1.1k
u/LionHeartedLXVI This flair doesn't exist 15h ago
191
u/Automatic_Tie_3188 14h ago
Hey look it’s that scene from Meet the Spartans. (I’m not ever gonna watch that movie, I just know this video is referenced in that movie)
74
u/froderick 13h ago
That movie is unironically my guilty pleasure. I know it's hot garbage but for some inexplicable reason I enjoy it.
→ More replies (8)41
u/AceyPuppy 13h ago
All those parody movies are hot ass but perfect at the same time. I was dying laughing at The Comebacks a few weeks ago.
→ More replies (8)16
→ More replies (1)21
u/must_go_faster_88 14h ago
Oh that movie was such ass
→ More replies (1)9
47
u/butlovingstonTTV 13h ago
Wasn't that guy a bit right in retrospect?
31
u/ExplodingCybertruck 11h ago
I just recently watched the South Park episode about Britney. Dude was totally right. Society and the music/movie industry loves to chew up and spit out young pretty women.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)22
10
→ More replies (8)18
1.5k
u/Mughalbadsha12 15h ago
leave the billion dollar corporation alone theyre just a small indie team
478
u/Lord_Viktoo 13h ago
Well, look at how Pokemon looks, and you could be fooled. :P
263
u/Fearful-Cow 13h ago
small indie teams would at least innovate mechanics over a 30 year period.
152
→ More replies (6)46
u/Sketch13 13h ago
to be fair, they have introduced new stuff, the problem is all the new stuff is worse than the old stuff lol. Pixel-era Pokemon was still the best, everything after has been a bit weird and ultra gimmicky.
But it's a game for kids, so what do I know.
→ More replies (3)17
u/Aggressive_Ask89144 12h ago
Black and White 2 just feels like literal perfection having a beloved style, story and there is so much content to do. I wish they would make a proper pixel game again, but that's a fever dream.
I'm personally very fond of ORAS though lmao. I played Black first, but it's the main pokemon game I spent several times more than the others at about ~500 hours. I actually loved Scarlet's gaameplay but I only sunk 120~ and that's several times more than the usual of 30 or so like Shield 💀
→ More replies (15)14
u/Spinnie_boi 🥄Comically Large Spoon🥄 12h ago
Honestly the issue there is that The Pokémon Company sets super hard deadlines for GameFreak to put the games out by (for merch and anime production purposes) and it’s just not enough time to polish the games as well as they did 15+ years ago. At least it seems they’re slowing things down now, they didn’t release a new game or DLC last year for the first time since 2015
→ More replies (1)6
u/MasterChildhood437 10h ago
and it’s just not enough time to polish the games as well as they did 15+ years ago.
The games were never polished because GameFreak's dev. team kind of bites. It took Iwata coming in to actually fix the damn things for them to even function.
Nintendo had similar issues in the 80s and early 90s and also relied on HAL's staff--who actually knew what they were doing--to clean up the unworkable software they churned out. GameFreak just never really evolved the way Nintendo's in-house dev teams have.
3
u/-Cinnay- Nice meme you got there 7h ago
They are too small for the games they're trying to make and the strict deadlines they've been trying to meet.
→ More replies (10)3
u/Wooden_Echidna1234 6h ago
What you dont like NPCs without shadows and flat buildings with copy pasted windows?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (30)177
u/UnpluggedUnfettered 13h ago
They barely scraped by in 2024 with $1.5 billion in (net) profits, and people expect them to be able to continue to be able to pay their 7,724 employees without raising the price of their games?
I mean, if Nintendo tried to give every employee (including janitors and customer service) a paltry $175,000 annual salary increase, they'd barely have (net) profitted $200,000,000 last year.
People need to grow up, no business can be expected to survive like that!
→ More replies (14)66
u/Solid_Snark OC Meme Maker 13h ago
The saddest part about modern gaming is the developer companies are making huge profits but then they layoff the actual developers that made the game.
God forbid you share the profits with the people most responsible for them. No. We gotta give all that money to the CEO that keeps making bone-headed decisions.
37
u/Rock_Strongo 13h ago
Nintendo specifically is pretty famous for doing very few layoffs though. They prioritize long term talent retention way more than most game companies, especially in the west.
You're correct they don't do profit sharing though. And they are still a public company so they do prioritize profits and shareholder benefits in the form of dividends.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Geno0wl 12h ago
Japan expects loyalty from their employees and shockingly frequently actually shows loyalty back. Their work hour expectations are a nightmare, especially for people who want to have families, but they otherwise do treat their workers a lot better than the US does easily
→ More replies (5)5
u/DetectiveGold4018 11h ago
I mean, in Japan a man can spend practically Zero time with his family and still be considered a good family guy, East Asian societies are kind of like that, even Hindus MENA and Latinos who work ridiculous hours still value spending time with their families in a way that's just alien to Asians
Not even defending how brutal the working hours can get, but it's a completely different culture
27
u/kirby_krackle_78 13h ago
Isn’t Nintendo well known for retaining their staff? I think Iwata took a pay cut so that they didn’t have to do mass layoffs?
(Sorry for interrupting Hate Week. As you were.)
14
u/jaxonya 12h ago
98% retention rate, but how dare you come in here and disrespect us with facts.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (1)3
u/Annual-Jump3158 3h ago
The saddest part about modern gaming is the developer companies are making huge profits but then they layoff the actual developers that made the game.
"Money people" on one side and creatives and code wizards on the other. People might wonder how games can bring so much joy, but the gaming industry always seems to have something lined up to try and cram down consumers' throats against their will. Let it be a mystery no longer.
391
u/Upstairs-Yak-5474 15h ago
i have a question do u need to pay the $20 subscription community fee to communicate with people online or find lobbies along with the $80 to get mario kart?
like whats the community fee for its seems like discord but nintendo
→ More replies (10)194
u/Yur1n4M00n 14h ago
You need subscription for online games/function but that's with every console. Nintendo has either cheapest or 2nd cheapest (idk xBox prices).
The new function is discord without being bound to discord
236
u/Jealous_Answer3147 14h ago
It's the cheapest for a reason, it's generally a terrible service
→ More replies (14)37
u/Ninja0verkill 9h ago
Isn't that because they don't use dedicated servers for multi-player? I think even smash bros uses peer to peer connection that has horrible lag.
→ More replies (5)61
u/stunt876 9h ago
Then wth are they charging for? If its a subscription it goes towards the server but if its peer to peer we are paying to maintain the server and access to our own server
→ More replies (1)22
u/cheesetombatta 7h ago
Nothing. It’s a racket. But it’s been the norm since the first Xbox so consumers pay it without question
28
u/Vrazel106 14h ago
So you need the sub and to pay for the game itself at 80$ a piece?
→ More replies (17)6
→ More replies (12)5
u/Stargost_ 12h ago
"but that's with every console" the Steam Deck doesn't charge you a dime for either online functionality or cloud storage.
→ More replies (2)
595
u/Avnesya 14h ago edited 14h ago
Is there actually "people" unironically defending em at this point?
Legit asking
edit : typo
359
u/Apprehensive_Foot139 14h ago
I remember when people were out for Palworld's devs' blood when it came out. I remember people rejoicing when nintendo finally filed for a lawsuit. I don't get these people tbh
47
u/ImNotSkankHunt42 13h ago
Which is stupid because patents don’t belong in games, but fanboys gonna do
→ More replies (3)203
u/BobTheKekomancer 13h ago
The church of nintendo has THE WORST, most braindead fanboys you could imagine.
→ More replies (4)66
u/LightbringerOG 13h ago
Nostalgia is a powerful drug.
Same thing would be Sonic fans, only difference is Sega is not an asshole company, not that I know of.41
u/ExiledFromSpace 13h ago
Sega banished their collective assholes to "work on" Phantasy Star where they can't hurt anyone (except fans of Phantasy Star).
→ More replies (2)4
→ More replies (5)12
32
u/MightBeTrollingMaybe 13h ago
AFAIK Palworld shrugged the lawsuit off by just slightly modifying the game mechanics anyway.
Game's still there, perfectly healthy. And by the looks of it its graphics are still gonna be better than the upcoming new Pokémon game anyway.
22
→ More replies (37)16
u/LuckyBlockReddit 13h ago
I don't really care too much about Palworld, but as an artist I don't like that they took designs from Pokémon and changed a few things, then called it a Pal. I'm no fangirl for Pokémon, but I'm not a fan of plagiarism either.
Though the hate isn't justified. I dislike the game, but I wouldn't say I hate it to the extent I want the developers sued. Those people need to grow up.
→ More replies (3)459
u/Findict_52 14h ago
Not so much defense, more like "uhh, yeah, things cost money, inflation exists, welcome to the real world", and I can't disagree honestly. People gotta use an inflation calculator on old games.
This meme does have real "too late, I drew you as the soy cuck and myself as the chad!" energy.
84
u/Yohnavan 13h ago edited 13h ago
Definitely. The only "defense" I've seen is people reminding others that inflation exists and how many nes and snes games were $90+.
Hell, there is even a Simpsons clip from 30 years ago where Marge refuses to buy Bonestorm for Bart, citing how new games cost "upwards of ninety dollars"
"You reminded me inflation is real! Stop defending a billion dollar company. Ya'll are so brainwashed and cannot think for yourselves" - Guy who spent hundreds of hours online trying to tell people they were wrong for liking Tears of the Kingdom.
Of course, the solution for this new generation of gamers is to release the game for $30, then make a killing on in game transactions they are stupid enough to make. Then use the money from those transactions to actually finish the buggy game they released
→ More replies (3)24
u/Thrasy3 11h ago
I assume along with the “There a no good games today” crowd it’s mainly people too young to remember the snes and the days before YouTube(rs) existed.
I only bought a switch last year because was travelling and haven’t had a Nintendo since the N64 - but I was under the impression Nintendo still puts out quality, finished products.
I mean at least I’ve never heard of the Nintendo equivalent of Anthem, Cyberpunk or Concord.
And I’m part of the crowd that only buys games on discount when it’s packaged with DLC and the bugs have been fixed.
→ More replies (1)13
u/RhynoD 10h ago
"Today they release half-finished games full of bugs and then spend years patching them to be playable!"
Yeah and 20 years ago they released half-finished games full of bugs and then didn't do shit to fix them. Because without the internet being as pervasive as it is now, they could sell out the game before word got around that it was shitty and not worth buying. Some of the most beloved games from that time are horrendously broken.
Doesn't make it ok for studios to release unfinished garbage today just because they can patch it to playable later. Just saying it was often shitty back then, too. Nintendo charging too much for their games isn't their fault, it's the fault of the political party that's been fighting against unions and raising the minimum wage and has been crashing the economy once a decade at least since I've been alive. Nothing wrong with pointing out to Nintendo that we can't afford these prices, but be mad at the people who are making wages stagnate.
→ More replies (3)40
u/ElmsVidsOff 13h ago
Anytime who has been a gaming adult for any length of time understands that, overall, gaming is cheaper than the past.
→ More replies (1)22
u/House-of-Raven 13h ago
Also, comparatively, it’s still one of the cheapest forms of entertainment. You buy a movie ticket and it costs you $25-30 for an hour or two of entertainment. I bought BG3 for $80 and have 400 hours on it (so far) and will very much have more on it. That averages out to 20 cents for an hour of entertainment. Even factoring in a need for a console, $400-500 spread out over thousands of hours ends up being a cheap investment.
I’m not defending Nintendo, they do lots of shady stuff and their controllers are shittily made these days. But the price of games these days isn’t entirely outrageous.
→ More replies (3)6
u/A2Rhombus 10h ago
Yeah I imagine myself breaking 100 hours in Mario Kart, as far as I'm concerned $80 is a steal 🤷
66
u/Loud_Interview4681 14h ago edited 14h ago
They no longer have to make and ship cartridges to distribute them. They just let you download said game. The margins are insanely large. Add in they not longer subsidize consoles and release a new one every few years... yea. also the technology isn't improving that much as we have reached a pretty big limit on screen size etc. No more big innovation to make graphics look perfect- it is just art style now and most of the games reuse what works.
50
u/Itkillsmeinside 14h ago edited 14h ago
The hardware margins are insanely large, but how can you calculate the software costs? Software engineers aint cheap. I’m not defending I’m just understanding that its not free to sell video games. I’m not buying an 80$ game.
80$ likely pays for around an hour of one engineers time, if that
→ More replies (23)3
u/ElmsVidsOff 13h ago
"graphics can't get much better" has been a lie for decades
It's certainly not the truth now.
Also... ironic that you mention cartridges, because the Switch 2 games will absolutely be cartridge-based, just like the switch.
Nintendo games might but have to pay for retail space, but they are definitely still being manufactured.
37
u/237throw 14h ago
Bro do you know what the cost of labor is for a well polished game?
The upfront cost is enormous.
→ More replies (10)86
u/Few-Requirements 13h ago edited 10h ago
The margins are insanely large.
Pfft, that's a great joke.
Oh, you're serious.
I really want to see what "margin" you are specifically thinking of.
AAA game dev is one of the highest risk industries in the world. Games generate losses constantly. 2023 and 24 saw about 50'000 layoffs across the industry. With 1500 more in 2025.
One of the biggest game publishers in the world is on the brink of shuttering.
So please, be specific. What margins?
Edit: Go figure, the person I responded to mentioned nothing about "margins" and instead claimed "We have better tools, AI and Unreal Engine so games are easy and cheap to make now". What a fucking moron.
25
u/theturtlemafiamusic 12h ago edited 12h ago
Mario Kart World is absolutely not a high risk release.
Mario Kart 8 made about 3 billion dollars on an estimated 100 million dollar budget.
Following your logic Mario Kart World should cost less than the average game, when it's actually more expensive than a riskier game they're releasing (Donkey Kong Banaza). The most recent Mario Kart (Tour) was also free to play.
14
u/NazzerDawk 11h ago
Wouldn't it be sensible to put the higher price on the sure thing than on the game that seems far riskier? People WILL pay for Mario Kart. They won't pay a higher price for a 3D Donkey Kong.
→ More replies (3)9
→ More replies (89)10
u/Bea-Billionaire 12h ago
You referring to Nintendo, the $80Billion company?
14
u/Few-Requirements 12h ago
Microsoft and Sony's gaming divisions are among their smallest, and Nintendo's valuation is so low that Microsoft wanted to acquire them before buying Activision.
Which shows you how small the biggest games companies are.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)16
u/Digitalion_ 13h ago
Development costs are higher than ever. With the progression of technology, it takes more time and effort to take advantage of that extra power. This is especially true with Nintendo games who are specifically known for putting a "Nintendo polish" on all of their games. That polish doesn't come cheap. And this is despite their consoles being less powerful than other modern consoles, meaning they have to put additional resources into overcoming technological obstacles.
Now add in inflation and wage increases (in Japan where these games are being developed) into the equation and you start understanding why they need to raise prices on their games.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (246)16
u/BLSS_Noob 13h ago
Back then the market wasn't so large that's why they were more expensive, more consumers menat lower prices. Now they just want to push the boundaries and make more money, idk how people can defend large companies like Nintendo at all.
24
u/TheBigness333 13h ago
The markets growing is why games haven’t gone up in price for 20 years. That growth is slowing down and the 60$ is no longer sustainable.
Also, it doesn’t matter anyway because if people will pay more for a product, that’s what the product costs.
→ More replies (13)6
u/11711510111411009710 13h ago
Can you show me that the $60 is unsustainable for Nintendo, super giant multi billion dollar corporation?
→ More replies (1)5
u/TheBigness333 12h ago
No. I explained why the industry is shifting its prices. Just reread my post if you need the information again.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (1)13
u/balatro-mann 13h ago
it's less defending the company and moreso expressing general annoyance at gamers who throw a fit everytime nintendo does a totally expected fuck up.
like there are people genuinely surprised that a console in 2025 is 450 bucks, and i'm not allowed to point fingers at them? nintendo fans are notorious for setting themselves up with horrid expectations and being upset when they're ultimately not met.
→ More replies (6)47
9
u/pragmaticzach 13h ago
I just don't really care? It either works out for Nintendo and they were right, or it doesn't. People will either pay the price, or they won't.
There's nothing to defend here, in my eyes. If you don't like the price, don't buy it. If enough people agree, Nintendo will have to react.
→ More replies (1)6
u/milf-hunter_5000 10h ago
its not a defense of nintendo for me. its a matter of common sense. inflation has an impact on everything, but gamers seem to think games should only ever cost $60.
it would be a fairer conversation if we knew the actual cost of games translated to a paycheck for the people who deserve it, but we all know the people at the top get richer while they cut costs and people.
but think about it, games should cost about $100. they don't, so you're getting fleeced with dlc and battle passes to try and claw the other $40 at least out of you.
→ More replies (2)23
38
u/Longjumping-Crazy564 14h ago edited 14h ago
I "defend" it because I, as a consumer with a functioning brain, can simply choose not to buy a luxury good if I deem it not worth my money.
Admittedly I only got a B in my high school economics class over 20 years ago, and never want to college, so it's entirely possible I simply don't understand any of this.
42
→ More replies (5)3
u/McMorgatron1 13h ago
Yeah I'm the same.
I can afford it, and it looks fun, so I will buy it.
If it didn't look fun or worth the money, I wouldn't buy it.
Simple.
→ More replies (157)8
u/Metal__goat 14h ago edited 7h ago
I'll criticize them for never putting games on sale, even a decade later! But, It's almost to the penny with (US) inflation.
49.99 AAA game in 2004 comes to $86.
If 80 is too much then don't buy it, wait for a used copy at your local game store.
Not buying stuff is voting with your money, if their sales take a hit, shit will come down.
343
u/Tortue2006 15h ago
I don’t have a problem with a higher price, although 80 bucks is quite a bit. I have a problem with salaries not going up as well.
176
u/Ok_Buffalo_423 14h ago
Oh salaries definitely went up, just not for the people who actually make the games
→ More replies (6)151
u/kingrufiio 14h ago
He isn't talking about Nintendo salaries.
→ More replies (1)28
u/Ok_Buffalo_423 13h ago
Oh my bad lol I misunderstood his comment
→ More replies (4)29
u/MrWaluigi 12h ago
Though your comment made me realize something, compared to most AAA game studios, they’re a select few that have little to no articles about them having the, “mass layoffs, biggest profits ever.” I think they have a low turnover rate over at their company. Granted, could be biases that are not letting me see those things but still.
→ More replies (1)30
u/Ok_Buffalo_423 12h ago
From what I understand execs at Japanese companies are held accountable a lot more than their American counterparts. Execs will often take a hit to their pay in order to avoid layoffs where most American companies will lay people off to avoid having to pay the execs less.
According to their 2023 financial report the top executives at Nintendo made around 2m$ which is significantly lower than most other gaming companies which probably helps avoid layoffs where
7
u/Ppleater 7h ago
One person profiting while the rest of their colleagues suffer for it would be quite frowned upon in Japan, its culture is largely focused around supporting the collective. It's much more shameful for an executive to take more than what would be considered their due at the expense of those under them. If they got caught for it at least.
→ More replies (1)31
u/Forward_Ad4727 13h ago
$80 is specifically for Mario Kart most of the games are going to be $70. We all knew this was going to happen when PlayStation 5 games went up to $70.
→ More replies (7)9
71
u/Merfen 14h ago
I find it odd that people think games can just cost $60 forever, this is what we paid in the 90s for games, like at some point they were bound to raise with inflation. Did people expect to still be paying $60 in 2045 too?
24
u/LanyardJoe 13h ago
Yeah, tbh I was upset then I thought about this too, when I was like, a wee lad (I'm 21 now) the 360 games were like 60 dollars. We've had a recession and a whole plague outbreak but the price has only went up very recently. I don't think there would be any outrage about the price if wages also went up and people's basic needs were covered for
15
u/IAmBLD 10h ago
I just think the outrage is misplaced, like the economy is somehow Nintendo's fault.
Shit, in high school I could get a beefy 5 layer burrito at Taco bell for a buck, that shit costs like 4x as much now but I don't blame Taco Bell specifically for that.
Nintendo's getting a lot of blame here because of console war mentality that doesn't exist for many other markets. Like, there are no Del Taco fanboys to make memes like this about Taco Bell, no Walmart defenders who meme when the price of something at target rises, etc.
→ More replies (2)3
u/PorkedPatriot 9h ago
people's basic needs were covered for
We are talking about videogames hoss. Just don't buy.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (71)22
u/TheBigKuhio 13h ago
The cost of most things went up after Covid so I feel like AAA games also going up is not a shocker
9
u/Merfen 13h ago
Exactly, basically everything everyone buys has increased in price except video games, how are people this shocked and outraged when games finally catch up. Sure these companies make a ton of money, but they can't just be expected to take a loss because people want video game prices to stay the same for their entire lives while everything else raises with inflation.
3
u/UUtch 7h ago
Unless you were already a top earner, they have
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w31010/w31010.pdf
page 47
→ More replies (9)9
u/Pixel22104 13h ago
Yeah same. I mean like yeah it sucks that it’s going to be $80. But I’ll just learn to live with it. Like I do with most things
145
u/Blue_Bird950 15h ago
DK costs $70
44
u/obeymeorelse 12h ago
And Mario Kart is $50 with the bundle. I know that's its own problem as it's essentially nintendo telling us to screw physical games but it seems to be a one and done thing as Mario kart has that much demand. I'm not defending the price but I highly doubt it will be a regular price for the generation
→ More replies (3)15
→ More replies (61)4
u/-Cinnay- Nice meme you got there 7h ago
Yeah, but it's easier to complain while pretending all games will be 80/90 bucks from now on
120
u/AdvancedTower401 13h ago
Y'all buy games incomplete for 80 dollars because it lets you play 2 days earlier
→ More replies (3)48
u/magikarp2122 12h ago
Don’t forget $120 for the special mega edition that lets you play 3 days early, and comes with the day -1 paid DLC game mode that was in the previous iterations’ base game.
→ More replies (1)8
u/AdvancedTower401 12h ago
I'm also absolutely flaming everyone who bought Skyrim on the switch who has already bought it, and definitely flaming the same with cyberpunk. Tho I do need to try it again on PC
→ More replies (5)5
u/magikarp2122 11h ago
To be fair, the multiple versions of Skyrim I have bought have all gotten well over 200 hours.
→ More replies (2)
159
u/Kenny-KO 14h ago
I hate to break it to people, This isn't a Nintendo only problem.
→ More replies (42)3
u/runnytempurabatter 11h ago
Except it is? Haven't paid over 30€ for a single game on steam or PlayStation
→ More replies (1)
41
u/xxademasoulxx 13h ago
I don't play Nintendo hardware as I game on PC, but I paid more for games in the 90s. Street Fighter 2 was $80, and Pilotwings was $60. Adjusted for inflation, that's like $171.63 and $134.79, respectively. I'm not defending Nintendo, but for me, who's been gaming since the 80s, nothing has changed what has is prices for other shit and just more whiny people who have a voice on the internet.
→ More replies (5)18
u/TheBohoChocobo 13h ago
Literally what I said in a different group. If games kept up with inflation like everything else for the last 30yrs (thank the gods they haven't!) games should be at least double what we pay now. You damn right I'm going to have some sticker shock, but I'm not going to complain bc a game from any game studio is 80$.
→ More replies (2)
33
u/skeletist 13h ago
Had a whole conversation with my Nintendo fan roommate and it came down to consumers really emphasizing the content value before they buy. An example is that last Mario kart game came out nigh on like ten years ago and honestly for how popular the game series is it sounds like it’s worth $80 of content if you’re a fan or just a family. He’s not a total die hard fan but nintendo has some of his fave series. I’m trying to make the jump to pc or at least a steam deck so I’m not completely sold either way.
→ More replies (3)28
u/Funeque 12h ago
My metric is that its worth it if I get an hour for each dollar spent, and at $500 for the bundle, and my time spent in MK8D, I fully anticipate getting my money's worth.
→ More replies (3)
17
u/Nice_Block 13h ago
There’s more drama in this comment section than any of the tariff posts lol
→ More replies (1)8
128
u/Ok_Buffalo_423 14h ago
Just remember these companies made BILLIONS of dollars selling games at 60$, this isnt about keeping the lights on or having enough money to make the next game. This is about siphoning as much money from the consumer as possible
10
u/Arachno033 11h ago
Yeah, that's what's usually called "business" or "corporate greed". Nobody likes it, but every business motto is "we want your money".
29
u/Mr_Isolation 13h ago
Yeah i am sure they are getting more than by every year. All of their games were 60 bucks and people still buy them like doughnuts + with their internet subscription fees and selling consoles i don't think Nintendo is gonna start begging at any pont.
All the shit about employees needing pay and inflation and tariffs doing stuff its all the most braindead excuse i can hear.
They could have been doing 60 bucks for like 10 more years without any issue but i guess can't expect any company to be humble.
→ More replies (4)29
u/Ok_Buffalo_423 13h ago
They have infact seen record growth in the last 5 years so they absolutely could get away with charging 60$ and still see massive profits. Inflation is just an excuse companies use to act like prices are totally out of their hands, like they (not Nintendo specifically) arent the driving force for inflation
→ More replies (1)16
u/CaptainCarrot7 13h ago
This is about siphoning as much money from the consumer as possible
I mean yea, that always was the only goal for literally every company.
→ More replies (1)12
u/Ok_Buffalo_423 13h ago
Im not saying it isnt, my comment was directed at the people acting like Nintendo needs to raise prices in order to stay alive. So many people online act like Nintendo isnt also a greedy company just like the rest of them
→ More replies (56)3
u/Rickpac72 10h ago
Yeah that’s how things work. If you have something people want to buy, you want to sell it for as much as people are willing to pay without pushing too many people away. If you are selling your house, you would take the highest offer even if you still come out ahead with a lower offer.
→ More replies (1)
25
u/kittenTakeover 13h ago
I remember somewhere around 2000 good games cost $40-50. In today's dollars that's $75-95.
25
u/Extermination-_ 12h ago
Ocarina of Time was $60 in '98. Today that's about $118. I think we should count ourselves lucky that we had 30 years of games not going up in price alongside inflation.
6
u/uCodeSherpa 12h ago
Gaming found different ways to extract dollars rather than raising prices. On top of that, those were big years for growth.
These days, gaming is not exceptionally growing like it was, and new methods to extract more money are not really happening. So we get price increases instead.
This is the way of investors demanding year over year growth. If you cannot get it another way, it comes as a major price increase.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)4
7
u/kinlopunim 7h ago
Why is every other game $70? Why is mcdonalds $15 a burger now? Why did you skip economics class?
23
u/BlueGlace_ 14h ago
The new Donkey Kong costs $70 tho? Like the same price as a modern CoD game, it’s just Mario Kart that is $80
→ More replies (2)
16
u/mennydrives 12h ago
There's no defending it but DK is $70 and Nintendo clearly wants everyone to give them $50 for Mario Kart at launch via the bundle option.
All of their $80 software options have some kind of workaround like that. All the $80 "Switch 2 Edition" games purchased as the cheaper Switch 1 version come with "free" upgrades if you subscribe to the "Expansion Pak" online service.
→ More replies (1)
22
u/cinderbrewmeadery 13h ago
It's amazing. 30 years ago some Super NES games were $80. After THIRTY years prices haven't gone above that.
8
u/twitchy-y 12h ago edited 6h ago
Completely agreed. I remember +-60 euros being the baseline from when I was a little kid about 20 years ago. I truly don't understand what all the fuss is about but I guess that statement makes me team "leave billion dollar company alone"...
→ More replies (2)
25
u/Constant-Parsley3609 13h ago
If that's too much then don't buy the games.
I don't see how this is becoming such a big issue. Nobody needs to defend Nintendo, because they haven't done anything wrong.
This isn't some sort of mandatory video game tax. You can just buy games from someone else. Steam is flooded with so many amazing £10/£20 games that it's impossible to play them all. If mario kart is too expensive, then there are other games to buy and play.
19
u/CaptainRogers1226 Knight In Shining Armor 13h ago
Mind you, half the people crying about these prices are going to spend $15+ on a single character cosmetic change in the next week or so.
5
u/MBCnerdcore 11h ago
And they will complain about forcing people to buy digital games being anti-consumer when Nintendo does it, while also shilling the Steam Deck.
→ More replies (8)11
u/Minute_Road8813 12h ago
Exactly, this isn't an ethical issue. Nobody is "defending" them. Some people are saying that they can't afford this system, others are saying that they do.
It's not like Nintendo is abusing its employees or anything (at least as far as we know).
25
u/Arnorien16S 13h ago edited 9h ago
People can sell anything for any amount they want, I will only buy at amounts I feel is worth it. I don't really see the point of pissing and shitting myself over Nintendo game prices like how I don't piss and shit myself over 600 USD LV key chains.
3
u/drunkbusdriver 8h ago
Well maybe that’s because you’re a normal adjusted person who hasn’t made the a handheld gaming system 80% of their identity.
3
u/Arnorien16S 8h ago
I don't think the people who made it their identity are complaining about the price.
21
u/Kqtawes 13h ago
The price in America makes sense because of inflation and Trump's dumbass tariffs.
Europe is getting fucked though.
→ More replies (15)
18
u/Zyrian150 13h ago
The thing I find interesting is the argument "wages haven't increased". Like, isn't that between you and your boss? What does Nintendo have to do with your wages?
→ More replies (2)9
u/nifterific 13h ago
It’s also one of the reasons game development is more expensive. Wages increased.
→ More replies (4)
18
u/TheTalley 13h ago
Already tired of hearing about this. You don’t have to buy the game or the console. I would guess most people complaining weren’t going to either way.
→ More replies (4)
71
u/TomaszA3 15h ago
Yeah we know can you stop posting about it? I've only seen this image 15 times today.
→ More replies (9)
77
u/SecondBottomQuark 15h ago
Did you know you can emulate Nintendo games on a PC or Steam Deck and download cracked copies?
87
u/IMN0VIRGIN 15h ago
Oh my god, how could you suggest people to do that?!
Please don't tell me what sites I can use to do that! That would really piss me off!
21
14h ago
[deleted]
11
u/IMN0VIRGIN 14h ago
Shut up, man! I'm trying to DMCA the next slightly relatable pokemon game.
7
u/Remnant_Echo 14h ago
Make sure to patent an obscure action after you see it used in a game reveal of the game at a GameFest so you can claim you technically had a patent before the game was released.
19
u/fly_over_32 15h ago
I would never. Please tell me how one would do that, so I don’t do it by accident
→ More replies (2)24
u/GlitteringStatus1 13h ago
Or, hear me out: You can not buy and not play their games. You can support other publishers who align better with your values, and lift them up instead.
→ More replies (1)13
→ More replies (28)11
u/Edmundyoulittle 14h ago
Not realistic to emulate a switch 2 game on steam deck. You'll need to wait for steam deck 2 for that
→ More replies (10)11
u/Paetolus 13h ago
Also might not be realistic for anything to emulate it. At least for a couple years. Depends on how well Nintendo locked it down.
→ More replies (6)
16
u/Probably_BBQ 14h ago
One my friend is a fan of Nintendo. His reaction was "Why am I even watching Nintendo Direct, if I would not be able to buy it anyway?"
11
u/anweisz 13h ago
Dude no one hates nintendo more than the fans. The moment the prices were announced everyone did a 180 towards an otherwise good direct and started complaining.
→ More replies (4)
3
4
u/Imaginated_Gamer 13h ago
Only Mario Kart is $80 USD. Pretty sure the new Donkey Kong game is $70 USD.
That being said…I can’t tell if the high price is because of inflation and all the tariffs on foreign goods or it’s just Nintendo being greedy (probably the latter, but then again, when is a company NOT greedy?) whatever it is, it’s gonna be a blow towards the casual gamer market they predominantly have.
5
u/kaminari1 13h ago
PlayStation, Xbox, and PC fans when they rose the price from $60 to $70 a few years ago.
3
u/TheMoonOfTermina 11h ago
Not defending the pricing at all, but Donkey Kong is $70, only Mario Kart is $80 at the moment. Be outraged responsibly, please don't spread misinformation.
5
u/Mythosaurus 7h ago
None of the Nintendo fans I know are defending this.
Everyone is instead talking about why and how video game are priced the way they are, and instead the companies are using DLC, battlepasses, and loot boxes to make the rest of that money.
24
u/mikedvb 13h ago
When you don't understand inflation and the fact that you're not going to buy things today for the same price you paid years ago.
Blaming Nintendo is silly, but easy to do.
→ More replies (6)13
u/Sharkaw 11h ago
Back then there were no microtransactions or dozens DLCs for every game. The sales were also much smaller. Gaming companies make more money now than ever.
Defending huge companies acting against your own interests is so unbelievably dumb.
→ More replies (3)
8
u/Creepy_Night4333 9h ago
I’ve never seen a customer base be so dedicated to a company that fucking hates them.
26
u/733t_sec 14h ago
Idk about Nintendo either way but this seems to be a long overdue adjustment in the gaming industry after prices were kept at $50 dollars for so long.
Using https://www.usinflationcalculator.com
$50 in 1990 is $122.07 in 2025
$50 in 1999 is $95.76 in 2025
→ More replies (51)
3
3
u/tormentedpersonality 11h ago
Probably the same guys that complained to Nintendo about pal world. People are weird.
3
u/FlamingPhoenix2003 11h ago
I felt my head falling off because what the fuck? Even though TotK was 70 bucks, it still felt like too much, and now the price is going up?! I hate this shit…
3
u/crestpetal 11h ago
80! when people told me it was gonna be expensive I thought it was still gonna be like 65 but 80! yeah nooooo
3
u/The_Dogelord 11h ago
I'm a Nintendo fan, but Jesus Christ that's expensive. I usually defend Nintendo, but the shit they're trying to pull is a fucking scam.
3
3
3
u/SharkInSunglasses 10h ago
I’m not defending Nintendo, I’m defending the fact that I can buy whatever I want with my money.
3
3
u/Lamprophonia 10h ago
They're going to pay for it no matter what the price is because they can't differentiate between a hobby and an identity.
3
u/CaptinHavoc 10h ago
I’m not gonna say that Nintendo is right for this, but after 17 years of inflation 80 dollars honestly not the worst. Had they kept up with inflation it would be 115 dollars.
Still not saying that it’s a good price point, just saying that an 80 dollar game isn’t the worst think Nintendo has ever done
3
u/Lenore_Sunny_Day 10h ago
From one loyal nintendo fan to others, they are making a terrible mistake.
3
u/midnightmeatmaster 9h ago
Tariffs are placed on Japan, Taiwan, China and other manufacturing countries and something made there gets more expensive. Nintendo is so greedy! 😂
3
u/frozen_toesocks 8h ago
Y'all, games have stayed at $60 in the time inflation has cut the buying power of $60 in HALF. This isn't a "leave the billion dollar corporation" alone thing, this is a "literally everything costs more than they did 25 years ago" thing
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Unable-Head-1232 7h ago
Is $80 supposed to be a lot? In today’s currency that’s just a burger meal for 4.
3
u/Another_Road 7h ago
I get the knee jerk reaction to saying it’s bootlicking, but inflation has increased significantly since games were $60. Enough to where $60 back then was worth more than $80 is now.
3
3
u/Stratostheory 6h ago edited 1h ago
The honest answer is $80 for a game isn't that outrageous when you consider they've been priced at $60 for almost 20 years now and haven't kept up with inflation.
The problem I have with it is NINTENDO charging $80 for a game. They honestly haven't innovated enough or modernized their hardware enough to justify the price.
They're charging $450 for a console and $80 for games that would have been the baseline quality last generation at best.
ESPECIALLY when their biggest direct competitor in the handheld market is the Steamdeck
But Nintendo is the Apple of the gaming industry, they don't HAVE to innovate, because people are going to keep buying their shit no matter how bad it is.
6
u/bip_bip_hooray 13h ago
ask ANY GAMER you know - anyone at all - if they'd rather have $60 games with increasingly pervasive and absurd microtransactions, or whether they'd rather just pay $80 for the game. then you'll have your answer.
→ More replies (2)6
2.5k
u/Sprite_Bottle 15h ago
$80? I thought you said 2 whole internet doubloons 🏴☠️