I’m strongly opposed to dictatorship, especially when it’s justified in the name of communism. At the same time, being an atheist, I don't personally value religious freedom as much—as long as the state itself maintains a secular or atheist stance.
That said, I understand that it's a slippery slope, and I would never support any form of government-imposed restrictions on freedom of speech or freedom of religion.
Still, hypothetically speaking—if a country had no racism, no communalism, ensured food security , provides free healthcare & eduction and upheld economic equality, then apart from religious freedom, what other fundamental rights would people need to raise their voice for?
From an outsider’s perspective, it sometimes seems that Chinese citizens, assuming they are non-religious and not part of any persecuted ethnic group, might not face as many daily struggles. But of course, I recognize that this assumption doesn't hold true in all cases.
My question is: If a state genuinely provided equality, economic stability, and peace—but restricted freedom of speech while staying secular—would lack of religious freedom or "Cultural genocide or culturicide" be a serious concern?
be minded this is just hypothetical thoughts, I know the practical implications of restricting freedom of speech and freedom expression.