MAIN FEEDS
REDDIT FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1jraffn/5_rate_cuts/mlddgp1/?context=9999
r/wallstreetbets • u/abishop717 • 3d ago
711 comments sorted by
View all comments
430
JPow is neither obligated nor inclined to clean up Don's mess. $SPY going under $500 after he talks.
66 u/Various_Car8779 3d ago He's obligated to step in when unemployment spikes -2 u/JGWol 3d ago And unemployment was down today and job numbers were good. So spy is going to nosedive against expectations cause forward earnings are now all crushed thanks to tariffs 4 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Unemployment was up. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago That’s only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
66
He's obligated to step in when unemployment spikes
-2 u/JGWol 3d ago And unemployment was down today and job numbers were good. So spy is going to nosedive against expectations cause forward earnings are now all crushed thanks to tariffs 4 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Unemployment was up. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago That’s only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
-2
And unemployment was down today and job numbers were good. So spy is going to nosedive against expectations cause forward earnings are now all crushed thanks to tariffs
4 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Unemployment was up. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago That’s only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
4
Unemployment was up.
1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago That’s only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing. 1 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
1
That’s only because labor force participation was up. The actual number of people of employed is increasing.
1 u/MasterGrok 3d ago Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed. 1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
Yes the equation for unemployment includes both force participation and number of employed.
1 u/Dr-McLuvin 3d ago Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
Someone explain to me why this is a bad thing.
430
u/Emilio___Molestevez 3d ago
JPow is neither obligated nor inclined to clean up Don's mess. $SPY going under $500 after he talks.