Came here to say basically the same thing. You get more useful information on your screen at once and you're able to move cards around a lot easier on moxfield. I've tried archideck multiple times but always go back.

I'm going through something similar. I can play competitive video games with next to no problem and even in-person 1v1 games (pauper lately) but I get so much anxiety from playing on mtgo edh against strangers for whatever reason. It's usually worse when I know I'm about to win, then it becomes almost panic inducing and is hard to keep it together and I've even had panic attacks in the past over it. But like I said, I can go to an FMN and play standard or pauper with next to no issues but edh online is an issue. Maybe it's the added pressure of playing against 3 people at once and now we just can't handle that as well anymore? I've had some other outside physical and mental issues going on but magic has sadly been a trigger for me and I don't play it as much as I used to. Are you dealing with any outside stresses in your life?

My therapist wants me to basically keep at it and keep playing and eventually it should get better as you tell yourself it's not that big of a deal and to chill. It's somewhat worked for me but I still have a ways to go.

Look into deep breathing exercises, they can help calm you down a bit once you start feeling yourself lose control. If this continues and doesn't seem to be getting better, I'd suggest talking with your doctor about maybe seeing a therapist or counselor about your anxiety. Medication can help a lot but it's not for everyone.

That...that has to be a typo right?

Right??

Fair enough. I usually don't run into many issues in that regard but I'm usually on public or semi-private trackers so I guess that makes sense. If I get more into private trackers, I'll look into those. Thanks.

Not sure what you mean, I've never had any issues and see it recommended constantly.

Mullvad is the best I've used to date.

Nah

I think you have too many basics as it is, I generally don't play more than 10 basics in 3 color decks. There are so many great, cheap dual lands that you may as well run them and help fix your colors better. I wouldn't go under 37 lands either. Consistently getting to muldrotha is crucial and you can't afford to be stumbling on lands. You could offset this a bit if you had a lot of reliable, early draw but you don't have that much.

[[Hermit Druid]] can also be an instant win if you activate him with no basics in your deck and you play a jace or thoracle. Obviously, you'd have to sub out cards like cultivate and Steve.

I personally like [[Walking Ballista]] and [[Mikaeus, the Unhallowed]]. Infinite damage and you can pick them both out of the yard in the same turn. They're also just good creatures on their own.

If you want to stay in bracket 3 with your current list, it's hard to say but I don't think Cyc Rift is the one to cut. It's far too good both being ahead and behind.

I'm having issues too but only when I turn my monitors back on each day. I turn my monitors off each night but I don't put my system to sleep. The next day when I turn them back on, my system is super laggy and less responsive. Apps and games are basically unusable. Restarting my system is the only way it goes away. I'm about to revert to 25.2.1 as I didn't have this problem with that one.

They're often more at range fighting vehicles and less so in close combat. If the new support is becoming more or less the medic class, them having SMGs instead would make much more sense. In turn, you're not giving LMGs to assault or recon obviously so the only option is engineer and it fits with how the class plays. It's not a big deal either way but I think it makes sense to me to make that swap.

I've said this in other posts but I like the new supply crate but they should give supports SMGs and give the LMGs to engineer. It just makes more sense given the playstyles imo.

Run Discord as administrator.

I like the idea of the combined pack that gives ammo and health. However, with this change, I would give supports SMGs and give engineers the LMGs. Supports would be more in the thick of things so CQC weapons make sense, where engineers are often more at range fighting tanks and such. Let Assault players go all in with grenade launchers, explosives and other offensive gadgets. Their job is to be anti-personnel so it's fine if they're a bit of a one-trick imo. Their teamwork contribution is clearing out objectives so their team can capture it.

One more thing with support/medic, I would keep the newer version of reviving players, aka holding E or whatever to pick them up instead of having a separate defib gadget. While I like defibs more gameplay wise, it pigeonholes support/medic players into the same gadgets every game (supply box + defib). That's boring, at least give them another option that doesn't feel forced.

Compared to the bf2042 alpha, what we've seen so far is MILES better already. The 2042 alpha was barely playable and was incredibly barebones. At the very least, this game looks like it has good bones.

I like this change but they should have SMGs instead of LMGs since they'll be more in the shit. Give engineer the LMGs.

An Arkveld chair with glowing purple chains on the side that get caught in the wheels.

Not sure what you mean, it seems to be doing just fine. It's still a large chunk of the meta.

I'm not excusing anything but I've had decent luck on my system (5800x + 7900xt + 32gb ram) by playing on the high preset, more or less, (hi rez texture pack on), 1440p, FSR quality, locking my frame rate to 72 and turning frame gen on. I obviously don't always get 72 fps but after the first few hunts, it hasn't been too bad. Could try locking it at 60 also. With frame gen on, some animations like the smithy wheel and cogs look...off and FSR quality doesn't look great in general.

My PC has been able to brute force the issues somewhat but this is pretty unacceptable. I knew it was going to be a problem and I was on a little too much copium that it would be better on release. Game itself is really nice but goddamn man, optimize your game Capcom or use a different engine. RE ain't it.

It's a problem with Denuvo.

I mean the only things I was looking for in the reviews were updates about performance and co-op (story). Sadly, at least for now, those aren't in the greatest of spots. Everything else I don't really care about. I'm going to have a great time either way but I worry me and my friends experience will be dragged down by the performance and the needlessly convoluted party system. Hoping for a good day 1 patch I guess.

The real challenge will be getting the game to run at 60+ Fps without frame gen.

I have a very similar version of this deck in paper and the biggest issue I have with it is its speed. I'm not a master of the deck by any means but going to time each round is a constant threat. Besides playing faster, which I tend to play fairly quick, does anyone have any general tips on how to close out games quicker with this deck?

The Game Haven - Dayton Ohio

https://g.co/kgs/jYnhe2C

I think 4 classes is fine. BF4 had it nearly perfect but I would give assault the ammo boxes and support becomes basically a medic. I think this would give support a bigger role over just being ammo bitch and assault would be less self-sustaining but opens up their kit options.

For weapons, still using BF4 as a guide, maybe engineers get LMGs and support/medic get SMGs. I'm not as convinced with that one but I think it makes a little bit more sense considering engineers aren't typically in CQC and could use the extra range. Medics are usually right there with assault players and SMGs would be a good fit.

Think of an appimage like a standalone or portable .exe file from windows. You don't need to typically install anything and they often work with any distribution. You can just keep it on your desktop or home folder somewhere and launch it when needed.