Someone call an ambulance

[u/iTriggerChuds]

[u/[deleted]]

Ok let’s see these studies

Edit: imagine getting downvoted for just asking for sources...

[u/KindOfHardToSpell → u/[deleted]]

Here you go!

https://www.pnas.org/content/115/19/E4330.short https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1368430216677304 https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v5-10-234/ https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/charlwrev10&div=13&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21565503.2017.1304224 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12315 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07393148.2017.1378296 https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/amet.12473 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0896920517740615 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/why-did-women-vote-for-donald-trump/7634311B37174FB5C0064CA5387E0077

And here's just the entire google scholar search results for "trump vote white status" https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C16&q=trump+vote+white+status&btnG=

Don't worry. If you don't agree with these results. Just say "the sample size was too small" or "this study was biased" and suddenly any scientific evidence against your point is worthless! Its so convenient that since some scientific studies are worse than others, we can just say any study against my viewpoints are the bad ones! Forget nuance lol.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

There’s nothing wrong with their comment. Attacking the tone instead of substance is a cheap ploy to discredit the comment.