand exercise and a left-hand one,
open string exercises,
then to review what they’re going to play,
and also to briefly review at church what I just taught them — to help them retain it.
But I’d like to improve all of this — I just don’t have a solid foundation to build on.
I thought about changing it so instead of doing the full 30 minutes with each student right away, I’d spend the first 10 minutes checking what’s missing in their current study and then ask them to work on that while I check on the others — and then later come back for 20 minutes to work on what’s left. But when I tried that, it felt like I ended up taking more time overall.
I’m open to any kind of advice, links, videos, books related to technique, methodology, or anything else you feel might be important.
Also, I’m about to start giving private lessons today. I have some idea of what to do, but I’d appreciate any tips on that as well.
I’m already very thankful to anyone who’s willing to help me — may God bless your life and your family!