CALLING ALL COLORADO RESIDENTS AN 2A FREEDOM FIGHTERS GET GOVERNOR POLIS TO VETO THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BILL

SB 003 HAS PASSED. Get your Semi Autos while you can!!! The Semi-Auto Ban Bill is headed to Gov. Polis ✉️

If signed, it will require: ⚠️ Special license ⏳ 3 days + 16 hours of training (every 4 years) 💸 Extra fees + wait times …just to own certain semi-autos with detachable mags (gas or hybrid operated — as defined by the AG).

We fought hard. But too many stayed silent — even other stores we did what we could just wish more had joined us.

Now it’s up to Polis. ☎️ Call. 📧 Email. 📲 Tag him. Demand a VETO. @GovofCO @jaredpolis Your voice matters more than ever.

IT'S TIME TO GET TO WORK COLORADO!

2A #ColoradoGunRights #VetoSB003 #StandUpColorado #NoToSB003

On March 28th, Mark Baird, the lone remaining plaintiff in Mark Baird v. Rob Bonta, made the following plea for donations.

We should be close to getting on the calendar. At last report the original panel retained jurisdiction. GOA and affiliate groups like Cal Guns in addition to Mountain Legal have filed 2 amicus on our behalf. Both briefs are very well written. As you all know, the state’s case has not changed in any way. The same tired public safety and the ridiculous notion that no one really openly carried loaded weapons in 1791. The same arguments debunked at least a dozen times. Judge Vandyke wrote a pretty scathing rebuke to the Democrat hack of a pseudo judge over her treatment of these same arguments over a year ago.

On the other side, our case has become...

Fellow Oregonians — SB 243 is making its way through the legislature, and while it's framed as a public safety measure, it contains serious overreach that could negatively impact responsible gun owners across the state.

This bill would:

• Impose a mandatory 72-hour waiting period — even after a background check is cleared,
• Ban a wide range of firearm accessories using vague and sweeping definitions,
• Raise the minimum age for legal firearm ownership to 21, even for adults who vote, serve in the military, and live independently, and
• Expand gun-free zones to include not just public buildings, but also the adjacent grounds — an undefined term that could include sidewalks, parking lots, or public spaces nearby.

It also gives local governments, school boards, and public agencies the power to ban Concealed Handgun License (CHL) holders from carrying on their property — creating a confusing patchwork of rules where carrying legally in one area could make you a felon in another.

We all want safer communities, but SB 243 misses the mark. It creates legal traps for people who follow the law while doing little to address the actual drivers of gun violence — like illegal trafficking, mental health crises, and domestic abuse.

📝 Submit your written testimony before the end of March 28:
👉 https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2025R1/Testimony/SJUD/SB/243/2025-03-27-15-00?area=Measures

📄 Read the full text of SB 243:
👉 https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2025R1/Downloads/ProposedAmendment/27451

📢 Your testimony doesn’t have to be long or formal — just honest, respectful, and clear. Every voice matters.

Let’s ask for smarter, more effective laws. Oregon deserves better.

Late last week, prosecutors requested a 30-day pause in the criminal case against a firearms dealer found with an unregistered silencer because “the Department of Justice is re-evaluating its litigation positions regarding silencers.”

Does New Hampshire gun purchases go by Connecticut state laws ? Example, an assault misdemeanor non-domestic max sentence one year disqualification in Connecticut… would New Hampshire also disqualify if I was just giving my CCW?

Does New Hampshire gun purchases go by Connecticut state laws ? Example, an assault misdemeanor non-domestic max sentence one year disqualification in Connecticut… would New Hampshire also disqualify if I was just giving my CCW?

Inside the article, you will find links to the SCOTUS docket for each of the Second Amendment cert petitions scheduled for the conference. The article also contains the questions presented in each case.

Is anybody in Congress talking about this? It’s a hearing safety issue.

Anybody who thinks a 5.56 suppressor is like the movies (I.e., virtually silent) is uninformed. Typical suppressed 5.56 is 130-140 dB, so still louder than a Who concert (who had the Guinness record for loudest concert back in the day).

We have this problem of being stuck with agents and administrators from the previous regime who we can't fire, still terrorizing innocent gun owners. Maybe we can get Trump to just issue a blanket pardon for certain crimes like having pistol brace. Thoughts?

I was approved in nh for a gun permit, but in Connecticut, I have a disqualification for handguns for a misdemeanor assault, not domestic punishable by a max one sentence. I received my gun permit in nh will nics deny me in nh if I have ct disqualification ?

Opinion here.

On the textual inquiry, it cites that the Plaintiffs have failed to show that the commercial restriction, which "presumptively [doesn't] implicate the plain text" (B & L Productions v. Newsom, 104 F.4th at 119), meaningfully constrained the 18-20-year-old Californians' right to acquire firearms. Here, the judge says that there are other routes, and the Defendants provide statistical data that to retain the lawful presumption. This is essentially interest-balancing.

On the historical inquiry, the judge mainly relied on the en banc opinion of NRA v. Bondi, in which the en banc majority relied on restrictions to 18-20-year-olds, although those restrictions were not firearm-related.