Whenever the topic of Disney Princesses is brought up, people always discuss whether the princess is a good role model or not. I just don’t understand why we are so focused on them being role models. Disney, as an identity, makes films and products based on fairytale adaptations; it’s not there to teach young girls a lesson. There’s PBS Kids for that.
It’s so tiring to hear critiques like "Ariel left the sea to be with a man" and similar comments that miss the narrative. A lot of these princesses do have agency, and even when they don’t do much in the classical era, they are still kind and work towards their goals. And it’s not only the princess that didn’t do a lot it’s also the prince. They are if not more shallow, most of them didn’t have a personality or any development compare to their princess. The real star of the show in that era was oddly enough the sidekicks, like the dwarf, the fairies and those mice’s. There’s a group of people who counter this notion, which is great, but I feel like they’re still biased in thinking that every princess should only be a “role model” or exist solely as an icon for little girls.
Back then, I don’t think Walt Disney ever intended for the princesses to be “role models”; he just wanted to create art involving fairytales. I think this whole idea that they have to be role models started in the '90s, when Disney could sell more products.
This push to make the princesses role models can lead Disney to overcorrect in their live action remakes, resulting in films that feel more bland and soulless. Additionally, in marketing, the most flawed princess or character is often more popular than those who fit the role model narrative. For example, Elsa is much more popular than Anna, and I think a lot of children can resonate with her more.
All that being said, I think Disney is at its best when they’re not focused on commercializing the princesses or trying to make them role models, but instead are more focused on creating good, whimsical fairytale-like movies. I think people underestimate that kids can tell the difference between reality and fiction, and many popular characters that children like are flawed yet still do the right thing. Batman is one of the biggest examples of this. A role model is more of a personal thing; you can’t really shape every character into this role model mold, because they’ll feel stale.
Anyway, I am kind of curious about what your opinions are, and I would love to hear them.
TDLR: I don’t believe that Disney princesses have to be, or should be pressured to be, role models. I think the pressure for them to be role models is kind of ruining a lot of Disney films and live-action remakes. Disney should focus on making good movies and creating princess traits that naturally fit the story, rather than trying to make them into “role models.” Also, I believe that role models are more of a personal concept, and kids have their own characters they look up to as role models, some of whom are even flawed, like Batman. Disney is a company that focus on entertainment and isn’t a one-hour PSA.