i don't know who is responsible for downtown street trees but they are doing a bad job of it. lots of trees that used to be there, i.e. along Woodward have been removed
honestly it seems like as soon as they get big they become inconvenient for... whatever reason... and then they're removed. we could have had nice trees there if we had simply let them grow in place
I can't speak for downtown, but it can be a micro-instance of 'not in my front yard'. I've seen this before in the redesign of other commercial corridors. Business and property owners want a canopy but don't want a tree blocking their signage and entrance from view for car traffic. This leads to no one having a tree in front of their property and no trees at all.
Those trees will either destroy the brick or concrete surrounding their trunks, or just die. You can't ring trees that closely.
Picture 2 looks good for the tree, but the other ones are doomed to failure.
Honest question, does this street need to be open to vehicle traffic? Removing that would give more room for both trees and people. But maybe it's the only way these businesses can get deliveries?
I feel like there must be some back alley method to getting food delivered. I don't think this road needs to be open to traffic, and it would be safer if it wasn't.
201
u/Future_Attempt_3672 4d ago
Holy shit, trees???