r/agedlikemilk 20h ago

Curdled.

Post image
52.9k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.6k

u/stereoroid 19h ago

Admitting he was wrong counts for something, though.

192

u/Lehelito 19h ago edited 18h ago

That follow-up barely counts for anything when it's used as an opportunity to humblebrag ("I'm a man on honor") and backtrack ("well ackshually Trump 2.0 is very different, other than that I was totally right, you know! ☝️🤓"). Nowadays I am finding it increasingly difficult to be forgiving of people who believe, trust, and worship Trump, especially after the decades of Trump proving himself to be an evil charlatan.

28

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 19h ago

That fuckwit, "Trump 2.0"? Trump didn't change, he just managed to ditch his somewhat sane handlers and surround himself with worshippers. Trump 2.0 is Trump 1.0 unfiltered.

5

u/DariaYankovic 18h ago

this should be the top comment

2

u/Thick_Cookie_7838 17h ago

He had a chance to find his yes men

1

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 17h ago

It seems he found them by listening on Fox News for who was gargling his balls the loudest?

1

u/TheMidnightBear 17h ago

I dont know, i think Covid screwing over his second term reelection, then getting so much media power after getting banned, then the bullet def loosened some screws.

Saying this as a non-american.

3

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 17h ago

He's on a revenge kick now. But he was then too. He got his feelings hurt by black man in white house and has been on a narcissistic meltdown the whole time.

3

u/TheMidnightBear 17h ago

I dont know, def way more bile this time.

Like, i was pretty chill about a second term in 2020, the past years made me nervous, and i started nicknaming him Trumpusneanu(wordplay on a play about one of our rulers, who also becomes a vengeful murderous tyrant during his second reign), especially after the bullet thing, but this is exceeding my expectations.

3

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 16h ago

You're probably right. He's on a vengeance tour after impeachment, felony convictions, and being convicted (ok 'adjudicated') of rape.

1

u/Astralesean 15h ago

So it is Trump 2.0 and it is different, that's what the expression means

129

u/Airway 19h ago

Exactly right. He basically said "I was wrong because Trump is acting different now, who could have seen it coming?"

When in reality he was wrong because he's stupid and it was easy to see this coming.

29

u/mrbadxampl 18h ago

it's hard to really even credit him with "Trump is acting different this time around" no he's not, he wanted to do all this kind of shit the first time but there were adults in the room to stop him!!! WHERE ARE THEY ALL NOW?!?!?

5

u/Annual-Ebb-7196 18h ago

Yup. No one in any way qualified will work for him. It’s just the sycophants now. And stupid ones at that.

3

u/Aware-Owl4346 16h ago

No adults want the stain of working for him.

3

u/mrbadxampl 16h ago

well, that and he fired the ones that tried to stay

1

u/Zanydrop 16h ago

I honestly didn't think Trump was stupid enough to put all those tariffs in place. I thought it was a bargaining tool and that he wouldn't really do it. Lots of people on the right and left never thought he would go this hard so I kinda get it.

1

u/mrbadxampl 15h ago

he talked about it the first time around

0

u/Astralesean 15h ago

So you're basically saying that Trump 2.0 was different 

15

u/antenonjohs 19h ago

I hate Trump just as much as everyone else, but I like to take these things at face value. He’s not implying “who could have seen it coming?” He admits he was wrong, simple as that.

12

u/Blubasur 18h ago

I wish people took trump at face value. No one should have assumed he was lying about anything until he proved otherwise…

6

u/naryfo 18h ago

I mean he lies a lot and plays both sides but yeah this wasn't a surprise to anyone who isn't obsequious towards a party.

7

u/Blubasur 18h ago

Doesn’t matter that he does. He should be taken at face value. If he says things that look like he is planning to commit voter fraud, force a 3rd term, do stupid shit like tariffs. It should have been taken at face value, even if he genuinely never would have done it.

We shouldn’t be voting for people like that, hard stop. They shouldn’t even be allowed in politics.

2

u/naryfo 18h ago

It does matter. I can tell you many examples of policy issues that he has said he would do and hasn't.

He should be taken seriously, but not everything he says should be. He only talks in hyperbole anyway. You can't take that at face value.

Even when he says he is going to tarrif as his economic policy, he lies about why. So again, you can't take everything at face value.

I understand this might be pedantic, but nuance exists in politics and is important.

0

u/Blubasur 17h ago

If you can’t take them at face value, they can’t be trusted, which means he shouldn’t be in the goddamn seat he is in right now.

I’m all for nuance but I’m not a goddamn mind reader. I either have to trust what he says or not. It is pretty pointless and in fact stupid to try and decipher if someone in politics is lying about specific topics. A politician you can’t trust, is not someone who should be in power, simple as that.

And I know, I know, that eliminates about 90% of them if were being generous. Well thats the problem isn’t it?

2

u/naryfo 17h ago

I was arguing whether his words should always be taken at face value, not whether he should be president, or if you could read minds.

2

u/mrbadxampl 16h ago

"he lies a lot" means it's a good idea to vote for him?

2

u/naryfo 16h ago

No. Meaning he can't always be taken at face value.

I despise and detest the man and would never recommend anyone vote for him.

3

u/VirtualBeyond6116 17h ago edited 17h ago

They twist themselves into knots trying to believe he's a business genius and not the incompetent, Semi-literate, narcissistic conman who can't even describe what a tariff is 9 years later or tell you what a trade deficit is.

What the fuck do they see when I see him ramble nonsense with a ridiculous combover and his face painted orange?

2

u/Blubasur 17h ago

Fuck knows, I think he is the result of many more problems. As much as he is a major issue, we should focus on the fact that he made it all the way there to begin with.

12

u/OkConcentrate5741 18h ago

I don’t see how you can say that, considering that Trump said that this is exactly what he was going to do during his re-election campaign. GP chose to ignore/dismiss Trump’s actual campaign promises, and call anyone who took Trump at his word, “fairly stupid liberals.” I mean, talk about a disingenuous argument on his part…

2

u/DariaYankovic 18h ago

Trump said a million different insane things. it was overwhelming so people grabbed onto the 5-6 things they cared the most about, either because they wanted or feared them.

3

u/OkConcentrate5741 18h ago

Yeah, or chose to ignore the ones that were inconvenient for their worldview, or made it morally/ethically/legally difficult to support him.

-3

u/antenonjohs 18h ago

Yeah Trump always sticks to his campaign promises/rhetoric . That’s why Hillary Clinton is sitting in a jail cell and Mexico paid for our border wall that was finished in 2017. And Russia and Ukraine had a ceasefire on Trump’s first day this term and that war is now over.

You can’t possibly be serious 😂😂

5

u/OkConcentrate5741 18h ago

Hmmmmm….. Trump didn’t do the things he couldn’t do. But he did do the things he could. You can’t be serious.

2

u/antenonjohs 18h ago

2

u/OkConcentrate5741 17h ago

Well, if those “major” unfulfilled promises are the things you want to judge Trump’s reliability on, be my guest. BTW, many of those items he missed on his first go-around he’s ticking off right now.

1

u/PlainNotToasted 15h ago

The using the US armed forces against Americans part of the program will certainly be exciting.

1

u/OkConcentrate5741 13h ago

My butt is pre-puckered.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] 18h ago edited 18h ago

[deleted]

2

u/OkConcentrate5741 17h ago

I’m talking about the fact that he didn’t throw Hillary Clinton in jail, nor did he get Mexico to pay for the wall, which were the two examples that the other poster used to bolster their argument that Trump doesn’t do what he says he going to do.

1

u/LowerEntropy 18h ago

He doesn't always lie. He said he was going to bring people together. I really didn't think he would do it, but damn, he's actually living up to his promise.

0

u/comityoferrors 16h ago

Your defense is that people should be excused for supporting him and talking shit about those who took his threats seriously, because he didn't do some of them (yet)? That's more of a reason to not support him. He's plainly a liar and a conman, and because he's unpredictable, it makes sense to oppose all of his shit because who knows what whack-a-mole he's playing with his brain cells and what he'll decide to do on a fucking whim. All of his threats are credible because he's a lying rule-breaking sack of shit.

2

u/antenonjohs 16h ago

Where am I saying that people should be excused for supporting him?

18

u/TheWeddingParty 19h ago

What do you think "Trump 2.0 is very different" means? What does that sentence mean to you?

6

u/Radiant-Quit9633 18h ago

Trump 2.0 IS very different. Even myself, who predicted a trump driven recession and has been preparing for it for a few months, believed that Trump couldn't fuck it up in 6 months. The first term he tested the waters, this term he is full blown out of control.

3

u/gxgx55 17h ago

The first term he tested the waters, this term he is full blown out of control.

The first term he wasn't surrounded by all yes-men.

2

u/tmurf5387 16h ago

100% correct. There were adults in the room that tried keeping him under control. Now he has nothing but sycophants catering to his every whim and playing backup music while Nero watched Rome burn.

2

u/VirtualBeyond6116 17h ago

Yeah, I thought 2026 would be the recession and devaluing of the dollar. I ahd no idea trump and Elon were in such a rush to ruin out country.

1

u/PingGuerrero 18h ago

Convicted felon 1.0 is shit.

Convicted felon 2.0 is really fucking shit.

0

u/antenonjohs 18h ago

It means that Trump’s acting very differently in his second term compared to his first. Why do you ask?

3

u/TheWeddingParty 18h ago

So how would that affect someone who is making predictions about what Trump will do? If he is acting differently, then someone making predictions based on his previous behavior CAN HARDLY BE BLAMED for expecting something different from what we are seeing? Right?

So it's a little excuse, see? Glad we could see eye to eye on this. Now excuse me, I'm going to go vomit out of my butthole

-2

u/Biggerthanashark 18h ago

Tenuous and reaching at best

6

u/TheWeddingParty 18h ago

Hey guys, next week the sun will explode.

Whoops guys, looks like the sun is still here. I'll admit it. Gosh this new sun is nothing like the sun I knew and loved, it would be gone by now. I'm still such a good sun analyst, probably an even better one because I admit my faults. But this is a mistake anyone who follows the sun could make. Please like and subscribe!

This is so fuckin stupid man. Like, this is a clear case of someone casually rounding the edges off of mistake, AND it doesn't even matter because who tf is this guy and who tf are we. Just more of the same stupid shit. An idiot imposed tariffs, another idiot didn't believe he would and is trying to sound like it's an understandable mistake, and here we are, a bunch of other idiots arguing about it. We should be making sweet love beneath an oak tree, forgetting Trump and Twitter exist.

0

u/Biggerthanashark 18h ago

Wild example and insulting because you think I voted Trump? Amazing, but not surprising

Edit: went ahead and downvoted myself for you because downvote is a disagree button

1

u/LowerEntropy 17h ago

Heh. Making excuses for the guy making excuses, then you get downvoted and you somehow manage to also find an excuse for that.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/zupobaloop 17h ago

Stop talking about the sun!

STOP TALKING ABOUT THE SUN!

1

u/AdventurousExpert217 17h ago

The only difference between Trump the first time around and this time is the first time around, he truly believed he had a mandate. He was humiliated when he found out he didn't. Because he has a very long history as a bully, his current behavior shouldn't surprise anyone - it's typical for bullies to double down and start bulldozing after they've been called out publicly. He is just bulldozing forward policies he talked about last time, but didn't have the mandate to implement through Congressional actions last go around.

13

u/Airway 19h ago

"Trump 2.0 is different", to me, sounds like he's saying it isn't his fault he was wrong because this isn't what was to be expected.

0

u/antenonjohs 18h ago

That’s a pretty big stretch… I don’t read “Trump 2.0 is different” as “it’s not my fault I was wrong” in the context here

1

u/Broad-Bath-8408 17h ago

How else could you read it? He's saying, 'I was wrong because of x' And the implication is that x is out of his control. So clearly he is saying he was wrong because of something he could not control, e.g., it is not his fault.

5

u/Imeanttodothat10 18h ago

No redaction on the "very stupid" people comment. And I would also guess no opinion change on the next issue "the very stupid left" has an opinion on.

2

u/alexq35 17h ago

Oh yeah, he’ll still think they were stupid to think that, and it was just luck they ended up being right, because they aren’t as smart as him.

2

u/Penguin_scrotum 18h ago

He admits he is wrong, but he does not admit that he is stupid, as he should. If one calls another “fairly stupid” for insinuating something would happen, one must have an extreme level of confidence that their understanding is correct. The confidence required to predict something will happen is less than the confidence required to predict it won’t and to call those who say it will “stupid.” Therefore, he should increase the severity of his stupidity accusations, but upon himself, where he admits he’s “stupid” or “very stupid”. His lack of admitting that he’s stupid is a form of backtracking his logic.

2

u/stregawitchboy 16h ago

So I guess I am still a "fairly stupid partisan of the left" though, huh?

1

u/Hatta00 17h ago

You like to take people's self-serving misrepresentations at face value?

You don't understand psychology.

0

u/General_Chest6714 17h ago

In the spirits of taking things at face value, I believe “Trump 2.0 is different” is the who could’ve seen it coming implication. He’s admitting to being wrong and he’s saying the reason he was wrong is bc he was basing his opinion on the Trump he thought he knew. But Trump 2.0 is different. A change he obviously did not see coming or he wouldn’t have held such an incorrect belief.

-9

u/mooseguyman 19h ago

I’m with you. I read that as “I did not take it seriously enough that he was vindictive this time around” which is absolutely fair and legit.

9

u/turkey_sandwiches 18h ago

It's not fair because he was vindictive as hell the first time around. Trump isn't different, they're just finally seeing a very small amount of what he's actually doing and realizing it's crazy.

2

u/Lehelito 18h ago

It's not fair though, is it? Trump's main political stance has always been vengeance and punishment of people he doesn't like. That's like one of the main reasons some people love him to the point of religious fervour.

2

u/Paddy_Tanninger 16h ago

TRUMP LITERALLY SAID HIS ENTIRE FISCAL POLICY WAS GOING TO BE THAT TARIFFS WOULD PAY FOR EVERYTHING

These people are willfully stupid. It's fucking unreal.

1

u/FrustratedPCBuild 18h ago

They’ve completely misunderstood Trump. Trump is a compulsive liar but not when he speaks about what he’s going to do, with that he’s sincere. He hasn’t changed since last time, he’d have done all of this last time but he had people reining him in, now he has people egging him on, that’s the change, not Trump.

1

u/LimberGravy 18h ago

Nobody on Trumps previous staff was involved with getting him elected this time. It was obviously going to be even worse

1

u/Aeseld 17h ago

I'm fair enough to admit that I didn't really believe he'd go as far as he has. I also thought he'd be reigned in by congress and the senate if he did.

The latter has yet to be proven wrong yet, but I'll be the first to admit I'm not holding my breath. Admittedly we only need a handful of GOP reps and senators to undo this entirely. I just don't know if enough of them have the guts to deliberately work against him.

1

u/teetering_bulb_dnd 17h ago

He is the "stupid one".. give him Credit when he accepts that..

1

u/Mercuryshottoo 17h ago

Who could have seen it coming, except the fairly stupid who base their assessments on data and factual observation, unlike me, a smart boy

1

u/Ughasif22 15h ago

Thank u

0

u/echild07 19h ago

Exactly this!

6

u/Deep-Thought 17h ago

Also, he doesn't take back calling the left stupid even though they absolutely called it.

2

u/Ughasif22 15h ago

Good catch

-1

u/UnderratedEverything 17h ago

Well apparently the left is indeed too stupid if they can't read between the lines and need an apology explicitly written out instead of just taking the implicit admission that they were right and he wasn't.

2

u/deeteeohbee 16h ago

You sound like someone who has never properly apologized for anything in their life. Your family must hate you.

4

u/PandaImaginary 18h ago edited 16h ago

To paraphrase: "This was a chance to get back at all those foreigners who created all our problems."

All our problems were created by lazy ass bigots and xenophobes who place the fault for the problems our own poor character and stupidity created on the heads of the nearest scapegoat.

And, quite aside from that, when you get back at foreigners, they'll get back at you. They'll behave, in other words, exactly as you do. Who indeed could have guessed that?

Who could have guessed that other people would make our tariffs reciprocal? Surely not the people suggesting reciprocal tariffs.

Who could have guessed that Trump was "truly going to implement 20% tariffs on everything?" Who could ever have guessed that a dangerous megalomaniac would ever do exactly what he said he was going to do when in power? After all, Hitler proved to be all talk.

Credit for saying the words, "I was wrong," though. It's a worthwhile act that's disappearing from the world fast.

However, an apology that indicated he had learned from the experience would have concluded something to the effect of: "I'm going to have to think twice about calling my opponents stupid when in fact they were smart and I was stupid about this. In fact *I'm dreaming, of course* maybe name calling should be eliminated from politics and all of us should advocate for our points of view while being open to changing our minds based on new information."

5

u/SnortMcChuckles 17h ago

Bravo. This was no apology or admission of error. This is a typical wool over your eyes excuse.

3

u/chewbacca-says-rargh 18h ago

Yea if anything I view these types as being even dumber because tariffs were literally one of the major platforms Trump ran on. This dude was just so up Trump's ass he didn't want to believe him so he could own the libs or something equally as stupid. Trump says he'll do something, this dude says no way only the stupid libs believe that, Trump does the thing, and idiots like this are all like "OMG he did the thing he said he'd do"

3

u/SmallsLightdarker 17h ago

Yeah, I'm not seeing the "honor" even if he would have been proven right. Let's say he didn't go with the tariffs like this guy assumed he wouldn't. How is it honorable to vote for someone who didn't do the things they run on and were just trolling, or just spouting nonsense, or whatever other excuse they would give him?

2

u/Lehelito 17h ago

Very good point!

8

u/kraghis 19h ago

God just take the support. This isn’t a Reddit argument it’s the fate of the modern world

3

u/peepopowitz67 17h ago

What support? Homie all of a sudden gonna become a working class ally? Of course not. He'll continue being capitalist ghoul and whine about "leftists"

Fuck him.

4

u/tresben 19h ago

Yeah especially since he made it all about himself, and didn’t mention any apology to the people he called stupid in his original tweet who ended up being the smart ones.

2

u/TryNotToAnyways2 17h ago

You know, if someone was buying into Trump prior to his first term and then later admitted to being wrong, that's one thing. But we now have 10 years of data. How anyone can still be on board after Jan 6 is beyond me. I agree, anyone who was talking up Trump in the last 7 years is either very dumb or deplorable.

2

u/TuskaTheDaemonKilla 17h ago

A man of honor also wouldn't be calling people "fairly stupid" for having a perfectly logical take. He'd say he disagrees and give his reasons, like a reasonable person.

2

u/Glarpenheimer 16h ago

I get it- but IMO the lion's share of the anger should be directed not at my fellow countrymen who were tricked, but at the cronies who did the manipulating. Believe me, die hard MAGA nuts drive me up the fuckin wall too- but as things get worse and more and more of them start to snap out of it, and admit they were wrong, for things to get any better we have to try our best not to turn them away.

1

u/Lehelito 15h ago

I like your perspective and I respect it. I just find it really difficult with the ones who glorify cruelty. Not all of them are well meaning naïve people.

1

u/Glarpenheimer 15h ago

Yes certainly. There are deplorable shitheads who came out of the woodwork and showed their true colors, and they should not be forgiven. But there are others who were fooled, and blind to the warnings aroun them- and those folks we should try our best to rehabilitate when they snap out of their delusion.

2

u/3rdtryatremembering 15h ago

“It takes a big man to admit his mistakes, and I am that big man”

1

u/Lehelito 15h ago

I agree, but did he admit his mistake though, or did he just try to find an excuse for calling people stupid while still glorifying himself?

2

u/3rdtryatremembering 15h ago

Yea, totally. It’s a Michael Scott quote from The Office lol

1

u/Lehelito 12h ago

Ah right, gotcha. Sorry, missed the reference.

4

u/drunkpunk138 18h ago

To be fair tons of people on the left were also saying there's no way Trump would do this, it's all just a distraction, he'll back down before they go into effect, etc. There are a lot of people in denial in this country and it isn't just conservatives.

But yeah the opportunity to present himself as anything honorable kind of kills it for me.

1

u/SilverDragon334 18h ago

He should have just said Trump is unpredictable and I was foolish to try. Because Trump is very difficult to predict. We still don’t know what he is going to do with them. Manufacturing in the US? Better trade deals? Gov revenue?

1

u/Itherial 17h ago

I feel like stating you won't remove a post because you have some integrity isn't a humblebrag

1

u/SamanthaJaneyCake 17h ago

I’m 100% with you on the second point (backtracking) but I don’t consider calling yourself a man of honour is humblebragging, more just stating a principle. One that he actually demonstrated decently by owning up to his failure.

Which he then naturally completely undid by backtracking…

1

u/Lehelito 17h ago

Fair point, but I think I would have found it more honourable if he just apologised for calling others "fairly stupid". This wasn't an apology though, it was an excuse. Not quite the same.

1

u/mama138 17h ago

One of the reasons people double down is because of how humiliating it is to be wrong. He is softening the blow for himself and I am ok with that. I would rather he do that than pretend it didn't happen or talk himself into rationalizing it.

1

u/_LoudBigVonBeefoven_ 15h ago

I read it more as the left can see the writing on the wall and should be listened to more than the right. 

That's the narrative we need to push

1

u/UncleDrunkle 15h ago

i think hes saying "I was wrong" and "wow this isnt the trump we know" -- not some backhanded way of saying "im right"

Should make for an interesting midterm

0

u/Puzzled-Parsley-1863 17h ago

Have fun in the social climate you're building.

1

u/Lehelito 17h ago edited 12h ago

Which is what? Resistance to people who want to harm others? A society where we hold people to account?

0

u/Puzzled-Parsley-1863 17h ago

Being vindictive will make people dig in their heels. This is a big part of prison reform, I.E when you treat people like criminals, they act like criminals. If you're unable to forgive those who you have scorned or disagreed with in the past, what incentive do they have to try and rejoin society and maintain the social contract?

2

u/Alone-Win1994 15h ago

We gotta gentle parent the very people who trash on kindness, compassion, empathy, and anything Jesus said?

Like giving medical help to people who chose to hate medical professionals and vaccines and ate horse paste until they were dying in a hospital room.

Darwin Awards/Herman Cain Awards sometimes need to be awarded lest people forget the lesson.

1

u/Lehelito 15h ago edited 12h ago

With respect, I'm not intending to be vindictive. There just comes a point when we need to actively defend society, our way of life, and our families from the MAGA movement. Sure, some of them are well meaning and willing to learn if shown kindness, but a lot of them are deliberately cruel and destructive. I wholeheartedly believe in prison reform, to use your analogy, but even in prisons there are people who need to be treated with more caution than your average inmate who just made some poor decisions in life.

0

u/Remarkable-Area2611 17h ago

Nah that’s a comedic “man of honor” and he fully acknowledges he is wrong. Youre reading into this wrong.

I read into this comment as someone that will be unhappy with what the guy posts no matter what it is.

1

u/Lehelito 17h ago edited 15h ago

With respect, you read my comment wrong. I would have been happy with an apology for calling people stupid. I try to be understanding. But this isn't an apology, it's an excuse.

-9

u/jooooooooooooose 19h ago

"I was wrong..." definitely means "I was totally right"

13

u/Hideo_Anaconda 19h ago

"I was wrong" but I totally shouldn't experience any loss of credibility or any other negative consequences, because "I am a man of honor".

3

u/jooooooooooooose 19h ago

its not that deep, the guys just saying he's not deleting it but he doesn't stand behind it anymore & he's keeping it up to keep the evidence of his wrong guess

0

u/UnderratedEverything 17h ago

Jesus, people here are reading so far into this. It's like getting mad that somebody compliments your outfit but not your accessories.

-5

u/stereoroid 19h ago

His second post is the only reason we’re seeing the first post. He could have said nothing.