r/wallstreetbets 23h ago

Discussion 5 rate cuts 😮

Post image
2.2k Upvotes

676 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.4k

u/CoughRock 23h ago

who's making these prediction for rate cut ? didn't jpowell explicitly said he's going to wait and see ?

732

u/DPMKIV 23h ago

It's called a FED bailout...

It theoretically should ease the free fall to prevent an all-out crash.

471

u/CoughRock 23h ago

adp non-farm report just came out. Much higher non-farm employment than predicted. We are screwed in term of rate cut. High unemployment and high core inflation gave jpowell easy excuse for pause rate and wait and see.

it's going to take a miracle to see rate cut now.

69

u/DPMKIV 22h ago

We'll see what actually happens. I mean... they printed money when COVID hit to keep the US spending.

If this sell off starts triggering massive buying of off shore stocks due to unease in US stocks... they gotta do something to keep investors in US stocks.

254

u/spookyswagg 22h ago

Ya, but inflation was at 2% then.

Inflation is predicted to rise this year, 4%, next year by >4%

Rate cuts now would just make that way worse…

50

u/clapsandfaps 21h ago

Honestly do they have a choice?

Not to be a doomsayer, but with rising inflation (again) due to tariffs, probable layoffs due to reduced demand on american goods due to tariffs and combine that with high interest to fight the self-induced inflation, people will default, a lot. Even domesctically produced goods will be hit with inflation due to potash tariffs.

I’m seeing in my unqualified crystal ball, a depression happening.

84

u/Massive-Opposite-705 21h ago

What the end goal if you print more money for a bail out just continue kicking the can down the road. It’s like we’re building a dam that gets weaker each renovation and gets more water behind it. The longer you keep repairing it with tape and sticks the bigger the flood will be when it collapses. Let pain hit when it is supposed to hit rather than pushing it to the next generation double

113

u/Syab_of_Caltrops Dirty HODLer 21h ago

The US is a world champ can kicker. You underestimate this country's can kicking skills.

5

u/onpg 18h ago

That worked because we were the world reserve currency. Something our Dear Leader is working very hard to end.

0

u/Syab_of_Caltrops Dirty HODLer 18h ago

What's going to replace it, a BRICS currency? The Euro?

I'm not denying there's pressure on the Petro Dollar and there are strong efforts to create an alternative, but all those alternatives are laughable, even conaidering the upheaval at the moment.

Humans love creaming doom and gloom, but it almost never come to pass.

4

u/onpg 15h ago edited 14h ago

How old are you? Curious. They were laughable. Until this week.

Edit: well, until Trump won re-election actually. Because after that all of this was kind of inevitable.

1

u/highroller_rob 55m ago

Hot Take: Trump is working to replace the USD with bitcoin.

→ More replies (0)

18

u/Krisevol 19h ago

Every world power that has fallen, did so because they kicked the can. Every one of them.

Our choice now or raise rates to 10+% and pay back the debt... Or crumble like the rest.

-2

u/Syab_of_Caltrops Dirty HODLer 19h ago

LOL, this has been the line for 30 years (since the 90s inflationary period). If you call for the fall of Rome every day for 600 years you'll eventually be right.

3

u/Krisevol 19h ago

Yup we will eventually collapse due to debt

→ More replies (0)

1

u/PrideOfAmerica 19h ago

They trained the Saints how to kick the can

13

u/Aquarius_Age 21h ago

It's been that way since 2008 unfortunately, apparently there's no alternative

1

u/YeetnotherThrowawayy 19h ago

no alternative that would keep power hungry fucktards who want complete control on the global financial system happy at least.

1

u/jawndell 21h ago

That’s what Volcker did in the 80s.  Just rip the bandaid off and let the economy heal. 

1

u/YeetnotherThrowawayy 19h ago

the whole fiat system which is deeply inherently flawed is built on kicking the can down the road as long as you can..

1

u/_senor_snrub 18h ago

what happens when you delete the water out of the excel sheet?

1

u/InclementBias 14h ago

everyone said this during covid prints and then during post 2008 QE and by all accounts JPow was landing the plane in insane crosswinds and we were so close while coping with the pain after all of us pointed and said it was impossible.. then this happens.

3

u/Massive-Opposite-705 13h ago

Jpow was doing a great job it sucks that he doesn’t get to close his tenure the way it could have gone. If he pulled off the soft landing it would’ve been incredible. Now we’ll never know

20

u/Drachos 18h ago

What you are describing is called stagflation and from the massive global experiment that was the 70s oil crisis (cause by OPEC refusing to export oil, so not a bad comparison to now) the BEST way to handle it is thus:

The reserve bank handles the inflation The government increases the safety nets And the public get ready to be raped.

The nation's whose central bank and government ignoring inflation to keep people in jobs ended up having inflation accelerate to much, wages went backwards and since they still had no oil, unemployment STILL continued to rise.

So they achieved nothing but wasted money and made things worse.

The nation that ignored everything but inflation also faired poorly, but not as poorly.

The nations who saw that no amount of government money was going to stop a lack of oil from crushing the job market so instead focused on accepting the high unemployment and catching people as they fell did best.

It freed the central banks hand to do the bloody work that needed to be done and made sure the worst of the pain fell on those who still worked.

Now obviously the price hikes and supply issues will be caused by the tarriffs this time, instead of OPEC. But the outcome is the same. The reserve bank MUST follow what it learned in the 70s and if need be publically make it clear that the safety net is government responsibility.

10

u/clapsandfaps 17h ago

Yeah, this is about to get bloody, trump and safety net does not fit in the same sentence.

So short and long term puts on everything is the play?

5

u/Kabouki 17h ago

Now add in one more variable. Trump moves on say Greenland as a distraction. Us oil and food exports get sanctions.

31

u/Bcider 21h ago

Yes, let it crash. Hard reboot the economy. Kicking the can since 2008 has screwed everyone.

52

u/-gawdawful- 21h ago

That was nearly 20 years ago. There is no hard rebooting the economy. The entire economy is based around the federal government propping up loser businesses and insanely useless tech enterprises. There is no rebuilding this house of cards.

44

u/Oberschicht 20h ago

2008

That was nearly 20 years ago.

This is truly the worst news of the day

9

u/Krisevol 19h ago

For the generation that will never be able to buy a house it is.

If we keep kicking the can, the next generation won't even be able to afford rent.

1

u/Pleasant_Race2717 20h ago

Wouldn’t be so pessimistic. Dot com bubble was a similar shitfest and it eventually corrected.

1

u/IHateLayovers 13h ago

The government isn't propping up tech. Big Tech prints money to send to DC for DC to buy flyover state votes.

Everybody was all doom and gloom about tech when interest rates rose. No, Mag 7 became a thing and while non-tech companies stagnated you saw Apple bust past $3 trillion. Even in our "high" interest rate environment you see OpenAI reach $300 billion valuation without government nonsense like Farm Welfare.

The past 5 years has proven it. Interest rates up? Big Tech. Interest rates down? Big Tech.

1

u/Jangandong 8h ago

Agree. Just let it all crash for a couple of years and destroy inflation.

1

u/matthewkulp 8h ago

It's not a computer you just restart and it works different. You have to actually have a coherent theory of macroeconomics that is supported by evidence in order to make good policy.

1

u/atpplk 20h ago

I’m seeing in my unqualified crystal ball, a depression happening.

That's a feature, not a bug.

1

u/Pleasant_Race2717 20h ago

If they print more money dollar will nosedive. With these tariffs demand for USD will go down, add billions in quantitative easing and you are set for disaster.

1

u/SuspendedAwareness15 14h ago

Rising inflation due to tariffs leads to rate HIKES, if the goal was to cap inflation. Yeah we are going into a recession right now, one we caused on purpose, when our economy was in a delicate position and we had no room to absorb recovery measures.

This decision guarantees we are fucked. There is nothing left to do but watch it fall.

1

u/inb4ElonMusk As Featured on CNBC Once 📺 12h ago

I thought potash was exempted in an EO

1

u/clapsandfaps 12h ago

It wasn’t, then it was. Hard to keep track.

What potash tariffs are in place right now? Canadian potash imports into the U.S. not covered by CUSMA are currently subject to 10 per cent tariffs and that is where they will remain for now.

How much of that is not covered, who knows.

https://thestarphoenix.com/business/what-you-need-to-know-about-tariffs-on-potash

1

u/inb4ElonMusk As Featured on CNBC Once 📺 11h ago

I’m assuming they’re going to start importing a lot from Belarus and Russia. Potash prices still up about 5% over the past month.

1

u/crimeo 8h ago

Neither is a good choice, there is no good choice other than impeaching Trump.

So when you have no clearly good choice as the Fed, then projecting "100% pRoBabiLitY" for one of the choices is dumb, it could go either way

1

u/Der_Hebelfluesterer 21h ago

Inflation versus economy the FED will choose economy and reduce rates anyway

1

u/Syab_of_Caltrops Dirty HODLer 21h ago

Who is predicting that? There is literally no data.

Yeah, sure, argue back "everyone knows X or Y" the truth is that uncertainty and fear is driving everything right now, not certainty and bad data.

1

u/Stockengineer 21h ago

Inflation due to policy changes interesting to see what he does.

1

u/commandandtakeit 20h ago

Exactly. Fed between a rock and a hard place with their hands tied behind their backs.

I guess that’s what happens when the bailout comes before the collapse like with the fake dump and then pump during Covid

35

u/Musicman425 22h ago

But this is purposefully self inflected. No reason to cut rates for self harm.

35

u/CoughRock 22h ago

pre-covid fed is very differently than post covid fed. Before we had international trade and immigrant labor to export inflation and labor cost despite a decade of money printing.

Right now that mechanism of reduce inflation via foreign supplier is gone. The labor cost reduction via immigrant labor is also gone.
There is no longer natural competition mechanism to keep inflation down from the supply side. The fed have open excuse to control inflation from the demand side.

I'm hoping for a dovish fed, but seeing how they are just borderline bureaucratic that can be replace by a machine. I wouldn't count on it. Get your put ready

8

u/G000z 22h ago

Repeat after me the White House nor the fed cares about the stock market...

7

u/StanTheManBaratheon 21h ago

They have no room to do that this time.

2

u/toywatch 9h ago

Jpow tanked the markets with numerous hikes till nasdaq was at 10000. His job is about the stock market, but controlling inflation and employment rates

1

u/yamzZ- 22h ago

Or they don’t

1

u/Happy_Penalty_9179 15h ago

How about impeaching the president? Why does the fed have to bail us out, Congress do your jobs

0

u/DPMKIV 15h ago

I mean... even Nancy/Obama/Sanders/etc have been talking about wanting to get certain global powers in check over the years...

They didn't want to do it... just talked about it. Now, someone is actually doing what they didn't want to do personally. Do you think they will stand in his way now that they have someone to blame if it goes sideways?

1

u/Happy_Penalty_9179 13h ago

Huh, I don't think Obama can impeach anyone at this point. Is your argument that the democrats didn't want to end free trade and that they are also beholden to their capitalist masters? Because yes I agree

1

u/DPMKIV 13h ago

Pretty much my point and they are letting the Don be their fall guy and letting it happen.

1

u/matthewkulp 8h ago

Large financial advisor firms are aggressively trying to move assets into global index funds as a result of this.

25

u/Ok-Instruction830 23h ago

More tariffs = lower rates. It’s one hack economists don’t want you to know 

54

u/4look4rd 22h ago

It’s going to be a choice of getting punched in the face (high unemployment) or punched in the head (high inflation). Will probably get both.

27

u/insertwittynamethere 21h ago

That's called stagflation, and the only way to beat it is typically escalating the rate to being a much higher level, not cutting, to stop the inflation first, which will cut demand, and hopefully cause prices to stabilize if not fall, but it will be a recession at the minimum all the same.

If they cut, and spending starts intensifying, while prices increase arbitrarily because of tariffs alone, then we are going to get into a situation of serious, run away inflation, which will the necessitate a very serious rate increase to stem.

That's why central banks are terrified of stagflation, because once it gets baked in, and it impacts the psychology of the market, it takes a paradigm shift in social mentality to change the perceptions of the economy enough to get out of stagflation.

The economy is as much science/mathematics as it is human psychology.

But for rn, they can not cut rates, or they risk serious inflation due to tariff price hikes alone. If anything, I am betting with high probability of a hike before the year is up as the tariffs filter throughout the economy and cause the price levels to rise. Without corresponding wage increases, moreover, people are going to struggle with their consumption, much less basic necessities.

However, since this is a tax, and not additional profit for these firms, there is no leftover money to give increases to employees without cutting into their bottom lines. We are about to witness a very 'fun' cycle of people working themselves to death for minimal return in order to just barely make it, while companies face decreasing sales domestically and internationally due to less money in people's pockets domestically and unwillingness to buy American/retaliatory tariffs shifting foreign demand away from US goods that are easily replaced.

1

u/Chemical-Cellist1407 39m ago

What’s the order? Inflation, lower consumer spending, then job loss (unemployment).

So then a recession and no buildup of factories and domestic manufacturing. Followed by rate cuts.

10

u/wsbgodly123 22h ago

What about kick in the nuts (sharp drop in consumer spending)?

7

u/4look4rd 22h ago

That’s complementary, JPowell special.

3

u/SandyBlyatCheeks 21h ago

POWELL! Right in the kisser!

9

u/asetniop 21h ago

"Stags are the most virile animal out there, that's why stagflation is good for America." - someone in the administration in six months, unironically

8

u/jfwelll 22h ago

Tariffs are inflationnary. Low rates are inflationnary.

Why the fed would even fuck everyone iver self inflicted policies?

20

u/Much-Creme1362 22h ago

Not if they drive up inflation.

-29

u/Karimadhe 22h ago

Found the parrot.

24

u/letmeshowyou 22h ago

Found the person who doesn’t know simple economics.

11

u/TruEnvironmentalist 22h ago

Simple math, lower interest rates dont mean jack if you have to pay 20% more for the product up front.

7

u/Much-Creme1362 22h ago

It's literally how rates work. The federal reserve has a DUAL mandate to keep inflation low and the economy growing. If inflation is up, they raise rates. If growth is down, they lower them. If both are up, they can't do jack shit.

8

u/spookyswagg 22h ago

I don’t think that’s how that works my dude

1

u/Ok-Instruction830 22h ago

😆 an economist trying to conceal the hack

2

u/bangbangIshotmyself 19h ago

Also if we get a rate cut won’t we see a serious escalation of inflation??

2

u/mouthful_quest 17h ago

Just curious if laid off government workers who’ve been given severance packages and aren’t allowed to report as unemployed is reflected in this non farm payrolls report?

2

u/mybreakfastiscold 16h ago

Layoffs due to tariffs will begin next week and continue through May. Plenty of time for the job market to tank before June

1

u/Temporary-Alarm-744 22h ago

To be fair to pow pow he’s now possibly trying to navigate a stagflation possibility

42

u/alekou8 22h ago

Btw this is exactly what trump wants

11

u/suspense99 22h ago

Would you explain to me who is trying to understand this? Why would trump want this? Trying to figure out his end goal. I'm trying to learn

51

u/idunnoiforget 21h ago

Listen to what Trump says about it. He wants other countries to pay their fair share through the tarrifs and stop taking advantage of America and bring back American manufacturing. And if you assume that he is not lying and means what he says then the only real logical conclusion is that he is an illiterate moron with an understanding of economics that is less than that of a second grader.

The finance YouTubers will have you believe he's intentionally crashing the economy in a 4D chess move to force the Fed to lower rates so that the national dept can be financed at a lower interest rate.

And there's the theory that he's crashing markets so he and his rich friends can buy up things for pennies on the dollar and basically copy paste the oligarch structure that was formed in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Realistically it could be a combo of the above

21

u/AGI2028maybe 20h ago

I think any of the 4d chess theories are pretty dumb. The “they crash it to buy it for cheap” is particularly stupid. Elon Musk is probably going to end up losing over $100,000,000,000 (if not way more) from this lol. There’s no way this is going to be net positive for him. The “oligarchs” wealth is in the stock market so crashing it so they can buy things for cheaper is robbing Peter to pay Paul.

The reality is just: Trump isn’t very informed and is stuck in the past. He rightly recognizes that free trade is a race to the bottom that ends with us losing jobs to essential slave labor in undeveloped countries. Buts he’s also rash and stupid and belligerent so he can’t intelligently target the worst offenders and instead just indiscriminately tariffed everyone.

TLDR: Trump correctly identifies a problem (that other countries are disinclined to see due to the wealthy not wanting anything to change) but is also a stupid person so he puts forth a solution that’s even worse.

6

u/Capitalist_Space_Pig 17h ago

"He rightly recognizes that free trade is a race to the bottom that ends with us losing jobs to essential slave labor in undeveloped countries."

This is offset by the other longstanding pillar of U.S. foreign policy, which was to encourage democratic governments in all countries. Much harder to race to the bottom if the slave labor can vote.

1

u/one_excited_guy 15h ago

He rightly recognizes that free trade is a race to the bottom that ends with us losing jobs to essential slave labor in undeveloped countries. Buts he’s also rash and stupid and belligerent so he can’t intelligently target the worst offenders and instead just indiscriminately tariffed everyone.

what is the right way to do it, im wondering? i dont get the sense that this even being a problem is widely accepted, let alone that anyone has an idea how to fix it

3

u/AGI2028maybe 15h ago

Wait, you don’t think businesses having the option to pay Bangladeshis 50 cents an hour is a problem for a low skill American worker looking to make a living wage in a similar industry? Come on bro. Would you be cool with us just removing the minimum wage? If not, what is the real difference between paying American workers slave wages vs. paying foreign workers slave wages instead? In a free trade world, there is no difference.

what is the right way to do it

Targeted tariffs on problematic countries and specifically aimed at hitting industries you want to promote back home.

So, imposing a huge tariff on Chinese electric cars might be fine if we were working to increase electric car production here, change our sourcing to get materials from friendly countries, etc. But Trump just put tariffs on everyone and everything. So all he has done is place a 10-40% sales tax on everything imported.

Americans will eventually get this stuff from American companies, but it will take several years to build up the production and, in the meantime, we will all suffer. And so will our allies who we are fucking over for no reason.

1

u/one_excited_guy 13h ago

Wait, you don’t think businesses having the option to pay Bangladeshis 50 cents an hour is a problem for a low skill American worker looking to make a living wage in a similar industry?

i do, but thats not the sense i get from most of the people talking about the tariffs, they sound to me like they think theres not even a problem worth tackling.

Targeted tariffs on problematic countries and specifically aimed at hitting industries you want to promote back home.

makes sense. we'll see if thats what we end up closer to, or if he really doesnt have a plan to negotiate and just does want blanket fire

27

u/atpplk 20h ago

And there's the theory that he's crashing markets so he and his rich friends can buy up things for pennies on the dollar and basically copy paste the oligarch structure that was formed in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

To be honest I'm pretty sure he is too dumb to plan for this kind of things, but the gang around him are not. My guess is they now what buttons to press to influence him towards their designs.

5

u/BlackSquirrel05 20h ago edited 19h ago

Yeah it's the minors around him that i'm more worried about.

Not just the other billionaires behind his boys like Thiel and Yarvin.

6

u/idunnoiforget 20h ago

Theil straight up joked about blending up poor people to make food. Dude wants to make network states a thing

7

u/NeoMaxiZoomDweebean 19h ago

He also looked TEERIFIED when they asked him hos thoughts on that italian plumber.

1

u/_senor_snrub 18h ago

I've never seen anyone as puppified and resigned as don. He has many masters, but based on exactly what he said, his main one runs this giant country on a continent to the east. Those poor russian soldiers!

I am hopeful that everyone on earth sends Zelensky help. Everyone, send your baddest ass mother fuckers and have Zelensky say, fuck your peace plans. We're going to just kill them all.

1

u/datsundere 17h ago

Heritage foundation wants this.

1

u/spendology 15h ago

Trump, start Global Trade War, US Dollar Default with Mar-A-Lago Accords (swap US Treasury Notes & Bonds for zero-coupon 100 year bond that can't be traded) --> US Debt Goes Bye-Bye and US can start manufacturing again once quality of life and the US Dollar are lower than whale shit so we can competitively manufacture cheap stuff. WARNING: Some work may be "Pay Optional" #WINNING

1

u/one_excited_guy 15h ago

And there's the theory that he's crashing markets so he and his rich friends can buy up things for pennies on the dollar and basically copy paste the oligarch structure that was formed in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

can anyone explain how theyre gonna do that when their assets are evaporating at the same speed as or worse than the market? what money are they gonna use for this

1

u/idunnoiforget 5h ago

what money are they gonna use for rhis

If their money isn't all tied in assets with fluctuating value, they can directly buy smaller companies. Or they can finance it with their Assets as collateral. even if their billion shares of TSLA fell 40% that's still a big chunk of change that can be borrowed against and used for buying more things at the bottom.

1

u/one_excited_guy 2h ago

If their money isn't all tied in assets with fluctuating value

but it is.

Or they can finance it with their Assets as collateral.

they couldve done that at higher valuation of their assets, so this is only profitable for them if their assets tank significantly less than the market since they'll be paying a whole bunch of interest.

even if their billion shares of TSLA fell 40%

the above doesnt work then because the whole market didnt tank 40%, but TSLA did.

0

u/ItsOnLikeNdamakung 15h ago

I honestly thought him trying to manipulate the economy and market would force Powell to adjust rates in time for the US to refi a part of the national debt at a better rate.

1

u/idunnoiforget 5h ago

Lowering rates as other regards have pointed out to me is inflationary. Tarrifs are also inflationary. Therefore rates may not be lowered

2

u/forlornstrawberry 20h ago

I think the basic idea is that cutting interest rates stimulates the economy. It gets people borrowing (because they want to spend!). And the lower interest rates go, the less incentive people have to keep their money tied up in bonds or similar investments.

This is why the Fed used high interest rates to curb inflation. The economy was too stimulated. Raising interest rates was like giving the economy a xanex, to chill it out so prices would quit rising. Then, as inflation has waned, the Fed has able to slowly cut interest rates. But the Fed has to be slow; it has to wean the economy off of the high interest rates it set. If the Fed cuts interest rates too fast, the economy will get hyper-stimulated too fast and inflation will come right back.

Now we get to Trump. As President, he cares about the stock mark and economy. But he also wants his tariffs. His tariffs will hurt the stock market and economy. So he's hoping the fed will cut rates, which might stimulate the economy enough to counteract/balance out his tariffs. In his view, he can enact all of the tariffs without any of the pain if the Fed cuts rates.

That's the gist of it, I think.

There are disagreements over whether cutting rates will counteract the tariffs, and over what the right move for the Fed is, but the bottom line is that Trump thinks interest rate cuts will stimulate the economy, counteracting his tariffs.

2

u/suspense99 19h ago

Thank you for explaining this so well!

3

u/Significant_Treat_87 15h ago

the problem, as im sure youve seen plenty of others say already, is that inflation is already elevated. they don’t want to cut rates. 

once growth slows to a crawl and inflation is also high, it’s very difficult to turn things around. you’ve found yourself outside of the normal boom bust yin yang cycle and can easily get stuck that way for years. 

0

u/atpplk 20h ago

Because once you are deep in the only way to get money will be to sign in the military and cross the Canadian border while Don the con friends buy all properties.

1

u/Key_Sea_6606 15h ago

Lower rates = bigger real estate bubble which is what he has his money on

0

u/Gambler_Addict_Pro 21h ago

The idea of tariffs are to bring manufacturing jobs back. If companies want the US market, they’ll have to have factories here and employ Americans. 

Low interest rates make people spend money since why not buy what you want since the price is the same as waiting?

The disagreement is because nobody knows what will happen and they will rationalize their opinion AFTER the fact. There are sectors that tariffs won’t help. Low interest rates create a bubble, specially in the housing sector. 

-26

u/Claxxe 22h ago

They literally can't answer that. 99% of these people hate trump and musk because they're told to and just repeat everything. Guarantee nobody will explain anything to you because they haven't explained anything to anybody, because they have no idea.

Stocks went through the roof last year but the economy was fucked, stocks haven't been connected to the economy in years. That's not even a political statement, it can be observed just by looking at the data.

11

u/wabassoap 21h ago

Ok I’m listening. What actually is the plan?

-21

u/Claxxe 21h ago

I have no idea, but to say he's intentionally going to cripple everybody is straight up fucking retarded. What would he gain? Gets richer? Where's he going to spend the money when everybody's destitute?

You're a political pundit and don't even realize it, you belong behind Wendy's.

12

u/iliveonramen 21h ago

Lololol!

You support something that is cratering markets and going to crater the economy without knowing anything about how it’s suppose to achieve anything.

And others are the braindead lemmings?

-1

u/Claxxe 21h ago

Where did I express support for anything?

12

u/ama_singh 21h ago

Where's he going to spend the money when everybody's destitute?

Buddy go take your meds.

-8

u/Claxxe 21h ago

Exactly what I expected, I literally called it in my first comment. Give me all of the down votes, I fucking love it.

-7

u/Claxxe 21h ago

Oh and I don't even vote.

6

u/DJayLeno 20h ago

Where's he going to spend the money when everybody's destitute?

The destitute can be forced to sell off their remaining assets at a huge discount.

4

u/TanneAndTheTits 21h ago

If FED rates go down his companies and Uber- rich buddies can borrow more money for cheaper and refinance previous loans at a lower rate. If companies go under, they get bailout money.

TL;DR: JPOW! GET THE MONEY PRINTER!

-1

u/Claxxe 21h ago

Genuinely, probably some of the dumbest shit I've ever read. Based on all of your fabricated bullshit, the USD is going to crater in value. That would, objectively, reduce the cost of all current loans significantly. But yeah, it's totally the loans he's trying to reduce the cost of by hammering reciprocal tariffs.

This is absolutely hilarious!

5

u/TanneAndTheTits 21h ago

I'm just saying man, more money = more money. And more money = more problems. So therefore, more problems = more problems. Problem???

-1

u/Claxxe 21h ago

You're all saying he's killing the country. Correct? What do you think happens to the global currency? They keep using USD for they jump to another one. They're not going to keep using USD.

= Hyperinflation beyond the authority of any singular organization.

So you're saying he's going to refinance a bunch of shit after hyperinflation? It's insane, and yet here I am getting bombarded by calling out the bullshit.

I fucking love it, I'm here on my day off laughing maniacally at this but unfortunately I have stuff to do and won't be back for a while, but I'm very excited to see the responses in a few hours.

As Fez from that's 70s show loved to say, GOOD DAY!

→ More replies (0)

-8

u/alekou8 22h ago

Well his whole thing is to get interest rates down, this will likely quickly make that happen

15

u/spaceporter 21h ago

Trump is crashing the economy in an inflationary not deflationary way. I don't foresee the Fed wanting to cut rates, which is also inflationary. Trump doesn't understand that. If he wanted to get the Fed to cut rates drastically, he should have chosen deflationary market crashing lunacy, for example increasing income taxes by 50% instead of tariffs, which are consumption taxes.

9

u/branyk2 21h ago

Yeah, genuine austerity where you actually cared about deficits and debt would trigger massive rate cuts. Instead we're cutting a few billion dollars from expenses and a few trillion dollars from revenue, so it's really just an extremely sloppy and cruel stimulus exclusively for the richest people in the country.

1

u/spaceporter 18h ago

Yes, drastically cutting government spending probably would have done it, too.

Trump doesn't have the patience or managerial skills to do that successfully. He tried with DOGE, but since the money has already been apportioned by Congress, he couldn't do that in the time frame he wanted.

Instead of higher taxes, cutting government spending would have done similar.

1

u/alekou8 18h ago

I’ll bookmark this

83

u/spookyswagg 22h ago

Inflation is predicted to rise to 4% this year and >4% next year

Without accounting for retaliatory tariffs or potential rate cuts.

Why would Jpow go and make that worse by lowering rates? Just to save the stock market?

What is more important for the Fed, inflation or stock prices?

7

u/SuchCattle2750 19h ago

Inflation. Price stability is literally their only job.

4

u/Inner_Honey_978 17h ago

Yes inflation, but the fed very specifically has a dual mandate that includes balancing price stability with maximum employment

1

u/Deep90 3h ago

I think Jpow will cut if he sees the job market needs more attention than inflation, but I'm not sure if there is anything else that might sway him.

-6

u/Grand_Ad5229 22h ago

Fed only saw cumulative inflation ticking up .3 percent this year on PCE from 2.5 to 2.8 percent. Markets think they’ll try and save jobs as long as it doesn’t get out of control.

10

u/spookyswagg 22h ago

-11

u/Grand_Ad5229 21h ago

I don't know how much stock I'd put in a German bank, is anyone in US predicting that now?

-13

u/Jumpy-Importance 21h ago

Old data? It’s current data. You’re taking future projection from a company we’re currently putting 20% tariffs on. Can’t see the conflict here 🥱

0

u/legbreaker 21h ago

Who expects unemployment to go up?

Companies are trying to bring manufacturing to the US, so there will be plenty of jobs (just not well paying).

So we will have low unemployment but way worse utilization of manpower. We will see people with specialized degrees have to start working labor in a drone factory.

Quality of life goes down hard and people can’t afford their loans… but they will not be unemployed.

High employment does not necessarily mean good usage of resources.

It will make the Fed position very hard, economy in the shitter, inflation rising, low unemployment… all their tools will be useless.

6

u/Grand_Ad5229 21h ago

They are no doubt in a tough spot, we should start to see layoffs however as companies begin to digest & react to all of this. Consumers are going to pull way back and only buy essentials.

I think companies will try and go lean and just rely on the hoards of cash they have stockpiled until we can get a new president potentially.

I don't know ultimately how much manufacturing is going to be relocated, CEO's on the record as very reluctant to make any concrete plans with Trump because he could change his mind on a whim.

There will be hiring freezes and layoffs coming soon.

The country may have made a huge mistake re-electing him.

5

u/Cheetah_05 17h ago

It's pretty unlikely companies will actually start bringing manufacturing to the US, unless there is a guarantee these tarriffs will last even after Trump's term. Buildig a new factory and getting it completely set up isn't a month process, and it's incredibly fucking expensive.

Factories aren't in the US right now because it's cheaper elsewhere. If the tarriffs go away, it'll again be cheaper to manufacture elsewhere. The companies that invested in new US factories are then left holding the bag, since their competitor's product will be cheaper (since manufacturing in other countries is cheaper).

If the genuine desire is to increase manufacturing in the US, you can indeed use tarriffs, but companies have to be aware of this beforehand, and have to be able to trust that these tarriffs will last a long enough time that the building of a new factory is cost-effective. Regardless of political affiliation, Trump has caused a lot of economical unrest, which makes companies a lot more hesitant and unwilling to take the risk.

1

u/pine1501 18h ago

hello America, welcome to the rest of the world.

-2

u/AGI2028maybe 20h ago edited 20h ago

What is more important for the Fed, inflation or stock prices?

Is this even a serious question?

Stock price is more important to the fed lol. That’s why the best advice you can give anyone is to invest in the stock market. Rich people will let any other negative thing happen long before they would let the market tank.

1

u/Key_Sea_6606 15h ago

Stay delusional and poor bro

44

u/ric2b 22h ago

The best move for the Fed right now would be to keep rates where they are and force congress to reverse the tariffs, anything else is way too damaging for lowered rates to fix.

12

u/Gh0StDawGG 22h ago

Tariffs not going anywhere. How the fed fixes 🥭mess will be interesting.

1

u/adrr 21h ago

Raise rates to drain more dollars from the market.

4

u/AGI2028maybe 19h ago

If Powell even hinted at a rate increase the market would literally be down 10% within a second.

1

u/dqdg 22h ago

Well, we know that is not going to happen. Its all up to the Fed, whom I am hoping is not influenced by the WH (ugh)

3

u/ric2b 21h ago

Well, we know that is not going to happen.

Some republicans are already talking about it, don't be so sure.

1

u/DPMKIV 15h ago

Agreed, the FED really has no reason to do anything here.

They should and likely will let the new norm settle and move to QE and such once the damage is done.

What is done is done, and this is a world we are going to have to figure out how to operate in now.

This whole thing really highlights how our branch's checks-n-balances process that was built in is failing. Something with such a global impact should have been approved by the House and Senate. We see our house and Senate are 2 steps behind the executive branch's public addresses.

2

u/ric2b 12h ago

The checks and balances are mostly bullshit myths propped up by tradition, as we're now seeing.

The system is very fragile, favors the executive way too much and mathematically polarizes to only two options.

1

u/ironforger52 22h ago

Ain't happening.  They need a 2/3 majority to override Trumps veto

5

u/ric2b 21h ago

Democrats will definitely go along with it so you only need about 1/3 of republicans.

1

u/ironforger52 18h ago

Republicans are not defying trump.  The vast majority is locked step with trump

1

u/ric2b 12h ago

Some of them are cracking already. We'll see.

6

u/Gh0StDawGG 22h ago

Fed bailouts are when they pump cash into the market.

10

u/Intrepid00 22h ago

Not with this massive inflation Chief Chuckle Fuck is causing. You get high rates with stagflation and you like it.

3

u/PantsMicGee 🦍🦍🦍 12h ago

Fed doesn't give a shit about the market price.

2

u/Old_Man_Heats 22h ago

Fuck no please, gimme the gutter I want to buy all the stock for a handjob

2

u/mtbaird5687 21h ago

And I was so hoping to refinance my 7.375 mortgage...

2

u/lovely_sombrero 12h ago

If there is a Fed bailout, it will be in the form of direct cash transfers to corporations and rich people, like QE after 2008. No way they are lowering interest rates even further for fears of pushing up inflation.

1

u/dinodan412 22h ago

While increasing inflation on top of the inflation increase from tariffs and then the same thing happens.

I guess it's going to be more of what the goal is, keep inflation reasonable, or avoid a crash. Either way you can't avoid both at the same time now, and it probably will be lucky if only one happens

1

u/jfwelll 22h ago

Yayyyy hyperinflation of stagflation woohoooo

1

u/ibobnotnot 21h ago

how are cuts going to save the economy from this much stupidity

1

u/Competitive_Mix3627 21h ago

Isnt the US national debt already about 122% GDP? Speed run to fiscal collapse 😂

1

u/legbreaker 21h ago

Yep creates a bunch of free money chasing after the same few workers and limited resources (we will paying way higher prices for all supplies, minerals, wood, components etc).

This will be a unique era where we will have to take on much more debt just to be able to keep up current production levels. 

Contrasted to before where people take on debt to increase production capacity.

This will lead to pretty bad inflation and stagnant or decreasing GDP.

Are you tired of winning yet?

1

u/jawndell 21h ago

I’m sure that’ll help inflation….

1

u/brokester 21h ago

Ah yes, so we can have an even bigger crash later on. Love it.

1

u/tribbans95 20h ago

And make inflation run rampant. Yay!!

1

u/Meehh90 20h ago

That's not a great mix, it's frightening even.

Increasing money supply, which has an inflationary effect on a local economy, while increasing base costs of products through tariffs.

1

u/GayGeekInLeather 19h ago

But wouldn’t 5 rate cuts theoretically kick inflation into overdrive?

1

u/The64only 18h ago

Not if we’re in a state of stagflation. At that point there’s not much the Fed can do which is why JPow warned the Fed may be limited in its ability to respond.

1

u/smartello 16h ago

until inflation hits and it's gonna hit fast and then meet 20% rates

1

u/SuspendedAwareness15 14h ago

It would not. It would supercharge spending, and as a result inflation, when inflation is already going to spike by 20% due to tariffs. It will completely distort housing and assets markets, and we will still go into a recession. However when the recession sets in, there will be nowhere for the fed to go to mitigate it.

Cutting rates right now would be disastrous.

1

u/DPMKIV 14h ago

Tariffs make things cost more dollars for the consumer.

Inflation makes the dollar less valuable for the consumer.

They have the same net result for the consumer, I suppose, reducing their buying power. But they are mechanically different in how they operate.

Lowering interest rates would give consumers access to cheaper borrowing to offset the tariff impact on their debt usage.

Would also pull cash out of high yeild accounts and bonds back into the economy and stock market. High yield accounts and bonds have been producing a safe ROI for a while now that contends with the SP500 avg ROI yoy. With very low/no risk...

1

u/SuspendedAwareness15 14h ago

And when those consumers exercise that cheaper borrowing, and more importantly the wealthy dip into cheaper debt with which to buy assets, overall consumer demand goes up.

Because of the tariffs, and trade wars, supply will go down.

Demand going up and supply going down at the same time means prices will increase rapidly.

Bonds have been contending with SP averages, but are at 1/5th of SP actuals over the last 2 years.

2

u/DPMKIV 14h ago

True true... I'm not saying the FED has an easy job. And fiscal tuning is complicated AF.

But... reduction of interest short term could ease the bleed if they need to bail out the stock market at a macro level. Not that they will, just that it could.

2

u/SuspendedAwareness15 14h ago

It would ease the bleed at first, but would trigger a series of dominoes that would make the crisis many times worse in six months if we didn't perfectly thread an invisible needle with invisible thread.

We are getting a recession either way. Going into a recession with low rates, low trade, high debt levels, after Trump printed 7 trillion 5 years ago and biden printed 2 trillion over the last 4 years. After we just got out of 2 years of very high inflation. In the middle of a housing price crisis.

We will have used all our tools at this point as hard as they can be used without breaking, right before the real crisis starts. So we would have nowhere to go. It would be a devastating depression akin to 1929. There would be nothing left in the toolbox.

It's how countries like Argentina went from world class economies to clown shows.

1

u/alien_believer_42 14h ago

Quantitative easing doesn't do shit for tariffs.

1

u/Tacocats_wrath 8h ago

This is not healthy rate cuts though. Inflation due to tarrifs are going to compound with Inflation from rate cuts.

1

u/crimeo 8h ago

Yeah that's great and indeed 100% guaranteed... UNLESS there's mass inflation such as from, oh I don't know, adding 20-30% cost to everything through direct tax

1

u/Stunning_Mast2001 7h ago

that trick doesn’t work in these conditions. we don’t have investing hesitancy, we have brick walls

rate cuts now is a death spiral— positive feedback loop of problems

1

u/Key-Banana-8242 3h ago

Bailout is a questionable term here

Idk if it really would do that much

1

u/DickFineman73 8h ago

Usually recessions are deflationary, and turning on the money printer partially counteracts that.

Tariffs, and a recession caused by tariffs, isn't fundamentally deflationary - it's inflationary. We're looking at potentially 5-10% inflation across the board without the Fed lifting a finger... and if the Fed does try to bail anyone out with a stimulus print or loan, that just adds more gas to the inflation fire.

Donald Trump isn't even smart enough to crash the economy properly.