So I saw A Minecraft Movie yesterday, and even though the theater experience was fun and chaotic, I personally thought the film was absolutely terrible. It's a film that is definitely targeted towards children, but treats children as if they were stupid. Now, if you liked it and saw something I didn't, thats great. That's not what this post is about. But I've noticed a trend in recent years when a movie like Minecraft, or The Super Mario Bros. Movie, or Moana 2 releases and gets negative feedback due to a lazy story or bad writing, there's a subsect of people who will say something along the lines of
"It's a movie that's made for kids, why did you expect a good story?"
This is a stupid ass argument. Some of the greatest films of all time have been movies made for children. The work of Studio Ghibli, Pixar, hell even in recent years we've had films like The Wild Robot, Flow, Puss in Boots The Last Wish, Spider-Verse, etc; no one says these comments about any of these films. Thats because these are films that actively tried to tell a good story that is meaningful and fun. These movies tried. Roger Ebert has a quote, and correct me if I get the wording wrong, where he said "if a kids movie can only be enjoyed by children, then it's not a good kids movie".
I think this argument genuinely irks me for a wide variety of reasons, and they're almost all personal. I work with kids, movies have always been my passion, and debating is something I have a lot of interest in and deeply care about. This argument sucks in all three of these categories.
1) it treats children like they're stupid and can't handle films with any sort of subtlety. Kids are smarter than the majority give them credit for. They don't need every single thing spelled out, for the most part they'll be able to figure it out. It implies that children are too stupid for good movies so they need dumbed down slop. But again, there are children's movies that have stood the test of time and are universally beloved and remembered for being amazing for all ages, and show that children can handle more than a story that explains every single thing that happens.
2) This also implies that films don't need to try. We're in kind of a rough spot right now with blockbusters, there are some truly amazing ones, but so many are soulless, corporate, and just lazy. This kind of mentality does not push studios to make better movies, it's telling them that it's okay to be content with garbage. That they shouldn't try harder even though they have over 100 million dollars to make something worth paying money for. It just paves the way for more forgettable, meaningless garbage that only exists to profit off of an existing IP.
3) This is just a bad argument and doesn't work in really any capacity. It inadvertently agrees with the original argument that the story is bad, but tries to use it as a defense. It's like if I was to talk about a book with a friend, and I say "I thought the writing was pretty bad and kinda lazy" and they respond with "well it's a book for Teenage Girls, why did you expect it to have good writing? It's not made for you, just turn off your brain and have fun with it" ignoring the fact that good books for that audience exist, and just because it's made for an audience that you're not a part of doesn't excuse it from being poorly made. Along with this, the "turn off your brain and have fun with it" argument also doesn't work. If I don't have fun playing Basketball and someone tells me to just have fun while playing, i'm not gonna have fun. I like dumb fun movies. The Sonic films are a good example. They're dumb, but the characters are well written enough that I still care about what's going on in the story and I care what happens. I'm not going to ignore every problem a film has because "I'm supposed to be having fun"
I know this was a long ramble, and if you have fun with these kinds of films, that's genuinely awesome and I'm so happy for you. But the argument itself is lazy, doesn't encourage good conversation, and shows a lack of media literacy/acceptance for bad entertainment.